Maximalist Blasphemy, Minimalist Reverence for the Mother of God

Some commentators have speculated that one of the reasons explaining Society of Saint Pius X Superior General Father Davide Pagliarni’s decision to have priests consecrated as bishops in less than five months is the conciliar sect’s warfare against Our Lady in Mater Populi Fidelis, November 4, 2025, which denigrated Our Lady’s role as the Mediatrix of All Graces and as our Co-Redemptrix. Despite this, however, the dance of the cuckoos between the Society’s leaders and the prefect of the conciliar sect’s dicastery for the destruction of the Faith, Victor Manuel Fernandez, continues as though a “solution” will be found after failed efforts in 1978, 1988, 2000, 2009, 2012, and 2017 to “solve” a “problem” that stems from the Society’s adherence to Gallican principles that were condemned by Pope Pius VI in Auctorem Fidei, August 28, 1794, that the late Bishop Robert Fidelis McKenna, O.P., summarized as follows: “The Society of Saint Pius X wants to have their pope and eat him, too.”

Although I will be addressing this Dance of the Cuckoos in my next original commentary, suffice it to say for the moment that there has never been nor can there ever be any pretext for an organization that considers itself a “check” on a putative pope’s teaching to “negotiate” on points of doctrine as what is decided by the Catholic Church is unnegotiable. As a true priest commented to his email list yesterday that he had a “solution,” however:

“The Society of St. Pius X only need announce they are joining the Chinese Communist party...because, per current Vatican policy, this is the only way to have the consecration of bishops without a papal mandate, without doctrinal discussions and obviously without any excommunications!”

As they say these days, that is a “killer” quote.

The purpose of this commentary, however, is to comment, if ever so briefly, about the fact that Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV has approved new statutes for the “Pontifical” International Marian Academy.

The statutes state that the purpose of the academy is as follows:

The Pontifical International Marian Academy promotes and coordinates, following the path of truth , the exchange between 'scholars of Mariology' from around the world; following the path of beauty , it fosters expressions of the human heart as manifested through worship, devotions, pilgrimages, and all forms of art; following the path of charity, it strives to ensure that Marian study and devotion are not reduced to sterile devotionism, but give life to Marian places that promote the well-being and integral development of the human person in harmony with the environment. Statutes of the Pontifical International Marian Academy.)

Interjection Number One:

Our Lady does not pray for there to be the fulfillment of Jaques Maritain’s and German Grisez’s
“integral development of the human person in harmony with the environment.”

Our Lady prays for us to sanctify and save our immortal souls in obedience to the teaching that her Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, entrusted exclusively to His Holy Catholic Church for its infallible explication and eternal safekeeping.

To the next passage:

The Pontifical Academy identifies and dynamically pursues forms and methods that favor the dissemination of a sound Mariological knowledge according to the path of culture, which synthesizes the three aforementioned paths, in service of the Church and universal brotherhood in solidarity of justice and world peace.

Interjection Number Two:

Our Lady does not subscribe to the Abu Dhabi document on “Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together,” February 4, 2019.

Our Lady is neither a globalist nor an ecumenist.

Indeed, turning to Father Maximilian Kolbe:

"Only until all schismatics and Protestants profess the Catholic Creed with conviction, when all Jews voluntarily ask for Holy Baptism – only then will the Immaculata have reached its goals.”

“In other words” Saint Maximilian insisted, “there is no greater enemy of the Immaculata and her Knighthood than today’s ecumenism, which every Knight must not only fight against, but also neutralize through diametrically opposed action and ultimately destroy. We must realize the goal of the Militia Immaculata as quickly as possible: that is, to conquer the whole world, and every individual soul which exists today or will exist until the end of the world, for the Immaculata, and through her for the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus.” (Father Karl Stehlin, Immaculata, Our Ideal, Kansas City, Missouri, Angelus Press, 2007, p. 37.)

Father Maximilian Kolbe had condemned “today’s ecumenism” as being “no greater enemy of the Immaculata and her Knighthood” while urging members of the Militia Immaculata to neutralize and ultimately destroy, prophetic words that the conciliar “popes” have ignored as though they were never uttered.

