Saint Stephen of Hungary: A Beneficient Patron of the Church and Defender of the Holy Faith

Saint Stephen of Hungary was one of the great exemplars of the Social Reign of Christ the King during the era of Christendom. Married to the sister of another such exemplar, Saint Henry of Bavaria and the Holy Roman Emperor, Saint Stephen knew that his principal responsibility as the steward of civil governance was to try to foster those conditions in his Kingdom of Hungary wherein his subjects could better sanctify and thus save their immortal souls as Catholics. Saint Stephen of Hungary, whose own parents had become Catholic as a result of the missionary work that had been underwritten and supported by his future brother-inlaw, ruled for Christ the King in all things at all times, seeing it has his solemn obligation to work for the conversion of everyone in his realm to the true Faith and to assure that those who became Catholic persevered in the Faith until the point of their dying breaths.

As Saint Patrick had understood some six hundred years before, the conversion of pagan peoples begins with the conversion of their leaders, which is why he, Saint Patrick, sought to convert the Druid chieftains upon his arrival on the Emerald Isle, the Island of Saints. Saint Stephen knew that he had the responsibility to seek his own interior sanctification on a daily basis if he wanted to be in fact a king in the image of the King of Kings, if he wanted to show his subjects how to persevere in prayer and penance and mortification and almsgiving in order to show them that even the rulers of kingdoms must submit themselves humbly to the Divine Redeemer as He has revealed Himself to men exclusively through the Catholic Church.

Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., wrote the following elegy in behalf a man who shaped the course of Catholicism in Central Europe, Saint Stephen of Hungary, who was chosen to Catholize the very lands that once belonged to Attila the Hun himself:

‘Out of the eater came forth meat, ad out of the strong came forth sweetness. The people with teeth of steel, grinding the nations, gives itself up as food to him, to whom was said: “Kill and eat;” the mouth of the Huns, formerly vomiting foam and rage, now distils the honey of charity. Such, O Christ, are thy miracles; such are Thy works, O our God!’ Thus does Baronius, on reaching in his history the year of Christ 1000, hail the arrival of the Hungarian deputies, who came to offer to the Roman Church the suzerainty of their land, and beseech the Vicar of Christ to confer the title of king upon their duke Stephen.

We are carried back in thought a century earlier, when, led by Arpadus, the son of Almutz, under the banner of the hawk, the Magyars came down from the mountains of Transylvania into the plains watered by the Theiss and the Danube. Attila seemed to live again in those sons of his race, who poured like a torrent over Germany, Gaul, and Italy. But the empire of the Huns was reconquered Pannonia was to be lasting only on condition of its ceasing to be the scourge of God, and becoming the rampart of His Church. In this world, while it is not yet time for eternal justice, the instruments of God’s anger are soon broken unless they are amenable to love. Five centuries earlier, Attila in person was rushing like an overflowing river upon the capital of the world, where he was met by the sovereign Pontiff. The Hungarian chronicles record the following message as having been then received from heaven by the universal devastator: ‘Hearken to the command of the Lord Jesus Christ. Thy pride shall not be suffered to enter into the holy city where lie the bodies of My apostles. Return. Later on a descendant of thine will come to Rome with humility; and I will cause him there to receive a crown that shall last for ever.’ Attila thereupon recrossed the Alps, and had only just time to reach the Danube before he died. In the days of St. Stephen the heavenly promise was fulfilled. Let the reader not be astonished that we do not discuss its authenticity. Legendary or not, as to the forms with which national traditions have clothed it, there is nothing in this divine engagement which the historian need reject; it is in accordance with the rules of God’s Providence, which governs history. God never forgets a service; nor does apostolic gratefulness war out with years; the debt of gratitude which Leo the Great contracted, Sylvester II. paid at the appointed time. From that tomb respected by the plunderer, a virtue came forth, changing the avenger into an apostle. The crown, placed on the brow of Attila’s successor by Peter’s successor, was destined to be his as long as he should be preceded the cross, that other mark of honour conferred upon him. Like the Holy Empire, to which Hungary was to be later on united without being absorbed by it, the Hungarian monarchy was founded upon Peter; for his sake it subsisted, and he alone, under God, was the safeguard of its future. 

