Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us
          August 3, 2012


Hating Christ the King Is The Greatest Hate Crime Of All

by Thomas A. Droleskey


At the root of all true hatred of human beings in the world is the devil's hatred of the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity. The adversary inspired Eve and, through her wiles, Adam, into disobeying God as they ate of the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden.

Original Sin disordered man's relationship with God. It disordered man's relationship with his fellow man. It even disrupted the balance and harmony of nature itself.

Each of the problems that we face in the world has Original Sin as its remote cause and the Actual Sins of men as its proximate cause. That is why, my good and few readers, who keep dwindling away, it appears, there is no electoral, political, economic, legal, constitutional, secular, naturalistic, ideological or philosophical way to ameliorate the effects of fallen human nature. The state of the world depends upon the state of souls. Despite the fact that there will be disorder and disharmony in the world until the Second Coming of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ at the end of time, the extent to which there is more order in the world at any given time is the result of the extent to which the very inner life of the Most Blessed Trinity, Sanctifying or Habitual Grace, dwells in the souls of men as they seek to make reparation for their sins and grow in virtue as members of the Catholic Church.

Once again, let me turn to Pope Saint Pius X and Pope Pius XI to drive home this fundamental point that so many Catholics all across and up and down the vast expanse of the ecclesiastical divide seem eager to ignore during the diabolical assaults that afflict their immortal souls every time the false opposites of naturalism engage in their mock contests that are called elections:


Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

20. Every true and lasting reform has ultimately sprung from the sanctity of men who were driven by the love of God and of men. Generous, ready to stand to attention to any call from God, yet confident in themselves because confident in their vocation, they grew to the size of beacons and reformers. On the other hand, any reformatory zeal, which instead of springing from personal purity, flashes out of passion, has produced unrest instead of light, destruction instead of construction, and more than once set up evils worse than those it was out to remedy. No doubt "the Spirit breatheth where he will" (John iii. 8): "of stones He is able to raise men to prepare the way to his designs" (Matt. iii. 9). He chooses the instruments of His will according to His own plans, not those of men. But the Founder of the Church, who breathed her into existence at Pentecost, cannot disown the foundations as He laid them. Whoever is moved by the spirit of God, spontaneously adopts both outwardly and inwardly, the true attitude toward the Church, this sacred fruit from the tree of the cross, this gift from the Spirit of God, bestowed on Pentecost day to an erratic world. (Pope Pius XI, Mit  Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937.)

Yes, we must reform our own lives with every beat of our hearts, consecrated as they must be to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. In order to do this, of course, we love God as He has revealed Himself to us exclusively through His Catholic Church with our whole mind, our whole soul, our whole body, our whole heart and our whole strength. We must love others for love of Him, Who wills the good of all men, which is the salvation of their immortal souls as members of the Catholic Church.

To love God, therefore, we must hate what he hates.

God hates sin. So must we.

God hates heresy. So must we.

God hates falsehood any kind. So must we.

God hates false religions and has nothing to do with them. So must we.

To hate sin is not to hate the sinner.

To hate heresy is not to hate the heretic.

To hate falsehood is not to hate those who propagate it.

To hate false religions is not to hate those to adhere to them.

Catholics know all of this. Granted. Unfortunately, we live in a topsy-turvy world that is suffering the effects of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King wrought by the Protestant Revolution and the subsequent rise and triumph of Judeo-Masonry and its multiplicity of  "ideas" that have enshrined naturalism as the foundation of personal and social life. Men fall prey to sentimentality and emotionalism, illogic and passion. They are prone to believe everything except the true religion, prone to make excuses for their own sins and to seek to enable family members and friends who are living lives of unrepentant sin.

As the devil hates God but knows that he cannot destroy Him, he wants to do the next best thing: to convince men to hate God and His Holy Church and the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law so that they will wind up hating themselves and their fellow men, becoming instruments of disorder and violence in the world.

Thus it is that what should be valued more than anything else, pleasing God, has been supplanted by the desire to please self and to hate anyone who dares to suggest that a person must adhere to the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law as they have been entrusted by Christ the King to His true Church for their eternal safekeeping an infallible explication.

Those who are steeped in their own sins and/or seek to excuse their family members and friends who are so steeped have no comprehension of what sin caused Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to suffer in His Sacred Humanity during His Passion and Death and caused His Most Blessed Mother's Immaculate Heart to be pierced through and through with those Seven Swords of Sorrow.

Reaffirmed and enabled by their fellow sinners, each of whom is but a contingent being who will face Christ the King at the moment of the Particular Judgment, some of the more virulent among their ranks will seek to strike out with all of the fury of Hell itself against anyone who serves as a rebuke to their consciences.