Back to the new statutes for the conciliar sect’s international Marian academy:

Since its founding, it has been linked to the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office (now the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith). With the 1997 Statutes, the Pontifical Council for Culture coordinated its activities with the other Pontifical Academies. With the Apostolic Constitution Praedicate Evangelium, this function is carried out by the Dicastery for Culture and Education.

Having emerged within the Order of Friars Minor at the Pontifical Athenaeum Antonianum , which later became a university, on May 18, 1972, the Pontifical International Marian Academy was aggregated to it as an institution specializing in Mariology. On December 4, 2012, the Pontifical International Marian Academy saw the Pontifical Academy of the Immaculate Conception merge into its ranks.

Today, the Pontifical Academy, as an autonomous legal entity, continues its collaboration with this Franciscan University through an agreement. Thus, the "Blessed John Duns Scotus" Chair of Mariological Studies has been established within the Faculty of Theology, while the "Carlo Balić Library" has been established within the Library. These forms of collaboration should not be considered exhaustive and do not preclude others, depending on the opportunities and indications of the Church's Magisterium in the fields of theological research and evangelization. Therefore, the Pontifical Academy utilizes the most appropriate tools for collaboration with academic, ecclesiastical, and civil institutions, with a view to a fruitful dialogue and encounter between faith, culture, justice, and peace in the name of Mary, the Mother of Jesus. (Statutes of the Pontifical International Marian Academy.)

Interjection Number Three:

Our Lady is referred to as the Mother of Jesus, not as the Mother of God, a title that Catholics have always believed but was defined solemnly at the Council of Ephesus in 431 to refute the Nestorian denial of Our Lady’s Divine Maternity, denial that is accepted by most Protestant sects. which is, of course, why the conciliar revolutionaries refer to Our Lady as the Mother of Jesus, which is true enough, but not as the Mother of God because to do so would be to offend the Protestants. These heretics do not care about offending the Mother of God nor about explicating this title to non-Catholic Christians.

All right, I proceed now to the final passage to be examined in this brief commentary:

The Academy, which since its inception has venerated as its patron the Mother of the Lord in her Mystery of the Immaculate Conception and Assumption into Heaven, has the task of promoting and supporting Mariological-Marian research at all levels and of coordinating its studies in the context of an ever-renewed evangelization, taking into account the language of the various cultures and the Marian manifestations specific to each people, involving the Mariological Societies and the various ecclesial and cultural institutions, the religious or lay training centers, the Episcopal Conferences, Dioceses and Parishes, as well as the Marian Movements and Shrines, in the deepening of the presence of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the mystery of Christ and the Church and with a view to a healthy popular piety to avoid any form of maximalism or minimalism. (Statutes of the Pontifical International Marian Academy.)

Final Interjection:

The avoidance of “maximalism” obviously refers to Mater Populi Fidelis’s rejection of the indiscriminate usage of Our Lady as our Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces and, I suppose to referring to Our Lady as Mother of God, as noted before, to avoid violating the tenets of false ecumenism. The conciliar revolutionaries are thus de facto Nestorians and Protestants.

There is not word in these statutes to Our Lady’s Holy Rosary, her Brown Scapular, the Miraculous Medal of Grace, the Green Scapular, the Five First Saturday devotions, or to total consecration to Our Lord Jesus Christ through her own Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

Are these maximalist devotions to be ignored in favor of supposedly “contemporary” trends and cultural “developments”?

We must remember that these are the times that God has chosen for us from all eternity to live and thus to work out our salvation in fear and in trembling as members of his Holy Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order. It is to kick against the goad to wish that we lived in different times as this is place into question the Providence of God and the efficacy of His graces to assist us at every moment of our lives.

This is not a time of despair, and those who think that it is to “despair” of our situation by emphasizing First and Last Things and to exhort others to pray Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary are sadly mistaken. Prayer, penance and sacrifice are the instruments we have at our disposal now as there is no way to turn back the advancing tide of evil by means that are merely natural.