Let not the sad forebodings of the present hour make us forget the marvelous power shown on this feast by the Lamb the rule of the earth. Scarcely had the blood shed by the sons of Arpadus disappeared from the streets of the cities; scarcely had the smoke of burning ruins and the dust of crumbling walls had been scattered; when their fierce energy, tempered like a choice blade in the waters of the sacred font, became the defence of Christianity in the east. A new sort of invasion began; the holiness sprung from Stephen put forth numerous branches, which, shedding their beautiful blossoms over the whole earth, filled all lands with perfumes of the Spouse. (Dom Prosper Gueranger, The Liturgical Year, Volume XIV: Time After Pentecost, Book IV, pp. 133-135.)

No one rules properly over others, including parents over their children, unless he seeks first of all the eternal good of those whom he rules. That is why, you see, American government and politics are so farcical. No ruler in this country's history, including the only nominally "Catholic" President of the United States, John Fitzgerald Kennedy (a man who was not exactly concerned about the sanctification of his immortal soul), has ever been concerned about the proper formation of souls as Catholics unto their eternal salvation. The Modern State, including the United States of America, was founded in the belief that man is more or less selfredemptive, that he can pursue virtue on his own, that the measure of man's "progress" lies chiefly in the area of the acquisition and expansion of "wealth" and advancements in the realm of technology and science.

Saint Stephen of Hungary understood that the authentic measure of man's true "progress" rested solely on his love of God as He has revealed Himself to us exclusively through His true Church, the Catholic Church, by seeking to cooperate with the graces He won for all men by the shedding of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross. The fate of nations is determined by the state of the souls of its inhabitants. Saint Stephen, therefore, is to be distinguished from the craven careerists of modernity. He is also to be distinguished from conciliarism and its apologists, men and women who have convinced themselves that Christendom was but a phase in the dialectical evolution of historical events and that it is neither necessary or even desirable to seek a return thereto, contenting themselves with the belief that a generic acceptance of "God" or "Christian values" or "natural morality" is enough for "modern man." And he is to be distinguished from those steeped in all false religions, including those of Protestantism, who believe that they can pursue personal sanctity and social order absent a submission to the Deposit of Faith and a reliance upon Sanctifying Grace. Saint Stephen knew that Catholicism was the one and only foundation of personal and social order, that nothing else can be provide a "respite" from the ravages of Original and Actual Sin.

Oh, not so with Saint Stephen, who would identify himself entirely with these words of Pope Leo XIII in Tametsi Futura Prospicientibus, November 1, 1900:

A system of morality based exclusively on human reason robs man of his highest dignity and lowers him from the supernatural to the merely natural life. Not but that man is able by the right use of reason to know and to obey certain principles of the natural law. But though he should know them all and keep them inviolate through life-and even this is impossible without the aid of the grace of our Redeemer-still it is vain for anyone without faith to promise himself eternal salvation. "If anyone abide not in Me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up and cast him into the fire, and he burneth" john xv., 6). "He that believeth not shall be condemned" (Mark xvi., 16). We have but too much evidence of the value and result of a morality divorced from divine faith. How is it that, in spite of all the zeal for the welfare of the masses, nations are in such straits and even distress, and that the evil is daily on the increase? We are told that society is quite able to help itself; that it can flourish without the assistance of Christianity, and attain its end by its own unaided efforts. Public administrators prefer a purely secular system of government. All traces of the religion of our forefathers are daily disappearing from political life and administration. What blindness! Once the idea of the authority of God as the Judge of right and wrong is forgotten, law must necessarily lose its primary authority and justice must perish: and these are the two most powerful and most necessary bonds of society. Similarly, once the hope and expectation of eternal happiness is taken away, temporal goods will be greedily sought after. Every man will strive to secure the largest share for himself. Hence arise envy, jealousy, hatred. The consequences are conspiracy, anarchy, nihilism. There is neither peace abroad nor security at home. Public life is stained with crime.

So great is this struggle of the passions and so serious the dangers involved, that we must either anticipate ultimate ruin or seek for an efficient remedy. It is of course both right and necessary to punish malefactors, to educate the masses, and by legislation to prevent crime in every possible way: but all this is by no means sufficient. The salvation of the nations must be looked for higher. A power greater than human must be called in to teach men's hearts, awaken in them the sense of duty, and make them better. This is the power which once before saved the world from destruction when groaning under much more terrible evils. Once remove all impediments and allow the Christian spirit to revive and grow strong in a nation, and that nation will be healed. The strife between the classes and the masses will die away; mutual rights will be respected. If Christ be listened to, both rich and poor will do their duty. The former will realise that they must observe justice and charity, the latter self-restraint and moderation, if both are to be saved. Domestic life will be firmly established ( by the salutary fear of God as the Lawgiver. In the same way the precepts of the natural law, which dictates respect for lawful authority and obedience to the laws, will exercise their influence over the people. Seditions and conspiracies will cease. Wherever Christianity rules over all without let or hindrance there the order established by Divine Providence is preserved, and both security and prosperity are the happy result. The common welfare, then, urgently demands a return to Him from whom we should never have gone astray; to Him who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life,-and this on the part not only of individuals but of society as a whole. We must restore Christ to this His own rightful possession. All elements of the national life must be made to drink in the Life which proceedeth from Him- legislation, political institutions, education, marriage and family life, capital and labour. Everyone must see that the very growth of civilisation which is so ardently desired depends greatly upon this, since it is fed and grows not so much by material wealth and prosperity, as by the spiritual qualities of morality and virtue.  (Pope Leo XIII, Tametsi Futura Prospicientibus, November 1, 1900.)