The real "haters" in the world are those sinners who, although they do not realize it at all, hate themselves and, having unsettled their own natures by means of their rebellion against God and His Holy Laws, thus are perpetually angry at anyone and everyone who they see as a reminder of the simple fact that they must reform their lives lest their perish in the flames of Hell for all eternity.

Despite all of the rash judgment attempting to blame "right wing fanatics" for shooting attacks or planned bombings that wind up having been committed by "lone wolf" nuts, victims of the Modernity themselves (see All Continues To Fall Apart Absent Christ The King), the real hatred in the world is that of Christ the King and His Social Kingship over men and their nations. Those who stand for Him and hate the promotion that which caused Him to suffer once in time and wounds His Church Militant here on earth today, must be castigated by one empty naturalistic, sentimentally-laden and emotionally-charged slogan after another in order to ostracize and condemn those who dare to speak out against sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

This hatred of Christ the King is nothing new. It goes back to the very beginning of the United States of America, something that I have tried to point out numerous times over the years:

The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.

Unembarrassed by attachments to noble families, hereditary lines and successions, or any considerations of royal blood, even the pious mystery of holy oil had no more influence than that other of holy water: the people universally were too enlightened to be imposed on by artifice; and their leaders, or more properly followers, were men of too much honour to attempt it. Thirteen governments thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favour of the rights of mankind. ( President John Adams: "A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America," 1787-1788)

"And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away {with} all this artificial scaffolding…" (11 April, 1823, John Adams letter to Thomas Jefferson, Adams-Jefferson Letters, ed. Lester J. Cappon, II, 594).

Can a free government possibly exist with the Roman Catholic religion? (John Adams, Letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 19, 1821)

I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced! (John Adams, Letter to Thomas Jefferson, quoted in 200 Years of Disbelief, by James Hauck)

"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise, every expanded prospect."—James Madison, letter to William Bradford, Jr„ April I, 1774

". . . Freedom arises from the multiplicity of sects, which pervades America and which is the best and only security for religious liberty in any society. For where there is such a variety of sects, there cannot be a majority of any one sect to oppress and persecute the rest."—James Madison, spoken at the Virginia convention on ratification of the Constitution, June 1778

"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution."—-James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance," addressed to the Virginia General Assembly, 1785

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes. (Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Alexander von Humboldt, December, 1813.)

May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government. That form which we have substituted, restores the free right to the unbounded exercise of reason and freedom of opinion. All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God. These are grounds of hope for others. For ourselves, let the annual return of this day forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them. (Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Roger Weigthman, June 24, 1826, ten days before Jefferson's death.)


Why is it any surprise today that organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai Brith and the Southern Poverty Law Center categorize as "haters" those Catholics who seek with urgency the unconditional conversion of non-Catholics to the true Faith and who call sin by its proper name, thus figuratively tarring and feathering them in the eyes of the world? It is not surprise whatsoever. It is what must happen in a land founded on the false belief that men of different religious beliefs or of no such beliefs whatsoever could work together for the common good and pursue "civic virtue" without belief in, access to and cooperation with Sanctifying Grace.

The Anti-Defamation League, for example, has been in the vanguard of filing amicus curiae briefs in favor of "marriage" between persons of the same gender and has militated in behalf of "gay rights" consistently (see Reform, ADL, NCJW, Rabbis for Human Rights praise DOMA loss in First US Circuit of Appeals, ADL Supports Chicago's Gay Pride Parade and and ADL Applauds President Obama's Affirmation That Same-Sex) even though the leaders of this Christophobic, Talmudic organization have to ignore the following words of the Old Testament to do so:


[21] Thou shalt not give any of thy seed to be consecrated to the idol Moloch, nor defile the name of thy God: I am the Lord. [22] Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination. [23] Thou shalt no copulate with any beast, neither shalt thou be defiled with it. A woman shall not lie down to a beast, nor copulate with it: because it is a heinous crime. [24] Defile not yourselves with any of these things with which all the nations have been defiled, which I will cast out before you, [25] And with which the land is defiled: the abominations of which I will visit, that it may vomit out its inhabitants.

[26] Keep ye my ordinances and my judgments, and do not any of these abominations: neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you. [27] For all these detestable things the inhabitants of the land have done, that; were before you, and have defiled it. [28] Beware then, lest in like manner, it vomit you also out, if you do the like things, as it vomited out the nation that was before you. [29] Every soul that shall commit any of these abominations, shall perish from the midst of his people. [30] Keep my commandments. Do not the things which they have done, that have been before you, and be not defiled therein. I am the Lord your God.  (Leviticus 18: 21-30.)

