Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us
                               October 2, 2009

Flying The Flag For The Commies

by Thomas A. Droleskey

Although a report had circulated about a month ago that the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama had approved the flying of the flag of the so-called "People's Republic of China" above the White House to commemorate the sixtieth anniversary of the butchers of Beijing's overthrow of the government of the Republic of China on October 1, 1949, the Obama administration issued a press release to debunk the story that had circulated widely on the internet:

The White House on Friday [September 4, 2009] dismissed as inaccurate reports from China that the administration will mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic by flying the Chinese flag on the South Lawn.

China Daily, citing other media reports, claimed the president of the Fujian Association of the United States had been granted permission to hoist the flag "in a ceremony in front of the President's residence."

A ceremony, indeed, will take place. But it won't happen on the White House grounds -- rather, on the Ellipse, on the other side of E Street from the presidential residence.

China Daily's report -- which said the flag would represent strong U.S.-Chinese relations and recognition of China's success in hosting the 2008 Summer Olympics -- set off howls of protest on the Internet and among conservative talk show hosts despite failing to receive confirmation from the White House.

Demonstrations by foreign groups on the Ellipse or in Lafayette Park, in front of the White House, are not uncommon. But foreign flags are only flown on the White House grounds or on Pennsylvania Avenue to mark "state" or "official" visits of the countries' leaders.

Under those guidelines, the Chinese flag has flown on White House grounds before, in April of 2006, when President Hu Jintao visited then President George W. Bush.

In fact the current controversy is reminiscent of that visit. The Chinese insisted it was a state visit, despite U.S. assurances it was only an official one. The "state visit" label would have implied a bigger honor to Hu and to China, but Bush only had a handful of state visits and Hu's wasn't one of them.

Still, Chinese media continued to report it was a state visit even after it was over. And they continue now to report that the Fujian Association rally will take place on the White House lawn, even though U.S. officials insist it will not. (White House Debunks Reports It Will Fly China's Flag on South Lawn)

 

The actual ceremony did take place on the Ellipse, not on the South Lawn of the White House grounds, yesterday, October 1, 2009, the Feast of Saint Remigius, the bishop who baptized the King of the Franks who would be responsible for starting the process of the Catholicization of France. A rag-tag group of Chinese dancers and others gathered on the Ellipse, which was the site of the annual rally prior to the March for Life on January 22 for many years until relatively recently. Video of the flag-raising event showed that there were a lot of wide open spaces on the Ellipse. The event was a joke, organized by apologists for one of the most murderous regimes in the history of the world, a regime that still oppresses its citizens and executes political dissidents arbitrarily and limits families to having but one child, a land where there has been forced abortions and forced sterilizations, a land where many citizens work as the effective slaves of the Communist authorities in factories to produce goods for multinational corporations whose officials have close working (and sometimes financial) relationships with those authorities (see Let Me Know How the Commies Tip!).

No, the murderous Red Chinese oligarchs do not have to have their flag flying over the White House to know that every President of the United States of America from Richard Milhous Nixon through Barack Hussein Obama has been more than willing to do their bidding for them, ignoring, along with the conciliar "popes," of course, these plain words from Pope Pius XI in Divini Redemptoris, March 19, 1937:

In this renewal the Catholic Press can play a prominent part. Its foremost duty is to foster in various attractive ways an ever better understanding of social doctrine. It should, too, supply accurate and complete information on the activity of the enemy and the means of resistance which have been found most effective in various quarters. It should offer useful suggestions and warn against the insidious deceits with which Communists endeavor, all too successfully, to attract even men of good faith.

