by
Thomas A. Droleskey
There was great "chatter" among Catholics about the "necessity" of supporting the "lesser of two evils" in the dog and pony sideshow of naturalism that ended on Tuesday evening, November 6, 2012.
Indeed, so many people are throwing fits of hysteria over the thoroughly predictable results of this year's circus that is nothing other than a manifestation of the "universal madness" that has resulted from the "universal franchise," a madness that Pope Pius IX warned French pilgrims in 1872 was the only logical result that could occur when everyone in the masses is permitted to cast a vote.
You see, the mania of "voting" is such that it extends to all walks of life today.
"Instant" polls ask you to vote on various matters of trivial insignificance importance that can range from "Is Orenthal James Simpson guilty of murdering Nicole Brown Simpson" to "Should Robert Allen Dickey be signed to a long-term contract extension by the New York Mets" to "Is the Long Island Power Authority doing a good job restoring power to those in Nassau and Suffolk Counties who lost it during Superstorm Sandy and, more recently, in the "milder" Nor'easter that brought up to eight inches of snow on Long Island" to "Who has the better haircut, Barack Hussein Obama or Willard Mitt Romney."
Although I have never once watched a so-called "reality" television program, it is my understand that viewers of such programs can "vote who should "thrown off" of some facsimile of Gilligan's Island or who should win something called "dancing with the stars." Americans are crazy about voting. Just crazy about it.
The reason for my descending into farce at the beginning of this article is to illustrate the simple truth that what was not clear to those who wrote on the issue of voting in the 1950s should be clear enough to us by now, namely, that the whole enterprise of voting is a farce from beginning to end.
As I demonstrated in several parts of my recently recorded video series (see A Case Against Obama and Romney, part 1, A Case Against Obama and Romney part 2, and A Case Against Obama and Romney part 3, A Case Against Obama and Romney, part four, A Case Against Obama and Romney, part five, A Case Against Obama and Romney, part six, A Case Against Obama and Romney part seven and A Case Against Obama and Romney, part eight), issues of fundamental moral truth (the nature of marriage, the inviolability of all innocent human life) are "on the table" for the "people" to decide. That is why I pointed out in Do You Hear The People Sing? four years ago now that to herald an alleged "victory" (which Proposition Eight in California at the time was not, something explained in that old article) at the ballot box in a referendum put to the people for a "vote" is to accept the false premise that the "people" have any "right" at all to "decide" that matters that have been decree by the true God of Divine Revelation from all eternity. Making such a concession is gravely erroneous as it convinces "the people" that they, not Christ the King and His true Church, are the ultimate moral arbiters, and it leads to the inevitable reversal at the ballot box when the naturalistic pull of sentimentality eventually whittles away opposition to what comes to be seen as exercises in "human rights" rather than sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.
To wit, it was four years ago that I noted in Written In Sand that the results of elections are indeed reversible two or four years later. We live in the madness of a system where everything is up for "vote" and for a "change." The only exception to this is when those who belong to the organized crime family of the false opposite of the naturalist "right" lose a presidential election and decide to "change" in order to be more "like" the organized family of the false opposite of the naturalist "left" in order to "win" elections. And this is why the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Representative John H. Boehner (R-Ohio), has said that "ObamaCare Is The Law Of The Land" and that there will be no efforts to repeal it, although there might be some efforts to deal with those parts of it that are fiscally untenable.
Lots of luck, Mister Speaker. As I noted a little over four months ago now, ObamaCare is Here To Stay, something that would have been the case even if Willard Mitt Romney got himself elected three days ago as the United States Senate is now even more firmly in control of the Democratic Party than it was a result of the 2010 mid-term Congressional elections. Even Romney, who gave the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the monstrosity that is RomneyCare, said after the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in the combined cases of National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. and Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Florida, et al. that there were certain elements of the national health-care takeover that he wanted to keep.
