Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us
                                July 1, 2009

Let Me Know How The Commies Tip!

by Thomas A. Droleskey

The modern civil state was founded upon false, naturalistic, religiously indifferentist, anti-Incarnational and semi-Pelagian principles. That is, the modern civil state, including the United States of America, is founded upon the belief that it is possible for men to order their own lives, both personally and socially, without referencing the Deposit of Faith that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ entrusted exclusively to the Church that He founded upon the Rock of Peter, the Pope, the Catholic Church, for Its eternal safekeeping and infallible explication and that it is possible for men to be virtuous, no less holy, without belief in, access to and cooperation with Sanctifying Grace. The modern civil state is thus premised upon the false belief that it is neither wise or necessary to recognize the Catholic Faith as its official religion and that it is simply "good enough" for men of different religious beliefs--or no religious beliefs whatsoever--to work together as "brothers" for the common good, undertaken without regard to First and Last Things.

A civil state founded upon the premises of religious indifferentism will produce a society that is hostile even to the binding precepts of the Natural Law, to say nothing of one that is hostile to the Catholic Faith. Atheism becomes, as Pope Leo XIII noted in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, the inevitable lowest common denominator in such a situation:

To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of religion between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to each other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all religion in both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as atheism, however it may differ from it in name. Men who really believe in the existence of God must, in order to be consistent with themselves and to avoid absurd conclusions, understand that differing modes of divine worship involving dissimilarity and conflict even on most important points cannot all be equally probable, equally good, and equally acceptable to God. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

 

Social order was maintained in the United States of America in spite of its being founded on the false, naturalistic principles that have led us to the triumph of statism and the surrender of legitimate national sovereignty to various supranational organizations only to the extent that Actual Graces flowed out of the offerings of Holy Mass at the hands of true bishops and priests in the time between the nation's founding and the "Second" Vatican Council's "reconciliation" with those false principles, which played an important contributing role in the development of the synthetic concoction that is the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service. The drying up of the wellspring of Actual Graces as a consequence of the abomination that is the Novus Ordo service has contributed to the expediting of social anarchy and the triumph of statism that must follow in the wake of such social disorder.

The overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King wrought by the Protestant Revolt and institutionalized by the multifaceted, inter-related naturalistic forces of Judeo-Masonry established the sovereignty of "man" and nations in the place of the Sovereignty of Christ the King. Men and nations, however, must be lost absent a due subordination to Christ the King as His Social Kingship must be exercised by His Catholic Church in all that pertains to the good of the souls for whom He shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross to redeem. The overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King wrought by the Protestant Revolt and institutionalized by the multifaceted, inter-related naturalistic forces of Judeo-Masonry has deified "Man" as well as created veritable pantheons of naturalistic "saints" whose commitment to "liberty of man," we are told, is the foundation of our own "personal liberty" today.

Alas, the true measure of human liberty is a man's freedom from enslavement to the powers of sin and eternal death as he yokes Himself to the only true liberty that exists, the liberty won for us on the wood of the Holy Cross by the Divine Redeemer, Who poured out His Most Precious Blood for us as a Laver of Redemption. The Catholic Faith alone is the sole means by which men can live as truly free men who seek to scale the heights of personal sanctity as they make reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for their sins and those of the whole world. Constitutions and declarations based upon a dismissal of the Sacred Rights of Christ the King in the name of "human liberty" wind up degenerating over the course of time to such an extent that even the precise meaning of the words contained in their own texts become as meaningless and as irrelevant to future generations as the precise meaning of the words contained in Sacred Scripture are to Protestants, who believe themselves to be their own "interpreters" of Holy Writ, and to baptized Catholics who adhere to Modernism.

Why should a "liberal" judge pay any heed to the precise words contained in the Constitution of the United States of America when Protestants and Modernists and unbelievers can make of the words of Holy Writ whatever they want. That is, why should the words of a civil constitution be any more hallowed or sacred than the words of Sacred Scripture. If one can deconstruct the Word of God, my friends, it is relatively easy to deconstruct the words of a civil constitution. Those who reject the authority of the Catholic Church to be the sole guardian and infallible explicator of all that is contained in Divine Revelation, which consists of Sacred Scripture and Apostolic or Sacred Tradition, and who reject her authority to exercise the Social Reign of Christ the King in the civil realm must create a substitute "authority" to guide them, and that substitute authority in a civil state founded on the false premises of naturalism will become, sooner or later, the state itself, which becomes the true secular "church" from which no one can dissent legitimately.