"All elements of the national life must be made to drink in the Life which proceedeth from Him-legislation, political institutions, education, marriage and family life, capital and labour. Everyone must see that the very growth of civilisation which is so ardently desired depends greatly upon this, since it is fed and grows not so much by material wealth and prosperity, as by the spiritual qualities of morality and virtue." And there is only one fountain-head from which springs the supernatural helps to persevere in authentic morality and virtue: the Catholic Church. It is thus, as Saint Stephen of Hungary himself recognized, an absolute necessity that the civil state afford the Catholic Church full recognition as the one and only true religion that has the Divinely-instituted right to interpose herself as a last resort, following the exhausting of her Indirect Power of preaching and teaching and exhortation, to prevent civil potentates from undertaking actions contrary to the good of souls and thus contrary to the common good of society itself.

Pope Leo XIII had written fifteen years before Tametsi Futura Prospicientibus, in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, of the Europe that had emerged as a result of the consistent efforts of the great missionaries, such as Saint Patrick and Saint Aidan and Saint Augustine of Canterbury and Saint Boniface and Saint Hyacinth, to convert men and their nations to the true Faith and as a result of the work of rulers such as Saint Henry and Saint Edward the Confessor and Saint Stephen of Hungary and Saint Louis IX:

There was once a time when States were governed by the philosophy of the Gospel. Then it was that the power and divine virtue of Christian wisdom had diffused itself throughout the laws, institutions, and morals of the people, permeating all ranks and relations of civil society. Then, too, the religion instituted by Jesus Christ, established firmly in befitting dignity, flourished everywhere, by the favor of princes and the legitimate protection of magistrates; and Church and State were happily united in concord and friendly interchange of good offices. The State, constituted in this wise, bore fruits important beyond all expectation, whose remembrance is still, and always will be, in renown, witnessed to as they are by countless proofs which can never be blotted out or ever obscured by any craft of any enemies. Christian Europe has subdued barbarous nations, and changed them from a savage to a civilized condition, from superstition to true worship. It victoriously rolled back the tide of Mohammedan conquest; retained the headship of civilization; stood forth in the front rank as the leader and teacher of all, in every branch of national culture; bestowed on the world the gift of true and many-sided liberty; and most wisely founded very numerous institutions for the solace of human suffering. And if we inquire how it was able to bring about so altered a condition of things, the answer is-beyond all question, in large measure, through religion, under whose auspices so many great undertakings were set on foot, through whose aid they were brought to completion. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

Saint Stephen knew that the evils of his day could only be fought with Catholicism and nothing else. Nothing else. Why is it so hard for so many Catholics, including traditional Catholics, to accept that simple fact. Our cause is not the "American cause." Our cause is not the "conservative" cause. Our cause is not the "libertarian" cause. Our cause is not the "Republican" cause or the "Democrat" cause." Our cause is not the "Constitutional" cause or the cause of "Original Intent" of the American Founding Fathers. Our cause is one and ever the same: the Catholic cause, something that is hated by the devil's minions in the levers of civil and cultural centers of influence around the world and, sadly, something that is hated by almost all of the conciliarists as being an actual "impediment" to the manifestly false cause of "interreligious dialogue" and "universal brotherhood," causes that have everything in common with Judeo-Masonry and nothing in common with Catholicism.