Ah, that is why I wrote the following the day after Chief Justice John G. Roberts decided in favor of a clearly unconstitutional law that is also in violation of the Natural Law principle of Subsidiarity as the George Walker Bush appointee declared that the matter was one for the "people" to decide, not for unelected judges. Well, behold what "the people" decided, huh? Anyhow, this is what I wrote at the time (pardon me, if I'm on a "I told you so" binge as it is a little frustrating, humanly speaking, to spell this all out for the readership of this site only to have so many lose their minds and to think that their "lesser evil" was going to "champion" a reversal of ObamaCare):
Although very few people read these articles and
fewer yet seem willing to accept what is for them the hard truths that I
write about the inevitable degeneration of a nation founded on false
principles, let me state an additional hard truth that even fewer
readers will be able to accept or understand as they become agitated
into "doing something" to reverse the decision rendered yesterday of the
Supreme Court of the United States of America in the combined cases of National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. and Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Florida, et al.
That decision is here to day. The so-called Protection Protection and
Affordable Care Act, herein after referred to quite properly as
ObamaCare is here to stay. It is not going away.
No, ObamaCare is not going to go away even in the
unlikely event that former Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Willard Mitt Romney, upon whose "RomneyCare" it is based, is elected
President of the United States of America on Tuesday, November 6, 2012.
Even if the election results in this unlikely outcome, you see, and the
hapless members of the organized crime family of the naturalist "right"
in the Republican Party maintain control of the United States House of
Representatives and take majority control the United States Senate, they
will not have the sixty votes in the Senate necessary to block any
filibuster that the opposite number in the organized crime family of the
naturalist "left" will wage to the very death in order to prevent
ObamaCare's legislative repeal. Mind you, that's the supposedly "best case"
outcome that many clueless adherents of "conservatism" and
"constitutionalism" can expect. There will simply not be a "filibuster
proof" majority in the United States Senate to repeal ObamaCare in its
entirety. It is here to stay in one form or another.
Moreover, there are two other scenarios, one "worse" and the other "worst."
"Worse case" scenario: The lawless,
reckless statist who was known for a long time as Barry Soetoro, Jr.,
but has been known for the past thirty years or so as "Barack Hussein
Obama" is, as I expect and predict will be the case, re-elected on
November 6, 2012. Even if Republicans wound up controlling
both Houses of the United States Congress, which is possible, one is
still back to the reality that any attempt to repeal even a single
provision of ObamaCare, including the "individual mandate" that was
declared constitutional as a result of Chief Justice John Roberts simply
rewriting the Affordable Care and Patient Protection Act's specific
reference to a "penalty" upon taxpayers for not purchasing health
insurance as a "tax" even though Congress specifically rejected
referring to it as "tax," will be vetoed by a re-elected Obama. There
will not be 290 votes in the House of Representatives or sixty-seven in
the Senate to override such a veto.
"Worst case" scenario: Obama is
re-elected and the Democrats regain control of the House of
Representatives as well maintaining their control of the Senate.
Remember, ladies and gentlemen, we live in a country full of boiled frogs,
that is, citizens who have limited spans-of-attention and are easily
distracted by the panoply of bread and circuses that our caesars use to
keep the masses busy as they increasing their hold over us and the just
exercise of legitimate liberties. Most people "get used" to their
"government goodies." They got "used" to Social Security and Medicare
and Medicaid. They got "used" to the increase of the size and scope and
the power of the Federal government during World War I and the New Deal
and World II and the Cold War and the Great Society/War on Poverty. They
expected Republican administrations under Dwight David Eisenhower and
Richard Milhous Nixon and Leslie Lynch King, Jr./Gerald Rudolph Ford,
Jr. and Ronald Wilson Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush and George
Walker Bush to keep the various unconstitutional programs, create and
maintained by the confiscatory taxing power of the Federal government.
They so.
All right. I told you so.
Moreover, I told you two years ago, following the Republican Party takeover of the United States House of Representatives, that President Barack Hussein Obama was almost certain to be re-elected as the electoral college map and the changing demographics of this nation (demographics that have changed as a result of contraception and abortion, I should note yet again):
Ah, such must be the situation that obtains when most
of those in the halls of civil power are governed by the amorality of
Niccolo Machiavelli in a world where almost no one, especially those in
civil power, has any understanding, no less allegiance to, the Social
Reign of Christ the King as It must be exercised by the Catholic Church.
