Ever At the Service of Those Who Deny Christ the King Before Men, part one

The more things change, the more they remain the same, and this aphorism is quite pertinent when considering the hatred that contemporary Talmudists, most of whom are not biological descendants of the twelve tribes of Israel, have towards Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, His Holy Catholic Church, and the entirety of the Sacred Deposit of the Holy Faith. This is because the Talmudists of our own day, much like the Biblical Jews at the time of Our Lord’s Nativity 2024 years ago, believe in the concept of a political Messias who would thunderously manifest himself out of a mountainside to restore Israel to what they believe is its rightly place, Biblically, territorially, and politically.

Neither the Biblical Jews of Our Lord’s time nor their Talmudic successors today accept the fact that the Messias would manifest Himself as a helpless Babe Who was to be born of a virgin in poverty and anonymity and thence submit Himself to the authority of His Blessed Mother and His foster-Father, Saint Joseph, prior to embarking upon a Public Ministry that would conclude with His atoning for Adam’s sin on the wood of the Holy Cross. The thought of a personal Messias who would redeem men from their sins was repulsive to the minds of the Jews two millennia ago and it is just as repulsive to the Talmudists of today. Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was opposed by the Jews during His life and His Holy Apostles were opposed by the Jews after Pentecost Sunday, and they worked against the establishment of Christendom in Europe during the First Millennium and then worked insidiously to effects its downfall so that the secular, religiously indifferentist civil state of Modernity would supplant Holy Mother Church as a means of “secular salvation.”

As noted in many articles on this site, including Meet Some Catholics Truly Worth Admiring, part one and Meet Some Catholics Truly Worth Admiring, part two, Adolph Hitler rose to power in Germany of the Weimar Republic precisely as a result of the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic efforts to eliminate the influence of the Catholic Church on public life. The Nazis were racialists who hated the Catholic Church, gripped as many of them were by the devil’s occult practices and all manner of unspeakably morbid perversity. The Catholic Church was not responsible for the crimes, no matter their extent and nature, against the Jews committed by agents of the Third Reich, and the devil has used the professional propagandizing about these crimes to prevent the souls of Jews from being converted to the true Faith. The conciliarists are thus responsible for a genocide against souls that far exceeds the carnage wrought by the Nazi regime.

Indeed, it is no exaggeration whatsoever to state that the counterfeit church of conciliarism is a puppet of Judeo-Masonry as its leaders have worked assiduously to make what they purport is “Catholicism” acceptance to the synagogue and to their sycophantic lords of the world.

The lords of conciliarism have reconciled what almost everyone alive believes is the Catholic Church to the accept the very thing that one true pope after another has condemned as summarized by Pope Leo XIII in Custodi di Quella Fede, December 8, 1892:

Everyone should avoid familiarity or friendship with anyone suspected of belonging to masonry or to affiliated groups. Know them by their fruits and avoid them. Every familiarity should be avoided, not only with those impious libertines who openly promote the character of the sect, but also with those who hide under the mask of universal tolerance, respect for all religions, and the craving to reconcile the maxims of the Gospel with those of the revolution. These men seek to reconcile Christ and Belial, the Church of God and the state without God. (Pope Leo XIII, Custodi Di Quella Fede, December 8, 1892.)

Behold the violence that is awash in the world today as so many people, filled with hatred for others that is inspired only by the adversary, feel free to commit acts of violence upon those they deem responsible for this or that problem or this or that injustice, whether perceived or real, and are then cheered by others after committing wanton acts of violence, including cold-blood killings such as the one committed by Luigi Mangione against Brian Thompson, the chief executive officer of US Health:

A shocking number of young people support UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s killer, with 41 percent saying that Luigi Mangione’s alleged actions are “acceptable,” an Emerson College poll has found.

Twenty-four percent of U.S. voters ages 18-29 answered that Mangione’s alleged cold-blooded killing was somewhat acceptable, and 17% said it was completely acceptable.