The men who founded the United States of America, sons of the rationalistic "Enlightenment" that was the logical step-child of the Protestant Revolt, did not understand this. These men, many of whom had a founding hatred for Christ the King, decided to break away from British rule at a time when the aggregate total of taxes, duties, levies and imposts paid by the colonists was around seven percent of the average colonist's income. These men could not have fathomed a situation where the government they founded would tax up to thirty-three percent of the top income-earners in the United States of America, a situation where the average taxpayer is paying something close to half of his annual income in Federal, state and local taxes (including school taxes, property taxes, special service (water, sewer) district taxes). These men could not have fathomed a situation where the legitimate Natural Law rights and liberties of men that they believed were being violated by King George III and his minions would be even more suppressed by the very government they founded. They could not have fathomed this two hundred thirty-three years ago precisely because they believed that it was a sign of "progress" for men to be "free" of the "constraints" imposed by the dogmas of denominational religion, thus dooming us to be but the mere creatures of the state.

The founders of the United States of America, steeped in the lies of Protestantism and naturalism, also could not have fathomed that a country that rejects the Sovereignty of Christ the King and the true supranationality of the Catholic Church will wind up surrendering its own legitimate sovereignty on an incremental basis to various supranational organizations of naturalism, which is precisely what is happening right here in this country as a result of decades of treaties and trade agreements and as a result of the behemoth known as the "multinational corporation," an entity that knows allegiance only to its "bottom line" and to no single nation. The founders of the United States of America, eager to make the debatable case for a break from the United Kingdom (see Anglican preacher Jonathan Boucher's "dissenting" view on the necessity of making that break, Jonathan Boucher: On Civil Liberty, Passive Obedience, and Nonresistance, offered in the years before the Declaration of Independence was promulgated on July 4, 1776), could not foresee that a nation not yoked to the sweet Reign of Christ the King would become the slave of foreign bankers and international organizations and multinational corporations.

To wit, it was just three days ago now that we were having dinner as the guests of Mr. and Mrs. Anonymous, who have now returned to their home in a previously unexplored region of North America, at Mitchell's Fish Market in West Chester, Ohio. One of our favorite waitresses, Rachelle, was unavailable that evening because, Mr. and Mrs. Anonymous told us, there was going to be a large party of General Electric executives dining that night and everything had to be "perfect" for them.

The executives arrived together. Each and every one of them was from Red China. As the late Jack Paar would have said, "I kid you not."One of the restaurant's managers said that some of those in the General Electric party were top government officials from Red China who were meeting with their fellow countrymen in the employ of General Electric. Feeling quite particularly my boisterous New Yorker self that evening, , I yelled out at one point to Rachelle as she was passing by, "Rachelle, let me know how the Commies tip!" The Red Chinese, enemies of the legitimate national security and economic interests of the United States of America, have invaded our economic infrastructure without a shot being fired and as they have been enabled by one presidential administration, Republican and Democratic, after another ever since the late President Richard Milhous Nixon's Shanghai Communique (February 28, 1972 Full Text) with then Red Chinese Premier Chou En-lai.

As we know, the "commies" tip pretty well. Just as former President William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, who hosted illegal fund-raisers in the White House with various Red Chinese agents and arms merchants. Clinton's predecessor, George Herbert Walker Bush, sent National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft, a member of the Trilateral Commission and a close associate of former United States Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger, for whom Scowcroft once worked and whom he succeeded as the late President Gerald Rudolph Ford, Jr.'s National Security Advisor, to Red China on December 10, 1989, just a little over six months after the massacre of students in Tianamen Square on June 3 and 4, 1989, to reassure Red Chinese Communist Party Chairman Deng Xiaoping that the Bush the elder still consider the Communist despot to be a "friend" of the United States of America. Yes, the "commies" tip pretty well.

Just as social order within a nation must degenerate as a result of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King, you see, so must it be the case that even national sovereignty must be frittered away when nations do not recognize the true supranationality of the Catholic Church and thus seek to pursue the common temporal good domestically and peace with other nations internationally in full accord with the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law as these have been entrusted to the Catholic Church for their eternal safekeeping and infallible explication. And even though the false "pontiff," Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, has, reports indicate, criticized the multinational corporation in his soon-to-be released "encyclical" letter, he does not recognize or accept the fact that the multinational corporation is, like the modern state itself, the result of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King, a doctrine that he, Ratzinger/Benedict, believes is one of those truths that have become "obsolete" with the passage of time.