[11] If a man lie with his stepmother, and discover the nakedness of his father, let them both be put to death: their blood be upon them. [12] If any man lie with his daughter in law, let both die, because they have done a heinous crime: their blood be upon them. [13] If any one lie with a man as with a woman, both have committed an abomination, let them be put to death: their blood be upon them. (Leviticus 20: 11-13.)

From from being faithful to these words of Sacred Scripture, the leaders of the Anti-Defamation League attacks those who cite them as being "haters" even though such people are merely quoting the words that were inspired by God the Holy Ghost directly.

The same is true of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which was co-founded in 1971 by a Unitarian, which is a fancy word for atheist, by the name of Morris Dees, and a man by the name of Joseph R. Levin, Jr. Those who seek to defend the immutable laws of God must be denounced as haters even though they are being faithful to the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law. This is what must happen in a world where Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ does not reign as king over men and their nations. Those who defend the truth must be dealt with as harshly as Truth Himself, Who told us exactly what to expect from the world and its minions:

[16] You have not chosen me: but I have chosen you; and have appointed you, that you should go, and should bring forth fruit; and your fruit should remain: that whatsoever you shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you. [17] These things I command you, that you love one another. [18] If the world hate you, know ye, that it hath hated me before you.[19] If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. [20] Remember my word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than his master. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you: if they have kept my word, they will keep yours also.

[21] But all these things they will do to you for my name's sake: because they know not him who sent me. [22] If I had not come, and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. [23] He that hateth me, hateth my Father also. [24] If I had not done among them the works that no other man hath done, they would not have sin; but now they have both seen and hated both me and my Father. [25] But that the word may be fulfilled which is written in their law: They hated me without cause. (John 15: 16-25.)


In like manner, of course, we are hated by the true hate-mongers in the world, those who hate Christ the King and His Social Kingship over men and their nations, without cause. Deo gratias.

This hatred of the Social Reign of Christ the King, however, and hatred of those of us who defend it, is not confined to Talmudists and Unitarians and propagandists in favor of perversity and baby-killing. The rejected and utter hatred of the Social Reign of Christ the King is a basic building block of the conciliar world view, something that the then Joseph "Cardinal" Ratzinger made clear to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre  in the Palazzo Ufficio on July 14, 1987:


Under pressure, Rome gave in. On July 14, Cardinal Ratzinger received Archbishop Lefebvre at the Holy Office. At first the Cardinal persisted in arguing that "the State is competent in religious matters."

"But the State must have an ultimate and eternal end," replied the Archbishop.

"Your Grace, that is the case for the Church, not the State. By itself the State does not know."

Archbishop Lefebvre was distraught: a Cardinal and Prefect of the Holy Office wanted to show him that the State can have no religion and cannot prevent the spread of error. However, before talking about concessions, the Cardinal made a threat: the consequence of an illicit episcopal consecration would be "schism and excommunication."

"Schism?" retorted the Archbishop. "If there is a schism, it is because of what the Vatican did at Assisi and how you replied to our Dubiae: the Church is breaking with the traditional Magisterium. But the Church against her past and her Tradition is not the Catholic Church; this is why being excommunicated by a liberal, ecumenical, and revolutionary Church is a matter of indifference to us."

As this tirade ended, Joseph Ratzinger gave in: "Let us find a practical solution. Make a moderate declaration on the Council and the new missal a bit like the one that Jean Guitton has suggested to you. Then, we would give you a bishop for ordinations, we could work out an arrangement with the diocesan bishops, and you could continue as you are doing. As for a Cardinal Protector, and make your suggestions."

How did Marcel Lefebvre not jump for joy? Rome was giving in! But his penetrating faith went to the very heart of the Cardinal's rejection of doctrine. He said to himself: "So, must Jesus no longer reign? Is Jesus no longer God? Rome has lost the Faith. Rome is in apostasy. We can no longer trust this lot!" To the Cardinal, he said:

"Eminence, even if you give us everything--a bishop, some autonomy from the bishops, the 1962 liturgy, allow us to continue our seminaries--we cannot work together because we are going in different directions. You are working to dechristianize society and the Church, and we are working to Christianize them.

"For us, our Lord Jesus Christ is everything. He is our life. The Church is our Lord Jesus Christ; the priest is another Christ; the Mass is the triumph of Jesus Christ on the cross; in our seminaries everything tends towards the reign of our Lord Jesus Christ. But you! You are doing the opposite: you have just wanted to prove to me that our Lord Jesus Christ cannot, and must not, reign over society.

Recounting this incident, the Archbishop described the Cardinal's attitude" "Motionless, he looked at me, his eyes expressionless, as if I had just suggested something incomprehensible or unheard of." Then Ratzinger tried to argue that "the Church can still say whatever she wants to the State," while Lefebvre, the intuitive master of Catholic metaphysics, did not lose sight of the true end of human societies: the Reign of Christ." Fr. de Tinguy hit the nail on the head when he said of Marcel Lefebvre: "His faith defies those who love theological quibbles." (His Excellency Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, The Biography of Marcel Lefebvre, Kansas City, Missouri: Angelus Press, 2004, pp. 547-548.)