Consider this remarkably Catholic features about Saint Stephen of Hungary, contained in account of his life in The Roman Breviary, as quoted in Dom Prosper Gueranger's The Liturgical Year:

Stephen introduced into the Hungary both the faith of Christ and the regal dignity. He obtained the royal crown from the Roman Pontiff; and, having been, by his command, anointed king, offered his kingdom to the apostolic See. He built several houses of charity at Rome, Jerusalem, and Constantinople; and with a wonderful magnificent spirit of religion, he founded the archiepiscopal See of Gran and ten other bishoprics. His love for the poor was equalled only by his generosity towards them; for, seeing in them Christ himself, he never sent anyone away sad or empty-handed. So great indeed was his charity, that, to relieve their necessities, after expending large sums of money, he often bestowed upon them his household goods. It was his custom to wash the feet of the poor with his own hands, and to visit the hospitals at night, alone and unknown, serving the sick and showing them every charity. As a reward for these good deeds his right hand remained incorrupt after death, when the rest of his body had returned to dust.

He was much given to prayer; and would spend almost entire nights without sleep, rapt in heavenly contemplation; at times he seemed ravished out of his senses, and raised in the air. By the help of prayer, he more than once escaped in a wonderful manner from the attacks of powerful enemies. Having married Ghisella of Bavaria, sister of the emperor St. Henry, he had by her a son Emeric, whom he brought up in such regularity and piety as to form him into a saint. He summoned wise and holy men from all parts to aid him in the government of his kingdom and undertook nothing without his advice. In sackcloth and ashes, he besought God with most humble prayer, that he might not depart this life without seeing the whole kingdom of Hungary Catholic. So great indeed was his zeal for the propagation of the faith, that he was called the apostle of the nation, and he received from the Roman Pontiff, both for himself and for his successors, the privilege of having the cross borne before them.

He had the most ardent devotion towards the Mother of God, in whose honour he built a magnificent church, solemnly declaring her patroness of Hungary. In return the blessed Virgin received him into heaven on the very day of her Assumption, which the Hungarians, by the appointment of their holy king, call "the day of the great Lady.' His sacred body, exhaling a most fragrant odour and distilling a heavenly liquor, was, by order of the Roman Pontiff, translated, amidst many and divers miracles, to a more worthy resting-place, and buried with greater honor. Pope Innocent XI. commanded his feast to be celebrated on the fourth of the Nones of September; on which day, Leopold I. emperor elect of the Romans and king of Hungary, had by the divine assistance, gained a remarkable victory over the Turks at the siege of Buda. (Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., The Liturgical Year, Volume XIV: Time After Pentecost, Book IV, pp. 135-138.)

Here is another account of the life of Saint Stephen of Hungary as found in The Lives of the Saints: With Excerpts from Their Writings, which was an adaptation of Father Alban Butler's The Lives of the Saints as edited by Father Joseph Van with an introduction by Father Thomas Plassman that was published by J. J. Crawley and Sons in 1954:

Coming from the east under a chief called Arpad, a fierce, marauding people called Magyars invaded and conquered the central part of the Danube valley during the last years of the ninth century. King Stephen was of this race. The Magyars first learned of

Christianity on sporadic raids into north Italy and France. In the middle of the ninth century the Thessalonian priests, SS. Cyril and Methodius, had planted the faith in Pannonia, to the south, and had translated the Bible into the native tongue. It was not for a hundred years, however, that the Magyars gave serious attention to the Church. This was in the time of Geza, the third duke after Arpad. He was shrewd enough to see the practical desirability of Christianity as a protection against the inroads of his Christian neighbors on either side. He had the choice of turning to the Eastern Church at Constantinople or to the Church of Rome. Although Rome was more distant, he chose the Western Church, in fear that if he accepted Christianity from the east his domain would be incorporated in the recently revived Eastern Empire, the boundaries of which extended to the Danube.

Geza's first wife was Sarolta, one of the few Magyar women who was truly Christian. Of this union was born, about the year 975, a son named Vaik, the future king and saint. His mother took great care of his early training, and he had excellent Italian and Czech tutors. Geza married as his second wife a Christian princess Adelaide, sister of the duke of Poland; at her behest, Adalbert. archbishop of Prague, came on a preaching mission to Hungary. Geza and his young son were baptized in 986, Vaik being given the name of the first martyr, Stephen; a number of the Hungarian nobles were baptized at the same time. For most of them it was a conversion of expediency, and their Christianity was, at the outset, merely nominal. The young prince, on the contrary, became a Christian in a true sense, and his mature life was spent spreading the faith and trying to live according to its disciplines and tenets.