And our currently pouting caesar, who will go through the motions of
"seeking" bipartisanship on certain issues, believes that that he still
retains his mandate, at least from half of the voters, to defend his
programs, including Obama Care:
Q According to some exit polls, sir, about one
out of two voters apparently said that they would like to either see it
overturned or repealed. Are you concerned that that may embolden voters
who are from the other party perhaps?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, it also means one out of two voters think it was the right thing to do.
And obviously this is an issue that has been contentious. But as I
said, I think what's going to be useful is for us to go through the
issues that Republicans have issues on -- not sort of talking generally,
but let’s talk specifics. Does this particular provision -- when it
comes to preexisting conditions, is this something you’re for or you’re
against? Helping seniors get their prescription drugs -- does that make
sense or not?
And if we take that approach -- which is different
from campaigning -- I mean, this is now governing -- then I think that
we can continue to make some progress and find some common ground. (Caesar's Press Conference.)
Permit me to extrapolate what the pouting caesar meant to communicate with this answer:
All right. My advisers told me to beat up on myself
out here, to admit that I've taken a shellacking. It's one that I don't
deserve, however. The Republicans were able to close the deal in
various House and state legislative races. They couldn't close the deal
on some Senate races that were close. This means that I still have a
base of support among the people, especially on the coasts, to begin my
re-election campaign, and I am not going to anger my liberal base by
revisiting ObamaCare. My liberal base is already upset enough with me
for not giving them a full-throated, avowedly nationalized system of
health care by means of the "public option." I cannot and I will not
alienate my liberal base any more by caving to Republicans on an issue
that is settled.
Indeed, do you really know what I am going to do: I
am going to spend the next two years oozing niceness, inviting
Republicans to dinners and luncheons and retreats at Camp David, a place
I abhor as I am not a rustic kind of guy. I will give them all kinds of
photo ops. And then I will blame them for being absolutely
intransigent, for being ideologues who stand in the way of progress
whenever I propose compromises that I know for a fact are
dead-on-arrival.
I will accuse these right-wing fanatics, these
lunatics from the fringe, of slowing down progress every time they issue
a subpoena to harass and intimidate me. I will posture and preen before
the cameras as I am doing now. And I believe that I have enough core
support at this time to win the States of New York, New Jersey, New
Mexico, Nevada, Minnesota, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont,
Massachusetts, Maryland, Delaware, Illinois, California, Oregon,
Washington, Hawaii, and the District of Columbia, without
any questions at all. I start my re-election campaign now with a
guarantee of at least 197 electoral votes. I can probably get
Pennsylvania, but I have to turn out my base in Philadelphia to do that.
If so, then I will have 217 electoral votes in my pocket. I will only
need fifty-three more electoral votes to get re-elected. Colorado has
nine electoral votes. I think I will win there. Michigan and Wisconsin
are winnable in a presidential election. That's forty-three more votes.
I'm almost home. I don't need no stinkin' compromise with my enemies,
er, I mean my opponents, the Republicans.
Independent voters may have abandoned the
Democratic Party this year. They will come back to me, especially if
Republicans nominate another Bob Dole figure or if they wind up
nominating Sarah Palin, who I don't think could carry her home State of
Alaska at this point.
Any more questions?
The pouting caesar knows his
math. That's why he's going to play to his base for the next two years
as he demonizes Republicans. It's all a game, my good and few readers, and it's a game that excludes any possibility of a victory
for Christ the King and the cause of the pursuit of the common temporal
good in light of man's Last End, the possession of the glory of the
Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost
for all eternity.
Men, whether acting individually or collectively,
deceive themselves if they think that they can make the world a "better"
place absent a profound devotion to Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary. Our
Lady told us in the Cova da Iria near Fatima, Portugal, ninety-three
years ago that we must pray the Rosary to console the good God and to
make reparation for our sins as we pray for the conversion of poor
sinners and for the faithful fulfillment of her Fatima Message. This is a
work of the Mercy of the Divine Redeemer, Who is giving us every chance
to repent and convert. Why do men still persist in their obstinate
refusal to take Our Lady's Fatima Message seriously and to organize
Rosary processions and rallies to counter the naturalism of the day and
to serve as valiant champions of Christ the King?
We must not be distracted by the side shows of
naturalism or conciliarism. We must serve as champions of Christ the
King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, especially by
praying as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits.