As a antidote to the new statute, it is wise to turn  to Pope Saint Pius X, who used  Ad Diem Illum Laetissimum, February 2, 1904, on the approaching fiftieth anniversary of Pope Pius IX’s issuance of Ineffabilis Deus, December 8, 1854, to explain some of the prerogatives of Our Lady’s Immaculate Conception and the private and public honor that is owed to her as the Mother of God and the Mediatrix of All Graces:

11. If then the most Blessed Virgin is the Mother at once of God and men, who can doubt that she will work with all diligence to procure that Christ, Head of the Body of the Church (Coloss. i., 18), may transfuse His gifts into us, His members, and above all that of knowing Him and living through Him (I John iv., 9)?

Brief Interjection:

Who can doubt this?

The conciliar revolutionaries, men are no more Catholic than William Franklin Graham IV.

12. Moreover it was not only the prerogative of the Most Holy Mother to have furnished the material of His flesh to the Only Son of God, Who was to be born with human members (S. Bede Ven. L. Iv. in Luc. xl.), of which material should be prepared the Victim for the salvation of men; but hers was also the office of tending and nourishing that Victim, and at the appointed time presenting Him for the sacrifice. Hence that uninterrupted community of life and labors of the Son and the Mother, so that of both might have been uttered the words of the Psalmist “My life is consumed in sorrow and my years in groans” (Ps xxx., 11). When the supreme hour of the Son came, beside the Cross of Jesus there stood Mary His Mother, not merely occupied in contemplating the cruel spectacle, but rejoicing that her Only Son was offered for the salvation of mankind, and so entirely participating in His Passion, that if it had been possible she would have gladly borne all the torments that her Son bore (S. Bonav. 1. Sent d. 48, ad Litt. dub. 4). And from this community of will and suffering between Christ and Mary she merited to become most worthily the Reparatrix of the lost world (Eadmeri Mon. De Excellentia Virg. Mariae, c. 9) and Dispensatrix of all the gifts that Our Savior purchased for us by His Death and by His Blood.

13. It cannot, of course, be denied that the dispensation of these treasures is the particular and peculiar right of Jesus Christ, for they are the exclusive fruit of His Death, who by His nature is the mediator between God and man. Nevertheless, by this companionship in sorrow and suffering already mentioned between the Mother and the Son, it has been allowed to the august Virgin to be the most powerful mediatrix and advocate of the whole world with her Divine Son (Pius IX. Ineffabilis). The source, then, is Jesus Christ “of whose fullness we have all received” (John i., 16), “from whom the whole body, being compacted and fitly joined together by what every joint supplieth, according to the operation in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in charity” (Ephesians iv., 16). But Mary, as St. Bernard justly remarks, is the channel (Serm. de temp on the Nativ. B. V. De Aquaeductu n. 4); or, if you will, the connecting portion the function of which is to join the body to the head and to transmit to the body the influences and volitions of the head — We mean the neck. Yes, says St. Bernardine of Sienna, “she is the neck of Our Head, by which He communicates to His mystical body all spiritual gifts” (Quadrag. de Evangel. aetern. Serm. x., a. 3, c. iii.).

14. We are then, it will be seen, very far from attributing to the Mother of God a productive power of grace — a power which belongs to God alone. Yet, since Mary carries it over all in holiness and union with Jesus Christ, and has been associated by Jesus Christ in the work of redemption, she merits for us “de congruo,” in the language of theologians, what Jesus Christ merits for us “de condigno,” and she is the supreme Minister of the distribution of graces. Jesus “sitteth on the right hand of the majesty on high” (Hebrews i. b.). Mary sitteth at the right hand of her Son — a refuge so secure and a help so trusty against all dangers that we have nothing to fear or to despair of under her guidance, her patronage, her protection. (Pius IX. in Bull Ineffabilis).

