Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV Indemnifies The Likes of Those Admonished by Pope Pius XI

Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV really meant it seven weeks ago when he said that no one can is pro-life unless he supports “migrants’ rights” as well as opposing the surgical execution of innocent preborn children.

Let me reprise what he said and my own commentary about it before proceeding to note that the currently reigning universal public face of apostasy and betrayal met recently with the radically pro-death, pro-sodomite Jay Robert Pritzker, who is the Governor of the State of Illinois, which is Prevost/Leo’s home state:

On September 30, a journalist from EWTN asked Leo what he thinks about Illinois Sen. Durbin being set to receive an award from Cupich despite his support for abortion.

Leo gave a long-winded answer that appeared to imply he did not have a problem with Durbin receiving the award.

“I think that it is very important to look at the overall work that a senator has done during … 40 years of service in the United States Senate,” he stated. “I understand the difficulty and the tensions but I think, as I myself have spoken to in the past, it is important to look at many issues that are related to what is the teaching of the Church.”

“Someone who says I’m against abortion but says I’m in favor of the death penalty is not really pro-life,” the Pope said. “Someone who says I’m against abortion but I’m in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don’t know if that’s pro-life.”

“So, they are very complex issues, I don’t know if anyone has all the truth on them, but I would ask first and foremost that there would be greater respect for one another and that we search together both as humans beings, in that case as American citizens or citizens of the state of Illinois, as well as Catholics to say we really need to look closely at all these ethical issues and to find the way forward as Church.”

“The Church teaching on each one of these issues is very clear,” he added. (Pope Leo says support for death penalty is ‘not pro-life,’ defends awarding pro-abortion Durbin.)

Several quick comments.

First, Francis Prevost/Leo XIV contradicted himself by saying: (1) “I don’t know if anyone has all the truth on them [the life issues]; and then by saying (2) “The Church teaching on each one of these issues is clear.”

Well, the Catholic Church is the infallible expositor of the Divine Positive Law, which is part of Divine Revelation, and the infallibly authoritative teacher of all that is contained in the Natural Law, which is knowable by reason and does not depend upon human acceptance for its binding force or validity. She alone has all truth on moral teaching.

Second, as I have noted so many times before, there is absolutely zero moral equivalence between the slaughter of innocent preborn children and the death penalty. Innocent life is always inviolable, and the taking of innocent human life, willful murder, is one of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

To emphasize the gravity of this crime, Pope Pius XI explained the terrible fate that awaits in public life who betray the innocent preborn to the bloody hands of baby butchers:

Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.) 

This statement from the pen of a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter is enough in itself to disqualify Richard Durbin from the sacramental life of the Catholic Church, no less from receiving honors that he not only does not deserve but wind up emboldening the wicked in this life, are impediments to an evil doer’s conversion and thus repentance before he comes face-to-face with the Avenger of innocent blood, which has cried out from earth to Heaven.

Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV has thus kneecapped what was a growing list of “conservatives” within the conciliar “hierarchy” within the United States of America in a manner worthy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio himself, and those “bishops” would have had left stranded in the cold if Richard Durbin, who is a demagogue to the rotten core of his being, had not declined the award that Blase Cupich wanted to bestow on him because of the controversy Cupich’s invitation engendered.

Third, it is very clear that Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV lives in world shaped by leftist ideology and the false narratives that flow therefrom.

The false “pontiff’s” comments about the rough treatment of illegal immigrants, most of whom were brought into the United States of America by Latin American drug cartels whose members have flooded our urban and rural areas with a tidal wave of fentanyl and other illegal drugs that addict American citizens and has brought with it countless violent attacks, many of them fatal, against innocent American citizens.

Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV must either be ignorant about or completely uninterested in the victims of illegal immigrants whose plight at the hands of Immigration and Custom Enforcement officers he considers to be the moral equivalent of the daily slaughter of the innocent preborn by chemical and surgical means.