Indeed, Ratzinger/Benedict would blanche at the late Father Denis Fahey's analysis of how the legitimate sovereignty of nations has been eclipsed in the world as a result of the systematic and planned warfare against the Sacred Rights of Christ the King by the forces of Talmudic Judaism, which has sought to further institutionalize naturalism as the foundation of personal and social order:

In the thirteenth century, the high water mark, so far, of man’s acceptance of the order established by God, Catholic Europe acknowledged the divinity of our Lord: it admitted the reality of the supernatural life of grace, and the divinely appointed right of the Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, to say what was opposed to that life and what favoured it, in other words, to be the judge of what was moral and what was immoral, whether in the actions of states or individuals.

The so-called Reformation saw this claim of the Mystical Body of Christ denied by a large part of what was once Catholic Europe. This meant rejecting the order set up by our Lord Jesus Christ while attempting to retain belief in His divinity. From the Jewish point of view, it was a big step in advance, for it meant the abolition of the supremacy of the supranational Mystical Body of Christ over a number of states. The state, in each country which embraced Protestantism, took the place of the Mystical Body of Christ. Thus a purely natural entity arrogated to itself divine functions, by organising its particular form of religion, composed of a mixture of natural and supernatural elements, as a state department. It is true that this natural entity, the state, still acknowledged that, as a society, it had a duty to God and retained some elements of supernatural religion.

The French Revolution carried a step further the process of decay in the acceptance of the divine plan. Religion was considered to be a private matter only; for the state, as a society, denied that it had any duty to God, natural or supernatural. This was complete social apostasy on the part of nations which had once been Catholic and, as such, had acknowledged the rights of Christ and of His Mystical Body on earth. Every country in which a Masonically directed revolution proved successful, as in France in 1789, began by decreeing the separation of Church and state. Thus country after country completely rejected the Mystical Body of Christ. In this way the supernatural Messias was dethroned, while at the same time, the way was positively prepared for the advent of the natural messias by the granting of full citizenship to the members of the Jewish nation. The Jewish writer, Bernard Lazare, expresses this very forcibly. “The Jew,” he writes, “is the living testimony of the disappearance of the State founded upon theological principles and which the Christian anti-Semites dream of reconstructing. The day when a Jew became the holder of a public position, the Christian State was in danger. That is perfectly accurate, and the anti-Semites who affirm that the Jews have ruined the idea of State could say with greater justice that the entry of the Jews into society symbolised the destruction of the State, that is, of course, of the Christian State.

When the Jews become citizens of the non-Jewish states, they still retain their primary allegiance to their own nation, which, according to them, is the chosen vehicle of divine order for the other nations. They still continue to look forward to the natural messianic era, that is, to the era when their nation will dominate over the others. Their advance to positions of power and influence, aided by their control of finance, has been utilised everywhere in the once Catholic states to eliminate from public life the influence of the supernatural life and the remains of the Catholic organisation of society. For example, when the Jew, Naquet, got the French state to pass a divorce law, this meant that France, as a state, no longer acknowledged the indissolubility of the union of Christ and His Mystical Body. Thus French society was brought a stage nearer to the new messianic era. Such is the inner significance of that historical event whose consequences in the natural order have been disastrous for France

FREEMASONRY HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVANCE OF NATURALISM

There is unorganised opposition to the supernatural life of grace in each one of us, owing to the fall. This unorganised opposition of individuals leads to the formation of little anti-supernatural groups here and there, even without the concerted action of vast organised forces. The existence of united anti-supernatural action on the part of organised bodies is so far removed from the mind of the average Catholic that it needs to be stressed particularly and its aims made clear. The Christian framework of society is destined not only to aid us in attaining union with Christ but to serve as a bulwark against the assaults of the forces organised against our supernatural life. These forces are three in number, one being invisible, the other two visible. The invisible host is that of Satan and the other fallen angels, while the visible forces are those of the Jewish nation and Freemasonry. The Jewish nation is not only a visible organisation, but its naturalistic or anti-supernatural character is openly proclaimed by its refusal to accept the supernatural Messias and by its looking forward to a naturalistic messianic era. The Masonic society or group of societies is a visible organisation, but its naturalistic or anti-supernatural character is secret or camouflaged. The naturalism or anti-supernaturalism of its aims, as well as of its ritual and symbolism, is clearly grasped by only relatively few of the initiated. The pantheistic deification of man, which is the consequence of this naturalism, is the supreme secret of Freemasonry. Both of these visible societies, however, make use of subterfuge and secrecy in their modes of action against the supernatural life of the nations of the world. Accordingly, the most vitally real struggle in the world is that waged by those naturalistic or anti-supernatural armies, under the leadership of Satan, against those who accept the supernatural life of grace, participation of the life of the Blessed Trinity, under the leadership of our Lord Jesus Christ.