This is important to emphasize as there is a common bond between the likes of the Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center with the conciliar revolutionaries to demonize "radical traditionalists" as "dangerous" people who must be denounced with exceptional furor. All manner of conciliar officials have done this. Anyone who cleaves to the immutable teaching of the Catholic Church, especially on the doctrine of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the fact that Talmudic Judaism is a false religion that has the power to sanctify and save no one, must be denounced openly.

Moreover, there is also a common bond between many, although not all, conciliar officials and the likes of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center on the issue of what is called "gay rights." As Mrs. Randy Engel documented so thoroughly in The Rite of Sodomy, the nooks and crannies of the counterfeit church church of conciliarism are filled to the rafters with active practitioners of perverse sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, men who have indemnified and enabled each other to the point of shielding their fellows from criminal prosecution for their crimes against unsuspecting souls.

Formerly Catholic parishes, schools, religious "miseducation" program," colleges, universities, professional schools, hospitals and conferences have been inundated with homosexualist propaganda as the very language used in parish bulletins and from the pulpit and in classrooms and diocesan publications reek of "gayspeak" in order to break down what might remain of the sensus Catholicus after fifty years of assaults waged by means of the liturgical and doctrinal revolutions. The architecture, interior design, art and music of many wreckovated or newly built church buildings in the conciliar church  Never before has it been heard that a true and legitimate Successor of the Apostles has ever referred to human beings on the basis of a nonexistent "self-identification" that is based upon a proclivity toward and/or an immersion in perverse sins against nature. Never has been the case. Ever. At any time. (Could you imagine kleptomaniacs banding together to refer themselves as "Sticky," demanding acceptance as "Stickies" because of their sticky fingers?)

A number of so-called "bishops" themselves are practitioners of perversity. Although one "bishop," the predator named Daniel Leo Ryan, has been "suspended" from exercising what is called a public ministry, each has remained in "good standing" in the conciliar structures. Some, such as Rembert George Weakland, who worked directly under Monsignor Annibale Bugnini as the revolutionary work of the Consilium that planned the liturgical abomination known as the "Novus Ordo" and who then served as the conciliar "archbishop" of Milwaukee between 1977 and 2002, have even been applauded by the "faithful" years after their exposure as moral perverts in the clothing of Catholic bishops (see Weak In Mind, Weak In Faith and Just A Matter of Forgiveness?). 

There has been quite a profound bond, you see, between many in the conciliar structures and the professional smear-mongers in the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center over the false claim that those who state the immutable teaching of the Catholic Church about Judaism are "anti-Semites" and that those who denounce perverse sins against nature that cry out to Heaven for vengeance "hate" those are commit such sins.

Perhaps that bond is best illustrated by the corrupt life and revolutionary nature of Joseph "Cardinal" Bernardin, who, having been consecrated on April 26, 1966, was a true bishop, using that position to destroy the Catholic Faith in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, Ohio, from December 19, 1972, to July 9, 1982, and thereafter in the Archdiocese of Chicago until his death on November 14, 1996. Bernardin had been an auxiliary bishop in the Archdiocese of Atlanta from 1966 to 1968 until he became the first general secretary of the named National Conference of Catholic Bishops, which was the renamed version of the National Catholic Welfare Conference. Bernardin helped to populate the conciliar hierarchy in the United States of America with his "boys" as he filled the offices of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference (now called, quite laughably, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) with lay employees who were enthralled by his revolutionary ways and his charismatic demeanor.

Bernardin, as Randy Engel pointed out in The Rite of Sodomy, was one of the "boys" and expressed his sympathies in this regard on a number of occasions as he protected clerical abuses and created an entire ecclesiastical environment in Cincinnati and Chicago that catered to the needs of those steeped unrepentantly in sins of moral perversity. He had arranged with the "Windy City Gay Men's Chorus" to sing at his wake. They did so from the sanctuary of Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago, Illinois:

In Paul Likoudis’s book Amchurch Comes Out: The U.S. Bishops, Pedophile Scandals and the Homosexual Agenda, Likoudis fingers Cardinal Bernardin as the “bishop-maker who…gave the American hierarchy its pronounced pro-gay orientation.…Bernardin acquired power rapidly. As his friends back in Charleston continued buggering little boys, Bernardin used his influence, starting in 1968, as General Secretary of the U.S. Catholic Conference, to select bishops (many of whom are still ordinaries) who would, to put it charitably, condone and promote homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle and tolerate the sexual abuse of children by priests.”