There was also a stark partisan split among those polled, with 22% of Democrats saying they find the killer’s actions acceptable compared to only 12% of Republicans and 16% of independents who do.

The poll of 1,000 voters was conducted last week.

Mangione, 26, was indicted Tuesday on upgraded charges of murder as an act of terrorism. A grand jury slapped the Ivy League grad with first-degree murder and two counts of second-degree murder charges after he allegedly gunned down Thompson outside a Hilton in Midtown on Dec. 4.

Since the healthcare exec’s brutal execution, there has been a disturbing trend of celebrating his alleged killer among young people.

A twisted Disney-themed Boston dance party flashed pictures of Mangione’s face while the Hannah Montana song “He Could Be The One” played Friday.

Revelers could be seen dancing and flashing pictures as a slideshow honoring the alleged assassin was displayed behind the DJ.

Former Washington Post journalist Taylor Lorenz disturbingly posted “And people wonder why we want these executives dead,” on BlueSky after news of Thompson’s murder broke.

“If you have watched a loved one die because an insurance conglomerate has denied their life saving treatment as a cost cutting measure, yes, it’s natural to wish that the people who run such conglomerates would suffer the same fate,” she said in an article defending her vile comments.

Meanwhile, a socialist professor at Mangione’s alma mater, U Penn, venerated the alleged killer on social media, calling the accused murderer an “icon.” Julia Alekseyeva, an assistant professor of English and Cinema & Media Studies, posted on TikTok that she has “never been prouder to be a professor at the University of P3nnsylvania.”

Ugly trolls bashed the McDonald’s worker who tipped police off to Mangione’s presence in the restaurant, with others calling to boycott the fast-food franchise.

“To the stupid b–h that ratted out my baby Luigi Mangione…you will be dealt with,” one troll posted with a violent “Family Guy” GIF showing a character shooting another in the head. Some depraved individuals went so far as to set up a legal defense fund for Mangione.

And Chilling “Wanted” posters featuring Thompson’s face and names and photos of other healthcare executives were spotted plastered all over Manhattan this week.

New Yorkers even staged a Luigi Mangione lookalike contest in Washington Square Park, with the doppelganger winning a $50 prize.

The signs issued a stark warning threatening that “HEALTH CARE CEOS SHOULD NOT FEEL SAFE.” The alleged assassin, who comes from a well-to-do Maryland family led police on a five-day manhunt after he fatally shot Thompson on his way to the UnitedHealthcare parent company’s investor conference before finally being caught while eating at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s. (More than 40% of young voters say UnitedHealthcare CEO killing was ‘acceptable’: poll.)

As readers of this site know very well, such wanton disregard for the binding precepts of the Fifth Commandment are the direct result of the Protestant Revolution’s overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King in the Sixteenth Century and the subsequent rise of the religiously indifferentist Judeo-Masonic civil state of Modernity, It is a slippery slope from Protestantism to religious indifferentism, and from religious indifferent to atheism, and from atheism to anti-Theism. Men will have no regard for the lives and property of others if they do not see in each other the Divine impress and treat each other as they would treat the Divine Saviour in the very Flesh.

The contemporary disregard for the inviolability of all innocent human life has manifested itself very clearly in the daily slaughter of the preborn, both by chemical and surgical means, as well as in the institutionalization of in vitro fertilization, the medical industry’s manufactured, profit-making myth of “brain death,” the “starvation and dehydration of brain-damaged human beings, palliative care/hospice, euthanasia, forced euthanasia, suicide, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide and in a myriad of other ways, Most of these attacks upon human life have been promoted secular Jewish organizations, whose attorneys have been in the forefront of judicial edicts and legislative enactments that have resulted in the acceptance of sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance as “acts of mercy” that constitute “core” human “rights” and thus can and must be defended and celebrated throughout what passes for popular culture.