15. These principles laid down, and to return to our design, who will not see that we have with good reason claimed for Mary that — as the constant companion of Jesus from the house at Nazareth to the height of Calvary, as beyond all others initiated to the secrets of his Heart, and as the distributor, by right of her Motherhood, of the treasures of His merits,-she is, for all these reasons, a most sure and efficacious assistance to us for arriving at the knowledge and love of Jesus Christ. Those, alas! furnish us by their conduct with a peremptory proof of it, who seduced by the wiles of the demon or deceived by false doctrines think they can do without the help of the Virgin. Hapless are they who neglect Mary under pretext of the honor to be paid to Jesus Christ! As if the Child could be found elsewhere than with the Mother!

16. Under these circumstances, Venerable Brethren, it is this end which all the solemnities that are everywhere being prepared in honor of the holy and Immaculate Conception of Mary should have in view. No homage is more agreeable to her, none is sweeter to her than that we should know and really love Jesus Christ. Let then crowds fill the churches — let solemn feasts be celebrated and public rejoicings be made: these are things eminently suited for enlivening our faith. But unless heart and will be added, they will all be empty forms, mere appearances of piety. At such a spectacle, the Virgin, borrowing the words of Jesus Christ, would address us with the just reproach: “This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me” (Matth. xv., 8).

17. For to be right and good, worship of the Mother of God ought to spring from the heart; acts of the body have here neither utility nor value if the acts of the soul have no part in them. Now these latter can only have one object, which is that we should fully carry out what the divine Son of Mary commands. For if true love alone has the power to unite the wills of men, it is of the first necessity that we should have one will with Mary to serve Jesus our Lord. What this most prudent Virgin said to the servants at the marriage feast of Cana she addresses also to us: “Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye” (John ii., 5).

Now here is the word of Jesus Christ: “If you would enter into life, keep the commandments” (Matt. xix., 17). Let them each one fully convince himself of this, that if his piety towards the Blessed Virgin does not hinder him from sinning, or does not move his will to amend an evil life, it is a piety deceptive and Iying, wanting as it is in proper effect and its natural fruit.

18. If anyone desires a confirmation of this it may easily be found in the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary. For leaving aside tradition which, as well as Scripture, is a source of truth, how has this persuasion of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin appeared so conformed to the Catholic mind and feeling that it has been held as being one, and as it were inborn in the soul of the faithful? “We shrink from saying,” is the answer of Dionysius of Chartreux, “of this woman who was to crush the head of the serpent that had been crushed by him and that Mother of God that she had ever been a daughter of the Evil One” (Sent. d. 3, q. 1). No, to the Christian intelligence the idea is unthinkable that the flesh of Christ, holy, stainless, innocent, was formed in the womb of Mary of a flesh which had ever, if only for the briefest moment, contracted any stain. And why so, but because an infinite opposition separates God from sin? There certainly we have the origin of the conviction common to all Christians that Jesus Christ before, clothed in human nature, He cleansed us from our sins in His blood, accorded Mary the grace and special privilege of being preserved and exempted, from the first moment of her conception, from all stain of original sin.

19. If then God has such a horror of sin as to have willed to keep free the future Mother of His Son not only from stains which are voluntarily contracted but, by a special favor and in prevision of the merits of Jesus Christ, from that other stain of which the sad sign is transmitted to all us sons of Adam by a sort of hapless heritage: who can doubt that it is a duty for everyone who seeks by his homage to gain the heart of Mary to correct his vicious and depraved habits and to subdue the passions which incite him to evil? (Pope Saint Pius X, Ad Diem Illum Laetissimum, February 2, 1904.)

Catholic empires, kingdoms and principalities used to honor Our Lady publicly with pilgrimages, processions and festival on her feast days, including those feast days particular to a local area or region and those not included in the universal calendar of the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church. Moreover, Catholics who participated in these pilgrimages did so out of love for Our Lord and His Most Blessed Mother as they sought to make reparation for their sins.

Unlike the conciliar revolutionaries, these Catholics had horror for and detestation of their sins, and they did not want anyone to “accompany” them in those sins. They sought to quit their sins and to implore the intercessory help of Our Lady, without whose loving help we are lost. Doomed. Damned.