At the age of twenty Stephen married Gisela, sister of the duke of Bavaria, the future Emperor Henry II. Since Hungary was then at peace with its neighbors, Stephen devoted himself to rooting out idolatry among his people. In the guise of a missionary, he often accompanied the Christian preachers; sometimes he had to check their tendency to impose the faith forcibly. There had recently been a migration of German Christian knights into the rich and fertile plains of Hungary. These newcomers took up land and they also labored to make converts of the peasantry. Many Magyars not unnaturally resented this infiltration, which they thought jeopardized their territorial rights and their ancient pagan customs. They rose in revolt under the leadership of Koppany, a man of great valor. Stephen met the insurgents himself, having prepared for battle by fasting, almsdeeds, and prayer, and invoking the aid of St. Martin of Tours, whom he had chosen as his patron. The historic meeting took place at Veszprem in 998, and though Stephen's forces were inferior in size to those of the rebels, with the help of the German knights he won a famous victory. Koppany was slain.

To give God the glory for his success, Stephen built near the site of the battle a monastery dedicated to St. Martin, called the Holy Hill, and bestowed on it extensive lands, as well as one third ,of the spoils of victory. Known since that time as the archabbey of Martinsberg, or Pannonhalma, it flourished down to modern times. It is the mother house of all Benedictine congregations in Hungary. Stephen now followed up his plans by inviting priests and monks to come from Germany, France, and Italy. They continued the work of taming the savage nation by teaching it the Gospel; they built churches and monasteries to serve as centers of religion, industry, and education. Some of them died as martyrs.

Hungary was still without ecclesiastical organization, and Stephen now founded the archbishopric of Gran, with five dioceses under it, and later the archbishopric of Kalocsa, with three dioceses. He then sent Abbot Astricius to Rome to obtain from Pope Sylvester II the confirmation of these foundations as well as of other things he had done for the honor of God and the exaltation of His Church. At the same time he begged the Pope to confer on him the title of king, that he might have more authority to accomplish his designs for promoting God's glory and the good of the people. It happened that Boleslaus, duke of Poland, at this same time had sent an embassy to Rome to get the title of king confirmed to him by papal ordinance. Pope Sylvester, persuaded to grant the request, had prepared a royal crown to send him with his blessing. But the special zeal, piety, and wisdom of Stephen of Hungary seemed to deserve priority. The Pope too may have been moved by political considerations, since the powerful German Emperor Otto II was at that moment in Rome.

At any rate, he delivered this famous crown[1] to Stephen's ambassador, Astricius, and at the same time by a bull confirmed all the religious foundations Stephen had erected and the ordination of the Hungarian bishops. On his envoy's return, Stephen went out to meet him, and listened with reverence to the reading of the Pope's bull, bowing as often as the Pope's name was mentioned. It was this same Abbot Astricius who anointed and crowned him king with solemnity and pomp at Gran, in the year 1001.

To plant Christianity firmly in his kingdom and provide for its continued growth after his death, King Stephen filled Hungary with religious foundations. At Stuhlweissenburg he built a stately church in honor of the Mother of God, in which the kings of Hungary were afterwards crowned and buried. In Buda he founded the monastery of SS. Peter and Paul, and in Rome, Ravenna, and Constantinople hospices for pilgrims. He filled Martinsberg with Benedictines, who, as we have seen, were notable for practical works and founded four other monasteries of the order, as well as con. vents for nuns. At Veszprem there was a convent for nuns of the Byzantine rite. One effect of the conversion of Hungary was that the road used by pilgrims and crusaders going to the Holy Land was made safer, since the valley of the Danube formed a natural highway for at least a part of the long, difficult journey. To support churches and pastors and to relieve the poor, Stephen started the collection of tithes, and every tenth town was required to maintain a church and support a priest. Stephen himself built the churches and the bishops appointed the priests. He passed edicts for the severe punishment of blasphemy, murder, theft, and adultery. He commanded his subjects to marry, with the exception of monks, nuns, and clergy; he forbade marriages between Christians and pagans. Easy of access to persons of all ranks, Stephen was always ready to listen to the complaints of the poor, knowing that in helping them he honored Christ. Widows and orphans he took under his special protection.

This democratic King would often go about in disguise in order to find out the needs of humble persons whom his officials might overlook. Once, while dealing out alms thus, a rough band of beggars crowded around him, pulled at his beard and hair, knocked him down, and snatched away his purse. The King took this indignity in good humor, without making known who he was. When his nobles heard of the incident, they insisted that he should not again expose himself to such danger. Yet he renewed his vow never to refuse an alms to anyone who begged of him.