In the work of elimination of the supernatural life from society, the Jewish nation has been powerfully aided by Freemasonry. Freemasonry is a naturalistic society, that is to say, a society which claims to make men good and true independently of the supernatural life which comes to us through membership of our Lord. Masonry thus, in fact and in deed, puts itself above the Mystical Body of Christ, and its action has powerfully contributed to the elimination of the Catholic tradition, based on the divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the advent of the anti-supernatural or naturalistic mentality and outlook.

Masonic propaganda has so blinded the nations, even those that did not revolt against the Mystical Body in the sixteenth century, to the significance of naturalism, that it is difficult to rouse them to the full perception of the real issues at stake. The warnings of the sovereign pontiffs and the Judaeo-Masonic attack on the supernatural life in Spain have succeeded, it is true, in getting them to stir uneasily in their slumbers, but they cannot be said to be as yet awake. The Masonic Declaration of the Rights of Man of 1789 has contributed also to bewilder people with regard to the significance of the Communistic attack on private property. The real meaning of the equality of the French Revolution, the one behind which is all the driving force of Masonry, is that all men are equally God. Accordingly, in a properly constituted state, an absolute social equality should counterbalance natural inequalities. The right of private property as the greatest cause of social inequality must be abolished. We need not be surprised then at the lukewarm opposition to Communism wherever the virus of the French Revolution has penetrated. In this way the poorer members of society, who have had such sad experiences in the so-called Christian countries since the sixteenth century, are easily drawn to listen to Marx’s cajoling words. The proletariat, according to the Jewish siren, is a messianic class destined by its rule to bring about a new era in the world. People are slow to grasp that both the proletariat in general and the Russian proletariat in particular are only means for the messianic dreams of Marx’s own nation. . . .

On the one hand, we have to stand valiantly for the divine personality of Our Lord and for the transcendent claims of His Mystical Body, the Catholic Church, in which He continues to live and into which all must enter in order to be one with Him. The personality of our Lord, true God as well as true man, is not merely the subsistence of a created soul; it is the personality of the second Person of the Most Holy Trinity. The Jews as a nation have always rejected that divine personality and their efforts are directed to combating the influence of the supernatural life which He seeks to diffuse through the Catholic Church. We have to stand, therefore, unequivocally for the rights of Christ the King. Jewish efforts to eliminate the supernatural life of grace and faith in Jesus tend inevitably to drag life down to an infra-human level. We have, therefore, to resist and defeat Jewish efforts to dominate our society and mould it along naturalistic lines. In particular, the creation of money and the regulation of the volume of exchange-medium used by Christian peoples must be taken out of their hands. I have seen a saying of Meyer Amschel Rothschild quoted as follows: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.”

On the other hand, our Lord, true man as well as true God is a Jew of the House of David, born of the Virgin Mary, the Lily of Israel. Our Lord’s individuality, that by which as a man He is distinct from other members of the human race and belongs to a certain environment and a certain descent, is Jewish. The Blood that was poured out on the Cross at the hands of the official leaders of His own nation for the restoration of the divine life of the world was Jewish blood. Our Lord’s Sacred Heart is a human heart and He loves His own nation with a special love. We must never forget that or allow ourselves to fall victims to an attitude of hatred for the Jews as a nation. We must always bear in mind that He is seeking to draw them on to that supernatural union with Himself which they reject.

The Jewish nation has gradually become the most strongly organised non-secret visible force working for the elimination of the supernatural outlook in society and for the installation of naturalism. The supernatural outlook insists that we are a race whose highest life, the divine life of grace, by which the Blessed Trinity dwells in our souls, was lost by the fall of Adam, but restored by our Lord Jesus Christ. Naturalism denies the existence of any life higher than natural life and maintains that social relations must be organised on that basis. As members of Christ we are bound to work for the return of society to our loving Saviour, so that social organisation may be permeated with the reality of the supernatural life of grace. Pope Pius XI insists on this in the encyclical on the Kingship of Christ. Let us now take two examples of how our efforts to combat naturalism will bring us into conflict with the Jews in their preparations for the naturalistic Messias. The first example will deal with the political, the second with the economic, organisation of the world.