Pope Saint Pius X explained that Our Lady’s example of perfect humility and ready obedience to the will of God is for us all to imitate:

20. Whoever moreover wishes, and no one ought not so to wish, that his devotion should be worthy of her and perfect, should go further and strive might and main to imitate her example. It is a divine law that those only attain everlasting happiness who have by such faithful following reproduced in themselves the form of the patience and sanctity of Jesus Christ: “for whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be made conformable to the image of His Son; that He might be the first-born amongst many brethren” (Romans viii., 29). But such generally is our infirmity that we are easily discouraged by the greatness of such an example: by the providence of God, however, another example is proposed to us, which is both as near to Christ as human nature allows, and more nearly accords with the weakness of our nature. And this is no other than the Mother of God. “Such was Mary,” very pertinently points out St. Ambrose, “that her life is an example for all.” And, therefore, he rightly concludes: “Have then before your eyes, as an image, the virginity and life of Mary from whom as from a mirror shines forth the brightness of chastity and the form of virtue” (De Virginib. L. ii., c. ii.) (Pope Saint Pius X, Ad Diem Illum Laetissimum, February 2, 1904.)

We live in a world that rewards and celebrates unchastity, impurity, indecency and perversity. It is up to us as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary to make reparation for the paganism, satanism, materialism, naturalism, hedonism, pantheism, relativism, utilitarianism, egalitarianism, authoritarianism, statism and globalism that promises men “happiness” here in order to lead them to eternal unhappiness and punishment fire for all eternity in hell while being deprived of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity. Our acts of reparation for our sins and those of the whole world will help to plant a few seeds for the conversion of men and their nations to the true Faith, which is not the goal of Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV nor Victor Manuel Fernandez, who want to project onto Our Lady their own false beliefs and thus use her as a perjured witness for conciliarism.

Each one of our sins, no matter how small or venial, caused Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to suffer unspeakable horror in His Sacred Humanity during His Passion and Death. Those sins also caused Our Lady to suffer in a perfect communion with the sufferings of her Divine Son. Having been preserved from all stain of Original and Actual Sin, Our Lady's Immaculate Heart was perfectly joined to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. His sufferings were her sufferings. Her sufferings were His sufferings. The matchless union of hearts that existed once in time and exists in Heaven for all eternity between Our Lady and Our Lord requires from us a response of total surrender and submission. We must detest each one of our sins and seek to do penance for our forgiven mortal sins and for all of our venial sins and our general attachment to sin. Although our sins are wiped away in the Sacrament of Penance, the debt we owe for our forgiven sins remains. We are thus called, as one of the prayers in the Miraculous Medal Novena notes, to "recover by penance what we have lost by sin.”

Indeed, we must do much penance for our sins, for which we are being chastised by having to live at the same time as purported officials of the Catholic Church who please the devil no end by disparaging the role of Our Lady, who has crushed his head with her heel, in the economy of the salvation of the human race by her Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Herewith, therefore, are two prayers from The Raccolta that give witness to Holy Mother Church's official sanctioning of the title of Our Lady as Co-Redemptrix even we are told now that such “piety” was “exaggerated” does not truly correspond to the conciliar interpretations of Sacred Scripture.

We, however, should pray these prayers in reparation for the blasphemies committed in the past against Our Lady by the Jansenists of the Sorbonne in the Seventeenth Century and by the likes of Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Victor Manuel Fernandez, Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV during these “enlightened” days of conciliarism’s new “insights” for its utterly false religion:

In Reparation for Insults Offered to the Blessed Virgin Mary

O blessed Virgin, Mother of God, look down in mercy from Heaven, where thou art enthroned as Queen, upon me, a miserable sinner, thine unworthy servant. Although I know full well my own unworthiness yet in order to atone for the offenses that are done to thee by impious tongues, from the depths of my heart I praise and extol thee as the fairest, the holiest creature of all God’s handiwork. I bless thy holy Name, I praise thine exalted privilege of being truly Mother of Go, ever-Virgin, conceived without stain of sin, Co-Redemptrix of the human race. I bless the Eternal Father who chose thee in an especial way for His daughter; I bless the Word Incarnate who took upon Himself our nature in thy bosom and so made thee His Mother; I bless the Holy Spirit who took thee as His bride. All honor, praise and thanksgiving to the ever-blessed Trinity who predestined thee and love thee so exceedingly from all eternity as to exalt thee above all creatures to the most sublime heights. O Virgin, holy and merciful, obtain for all who offend thee the grace of repentance, and graciously accept this homage from me thy servant, obtaining likewise for me from thy divine Son, the pardon and remission of all my sins.  Three Hail Marys. The Raccolta: A Manual of Indulgences, Prayers and Devotions Enriched with Indulgences: approved by Pope Pius XII, May 30, 1951, and published in English by Benziger Brothers, New York, 1957, No. 328, pp. 228-229.)

O merciful Queen of the Rosary of Pompeii, thou, the Seat of Wisdom, hast established a throne of fresh mercy in the land that once was pagan, in order to draw all nations to salvation by means of the chaplet of thy mystic roses: remember thy divine Son hath left us this saying: “Other sheep I have that are not of this fold; them also must I bring, and they shall hear  voice; and there shall be one fold, and one Shepherd.” Remember likewise that on Calvary thou didst become our Co-Redemptrix, by virtue of the crucifixion of Thy heart cooperating with Thy Crucified Son in the salvation of the world; and from that day thou didst become the Restorer of the human race, the Refuge of sinners, and the Mother of all mankind. Behold, dear Mother, how man souls are lost every hour! Behold, how countless millions of those who dwell in India, in China, and in barbarous regions do not yet know our Lord Jesus Christ! See, too, how many others are indeed Christians and are nevertheless far from the bosom of Mother Church which is Catholic, Apostolic and Roman! O Mary, powerful mediator, advocate of the human race, full of love for us who are mortal, the life of our hearts, blessed Virgin of the Rosary of Pompeii, where thou dost nothing else save dispense heaven’s favors upon the afflicted, grant that a ray of thy heavenly light may shine forth to enlighten those many blinded understanding and to enkindle so cold hearts. Intercede with thy Son and obtain grace for all the pagans, Jews, heretics and schismatics in the whole world to receive supernatural light and to enter with joy into the bosom of the true Church. Hear the confident prayer of the Supreme Pontiff [of Holy Church in these times of papal vacancy], that all nations may be joined in the one faith, may know and love Jesus Christ, the blessed fruit of thy womb, who liveth and reigneth with the Father and the Holy Spirit world without end. And then all men shall love thee also, thou who art the salvation of the world, arbiter and dispenser of the treasures of God, and Queen of mercy in the valley of Pompeii. And glorifying thee, the Queen of Victories, who by means of thy Rosary, dost trample upon all heresies, they shall acknowledge that thou givest life to all the nations, since there must be a fulfillment of the prophecy in the Gospel: “All generations shall call me blessed.” (The Raccolta: A Manual of Indulgences, Prayers and Devotions Enriched with Indulgences, approved by Pope Pius XII, May 30, 1951, and published in English by Benziger Brothers, New York, 1957, Number 628, pp. 501-503.)

There is a whole lot of good, solid Catholic theology in the prayer just above.

Our Lady is the Co-Redemptrix of the human race.

Our Lady is the Seat of Wisdom.

Our Lady is our Refuge of Sinners.

Our Lady is the Treasurer of all the graces won for us by her Divine Son on the wood of the Holy Cross.

For Mater Populi Fidelis to be correct, Pope Pius XII erred when approving prayers included in The Raccolta that included titles that do not properly belong to the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Such is the enormity of the blasphemous Mater Populi Fidelis.

Oh, yes, there is one last point to be made in part one of this two-part commentary about Mater Populi Fidelis, and it is this: Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary, which, very tellingly, is not mentioned once in the text of Mater Populi Fidelis.

Not once.

We, for our parts, though, must continue praying Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary with love, fervor, and devotion while resting assured in the truth that Holy Mother Church has not “exaggerated” the titles of Our Lady, who is indeed our Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate.

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthazar, pray for us.