On this point We have already insisted in Our Allocution of May 12th of last year, but We believe it to be a duty of special urgency, Venerable Brethren, to call your attention to it once again. In the beginning Communism showed itself for what it was in all its perversity; but very soon it realized that it was thus alienating the people. It has therefore changed its tactics, and strives to entice the multitudes by trickery of various forms, hiding its real designs behind ideas that in themselves are good and attractive. Thus, aware of the universal desire for peace, the leaders of Communism pretend to be the most zealous promoters and propagandists in the movement for world amity. Yet at the same time they stir up a class-warfare which causes rivers of blood to flow, and, realizing that their system offers no internal guarantee of peace, they have recourse to unlimited armaments. Under various names which do not suggest Communism, they establish organizations and periodicals with the sole purpose of carrying their ideas into quarters otherwise inaccessible. They try perfidiously to worm their way even into professedly Catholic and religious organizations. Again, without receding an inch from their subversive principles, they invite Catholics to collaborate with them in the realm of so-called humanitarianism and charity; and at times even make proposals that are in perfect harmony with the Christian spirit and the doctrine of the Church. Elsewhere they carry their hypocrisy so far as to encourage the belief that Communism, in countries where faith and culture are more strongly entrenched, will assume another and much milder form. It will not interfere with the practice of religion. It will respect liberty of conscience. There are some even who refer to certain changes recently introduced into soviet legislation as a proof that Communism is about to abandon its program of war against God.

See to it, Venerable Brethren, that the Faithful do not allow themselves to be deceived! Communism is intrinsically wrong, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever. Those who permit themselves to be deceived into lending their aid towards the triumph of Communism in their own country, will be the first to fall victims of their error. And the greater the antiquity and grandeur of the Christian civilization in the regions where Communism successfully penetrates, so much more devastating will be the hatred displayed by the godless.

Even Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI scoffs at these words as he, in effect, told Catholics in the underground church in Red China to make their peace with the Communist government. It is no wonder that the lords of the world continue to do so.

To wit, Richard Nixon, the practitioner of the amoral realpolitik, believed that the "China card" could be used to bring Soviet dictator Leonid Brezhnev to the negotiating table so that the disastrous Strategic Arms and Limitations Treat (SALT, now called SALT I) could be concluded. To use the "China card," however, Nixon was willing to use what his then National Security Adviser and future Secretary of State Henry Alfred Kissinger called "constructive ambiguity" to sell-out the Republic of China on Taiwan. Nixon's establishment of United States Liaison Office in Beijing in 1973, a year after the Shanghai Communique (February 28, 1972 Full Text), as the prelude to the establishment of full diplomatic relations with the murderous thugs of Beijing by President James Earl Carter, Jr., on January 1, 1979, paved the way for American commercial investment, which Nixon and each subsequent occupant of the White House contended would "democratize" the "People's Republic of China," which remains a land of political repression of crimes against God and man.

Not one President of the United States of America has ever spoken out in behalf of the suffering Catholics in the underground church in Red China. These Catholics have been arrested, beaten, tortured, and executed. There has never been any presidential statement in behalf of the persecuted Catholics in Red China. These Catholics have been betrayed as well by the conciliar Vatican, especially by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict two years ago now (see A Betrayal Worthy of the Antichrist)

Indeed, many of the major donors to the campaigns of presidential candidates of both major American organized crime families of naturalism, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, have earned their blood money directly as a result of heading multinational investments in Red China, which is why then President George Herbert Walker Bush sent National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft, a member of the Trilateral Commission and a close associate of former United States Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger, for whom Scowcroft once worked and whom he succeeded as the late President Gerald Rudolph Ford, Jr.'s National Security Advisor, to Red China on December 10, 1989, just a little over six months after the massacre of around three thousand students in Tianamen Square on June 3 and 4, 1989, to reassure Red Chinese Communist Party Chairman Deng Xiaoping that the Bush the elder still considered the Communist despot to be a "friend" of the United States of America. And former President William Jefferson Blythe Clinton held illegal fund-raisers in the White House featuring Red Chinese arms merchants.

Yes, the Red Chinese flag has been flying, at least figuratively, over the White House for a long time. The White House is a bought-and-paid-for province of the interests of American multinational corporations and their Red Chinese paymasters. It is no accident that the Communist Chinese own, as of July of 2009, $800 billion in treasury securities of the government of the United States of America (see Holders of United States Treasury Securities). The enslavement of the people of Red China to a murderous regime that enforces the most gruesome anti-life policies imaginable means nothing to those who are heavily invested in Red China and whose political campaign coffers are filled with the blood money that emanates therefrom.