States and nations are bound to acknowledge the Catholic Church as the one true Church. Pope Pius XI shows that the naturalistic spirit has gradually come to infect society, because “by degrees the religion of Christ was put on the same level as false religions, and placed ignominiously in the same category with them.” Previously Pope Pius VII had written: “By the fact that the freedom of all forms of worship is proclaimed, truth is confused with error, and the holy and immaculate Spouse of Christ, outside of which there can be no salvation, is placed on the same level as heretical sects, and even as Jewish perfidy.” Now, since the French Revolution, states have placed all forms of error on the same level as the Mystical Body of Christ, and Jews have been admitted as full citizens of the once Christian states. By granting full citizenship to members of the Jewish religion, the state, to all intents and purposes, gives free rein to the naturalistic moulding process pursued by the Jewish nation, in view of the elimination of membership of Christ and the inauguration of the new messianic, era. It thus shows itself indifferent in the struggle between the true supernatural Messias, who has come, and the naturalistic messias, to whom the Jews look forward.

In regard to the economic organisation of the world, Pope Pius XI insists that “then only will it be possible to unite all in harmonious striving for the common good, when all sections of society have the intimate conviction that they are all members of a single family and children of the same heavenly Father and further, that they are one body in Christ, and everyone members one of another (Rom. XIII, 5).” To have lasting peace in society we Catholics, then, must strive to bring back the great truth that employers and employed must treat one another as members of Christ. It is, as we have seen, part of what we promise Christ as King, when we make submission to our Heavenly Father along with Christ as Priest at Mass. Now, the aim of the Jewish nation is to substitute for the supernatural Messias in whom we are members of one body, the rule of the natural messias. Accordingly, in virtue of Catholic principles, we must oppose the efforts of the Jews to get control of the economic organisation of society. How can we succeed in getting employers and employed to treat one another as members of Christ, if we allow social organisation to pass into the hands of those who have persistently denied and rejected His divine mission and for whom the supernatural Kingdom of His Mystical Body is simply a fraudulent attempt to turn Israel aside from its destiny.

We have, therefore, to resist and defeat Jewish efforts to dominate social organisms and mould them along naturalistic lines, in opposition to our Lord and His Mystical Body. The guilds of the Middle Ages, which reflected the solidarity of the members of the Mystical Body of Christ in economic organisation, rendered wonderful services to their members in times of sickness and need, thus efficaciously preventing Jewish money lenders from gaining control of families and property. We too in our day must safeguard the poor and needy from being tortured by Jewish money lenders. Our action in this connection however, must not be merely the negative one of combating illegalities and getting laws suitably amended, but the positive one of setting up organisations which will render services similar to those rendered by the guilds. Besides this safeguarding of the poor and needy, there is the more far reaching question of the creation of money and the regulation of the volume of exchange medium used by Christian peoples. That power must not be allowed to fall into, some would say to remain in, Jewish hands, or to fall into the hands of nominal or erstwhile Christians, Masons and others, who are dependent upon, or in alliance with Jews. We must combat Jewish attempts to bring under their domination individual Catholics and Catholic countries, even more vigorously than we must struggle against Freemasonry, because the Jews form a more strongly organised and more cohesive naturalistic force than Freemasonry.

It is not easy to combat Jewish naturalism in public life and at the same time keep oneself free from racial hatred, which is itself but a form of naturalism. Yet it must be done. On March 25th 1928, the Congregation of the Holy Office abolished the association called The Friends of Israel, which in action and language had departed from the mind of the Church and of the Fathers and had adopted a mode of procedure abhorrent to the liturgy, thus falling into naturalism. Nevertheless in that same decree, the Church insists upon the fact that she “habitually prays for the Jewish people which was the custodian of the divine promises down to Jesus Christ, and this, in spite of, nay rather on account of, their subsequent blindness. Actuated by this spirit of charity the Apostolic See has protected this people against unjust treatment and, as it condemns every kind of hatred and jealousy between nations, so in a special manner it condemns hatred of the people once chosen by God, namely, that hatred commonly designated as ‘Anti-Semitism.’”

Particular attention must be called to the phrase once chosen by God. It is the second time that the Holy See uses the phrase in recent years, the other being in the text of the prayer approved of by Pope Pius XI for the consecration of the human race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. The Holy See is evidently insisting upon the fact that there is no longer any chosen people or race, except in so far as the Jews, who were the custodians of the divine promises until the time of Jesus Christ, despite their official rejection of the Supernatural Messias, have not ceased to be the members of His own race. Certain nations have at times shown themselves, to some extent at least, dazzled by the belief that they were the chosen people or race, in the natural order. The pagan cult of race is but a modern manifestation of naturalism.