The Republicans did wind up nominating another Bob Dole figure, thus continuing the trend in all but one of the last six presidential elections (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012) wherein in the presidential nominee of the organized crime family of the false opposite of the naturalist "right" received under fifty percent of the popular vote. The only exception to this occurred in 2004 as President George Walker Bush defeated the pro-abortion Catholic United States Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John F. Kerry, by a national popular vote percentage of 50.7% to 48.3%, a margin that is almost identical to the one by which Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro defeated Willard Mitt Romney three days ago (50.3% to 48.1%). And if there is one thing that one can count on in such circumstances, my friends, it is this: establishment Republicans learn all of the wrong lessons from such results as they use thoroughly predictable defeats by their anointed naturalist knights in focus-group polished armor to try get away from those "divisive" "social issues" once and for all.
Consider what the outgoing Republican National Committee Chairman, Richard Bond, said after the defeat on November Tuesday, November 3, 1992, of President George Herbert Walker Bush to William Jefferson Blythe Clinton in the three-way race with Henry Ross Perot of the then-named "United We Stand" Party:
Richard Bond did not go gently into retirement. His
swan song as chairman of the Republican National Committee criticized
his party's rightward drift in general and its opposition to abortion in particular.
His words, while true, would have carried a lot more credibility had he
not waited until he was going out the door to utter them.
Where was Mr. Bond at the Republican Convention
last August, when he might have used his influence to mute the
demagoguery that wrong-footed George Bush's campaign from the start? Mr.
Bond now says he tried to deny Patrick Buchanan his disastrous
half-hour of prime time. Yet Mr. Bond also spent his time in Houston
justifying the proceedings. "We are America," he told one reporter.
"These other people are not America."
Still, his eleventh-hour conversion is welcome. His
attack on "zealotry masquerading as principle" makes sound moral sense.
His observation that the party must recognize that "America is getting
more diverse, not more alike" makes sound political sense. So, too, does
his observation that the social issues cherished by the evangelical
right, chiefly abortion, are almost certain to confine the G.O.P. to a
shrinking tent.
Mr. Bond thus joins prominent Republican moderates
like Gov. William Weld of Massachusetts and Senator Nancy Kassebaum of
Kansas. Both oppose exclusionary politics. Both believe that President
Bush's intrusive efforts to regulate a woman's right to choose stood
historical Republican principles -- limited government and individual
responsibility -- on their heads.
The question is whether there are enough Kassebaums
and Welds (and, belatedly, Bonds) around to reverse the party's course.
The center-right split in the Republican Party is a durable fact of
politics; after the 1988 convention Lee Atwater saw that, absent Ronald
Reagan's special magic, future Republican leaders must broaden their
base in terms of race and gender.
Mr. Bush did not do so. One distressing result is
that the party machinery is now increasingly vulnerable to the religious
and cultural right. Pat Robertson, for one, trots out exit polls
showing that white evangelicals were Mr. Bush's most loyal constituency.
He does not advertise the polls showing ruinous defections among women,
younger voters and independents.
A chastened Rich Bond has absorbed that message -- a
message surely worth adopting by principled conservatives not now
retired from battle. And George Bush, now in retirement, might be
forgiven for asking where Mr. Bond's wisdom was when he needed it. (Rich Bond -- Right, but Late.)
Similar sentiments are being expressed now by the "establishment," although there are those who think that they can "save the party," an idea that is as preposterous and futile as the one that those in the conciliar structures have as they seek to "help" the "besieged Benedict" turn back the "evil men" who surround him and "fight in the trenches" to restore a faith that the false "pontiff" himself has rejected throughout the course of his entirely priestly-life (see Hunkered Down on Mindanao and Still Hunkered Down In Mindanao.
Thus it is that the greatest of all evils facing the world today is the prime exponent of all heresies rolled into one, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who sent a note of congratulations to Obama/Soetoro on the latter's re-election three days ago:
Pope Benedict XVI has sent his best wishes to Barack Obama on his
re-election as president of the United States, while also highlighting
the president's "serious responsibilities" and the nation's "ideals of
freedom and justice."