It is therefore an entirely open question whether Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV has heard about or even cares to be informed about the violent murders of Laken Riley, Rachel Morin, Jocelyn Nungarary, or scores of others slaughtered by these "heralds of hope." No, the conciliar "popes" and their "bishops" have existed in a delusional world that is detached from reality as they shed crocodile tears for those who been used by drug and human traffickers to violate the just laws of other nations to regulate immigration and thus to prevent the very sorts of violent crimes that men such as Prevost/Leo refuse to admit have been committed. (From A Beaut of An Antipope.)

Now, here is the LifesiteNews report of Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV’s meeting with Jay Robert Pritzker, who imposed some of the most draconian, Stasi-like lockdown measures during the plandemic five years ago:

The stream of liberal clergy and scandalous public figures who are given audiences with Pope Leo XIV seemingly never comes to an end.

Earlier this year dissident Jesuit priest James Martin spent time with the Holy Father. He emerged from that meeting claiming that he believes Leo will ensure that “LGBT Catholics” are welcome in the Church.

So far, his prediction is correct, especially after the sacrilegious LGBT pilgrimage that took place inside St. Peter’s Basilica this summer.

Now comes news that pro-abortion Democratic Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois spoke with Leo for around 40 minutes at the Vatican during a private meeting Wednesday.

In the past, Pritzker has designated Illinois a “sanctuary state” for women seeking abortions, expanded access to chemical abortion pills, and approved policies LGBT activists have long desired. He may sign a bill that would legalize physician-assisted suicide.

According to a Pritzker spokesman, the audience with Leo Wednesday was arranged by — who else? — pro-LGBT Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich, a man with whom he has had a long and rather chummy relationship.

During COVID-19, for example, Cupich worked closely with Pritzker’s office to coordinate the shutting down of churches in his archdiocese. Cupich has also amplified talking points that echo Pritzker’s own remarks condemning the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

While Pope Leo has no doubt previously met with conservative clergy and laity — U.S. Cardinal Raymond Burke and U.S. Vice President JD Vance, for instance — the purpose of the Pritzker meeting seems to be overtly political.

Last week the U.S. bishops’ conference issued a “special pastoral message” for the first time in 12 years. The last time they released such a message was not to denounce the Biden administration’s mendacious spying on Catholics who attend the Latin Mass, or his backing of mutilation surgeries for gender-confused persons, but President Obama’s contraception mandate.

This week Tuesday outside Castel Gandolfo, Pope Leo expressed support for the USCCB’s message.

“I think we have to look for ways of treating people humanely, treating people with the dignity they have,” he said. “If people are in the United States illegally, there are ways to treat that. There are courts, there’s a system of justice. I think there are a lot of problems in the system.”

So the timing of Pritzker’s audience Wednesday is rather beneficial, politically speaking.

Indeed, the Chicago Tribune has reported that the two spoke about “their shared concerns about the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement practices in Chicago.”

And there you have it.

It would seem that the Vatican these days is willing to meet with any public figure, no matter how much they oppose the Church’s moral and doctrinal teachings. So long as they support Leo’s views on immigration, they are given the green light for a photo-op with the pope. (Pope Leo just met with Illinois' radically pro-abortion, pro-LGBT Gov. JB Pritzker.)

To this, my friends, it is enough to reprise Pope Pius XI’s stern admonition to pro-abortion public officials as contained in Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930:

Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.) 

As was the case with Jorge Mario Bergoglio before him, Rober Francis Prevost/Leo XIV is indemnifying hardened supporters and enablers of the chemical and surgical assassination of a innocent preborn human beings.

A true pope warned pro-death public officials that they would have to face “that God” Who “is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven.”

A false “pope” treats such officials with warmth and dignity.

Yet another correlative proof of the work being done by figures of Antichrist.

Additionally, Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV met with “married” sodomites recently and dined with mutants who have paid to have their bodies chemically and surgically altered in the biologically impossible and utter vain effort to change to become a member of the opposite gender” in an affront to the creative work of God Himself, to His Fifth Commandment, which forbids mutilating oneself or others, and the Natural Law:

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Leo XIV recently met with two “married” homosexuals during a private audience.