A telling aside: James Hitchcock reported that “the Windy City Gay Men’s Chorus was asked [by Bernardin, who knew he was dying] to sing at his wake in the Cathedral. The chorus’s director said that they regarded the invitation as a sign of approval by the Church…” (The Catholic World Report, Feb, 1997). Approval indeed! At least by Bernardin. The Gay Chorus performed six songs – in the sanctuary tot he right of the altar. (Bernardin and his "orientation". See also my review of The Rite of Sodomy, Understanding A Cesspool of Corruption and a review that I have read of a new book, written by sedeplenists who support "religious liberty," about Bernardin: Conciliar Church Paid for Obama to Take Alinsky Training).


Joseph "Cardinal" Bernardin was also on the cutting edge of those who believed that the source of "anti-Semitism" was none other than Saint John the Evangelist, the only Apostle to stand at the foot of the Holy Cross as the care of Our Lady was given unto him by the Divine Redeemer Who also gave Saint John--and hence each one of us--to be Our Lady's own adopted sons and daughters. Yes, Saint John the Evangelist, Who wrote his Gospel and his three epistles under the direct inspiration of the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost.

Here is the evidence once again in the event that you do not believe me or have forgotten having read what follows:

In the interim, as we await a scholarly resolution of the question of antisemitism in the New Testament, I would strongly urge that the Church adopt a pastoral approach. Father Raymond Brown, a renowned Catholic scholar on the Gospel of St. John, has suggested that the basis of a pastoral approach, at least with with respect to the Fourth Gospel, which is generally considered among the most problematic of all New Testament books in its outlook towards Jews and Judaism. In commenting on John's use of the term, "the Jews," Brown expresses his conviction that, by deliberately using this generic term (where other gospel writers refer to the Jewish authorities or the various Sacred Temple Jewish parties), John meant to extend to the synagogue of his own day blame that an earlier tradition had attributed to the Jewish authorities. Although John was not the first to engage in such extension, he is the most insistent New Testament author in this regard. Brown attributes this process in John to the persecution that Christians were experiencing during that time at the hands of the synagogue authorities. Jews who professed Jesus to be the Messiah had been officially expelled from Judaism, thus making them vulnerable to Roman investigation and punishment. Jews were tolerated by Rome, but who were these Christians whom the Jews disclaimed?

Father Brown maintains that this This is a key pastoral point. Christians today must come to see that such teaching, which an acknowledged part of their biblical heritage, can no longer be regarded as definitive teaching in light of our improved understanding of developments in the relationship between early Christianity and the Jewish community of the time. As Brown says in his book, The Community of the Beloved Disciple, "It would be incredible for a twentieth-century Christian to share or justify the Johannine contention that 'the Jews' are the children of the Devil, an affirmation which is placed on the lips of Jesus (John 8: 44)."

Negative passages such as these must be re-evaluated in light of the Second Vatican Council's strong affirmation in its Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Relations (Nostra Aetate) that Jews remain a covenanted people, revered by God. The teaching of recent Popes has also emphasized this. Pope John Paul II, in particular, has often highlighted the intimate bond that exists between Jews and Christians who are united in one ongoing covenant. ("Antisemitism: The Historical Legacy and the Continuing Challenge for Christians".)


How is this not blasphemy against God the Holy Ghost and Saint John the Evangelist? As you can see, however, Joseph Bernardin's bias against words inspired by the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity and written by the beloved disciple who stood faithfully at the foot of the Cross as the Divine Redeemer shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood to redeem us and as His Most Blessed Mother suffered the Fifth Sword of Sorrow being plunged into her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart is a distinguishing characteristic of the counterfeit church of conciliarism's relationship with the adherents of the Talmud. Great pains must be undertaken to avoid even the appearance of offending Talmudic Jews while tremendous offenses to God are planned for months, if not years, in advance. Meaning no disrespect to anyone who does not accept the fact that heretics cannot hold ecclesiastical office legitimately, such an inversion and perversion of truth should be a cause to consider the simple fact that the Catholic Church has never given the appearance of such infidelity and that she is incapable of giving such an an appearance of infidelity.

To write in such a manner, of course, is to make oneself a target of groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League, who are enabled at almost every turn by their friends in the counterfeit church of conciliarism. Many Catholics in the conciliar structures accept the "new teaching" about the Jews uncritically as this is what they have been taught in their "Catholic" schools and colleges and universities. And there are many Catholics in the conciliar structures who accept perversely sinful relationships as expressions of "love" that must be "tolerated" and "accepted" in the name of "diversity" and "inclusiveness."