The code of laws which King Stephen put into effect was well suited to control a hot-tempered people, newly converted to Christianity; but it was not at all pleasing to those who still opposed the new religion, and the wars which Stephen now undertook were religious as well as political. Stephen undertook the political reorganization of Hungary. He abolished the old tribal divisions and partitioned the land into counties, under a system of governors and magistrates, similar to that of the Western Empire. He also developed a kind of feudalism, turning the independent nobles into vassals of the crown, thus welding them into a political unity. He retained direct control over the common people. In 1025 there was a revolt led by a noble called Ajton, who was moving to transfer his allegiance to the Eastern emperor. Stephen mobilized his forces at Kalocsa and gained an overwhelming victory. After he had repulsed an invasion of Bulgarians, some of the Bulgarians returned, hoping to settle peaceably in Hungary. They were set upon by vengeful Magyars. Stephen straightway had a number of the Magyars hanged along the frontier, as a warning that well-intentioned strangers must not be molested. When Stephen's saintly brother-in-law, Emperor Henry II, died, he was succeeded by his cousin, Conrad II. Fearing Stephen's growing power, Conrad marched against him. A parley was arranged, and Conrad retired. This settlement, according to Stephen's subjects, showed the peace-loving disposition of their king.

The death of Stephen's son Emeric left him without a direct heir, and the last years of the king's life were embittered by family disputes and dark intrigues over the succession. Of the four or five claimants, the successful one was Peter, son of Stephen's sister, a ruthless woman who stopped at nothing to gain her end. Two of Stephen's cousins were no better and even conspired to have him killed. A hired assassin entered his bedroom one night, but the King awakened and calmly called out, "If God be for me, who shall be against me?" The King pardoned the assassin and his cousins as well. It is not surprising that "a time of troubles" followed the death of this great statesman and king; it lasted until the reign of St. Ladislas, some forty years later.

Stephen died on the feast of the Assumption, 1038. His tomb at Stuhlweissenburg became the scene of miracles, and forty-five years after his death Pope Gregory VII, at the request of Ladislas, ordered his relics enshrined and placed in the rich chapel which bears his name in the church of Our Lady at Buda. King Stephen was canonized in 1083. In 1696 Pope Innocent XI appointed his festival for September 2, the day on which Emperor Leopold won Buda back from the Turks. In Hungary his feast is still kept on August 20, the day of the translation of his relics. This saint merits the highest veneration for his accomplishments in both secular and religious matters, and, most especially, for having been an exemplar of justice, mercy, charity, and peace in a cruel age. (The Lives of the Saints: With Excerpts from Their Writings, edited by Father Joseph Van with an introduction by Father Thomas Plassman,  J. J. Crawley and Sons in 1954.)

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call a just and fitting ruler of men.

Saint Stephen of Hungary did not want to die until he had seen the entire kingdom of Hungary become Catholic. Can this be said of any contemporary Catholic public official in the United States of America? Can this be said of any conciliar "bishop" in the United States of America today? And it should go without saying by now that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who reaffirms people in their false religions as well as coddling outright atheists, does not believe that the Catholic Church has an urgent mission to convert men and their nations to the Catholic Faith, rejects the confessional Catholic State entirely.

Nevertheless, the example of Saint Stephen of Hungary is universal and eternal. His life of sanctity is the absolute prerequisite to the just exercise of civil rule. His zeal to convert souls to the Catholic Church is what should characterize the singular ambition of all those who hold (or who aspire to hold) public office in the world today. His desire to see Our Lady honored publicly by his kingdom should be the desire of any true patriot of every country in the world, including any true patriot here in the United States, remembering a true lover of his country wills her good, namely, her Catholicization in every aspect of her national life without any exception whatsoever. And anyone who thinks that a woman who is not devoted to the Mother of God is any kind of "role model," no less a fit servant in public life, is out of his Catholic mind. Devotion to Our Lady is a necessity for salvation, and it is a helpful thing to be concerned about one's salvation if one wants to be a just ruler of his family and of others, including those entrusted to the care of those in public office.

Father Denis Fahey noted these points very clearly in his The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation: 

We can thus easily see that the entrance of Christianity into the world has meant two things. Primarily and principally, it has meant the constitution of a supernatural society, the

Mystical Body of Christ, absolutely transcending every natural development of culture and civilisation. Secondly, it has had as result that this supernatural society, the Catholic Church, began to exercise a profound influence upon culture and civilisation and modified in a far-reaching way the existing temporal or natural social order. The indirect power of the Church over temporal affairs, whenever the interests of the divine life of souls are involved, presupposes, of course, a clear distinction of nature between the ecclesiastical authority, charged with the care of divine things, and the civil authority, whose mission is concerned with purely temporal matters. In proportion as the Mystical Body of Christ was accepted by mankind, political and economic thought and action began to respect the jurisdiction and guidance of the Catholic Church, endowed, as she is, with the right of intervention in temporal affairs whenever necessary, because of her participation in the spiritual kingship of Christ. Thus the natural or temporal common good of states came to be sought in a manner calculated to favour the development of true personality, in and through the Mystical Body of Christ, and social life came more and more under the influence of the supreme end of man, the vision of God in the three divine Persons.