Any form of Marxist-Leninist Communist, including the Maoist form introduced on the mainland on October 1, 1949, and institutionalized in various bloody stages, including the "Anti-Rightist Campaign" in the 1950s and "Great Leap Forward" from 1958 to 1961 and the "Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution" from 1966-1976 (although its height was between 1966 and 1969), is founded in a hatred of God. It is a form of what is called anti-Theism, an ideology based on the hatred of God as violence is used to impose a utopian scheme, founded in some version of the Marxian version (dialectic materialism) of the Hegelian dialectic (the belief that history is a clash of competing ideas, starting with a thesis that contains within itself the seeds of its own internal contradiction, giving rise to an antithesis that then clashes with the thesis to produce a new idea, the synthesis), which promises to make man happy in this life as the alleged source of all human conflict--the unjust and inequitable distribution of wealth and property--is removed by the killing off of the capitalists and the forced redistribution of their wealth according to various slogans (including the following: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs").

Marxism-Leninism of its very anti-Theistic nature denies that man has an immortal soul that is made in the image and likeness of God, which is why the ideology of evolutionism developed by Charles Darwin in the 1840s had such a influence on political ideologues such as Marx and Lenin and so many others. The human being, according to Marx, is nothing more than a higher form of animal who could be satisfied if he is fed, clothed, and housed. Man's only happiness is to be found in this life as there is no eternal life with God in Heaven for the just and no eternal punishment for those in Hell for those who die in state of final impenitence. The Marxist dialectic contends that the ultimate stage of human "perfection," Ideal Communism," will emerge when the wealth and property of all capitalists in the world has been distributed equitably, at which point all human conflict, including wars, will cease and the need for government will end. Marx himself contended that it is at this stage that "history" would "end" and "man" would "begin."

Marxists-Leninists and Maoists and other form of Marxist Communists believe that the evolutionary development of man to the stage of Ideal Communism is inevitable. The evolutionary process can be retarded by the schemes of capitalists and other "reactionaries." It cannot, however, be stopped, Marxists contend. Indeed, violent means must be employed to expedite the evolutionary process, which is why Mao Zedong (spelled Mao Tse-Tung when I was growing up in the 1950s and 1960s) said very cavalierly, "To make an omelet you must break a few eggs. To make a revolution you must break a few skulls." Men who do not believe they bear within themselves the Divine impress and they will be held to account for how they have treated their fellow men according to the Deposit of Faith that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has entrusted exclusively to the Catholic Church for Its eternal safekeeping and infallible explication believe that anyone who gets in the way of their plans is expendable.

Here is a very conservative estimate of the deaths caused by statist regimes in the Twentieth Century (these figures are in the thousands), demonstrating just how expendable human beings are in the eyes of those who reject the Catholic Faith as the only foundation of personal and social order:

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.TAB1.2.GIF

(Cold Blooded Murders by Governments)

 

Even these very conservative estimates of the mass murders and political executions committed by statist regimes, including those of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Red China (and of the United Kingdom!), are staggering. One will notice that the Third Reich of Adolf Hitler is in distant third place on this list with fifteen million fewer victims that those estimate for the Red Chinese regime that began its murderous rule over most of mainland China sixty years ago yesterday (there are a few remote parts of the Chinese mainland that have been, at least more or less, fairly autonomous under the control of various warlords in the past sixty years). And this list does not even take recognition of the fifty million innocent preborn babies who have been slaughtered under cover of the civil law in the United States of America by surgical means alone, no less take recognition of the additional 550 million babies who have been killed as a result of chemical abortifacients in the past forty-four years:

Surgical abortions in the United States (1965-2005)

Since the first states decriminalized abortion in 1967, it is estimated that more than 46,000,000 reported surgical abortions in the U.S. An estimated 1,878,990 were committed before Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case that lifted all restrictions. An average of 1,300,000 babies are killed annually through surgical abortion.