To reject the Social Reign of Christ the King and to propagate falsehoods about any false religion, including Talmudic Judaism, while the horror of personal sin is either denigrated or denied altogether is to fuel the madness of a world that has been robbed of the degree of Sanctifying and Actual Graces that would be present within it had it not been for the conciliar church's liturgical revolution. It is thus a "crime" to seek the conversion of those who adhere to the Talmud or to denounce sins that are a violation of the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law.

Make no mistake about it. A hatred of Christ the King drives the mad, mad, mad, mad world in which we live.

This hatred drives the forces of Modernity.

This hatred drives the forces of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism to such an extent that many Catholics who in the conciliar structures who still have a residue of the sensus Catholicus in their souls look to Protestant-based organizations such as the Family Research Council, where a hate-filled homosexualist activist shot a security guard on Wednesday, August 15, 2012, the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and, from reports I have read, appeared ready to shot and kill anyone he could find at the council's office while dropping Chick Fil-A bags near their bodies, and the Traditional Values Coalition (see Protestant group: DC gunman may have targeted us too) for the sort of "leadership" on various moral issues that should be provided by the Catholic Church.

This is truly demonic as the devil raised up Martin Luther to start the Protestant Revolution as the means to overthrow the Social Reign of Christ the King and usher in the "reign of man" according to ways of various naturalistic ideologies and "philosophies" while using the rotten fruit of the Protesant Revolution and its aftermath to create the insidious plague of Modernism that spawned the counterfeit church of conciliarism. The latter, so steeped in the errors of Modernity (separation of Church and State, religious liberty, a practical spirit of religious indifferentism), which is viewed by most people as the Catholic Church, has yielded the moral high ground to theological descendants of Martin Luther and John Calvin in large measure because of its embrace of the spirit of the world and its protection of know clerical abusers while fostering a "gay friendly" culture within its midst.

In case you have not heard this before, let me reiterate what is on the home page of this site and was on the front page of almost every issue of the printed journal Christ or Chaos between August of 1996 and June of 1993:

"America, it is said, is suffering from intolerance. It is not. It is suffering from tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ and chaos. Our country is not nearly so much overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded....

"...In the face of this broadmindedness, what the world needs is intolerance." (Fulton Sheen's "A Plea for Intolerance," 1931. This appeared in a column written by Patrick J. Buchanan in the 1990s and was noticed by the man, who was once a very good friend and whose family remains in my prayers daily despite being divided along the vast expanse of the ecclesiastical divide, who served as the hard-working managing editor of my printed journal. It was he, in fact, who came up with the very name of the journal that is used for this website.)


Although leaders some of the Protestant organizations that have been deemed as purveyors of "hatred" because they oppose the perversely sick concept of "marriage" between persons of the same gender and which have discussed the fact that unnatural inclinations can be remedied by means of various therapies are contemplating a lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center to demand the removal of their organizations' names from the later's list of "hate groups," what they, the Protestant leaders, fail to understand is that spread of the evils that they seek quite rightly to oppose is the result of the Protestant Revolution's overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King that made possible the lies of Modernity in the world. Their very organizations exist because of the evils made possible, proximately speaking, by the Protestant Revolution and the rise of Judeo-Masonry, by their common founder's rebellion against God's Divine Plan to effect man's return to Him through the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order.

Hatred of Christ the King and of Mary our Immaculate Queen is what drives this truly mad, mad, mad, mad world of ours, leading it to the lower reaches of the abyss.

That some evangelical and/or fundamentalist Protestants demonstrate more of a commitment to an attenuated understanding of the Gospel of the Divine Redeemer than do those who believe themselves to be Successors of the Apostles is certainly one of the greatest triumphs of the devil in this era of apostasy and betrayal.

The triumphs of the devil in this era of apostasy and betrayal are only temporary, however. In the end, of course, Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will triumph.


We must redouble our own efforts in prayer and sacrifice and penance and fasting and mortification to plant the seeds as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for the restoration of Christendom, praying as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit in reparation for our many sins, each of which has wounded Our Lord once in time and wounds His Church Militant on earth today, and those of the whole world:

Francisco Marto spent long hours in church to console the "good God." So must we:

With his sister Jacinta and his cousin Lucia, he had been blessed with three appearances by an Angel, and six by Our Lady.

At his third appearance, the Angel said to these three young shepherd children: "Console your God". These words impressed Francisco very deeply, and guided his whole life. He wanted to be the "Consoler of Jesus". He felt most hurt when he saw Jesus offended, and his ideal was to give Him consolation. He wanted to avoid sin, and others to avoid it, to save his Saviour sadness. He made very sacrifice he could to give consolation to Jesus. To do this he would stay along for long hours in church, or hide himself in some lonely place. Shortly before he died, he said "In haven I'm going to console Our Lord and Our Lady very much." (Holy Card of Francisco Marto.)