“When Brian mentioned to the pope that we are married [sic], we both felt received with warmth and kindness,” wrote Alex Capecelatro, CEO of Josh.ai, on Facebook. He posted pictures of their audience with Leo, which they were granted as a delegation of Archbishop José Gomez of Los Angeles.

Capecelatro is “partner” to Brian D. Stevens, a philanthropist and member of the Knights of Malta despite his scandalous homosexual lifestyle. The two men are incapable of real marriage, as natural law and the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church affirm.

When Capecelatro and Stevens shared with the pope how much Father James Martin, SJ’s pro-LGBT activism “means to them,” Leo reportedly “nodded approvingly at the mention of that [so-called] ministry,” according to Letters from Leo, a website authored by a Democratic Party operative, Christopher Hale. 

Hale stressed that Leo did not clarify Church teaching during the audience but appeared to accept the two homosexuals as-is.

In this audience and in other ways, Leo has tread the path of Pope Francis regarding his approach to homosexuality. For example, Leo promoted a bishop who has supported LGBT-themed liturgies to a consulting position within the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews, the Vatican announced on October 2.

The same month, Leo appointed the pro-LGBT Cardinal Blase Cupich to the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State. In 2015, during the Synod of the Family, Cupich proposed a pathway for both homosexual and divorced and “remarried” couples to receive the Eucharist in accordance with their “consciences.”

Leo has also met with Fr. Martin, famed for his LGBT activism. Martin later said the “message” he took from the meeting “was that Pope Leo will be continuing with the same openness that Francis showed to [so-called] LGBTQ Catholics.”  (Leo XIV meets with ‘married’ homosexuals at Vatican.)

VATICAN CITY — A group of 48 transgender women attended a major Vatican event on Sunday with Pope Leo XIV, continuing a tradition that began under his predecessor of inviting members of the LGBTQ+ community to the church’s annual “lunch for the poor.”

Unlike in past years, however, no trans women were seated at the pope’s main table.

The fact that they were present at all, the women said, suggested a willingness to keep open a door unlocked by Pope Francis, the late pontiff who revolutionized relations between LGBTQ+ Catholics and the world’s largest Christian faith.

“That he’d mingle, that he [sat] close to [us], that’s a good sign, right?” said Alessia Nobile, a trans woIn 2012, Leo criticized depictions of homosexuality in pop culture at a Vatican forum. In a recent book based on interviews with Leo, the new American pope described the LGBTQ+ question as “highly polarizing within the church” and noted that “for many people” beyond the West, “that’s not a primary issue in terms of how we should deal with one another.”

However, like Francis, he said that he will welcome LGBTQ+ Catholics to the church because they are either “a son or daughter of God.”

In September, Leo privately authorized the saying of a special Mass for a group of more than 1,450 pilgrims attending a historic LGBTQ+ event for the Vatican’s 2025 jubilee, though he did not make any public reference to it. Leo also has personally met with advocates of LGBTQ+ inclusion in the church.

Attendees at the Vatican lunch on Sunday numbered 1,300, with migrants, disabled people, those who are homeless and other guests gathered inside the Vatican’s Paul VI Hall.

Leo entered the cavernous room as an orchestra struck up a rendition of “O Sole Mio.” One trans woman handed him an image of the Madonna as he entered. He accepted it, moving to his table and addressing the crowd.

He welcomed the guests to “this lunch so strongly backed by our much beloved Pope Francis.” He blessed the attendees.

“Buon appetito,” he said, before sitting down to a meal of lasagna and chicken cutlets.

Trans women — many of whom had also met with Francis at dozens of papal audiences — began attending the Vatican’s annual lunch for the poor in 2023. That year, as well as in 2024, two members of the group were selected to dine at Francis’s head table. The late pope cordially conversed with the women, most of them fellow Latin Americans living in Torvaianica, a seaside town near Rome.

This time, all the trans women ate at separate tables. Like other participants at the large and free-flowing event, many of the women were unable to greet him personally or offer him handwritten letters.