The Jews look upon themselves now as the Chosen People, because they hold that they are the people destined to bring happiness to the world in the messianic era yet to come. Catholic writers would do well not to pander to this naturalism, by speaking of the Jews simply as the Chosen People, for thus they increase the confusion of thought in modern times. The Jews were chosen to be the custodians of the divine promises until the coming of Jesus Christ, of whom they were to be the fount according to the flesh. They have not ceased to be the race in which the “Word was made flesh,” and as such, they are the object of special love on the part of our Lord. But the naturalism by which they rejected Him and continue to hold that the happiness of the world is to come through their messianic aspirations is false and must be everywhere combated.

We have, therefore, a twofold programme set out before us. We must, on the one hand, defend our Lord’s rights and, on the other, seek to tear away the veil from the eyes of those whose blindness hurts Him in a special way. This is the programme set before us in these words of the Encyclical Letter, Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI. “If the faithful generally would understand that it is their duty to fight bravely and continually under the banner of Christ their King, then, fired with apostolic zeal, they would endeavour to win over to our Lord those who are estranged from Him or know Him not, and would valiantly defend His rights.”

Pope Pius X insisted in most appealing fashion upon the need for courage on the part of Catholics in the modem world, in the discourse he pronounced on the 13th December 1908 at the beatification of Joan of Arc. To St. Joan’s mind the coronation and anointing of the King of France were ever present, because that anointing did homage to the universal Kingship of Christ and linked up political power with the government of the Lord Jesus. She was the saint sent to remind the world, at the decline of the Middle Ages, of the formal principle of order in the world, the acknowledgment of the Kingship of Christ. The saintly Pope spoke of the heroism of Blessed Joan, and contrasted it with the timidity of so many Catholics in our day: “In our time more than ever before, the chief strength of the wicked lies in the cowardice and weakness of good men . . . All the strength of Satan’s reign is due to the easy going weakness of Catholics. Oh! if I might ask the Divine Redeemer, as the prophet Zachary did in spirit: What are those wounds in the midst of thy hands? the answer would not be doubtful: With these was I wounded in the house of them that loved me. I was wounded by my friends, who did nothing to defend me, and who, on every occasion, made themselves the accomplices of my adversaries. And this reproach can be levelled at the weak and timid Catholics of all countries.” (Father Denis Fahey, The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, pp.269-272; 274- 277.)

 

To combat the naturalism that is at the foundation of the modern civil state--and with which the counterfeit church of conciliarism has made its "official reconciliation"--that is at the root of social disorder domestically and the erosion of national sovereignty by international organizations and multinational corporations we must, of course, be cleansed in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance as the merits of the Most Precious Blood of Jesus are poured out upon our immortal souls as a laver of redemption. We must cleanse of our own enslavement to sin and selfishness as we give unto the Most Blessed Trinity through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary whatever merits we might earn from our prayers and good works and penances and sufferings and mortifications and from the calumnies that we must endure for refusing any "communion" at all with wolves dressed up as "shepherds" who are committed to and propagate the falsehoods of conciliarism. And we must be ever earnest about fulfilling Our Lady's Fatima Message in our own lives, praying as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit.

Oh, about those commies at Mitchell's Fish Market. They are, of course, human beings endowed with immortal souls which have been redeemed by the shedding of Our Lord's Most Precious Blood. I wanted to go into the private room where they were dining and hand them all Our Lady's Green Scapulars, although I think that the late Bill Koneazny (see A True Catholic Rendezvous) might have done so. My dear wife, however, took it upon herself to seek out a woman in that dinner party who had fallen in the restaurant while using her cellular phone. The woman went outside to use her cellular phone a second time. Sharon tracked her down, whereupon the woman, who was named Sharon, believe it or not, said that she was a "Christian." My Sharon gave her a Green Scapular, telling the woman to pray to Our Lady, who is the very Mother of God. The Sharon from Red China who will be working in Ohio was very grateful to my Sharon. for the Green Scapular.

We must pray for the conversion of all men and all nations to Catholic Faith so that they will yoke themselves to the true standard of liberty, Christ the King's Holy Cross, as they give unto Him all of their daily actions through the Immaculate Heart of Mary that was pierced through and through as her Divine Son's Most Precious Blood was shed to save us from the fires of Hell.

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary of reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary?

Most Precious Blood of Jesus, save us!

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Zachary, pray for us.

Saint Elizabeth, pray for us.

See also: A Litany of Saints

 





© Copyright 2009, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.