Mind you, this is not to condemn Jewish people nor to sanction any kind of violence against them whatsoever as their immortal souls have been redeemed by the shedding of every single drop of the Most Precious Blood of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ even though they reject this fact out of hand. We pray for the conversion of one and all to the true Faith while making to treat all others with dignity and respect. Every person we meet or encounter during the course of our lives within the Providence of God must be the object of our prayers, if not particularly, then generally. We will never know until eternity the fruit of our prayers for others if we offer them up with a pure intention and for the honor and glory of the Most Holy Trinity as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.

These important points having been noted, though, it is nevertheless true that there are human actors who have played their parts in creating the world without God and the state without the true Church by suppressing the Holy Name of Jesus and then stigmatizing those who profess the Holy Name as “bigoted” “haters,” and it is an undeniable fact that one of the chief goals of Talmudism and Judeo-Masonry is the de facto social, if not legal, criminalization of professing the Holy Name and of defending the Social Reign of Christ the King publicly.

Writing in the Irish Ecclesiastical Record nearly a century ago, Father Edward Cahill pointed out the chief goals of Judeo-Masonry in constructing a civil state and social structure that has no room for Christ the King and His Holy Catholic Church. Faher Cahill explained the ultimate goal of Talmudists was to infilitrate the Catholic Church as Theodore Herzl, the founder of International Zionism, had done with Protestant sects with great success first of all by creating reliable agents from within who would work to supress Catholic docrine before replacing it with the Judeo-Masonic ethos. It was in recognitition of this insidious goal that the Holy Office issued a condemnation of the Friends of Israel in 1928, something that Father Cahill discussed in his collected series of articles:

On March 28, 1928, the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office issued an important decision of the Holy See on ‘the nature and purpose of the Association called Friends of Irsael and on the pamphlet entitled Pax super Israel, edited by the directors of the Association. Although ‘many priests, bishops and even cardinal gave their adhesion to this association,’ the Sacred Congregation condemns and completely suppresses it, by reason of ‘its mode of acting and speaking which is out of harmony with the traditional sense of the Church, the mind of the Fathers and even the Sacred liturgy itself.

The secularist Press, which is mostly controlled by the great Jewish financiers, immediately showed its appreciation for the importance of the decree by striving in the decree by striving to misrepresent it as a gesture of disapproval on the part of the Holy See of Catholic anti-masonic writes, whereas the contrary is the case. The decree is an authoritative reassertion of the traditional attitude of the Church towards the Jewish people. The Church desires sincerely the conversion of the Jews to the true Faith. But she cannot compromise with them any more than she can with the Modernists or even with the so-called Anglo-Catholics. Hence, in the present decree, the Holy See takes measures against the Masonic and Jewish infiltrations into the Church, which were being attempted through the medium of the condemned association and pamphlet. On the other hand she also reprobates as contrary to the Christian spirit and teaching Anti-Semitism, properly so-called, just as she reprobates anti-Germanism or any other similar anti-ism that would imply ‘racial or national hatred.’ But to follow the direction of Leo XIII and ‘tear away the mask from Freemasonry and let it be seen as it really is,’ is not anti-Semitism even when Freemasons in question are Jews; and needless to say, the Holy See does not follow the example of the Masonic sectaries in misapplying the term. (Father E. Cahill, S.J., “Freemasonry: VI: The Jewish Element in Freemasonry, Irish Ecclesiastical Record, 1929.)

First, Father Cahill pointed out Holy Office had suppressed the “Friends of Israel” association because it had a “mode of acting and speaking which is out of harmony with the traditional sense of the Church, the mind of the Fathers and even the Sacred liturgy itself.” Yet it is that the counterfeit church of conciliarism has adopted this very mode of “acting and speaking” in a manner that is “out of harmony with the traditional sense of the Church, the mind of the Fathers and even the Sacred liturgy.” Father Cahill defended Catholic doctrine. The conciliarists promote that which is anti-Christ, placing them in league with the Talmudists, who have long sought to eradicate all mention of the Holy Name of Jesus from public life, which is precisely tha Bergoglio did yesterday save for those three references to "Jesus" without referring to Him as Our Lord Jesus Christ. Is it any accident that the Argentine Apostate almost never uses that reverent manner of speaking about the Divine Redeemer?