Chemical abortions in the United States (1965-2005)

Because many contraceptive measures are abortifacients (drugs that induce or cause abortions), it is important not to overlook the number of children killed by chemical abortions. Since 1965, an average of 11 million women have used abortifacient methods of birth control in the United States at any given time. Using formulas based on the way the birth control pill works, pharmacy experts project that about 14 million chemical abortions occur in the United States each year, giving a projected total of well in excess of 560 million chemical abortions between 1965 and 2005.

Total abortion in the United States (1965-2005)

If you add up the estimated number of surgical and chemical abortions, the total is more than 600,000,000 babies killed in the United States alone. (see: American Life League 2006 - Abortion Statistics)

Indeed, there is more of a kinship between the butchers of Beijing, who are least somewhat honest about their butchery, and the butchers in the United States of America than most people realize. This kinship has everything to do with the fact that, despite the differences between Marxism-Leninism/Maoism and the "republican" principles underlying the religiously indifferentist civil state of Western governments, both the governments of Communist nations and Western nations reject, although for different reasons, Catholicism as the one and only foundation of personal and social order. Nations that reject the true Faith become, sooner or later, statist enterprises steeped in one false naturalistic principle after another as the death of innocent human beings is accepted according to any number of ideological or utilitarian propositions. Naturalism, whether of the "left" or of the "right," must lead to statism.

Pope Pius XI, writing in his encyclical letter on atheistic communism, Divini Redemptoris, March 19, 1937, explained this common connection between Communism and the liberalism which made possible its rise as both reject the truths that men must subordinate themselves to the Deposit of Faith at all times and that they need Sanctifying Grace in order to live in accord with Its articles:

But the law of nature and its Author cannot be flouted with impunity. Communism has not been able, and will not be able, to achieve its objectives even in the merely economic sphere. It is true that in Russia it has been a contributing factor in rousing men and materials from the inertia of centuries, and in obtaining by all manner of means, often without scruple, some measure of material success. Nevertheless We know from reliable and even very recent testimony that not even there, in spite of slavery imposed on millions of men, has Communism reached its promised goal. After all, even the sphere of economics needs some morality, some moral sense of responsibility, which can find no place in a system so thoroughly materialistic as Communism. Terrorism is the only possible substitute, and it is terrorism that reigns today in Russia, where former comrades in revolution are exterminating each other. Terrorism, having failed despite all to stem the tide of moral corruption, cannot even prevent the dissolution of society itself.

In making these observations it is no part of Our intention to condemn en masse the peoples of the Soviet Union. For them We cherish the warmest paternal affection. We are well aware that not a few of them groan beneath the yoke imposed on them by men who in very large part are strangers to the real interests of the country. We recognize that many others were deceived by fallacious hopes. We blame only the system, with its authors and abettors who considered Russia the best-prepared field for experimenting with a plan elaborated decades ago, and who from there continue to spread it from one end of the world to the other.

We have exposed the errors and the violent, deceptive tactics of bolshevistic and atheistic Communism. It is now time, Venerable Brethren, to contrast with it the true notion, already familiar to you, of the civitas humana or human society, as taught by reason and Revelation through the mouth of the Church, Magistra Gentium.

Above all other reality there exists one supreme Being: God, the omnipotent Creator of all things, the all-wise and just Judge of all men. This supreme reality, God, is the absolute condemnation of the impudent falsehoods of Communism. In truth, it is not because men believe in God that He exists; rather because He exists do all men whose eyes are not deliberately closed to the truth believe in Him and pray to Him.

In the Encyclical on Christian Education We explained the fundamental doctrine concerning man as it may be gathered from reason and Faith. Man has a spiritual and immortal soul. He is a person, marvelously endowed by his Creator with gifts of body and mind. He is a true "microcosm," as the ancients said, a world in miniature, with a value far surpassing that of the vast inanimate cosmos. God alone is his last end, in this life and the next. By sanctifying grace he is raised to the dignity of a son of God, and incorporated into the Kingdom of God in the Mystical Body of Christ. In consequence he has been endowed by God with many and varied prerogatives: the right to life, to bodily integrity, to the necessary means of existence; the right to tend toward his ultimate goal in the path marked out for him by God; the right of association and the right to possess and use property.