“It went well, there was a fraternal and a joyful atmosphere,” said the Rev. Andrea Conocchia, a liberal Catholic priest who ministers to transgender women in Torvaianica. “We weren’t able to meet the pope,” he added, but they still “had us sit at tables very, very close to the pope.”

Two people familiar with the organization of the event said that head table tickets had not been provided to the trans women this year without explanation, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic.

AI Icon

But in an interview with The Washington Post, Cardinal Konrad Krajewski, the Vatican’s point person for the event, rejected any suggestion of an intentional snub. He said the tickets for the pope’s table this year had been handed out randomly to poor parishioners who had attended an earlier Mass, and that the trans women had arrived late to the event. (Trans women attend Vatican event with Pope Leo, but not at head table.)

So what?

The mutants were not at the head table.

What does that matter?

They shouldn’t have been there at all, but Jorge Mario Bergoglio started meeting with such mutants as early as 2015, not just a few years ago as was implied by the news report quoted just above:

As has been well-reported in the past two days now, Bergoglio’s latest venture into the world of the  freakish and bizarre took place on Saturday, January 24, 2015, the Feast of Saint Timothy, as he met with a Spanish woman, who had undergone gender mutilation surgery, and her “fiancée,” after the mutilated woman had written to him to explain that she had been described as the “devil’s daughter” by her local presbyter:

Vatican City, January 26 - Pope Francis on Saturday received in a private audience a Spanish transsexual and his girlfriend after the man wrote to him saying he had been cast out of the church in his native city, Spanish daily Hoy reported Monday.

The transgender male, Diego Neria Lejarraga, a 48-year-old former woman, wrote to the pope some time ago saying he had been "marginalised" by Church officials in the city of Plasencia, in the southwestern region of Estremadura, Hoy said.

Neria, a believer and a practising Catholic, said he had been rebuffed by elements of the local clergy and claimed the parish priest had called him "the Devil's daughter", Hoy reported.

Francis phoned him twice in December, setting up Saturday''s meeting in St Martha's House, the Vatican guesthouse the pontiff lives in, Hoy said.

The pope has said the Catholic Church should be more accepting of gays but recently failed to muster a big enough majority of cardinals to change doctrine on the issue.

Asked about the reported meeting, official Vatican sources declined to comment. (receives Spanish Transsexual”)

Well, I suppose that Federico Lombardi has finally learned—or has been told—to keep his mouth shut after one of Jorge’s “private” meetings or phone calls become a matter of public news once it is blabbed by the “private parties” being used by the false “pontiff” to “push the envelope” on his conciliar revolution to the uttermost limits of the LGBT agenda imaginable.

Some might protest that Bergoglio was only giving “comfort” to an aggrieved soul.

Really?

What’s the grievance?

The gender-mutilated woman is the devil’s daughter as to mutilate one’s body to change his gender is to play God with the very nature He has given to him and is a direct violation of the binding precepts that flow from the Fifth Commandment. Just as he really does not believe that there is anything inherently unnatural in “same-sex attraction,” so is it apparent that Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not believe that there is anything inherent wrong in undergoing gender-mutilation surgery. He is as perverted in his mind and in his soul as the woman who met with him in the company of the woman she intends to “marry” even though she is a “woman.” So much for Jorge’s supposed opposition to “same-sex marriage,” huh? What the mutilated woman, who believes herself to be a man, intends in reality to do is to “marry” another woman.

By giving a show of support and affirmation to the gender-mutilated woman, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is, in effect, communicating his belief that such a mutilation must be accepted as a fait accompli without any word of criticism or rebuke. Such a belief, though, is contrary even to the official teaching of his own Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which issued a “doctrinal note” on January 31, 2003, declaring that one who undergoes a “sex-change” operation does not change the gender that God gave to him:

VATICAN, Jan 31, 03 (CWNews.com) -- The Catholic Church cannot recognize the validity of a sex-change operation, the Vatican has declared.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has released a secret directive to bishops and religious superiors, indicating that an individual who has undergone a sex-change operation cannot be a candidate for the priesthood or religious life, and cannot enter into a valid marriage. The document also instructs pastors that they should not alter an individual's sacramental record to change the person's gender.