In a message, conveyed through the apostolic nunciature in Washington,
the Pope "expresses his best wishes to the president on his new mandate
and gives assurances of his prayers to God to help him carry out his
serious responsibilities, both in his own country and within the
international community," a Vatican statement reads.
"The Pope also speaks of his hope that the ideals of freedom and
justice, which guided the Founding Fathers of the United States of
America, may continue to shine out as the nation progresses," it
continues.
The same statement also contains comments on the election results made
by the Holy See Press Office's director, Jesuit Father Federico
Lombardi, in response to questions from reporters:
"As we all know, the U.S. president has an immense responsibility, not
only in his own country, but also towards the rest of the world, given
the role the U.S.A. plays at an international level," Father Lombardi
said.
"For this reason, we hope that President Obama, reconfirmed in his
duties today by the elections just completed, will respond to his fellow
citizens' expectations, serving law and justice for the good and
development of all people and respecting essential human and spiritual
values while promoting a culture of life and religious freedom — always
so precious in the tradition of the American people and its culture — so
that it can find the best ways to promote the material and spiritual
welfare of all; so that it can effectively promote integral human
development, justice and peace in the world." (Archenemy of Souls and Figure of Antichrist Ratzinger/Benedict Congratulates Kindred Spirit Obama, Stresses Freedom and Justice.)
Here is your greatest evil of all, ladies and gentlemen.
Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro is but a product of the very heresy, "religious liberty" or "religious freedom" that was exalted by the Americanist bishops of yore, starting with Bishop John Carroll himself (see Conversion in Reverse: How the Ethos of Americanism Converted Catholics and Contributed to the Rise of Conciliarism) and that has become an "official doctrine," a veritable "cornerstone of human rights" and "our first, most cherished freedom" by the conciliar "popes" and their "bishops." The practical atheism and attendant moral relativism of a statist such as Obama/Soetoro is the only logical end result of the belief in and embrace of "religious liberty."
It is thus laughable for Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI to expect that the very thing that gave us Obama/Soetoro and was denounced as a "monstrous right" by Pope Pius VI, a "heresy" by Pope Pius VII, "insanity" by Pope Gregory XVI, whose view was echoed by Pope Pius IX thirty-two years later, will be the means by which the false principles of the "Founding Fathers of he United States of America" will "continue to shine out as the nation progresses."
Progresses? Into what? More Sodom and more Gomorrha from coast-to-coast.
Pope Leo XIII explained what happens when the civil state is indifferent to the true Faith:
To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of religion
between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to each
other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all religion in
both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as atheism, however it may differ from it in name. Men who really believe in the existence of God must, in order to be consistent with themselves and to avoid absurd
conclusions, understand that differing modes of divine worship involving
dissimilarity and conflict even on most important points cannot all be
equally probable, equally good, and equally acceptable to God. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885. See also Practical Atheism as the Lowest Common Denominator and Not A Mention of Christ the King.)
How can a man who pursues things inimical to the peace and happiness of eternity be an instrument of the pursuit of the common temporal good according to falsehoods that made his very rise and retention in power possible in the first place?
Ah, what can you expect from a man who continues to place into question or simply deny almost every point of Catholic doctrine imaginable while claiming be a true, valid and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter?
Thus it is that the greatest evil facing us today resides in the Apostolic Palace in Rome, who did not even mention Purgatory while staging the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service on Saturday, November 3, 2012, for the souls of the deceased conciliar "cardinals" and "bishops" (Sacramentally Barren Liturgical Service Staged for Apostates who died over the course of the year) and said the following at the grotto of the popes in the crypt of the Basilica of Saint Peter on Friday, November 2, 2012, the Commemoration of All Souls:
Vatican City, Nov 2, 2012 / 03:27 pm (CNA/EWTN News).-
As Catholics around the world on Nov. 2 remember those who have passed
away, Pope Benedict XVI visited the Vatican Grottoes to pray for his
predecessors on the feast of All Souls.
In remarks made in St. Peter's square Nov. 1 anticipating All Souls
day, Pope Benedict said the feast “helps us to reflect on the double
horizon of humanity, which we symbolically express with the words
'earth' and 'heaven.'”
He noted on Thursday that All Souls should remind Catholics of the
reality of the communion of saints – a reality uniting all believers,
living and dead.