Accordingly, the divine plan for order in our fallen and redeemed world comprises, primarily, the supernatural social organism of the Catholic Church, and then, secondarily, the temporal or natural social order resulting from the influence of Catholic doctrine on politics and economics and from the embodiment of that influence in social institutions. From the birth of the Catholic

Church on Calvary and the solemn promulgation of her mission at the first Pentecost, the Kingdom of God in its essence has been present in the world. As a result of the gradual acceptance of the role of the Church by the temporal representatives of Christ the King, the social institutions of states and nations became deeply permeated with the influence of the supernatural life of Christ. Then, and only then, could the Kingdom of God in its integrity or the rule of Christ the King in its integrity, be said to exist. The Kingdom of God or the rule of Christ the King is present in its integrity only in so far as the whole social life of states, political and economic, is permeated with the influence of the Church. To put it in other terms, Christ fully reigns only when the programme for which He died is accepted as the one true way to peace and order in the world, and social structures in harmony with it are evolved.

The Kingdom of God in its essence is always with us, but the influence of the Church on politics and economics, in other words, the extension of the Kingdom of God in its integrity, has varied with the centuries. Broadly speaking, the thirteenth century has been, so far, the high water mark of that influence. Since then, until recently, there has been steady decay. No particular temporal social order, of course, will ever realise all that the Church is capable of giving to the world. Each of them will be defective for several reasons.

First of all, the action of the Church, welcomed by some Catholics, will be opposed by the ignorance, incapacity and perversity of others.

Secondly, even if all Catholics did accept fully, they could only reflect some of the beauty of the Gospel as the saints reflected some of the infinitely imitable holiness of Christ.

Thirdly, there would still remain the vast number of non-Catholics to be won for Christ and have their social life organised under His rule. It is towards this latter goal that every generation of Catholics is called upon to work. The aim is not, needless to say, to bring back the Middle Ages, for the river of time does not turn back in its course, but the aim is to impregnate a new epoch with the divine principles of order so firmly grasped in the thirteenth century. The result of the so-called Reformation and the French Revolution has been to obscure the rights of God proclaimed by our Lord Jesus Christ and to diffuse naturalism.

Naturalism consists in the negation of the possibility of the elevation of our nature to the supernatural life and order, or more radically still, in the negation of the very existence of that life and order. In our day owing to the progress of the anti-Christian revolt, the more radical meaning has become common. Naturalism may be defined therefore as the attitude of mind which denies the reality of the divine life of grace and of our Fall therefrom by original sin. It rejects our consequent liability to revolt against the order of the divine life, when this life has been restored to us by our membership of Christ, and maintains that all social life should be organized on the basis of that denial. We must combat that mentality and proclaim the rights of God.

In his Encyclical letter on Freemasonry, Pope Leo XIII teaches authoritatively: “From what we have already set forth, it is indisputably evident that their [the Freemasons’] ultimate aim is to uproot completely the whole religious and political order of the world, which has been brought into existence by Christianity, and to replace it by another in harmony with their way of thinking. This will mean that the foundation and the laws of the new structure of society will be drawn from pure naturalism.” Now, it is historically certain that the Declaration of the Rights of Man had been conceived and elaborated in the Masonic lodges before it was presented to the States-General of France. Accordingly, the infamous Declaration, a naturalistic or anti-supernatural document, is in reality a declaration of war on membership of Christ and on the whole structure of society based on that supernatural dignity. The same naturalistic hostility to membership of Christ and the supernatural life of grace runs through all the documents concerning human rights drawn up under the influence of the organised forces that were responsible for the Declaration of 1789. That is the real struggle going on in the world, and in it every member of Christ is called upon to play his or her part. There can be no neutrality. “He that is not with me is against me ” (St. Matthew XII, 30.) (Father Denis Fahey,The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation .)