The Vatican document was released in 2000, but its existence and contents were tightly guarded until earlier this month. The directives were reportedly sent at first to papal delegates in each country, and later to the heads of episcopal conferences. Vatican officials confirmed the existence of the document after the Catholic News Service reported on it, but the full text is not available to the public.

The Note from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith explains that an individual's physical characteristics-- which can be altered surgically-- constitute only a part of his gender identity. While the body can be changed, the sexual identity cannot, the Congregation says.

The Vatican document indicates that if a bishop or religious superior learns that an individual has undergone a sex-change operation, "that person cannot validly be admitted into a religious institute or society of consecrated life." The document adds that if a transsexual is now living in a religious order, "he must, for the good of souls, be expelled from the religious house."

The Vatican document was reportedly given greater circulation after a query from an American bishop, prompted by a dispute within a religious order in his diocese. (SEX- CHANGE OPERATIONS RULED INVALID BY THE CONCILIAR VATICAN.)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio may or may not know about this “doctrinal note,” which would not matter to him even if he did know about it. The Argentine Apostate lives by pure viscera.

What Jorge Mario Bergoglio does know, however, is that one of his chief nemeses in the conciliar structures, Raymond Leo “Cardinal” Burke, whom he deposed as the head of the Apostolic Signatura in conciliar captivity, had himself given credence to the supposed “validity” of gender-mutilation surgery (the singular case is being used to refer to what are a series of grotesque surgeries performed by real-life sons of Dr. Frankenstein by way of Dr. Moreau’s Island of Lost Souls) by accepting a gender-mutilated man, who had started to call himself “Julie Green,” to found a religious community of women in the Diocese of La Crosse, Wisconsin, which is why Joseph “Cardinal” Ratzinger’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith had been asked to issue the doctrinal note quoted just above.

Here is a review of the pertinent facts once again:

At times his theological allegiance with these orders placed Bishop Burke in some compromising positions. Most striking, perhaps, was the case of Sister Julie Green, a member of the Franciscan Servants of Jesus:

"Julie Green is living a lie!" writes Mary Therese Helmueller in an October 25, 2002, letter to Archbishop Gabriel Montalvo, Papal Nuncio to the United States. "[She] is a transsexual, a biological male. He is really Joel Green, who had a sex operation to make him physically appear as a woman.... I fear that The Church in America will suffer another 'sex scandal' if Julie Green continues to be recognized as a Catholic Religious Sister, and if Bishop Raymond L. Burke receives his final vows, as a religious sister, on November 23rd, 2002."

Montalvo forwarded the letter to Burke, who on November 20, 2002, replied to Helmueller. "With regard to Sister Julie Green, F.S.J., the recognition of the association of the faithful which she and Sister Anne LeBlanc founded was granted only after consultation with the Holy See," he writes. "These are matters which are confidential and do not admit of any further comment.... I can assure you that Sister Julie Green in no way espouses a sex change operation as right or good. In fact, she holds it to be seriously disordered. Therefore, I caution you very much about the rash judgments which you made in your letter to the Apostolic Nuncio."

Adds Burke: "I express my surprise that, when you had questions about Sister Julie Green, you did not, in accord with the teaching of our Lord, address the matter to me directly." (Bishop Takes Queen.)

While it is nice that Joel Green believed the surgery that he had to become “Julie Green” is “seriously disordered,” such a disavowal does not annul the fact that he had underwent such surgery himself and was presenting himself as a woman, no less a woman desirous of starting a religious community with the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism within the Diocese of La Crosse with the approval of a man, Raymond Leo Burke, whom Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict transferred to the Archdiocese of Saint Louis, Missouri, and later brought him to Rome and elevated him the conciliar "college of cardinals."

This having been noted, it could very well be that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is crazy like a fox in this instance. That is, he appears to be daring Raymond Leo Burke to criticize him publicly for meeting with the “transgendered” Spanish woman who believes herself to be a man. At the same time, though, Jorge is showing his disregard for the work of the congregation many believe that he wants to dismantle while forcing Burke to say that he disagrees with Ratzinger for approving the “doctrinal note” that stopped him from proceeding with his plans for “Sister Julie Green."