“The earth represents the journey of history, heaven eternal, the
fullness of life in God,” he said. “These two dimensions are united by
the reality of the 'communion of saints': a reality that begins here on
earth and that reaches its fulfillment in heaven.” (Pantheist Makes Remarks.)
Remember, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI does not believe in Purgatory. How do I know this? He has told us so. His view on many points of defined Catholic doctrine is that of the heretical and schismatic Orthodox, not the truth as stated by the council fathers of our Holy Mother Church's true general councils as they were held under the infallible guidance of the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost. (see From Sharp Focus to Fuzziness, Orthodox Heterodoxy and Anti-Apostles All.)
Ratzinger/Benedict's appointees continue to express all manner of felicitations to leaders of false religions when said instruments of the devil are observing their "sacred" festivals. Jean-Louis "Cardinal" Tauran, the president of the "Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, has done so a few days ago when sending a "Happy Deepavali" message to the devil worshipers of Hinduism (see Message to
Hindus on the occasion of the Feast of Deepavali and my own evisceration of such messages in Baal, Yes, Most Holy Trinity, No, Have a Happy and, among so many others, Happy
Vesakh, No, I Mean, Happy Diwali, Wait, Wait, Wait, Is It Ramadan Time
Now?--Oops, Let's Try Again, Ah, Yes, Happy High Holy Days, Right?).
How can the wrath of God being visited at the present time on the East Coast of the United States of America and elsewhere in the world at this time not occur when a man who presents himself as the Successor of Saint Peter--and is accepted by such except a handful of mostly warring people, many of whom are concerned principally about "turf" and "reputation" believes and does the things that he does and as this false claimant to the papal throne offers his "congratulations" to a Kindred Spirit of the New World Order upon whom he once imparted a "blessing on you and all your work, and on you also" while refusing to seek the man's conversion to the true Faith, thus making more possible the spread of grievous sin under cover of the civil law?
How can a supposed "pope" who shares with the reigning American Caesar a desire to see the malodorous United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child ratified by those nations that have not done so as of this time and who rejects the Social Reign of Christ the King while supporting the same kind of supranational economic and political organizations that must perforce reduce the legitimate national sovereignty of nations (see Kindred Spirit of the New World Order, Give Me Two Bayers, Please and Two More Bayers, Please) not serve as instrument of disorder and confusion in the world by reaffirming men in fundamental errors that opposed to the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and/or the Natural Law?
How can a putative "Sovereign Pontiff" who speaks to adherents of false religions in exactly the same manner as the reigning American Caesar be anything other than an enemy of souls and thus of all social order and the very fabric of the international peace he says he wants to establish (see Kindred Spirits of the New World Order; yes, this is a different article than the one liked twice above)?
Indeed, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI is the greatest evil of all facing us in the world today as he lacks the basic charity for the souls of such forgettable men as Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro and Willard Mitt Romney to seek with urgency their unconditional conversion to the United States of America.
Far, far from the mind and heart of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI and his fellow lords of Modernism--and thus far, far from the minds of the lords of Modernity--is the following simple and very concise expression of Catholic truth found in Pope Saint Pius X's Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910:
This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.
No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)
We should not fear the likes of Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, who are but means used by God to chastise us all. God is more powerful than Obama/Soetoro, is He not? Do we not deserve the chastisement?
We should not even fear the likes of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI., although we must certainly flee from any association with him, as the Immaculate Heart of Mary will triumph in the end.
May we believe in exhortation given us by Pope Saint Pius X to restore the Catholic City with all of our hearts as we give unto the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary all of our efforts to plant a few seeds when all men everywhere will exclaim as the fruit of the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary when the only peace plan that matters, Heaven's Peace Plan, Our Lady's Fatima Peace Plan, is fulfilled.
We need to pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit and make much reparation for our sins and those of the whole world as clients of those twin Hearts of matchless love that suffered as one during our Redemption and beat now as they have always beat, as one Heart that wills our salvation and the right ordering of men in states that are subordinate at all times to the Social reign of Christ the King.
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!
Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and at the hour of our death.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us, especially on your feast day today!
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
Saint Theodore, pray for us.
See also: A Litany of Saints
.