Just as matrimony and the right to its natural use are of divine origin, so likewise are the constitution and fundamental prerogatives of the family fixed and determined by the Creator. In the Encyclical on Christian Marriage and in Our other Encyclical on Education, cited above, we have treated these topics at considerable length.

But God has likewise destined man for civil society according to the dictates of his very nature. In the plan of the Creator, society is a natural means which man can and must use to reach his destined end. Society is for man and not vice versa. This must not be understood in the sense of liberalistic individualism, which subordinates society to the selfish use of the individual; but only in the sense that by means of an organic union with society and by mutual collaboration the attainment of earthly happiness is placed within the reach of all. In a further sense, it is society which affords the opportunities for the development of all the individual and social gifts bestowed on human nature. These natural gifts have a value surpassing the immediate interests of the moment, for in society they reflect the divine perfection, which would not be true were man to live alone. But on final analysis, even in this latter function, society is made for man, that he may recognize this reflection of God's perfection, and refer it in praise and adoration to the Creator. Only man, the human person, and not society in any form is endowed with reason and a morally free will.

Man cannot be exempted from his divinely-imposed obligations toward civil society, and the representatives of authority have the right to coerce him when he refuses without reason to do his duty. Society, on the other hand, cannot defraud man of his God-granted rights, the most important of which We have indicated above. Nor can society systematically void these rights by making their use impossible. It is therefore according to the dictates of reason that ultimately all material things should be ordained to man as a person, that through his mediation they may find their way to the Creator. In this wise we can apply to man, the human person, the words of the Apostle of the Gentiles, who writes to the Corinthians on the Christian economy of salvation: "All things are yours, and you are Christ's, and Christ is God's." While Communism impoverishes human personality by inverting the terms of the relation of man to society, to what lofty heights is man not elevated by reason and Revelation!

 

How ironic it is that the counterfeit church of conciliarism, which was been so favorably disposed to the Masonic principles of the modern civil state, has been interested from its outset in the reign of Angelo Roncalli/John XXIII in legitimizing the very Communist systems that were condemned by Pope Pius XI in Divini Redemptoris (for a contrast between the conciliar view and that of the Catholic Church, see A Betrayal Worthy of the Antichrist).

Judeo-Masonry helped to pave the way for the rise of Communism, both theoretically and, at least in some instances, in concrete, practical terms. Pope Leo XII, writing in his first encyclical letter, Ubi Primum, May 5, 1824, warned us that any association with Masonry and its principles would lead to greater evils, such as the Communism that was to follow within two decades of Pope Pius XII's death on February 10, 1829, something that so few people took seriously at the time or take seriously now:

But at what are these remarks aimed? A certain sect, which you surely know, has unjustly arrogated to itself the name of philosophy, and has aroused from the ashes the disorderly ranks of practically every error. Under the gentle appearance of piety and liberality this sect professes what they call tolerance or indifferentism. It preaches that not only in civil affairs, which is not Our concern here, but also in religion, God has given every individual a wide freedom to embrace and adopt without danger to his salvation whatever sect or opinion appeals to him on the basis of his private judgment. The apostle Paul warns us against the impiety of these madmen. "I beseech you, brethren, to behold those who create dissensions and scandals beyond the teaching which you have learned. Keep away from such men. They do not serve Christ Our Lord but their own belly, and by sweet speeches and blessings they seduce the hearts of the innocent."