Anyone who thinks that he is "consoling" Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ while he remains "neutral" about or supportive of any of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance is deceiving himself quite possibly to the point of his own eternal perdition, Such a person is in need of our prayers, to be sure. However, such a person is a proximate source of social chaos, not an instrument of justice founded in the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law. Sloganeering and sentimentality do not secure one's salvation. Indeed, they are instruments of the devil to lead sloganeers and sentimentalists into Hell as they take many others with them.

Conscious of making reparation for our own sins, which, although forgiven and thus no longer exist, are in need of our making satisfaction here in this passing, mortal vale of tears before we die, may our Rosaries each day help lift the scales from the likes of the confused Catholics and non-Catholics in public life, thereby hastening their return or conversion to the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true or lasting social order.

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.


Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Stephen the Protomartyr, pray for us.

See also: A Litany of Saints


An Encore: To Combat the Charge of "Hatred" Against Those Who Oppose Unnatural Vice

In order to once again help readers to combat the sloganeering and sentimentality that are used to promote the agenda of perversity, perhaps even by some of our own family members and friends and associates, permit me to summarize some salient points that are simply simple statements of Catholic truth that are not open to debate and from which no one can dissent unless a person can prove that he is not a contingent being (that is a person who has created himself) and that is body is not destined one day for the corruption of the grave until the General Resurrection on the Last Day:

1) God's love for us is an act of His divine will, the ultimate expression of which is the salvation of our immortal souls.

2) Our love for others must be premised on willing for them what God wills for us: their salvation as members of the Catholic Church.

3) We love no one authentically if we do or say anything, either by omission or commission, which reaffirms him in a life of unrepentant sin.

4) Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ hates sin. He wills the sinner to repent of his sins by cooperating with the graces He won for them on the wood of the Holy Cross and that flow into his heart and soul through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces.

5) One of the Spiritual Works of Mercy is to admonish the sinner. We have an obligation to admonish those who are in lives on unrepentant sin to turn away from their lives of sin and to strive to pursue the heights of sanctity.

6) God has compassion on all erring sinners, meaning each one of us. He understands our weakness. He exhorts us, as He exhorted the woman caught in adultery, to "Go, and commit this sin no more."

7) It is not an act of "love" for people to persist in unrepentant sins with others.

8) It is not an act of "judgmentalness" or "intolerance" to exhort people who are living lives of unrepentant sin to reform their lives lest their souls wind up in Hell for eternity.

9) Mortal Sins cast out Sanctifying Grace from the soul. Those steeped in unrepentant mortal sin are the captives of the devil until they make a good and sincere Confession to a true priest.

9) Certain sins cry out to Heaven for vengeance. Sodomy is one of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

10) Those engaged in natural or unnatural acts against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments do not "love" the individuals with whom they are sinning. Authentic love cannot exist in a soul committed to a life against the Commandments of God and the eternal welfare of one's own soul, no less the souls of others.

11) Those engaged in natural  or unnatural acts against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments are not fit to adopt children.

12) Those engaged in natural or unnatural acts against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments are not fit to adopt children because their very sinful lives put into jeopardy the eternal of the souls of the children they seek to adopt. It is not possible for people who are sinning unrepentantly to teach children to hate sin as God hates sin. They are immersed in sin. Pope Pius XI put it this way in Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930:





But Christian parents must also understand that they are destined not only to propagate and preserve the human race on earth, indeed not only to educate any kind of worshippers of the true God, but children who are to become members of the Church of Christ, to raise up fellow-citizens of the Saints, and members of God's household, that the worshippers of God and Our Savior may daily increase.

13) Those engaged in unnatural, perverse acts against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments are further unfit to adopt children because they have no right in the Divine Positive Law or the natural law to live together as a "couple."  Once again, Pope Pius XI's Casti Connubii:





Nor must We omit to remark, in fine, that since the duty entrusted to parents for the good of their children is of such high dignity and of such great importance, every use of the faculty given by God for the procreation of new life is the right and the privilege of the married state alone, by the law of God and of nature, and must be confined absolutely within the sacred limits of that state. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.)

14) Those engaged in unnatural, perverse acts against the Sixth and Ninth Commandment have no right in the Divine Positive Law or the Natural Law to present a "model" of parenthood that is from the devil himself. The words that Saint Paul wrote about perversity in Rome in his own day are quite apropos of our own:





Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use against which is their nature.

And in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error.

And as they liked not to  have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy.

Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.  (Romans 1: 24-32)

15) Matrimony was elevated to a Sacrament by Our Lord at the wedding feast in Cana. The Holy Sacrament of Matrimony is entered into by one man and by one woman to achieve these ends: the procreation and education of children, the mutual good of the spouses, a remedy for concupiscence. Pope Pius XI noted this in Casti Connubii:





This conjugal faith, however, which is most aptly called by St. Augustine the "faith of chastity" blooms more freely, more beautifully and more nobly, when it is rooted in that more excellent soil, the love of husband and wife which pervades all the duties of married life and holds pride of place in Christian marriage. For matrimonial faith demands that husband and wife be joined in an especially holy and pure love, not as adulterers love each other, but as Christ loved the Church. This precept the Apostle laid down when he said: "Husbands, love your wives as Christ also loved the Church," that Church which of a truth He embraced with a boundless love not for the sake of His own advantage, but seeking only the good of His Spouse. The love, then, of which We are speaking is not that based on the passing lust of the moment nor does it consist in pleasing words only, but in the deep attachment of the heart which is expressed in action, since love is proved by deeds. This outward expression of love in the home demands not only mutual help but must go further; must have as its primary purpose that man and wife help each other day by day in forming and perfecting themselves in the interior life, so that through their partnership in life they may advance ever more and more in virtue, and above all that they may grow in true love toward God and their neighbor, on which indeed "dependeth the whole Law and the Prophets." For all men of every condition, in whatever honorable walk of life they may be, can and ought to imitate that most perfect example of holiness placed before man by God, namely Christ Our Lord, and by God's grace to arrive at the summit of perfection, as is proved by the example set us of many saints.

This mutual molding of husband and wife, this determined effort to perfect each other, can in a very real sense, as the Roman Catechism teaches, be said to be the chief reason and purpose of matrimony, provided matrimony be looked at not in the restricted sense as instituted for the proper conception and education of the child, but more widely as the blending of life as a whole and the mutual interchange and sharing thereof. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.)

16) It is never permissible to put even one child into spiritual, if not physical, jeopardy by claiming that so many others would be helped if the Church did not cooperate with an unjust law. Our Lord said that it would be better for one to have a millstone thrown around his neck and thrown into a lake than to lead one of his little ones astray. He was not joking.

17) The civil state has no authority from God to sanction illicit relationships, whether between a man or a woman (such as Andrew Cuomo's relationship with his current girlfriend, which he is publicly flaunting) or between those of the same gender who are committing sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance. What Pope Pius XI wrote in Casti Connubii about "civil unions" between unmarried men and women applies just as equally to those who are committed the sin of Sodom:

To begin at the very source of these evils, their basic principle lies in this, that matrimony is repeatedly declared to be not instituted by the Author of nature nor raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a true sacrament, but invented by man. Some confidently assert that they have found no evidence of the existence of matrimony in nature or in her laws, but regard it merely as the means of producing life and of gratifying in one way or another a vehement impulse; on the other hand, others recognize that certain beginnings or, as it were, seeds of true wedlock are found in the nature of man since, unless men were bound together by some form of permanent tie, the dignity of husband and wife or the natural end of propagating and rearing the offspring would not receive satisfactory provision. At the same time they maintain that in all beyond this germinal idea matrimony, through various concurrent causes, is invented solely by the mind of man, established solely by his will.

How grievously all these err and how shamelessly they leave the ways of honesty is already evident from what we have set forth here regarding the origin and nature of wedlock, its purposes and the good inherent in it. The evil of this teaching is plainly seen from the consequences which its advocates deduce from it, namely, that the laws, institutions and customs by which wedlock is governed, since they take their origin solely from the will of man, are subject entirely to him, hence can and must be founded, changed and abrogated according to human caprice and the shifting circumstances of human affairs; that the generative power which is grounded in nature itself is more sacred and has wider range than matrimony -- hence it may be exercised both outside as well as within the confines of wedlock, and though the purpose of matrimony be set aside, as though to suggest that the license of a base fornicating woman should enjoy the same rights as the chaste motherhood of a lawfully wedded wife.

Armed with these principles, some men go so far as to concoct new species of unions, suited, as they say, to the present temper of men and the times, which various new forms of matrimony they presume to label "temporary," "experimental," and "companionate." These offer all the indulgence of matrimony and its rights without, however, the indissoluble bond, and without offspring, unless later the parties alter their cohabitation into a matrimony in the full sense of the law.

Indeed there are some who desire and insist that these practices be legitimatized by the law or, at least, excused by their general acceptance among the people. They do not seem even to suspect that these proposals partake of nothing of the modern "culture" in which they glory so much, but are simply hateful abominations which beyond all question reduce our truly cultured nations to the barbarous standards of savage peoples. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.)


Any questions, Thomas Menino?

Any questions, Proco Joe Moreno?

Any questions, Rahm Emmanuel?


© Copyright 2012, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.