As Father Fahey noted, we must "impregnate," to use his term," the modern world with "the divine principles of order so firmly grasped in the" Thirteenth Century. They were grasped, of course, three hundred years before the dawn of the Thirteenth Century. They were grasped by Saint Henry and by his brother-in-law, Saint Stephen of Hungary. We must invoke their intercession from Heaven to help us to resist the all-too-natural temptation to view the world and its problems naturalistically, that is to say without believing that it is necessary or possible to restore all things in Christ, as the saint we commemorate tomorrow, Pope Saint Pius X, noted throughout his eleven-year pontificate. We must not be concerned about this or that election; it really makes no difference at all as to which set of organized gangsters in the two major political parties control the levers of power. We must be concerned about helping ourselves and our children and our relatives and friends and coworkers to see themselves and the world clearly through the eyes of the Catholic Faith.

Dom Prosper Gueranger’s prayer to our Saint contains a very important reminder that the jaws of hell shall never prevail against the Rock of Saint Peter, the Pope, meaning that no true pope can teach what has come out of the mouths and been published far and wide by the conciliar “popes” and their “bishops” in the past nearly sixty-one years:

Apostle and king, protect thy people, assist the Church, succour us all. At the close of that tenth century, when anarchy had penetrated even into the sanctuary, hope sprang up once more on the day whereon the holy Spirit, the Creator and Renovator, chose thy race, in all its native vigour, to renew the youth of the world. Satan, who thought that the papacy was humiliated once for all, trembled with rage when he saw new labourers coming to Peter, as to the only foundation on which it is possible to build. The proudest family that had ever caused the empire of Romulus to shake, asked of Rome the right to be counted among the nations of the west. How true it is that the gates of hell shall never prevail against the rock, against the Church founded thereon, against the holy city prepared on the top of the mountains to draw all nations to itself! In vain had the storm stirred up the very mire of the torrents of the abyss; it was the hour when God lifted up His hand, as the prophet says, toward the far-off lands, and kings came bringing to the ever holy bride those unknown sons whom they themselves had educated for her. 

No, the Lord counfoudneth not them that wait for Him. And therefore we will hope, even against hope, in the future of the noble nation established by thee upon the apostolic strength. A people justly proud of so many irreproachable heroes, could not allow itself to be long led astray by a false liberty kept up by Jewish gold, and extolled by al the enemies of the country’s traditions. Martin watches together with thee over the land of his birth; and the sovereign of Hungary, the august Queen of heaven, will not suffer her loyal subjects to the proposals of the infernal spirit. (Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., The Liturgical Year, Volume XIV: Time After Pentecost, Book IV, pp. 138-139.)

We must have the same apostolic zeal for souls as Saint Stephen of Hungary possessed a thousand years ago now.

What can we do?

Assist exclusively at the Immemorial Mass of Tradition in the catacombs where no concessions are made to conciliarism or to its false shepherds.

Spend time in fervent prayer before Our Lord's Real Presence in the Most Blessed Sacrament if this is at all possible at this time of apostasy and betrayal.

Be totally consecrated to Our Lady's Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

Pray as many Rosaries each day as your state-in-life permits.

Wear your own Miraculous Medal and Brown Scapular.

Enthrone your homes to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Have images of the saints, starting with Our Lady and Saint Joseph, displayed prominently in your homes, which must be enthroned to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.

Carry on your person at all times plenty of Green Scapulars and blessed Miraculous Medals to distribute to fallen away Catholics and to all non-Catholics whom you meet each day.

Pray for crosses.

Pray for humiliation.

Offer all to the Blessed Trinity through Our Lady's Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart for the conversion of sinners, starting with ourselves.

Saint Stephen of Hungary was able to cooperate with the graces that were won for us by Our Lord on the wood of the Holy Cross and which flow to us through the loving hands of Our Lady to convert an entire nation. Those graces, my friends, are no less powerful or efficacious as they were a millennium ago. We have the means available to us to plant the seeds for the conversion of the United States of America to the Catholic Faith. We have the means to plant the seeds to realize the day when a Catholic bishop will be proclaiming the glories of Christus Rex esto perpetua.

Relying upon the patronage of Our Lady of Guadalupe, inspired by such great exemplars of Christ the King as Saint Stephen of Hungary, careful to fulfill Our Lady's Fatima Message in our own lives, praying as many Rosaries each day as our states in life permit as we offer ourselves each day to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart, we can win souls-and the soul of this very nation--for Christ the King and for Mary our Immaculate Queen.

What are we waiting for?

Vivat Christus Rex! 

Our Lady of Hungary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saint Stephen of Hungary, pray for us.

Saint Emeric, pray for us.

Saint Henry the Emperor, pray for us.