Of course this error is not new, but in Our days it rages with a new rashness against the constancy and integrity of the Catholic faith. Eusebius cites Rhodo as his source for saying that the heretic Apelles in the second century had already produced the mad theory that faith should not be investigated, but that each man should persevere in the faith he was raised in. Even those who put faith in a crucified man were to be saved, according to Apelles, provided that they engaged in good works. Rhetorius too, as We learn from St. Augustine, used to claim that all the heretics walked on the right road and spoke truth. But Augustine adds that this is such nonsense that he cannot believe it. The current indifferentism has developed to the point of arguing that everyone is on the right road. This includes not only all those sects which though outside the Catholic Church verbally accept revelation as a foundation, but those groups too which spurn the idea of divine revelation and profess a pure deism or even a pure naturalism. The indifferentism of Rhetorius seemed absurd to St. Augustine, and rightly so, but it did acknowledge certain limits. But a tolerance which extends to Deism and Naturalism, which even the ancient heretics rejected, can never be approved by anyone who uses his reason. Nevertheless -- alas for the times; alas for this lying philosophy!-such a tolerance is approved, defended, and praised by these pseudophilosophers.

Certainly many remarkable authors, adherents of the true philosophy, have taken pains to attack and crush this strange view. But the matter is so self-evident that it is superfluous to give additional arguments. It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth Itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members. For we have a surer word of the prophet, and in writing to you We speak wisdom among the perfect; not the wisdom of this world but the wisdom of God in a mystery. By it we are taught, and by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and that no other name under heaven is given to men except the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth in which we must be saved. This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.

But Oh! the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How incomprehensible His judgments! God, who destroys the wisdom of the wise, has clearly given the enemies of His Church, who despise supernatural revelation, a perverted mind corresponding to the symbol of iniquity which was written on the forehead of the wicked woman in the Apocalypse. For what greater iniquity is there than for those proud men not only to abandon true religion, but also to seek to ensnare the imprudent by criticisms of every sort, in speech and writings filled with all deceit! Let God arise and restrain, make futile and destroy this unbridled license in all its manifestations.

 

The Marxist-Leninist-Maoist form of Communism and the religiously indifferentist civil state of Western liberalism are simply two sides of the same naturalistic, Anti-Incarnational coin. The latter simply paves the way for the former as both degenerate over the course of time into such increasingly degrees of statism that they become, save for some differences here and there, indistinguishable on many key points.

Today, the First Friday of the month of October, the month of Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary and of the Holy Angels, and the very feast of our Holy Guardian Angels (see Put Your Guardian Angel To Work At All Times), gives us an opportunity to renew our consecrations to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus as we go to Confession and receive Holy Communion to make reparation for the sins, including our own, committed against the matchless love of the Most Sacred Heart of Our Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Our love for tender mercies of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus must grow as we reject all forms of naturalism, coming to accept the truth that Catholicism is indeed the one and only foundation of personal and social order.

Our Lady will help us to become apostles of the Social Reign of her Divine Son, Christ the King. She will help us to pray for those who have been oppressed by statist regimes, including that of the Red Chinese, in the past and those who are being persecuted by such regimes at this time. She will help us to pray for the conversion of Red China and the United States of America and of all countries to the Catholic Faith as part of the fruit of the Triumph of her Immaculate Heart once her Fatima Message is fulfilled.

Although we cannot consecrate Russia to her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart, we can and must fulfill Our Lady's Fatima Message in our own lives as we pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit, living penitentially as the clients of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through her own Immaculate Heart, considering it our privilege to embrace with joy whatever sufferings that come our way as we try to make reparation for our sins and those of the whole world. We must, as we pray for Perseverance while meditating upon the Fifth Glorious Mystery, the Coronation of of Our Lady as Queen of Heaven and Earth by her Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, on the last Saturday of Bishop Robert F. McKenna's, Rosary Crusade, cleaving exclusively to true bishops and true priests in the catacombs who make no concessions to conciliarism or its illegitimate officials.

The statists in the world and the conciliarists in the counterfeit church of conciliarism lose in the end. May we pray for their conversion now as we pray for our own conversion every day so that we will be more and more conformed to the tender mercies of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus as Catholics who offer everything we have and do to this Heart of all hearts through the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

The flag that we want flying over each of our lands is one that is emblazoned with the interlocked Hearts of Jesus and Mary to the shout alternating shouts of:

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary of reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary?

Most Precious Blood of Jesus, save us!

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Our Holy Guardian Angels, pray for us.

See also: A Litany of Saints

 





© Copyright 2009, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.