What can be stated with certainty is that the Argentine Apostate has shown that he accepts the “reality” of the supposed effects of gender-mutilation and desires to blunt all efforts on the part of conciliar "bishops" and priests/presbyers to "exclude" them from the life of the conciliar sect.

Cheer up.

Things are only to get worse under Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is taking the conciliar revolution where no revolutionary at the "papal" level had gone before. (From Mutilating All Truth, January 28, 2015.)

Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV smiled at the “married” sodomites and he mingled with ease amongst the mutants. This heretic is thus guilty of not performing admonishing the sinner of being an accessory to the sins of others that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

We stand for Christ the King and His Holy Catholic Church no matter what it may cost us in terms of human respect, career security, financial stability, or even relationships with friends and family, and rely upon Our Lady to send us the graces to remain faithful in the truth as we discharge the Spiritual Works of Mercy and thus avoid becoming complicit in the sins of others:

1. To instruct the ignorant.
2. To counsel the doubtful.
3. To admonish sinners.
4. To bear wrongs patiently;
5. To forgive offences willingly;
6. To comfort the afflicted;
7. To pray for the living and the dead.

Catholics also believe that there are nine ways that they can be accessories to the sins of others:

1. By counsel.
2. By command.
3. By consent.
4. By provocation.
5. By praise or flattery of the evil done.
6. By silence.
7. By connivance.
8. By partaking.
9. By defense of the ill done.

Conciliarism is by its very false nature uncharitable as it makes a mockery of the authentic, immutable teaching that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by making it appear that it is somehow opposed to tenderness and mercy to follow these words that Saint Paul wrote in his Second Epistle to Saint Timothy:

[1] I charge thee, before God and Jesus Christ, who shall judge the living and the dead, by his coming, and his kingdom: [2] Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine. [3] For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: [4] And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables. [5] But be thou vigilant, labour in all things, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill thy ministry. Be sober. (2 Tim. 4: 1-15.)

A physician does not "judge" anyone if he warns him what might happen if he does not stop engaging in a certain course of behavior that is deleterious to his bodily health.

Similarly, one who warns another about the state of his soul as he persists in a life of unrepentant sin is simply performing a fundamental Spiritual Work of Mercy, and those who are inclined to and/or steeped in perverse sins against nature are not to be left without being remonstrated as this is a duty of a Catholic before God and to the eternal and temporal good of the sinner.

It is one thing to sin and to be sorry and then to seek out the mercy of the Divine Redeemer in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance. It is quite another to persist in sin, no less perverse sins against nature, unrepentantly and to expect others to reaffirm him in those sins, whether explicitly by words of approval or implicitly by silence, which betokens consent. Catholics must judge the states of their own souls every night in their Examen of Conscience, and they have a duty to help others to recognize the serious states of sin into which they have plunged themselves, praying beforehand to God the Holy Ghost to fill them with wisdom and prudence so as to provide a warning in such a way that could plant a seed to get an unrepentant sinner to a true priest in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance.

Thus, as we continue to pray for the Poor Souls in this month of November, let us remember to pray Our Lady’s Rosary in reparation for the sins of the conciliar revolutionaries against Life, Death, and Truth as well as to make reparation for our own many sins that have worsened both the state of the world in general as well as the state of the Church Militant on earth far, far more seriously than we can realize.

Trusting in the ineffable mercy of the Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, while relying upon and remaining confident in the intercessory power of His Most Blessed Mother, she who is the Queen of Mercy, Refuge of Sinners, and Comforter of the Afflicted, without the least bit of presumption, we continue to pray for the restoration of a true pope on the Throne of Saint Peter and the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary that is to occur after the true pope fulfills Our Lady’s Fatima Request.

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us now and the hour of our deaths. Amen.

All to thee, Blessed Mother. All to thy Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart. Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, we love you. Save souls!

Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, Patron of Departing Souls, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.  

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Cecilia, pray for us.