Second, Father Cahill pointed out that the decree of the Holy Office against the Friends of Israel association defended Catholic doctrine concerning the Jews that has been abandoned by the conciliarists, who have termed it “anti-Semitic” even to speak about any necessity of seeking the conversion of the Jews to the true Faith before they die or to oppose their schemes for the further de-Christianization.

Consider the following words once again:

The decree is an authoritative reassertion of the traditional attitude of the Church towards the Jewish people. The Church desires sincerely the conversion of the Jews to the true Faith. But she cannot compromise with them any more than she can with the Modernists or even with the so-called Anglo-Catholics. Hence, in the present decree, the Holy See takes measures against the Masonic and Jewish infiltrations into the Church, which were being attempted through the medium of the condemned association and pamphlet.  (Father E. Cahill, S.J., “Freemasonry: VI: The Jewish Element in Freemasonry, Irish Ecclesiastical Record, 1929.)

Have the conciliar “popes” sought the conversion of the Jews?

Indeed, we have been told by the likes of conciliar revolutionaries that the Catholic Church has no "organized mission to preach to the Jews," who somehow get to be “saved” all on their own. Putative “popes” have gone into Talmudic synagogues content to be treated as inferiors as they have treated this false religion with respect and esteemed its symbols that belong to the devil himself.

Why is it so difficult for those in the “resist while recognize” movement to understand and accept these truths.

Third, Father Cahill’s reminder that it is not anti-Semitic to seek the conversion of the Jews or to oppose the schemes of some of their number to blot out the Holy Name of our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and spit on His Sacred Deposit Faith and His Holy Church herself is very similar to one provided by Father Denis Fahey in 1949, eight years after his, Father Cahill’s, death:

It is not to “hate” anyone to seek their unconditional conversion to the true Faith or to oppose their schemes to undermine It and to persecute those who defend It despite their own sins and failings. Indeed, it is a Spiritual Work of Mercy to seek with urgency the unconditional of non-Catholics to the true Faith (see (see Chopped Liver No More, To Advocate Christ The King, Nothing Else,  Chopped Liver No More Update, and Believing Catholics Pose No Threat to a Just Social Order).

Father Edward Cahill made the same point in the Irish Ecclesiastical Record in those series of articles that was published later as Freemasonry and the anti-Christian Movement:

We have already referred to Rationalism and Hermeticism (including Theosophy, Christian Scientism, Spiritism, etc.) as characteristic of the Masonic religion and philosophy, These, which are put forward as a substitute for real religion, are fast becoming more and more widespread in England and throughout the English-speaking world. They are the most powerful dissolvents of whatever elements of true Christianity are being attempted. This element is perhaps the most deadly and dangerous aspect of the whole Masonic movement; for it cuts deeper than anything into Christian life, whose very foundation it attacks.

The immediate aim of the practical policy of Freemasonry is to make its naturalistic principles effective in the lives of the people; and first of all to enforce them in every detail of public life. Hence its political and social programme includes:

(1) The banishment of religion from all departments of government, and from all public institutions; and as a mark of the triumph of this policy, the removal of the Crucifix and all religious emblems from the legislative assemblies, the courts of justice, the public hospitals, the schools and university colleges, etc. (Father Edward Cahill, S.J., Freemasonry and the anti-Christian Movement, Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged, published originally by M. H. Gill and Son, Ltd., in Dublin, Ireland, 1930, and republished by Kessinger Legacy Reprints, pp. 156-157.)

It is very telling that the conciliar revolutionaries have applauded these “developments” as most of their own colleges and universities have divested themselves of official control of what is purported to be the Catholic Church and have removed the Crucifix and other religious emblems from most of their classrooms. Formerly Catholic hospitals have done the same. Indeed, many of them, participating fully in the medical industry’s manufactured, money-making myth of “brain death”, have merged with secular corporations. And most Catholics in public life are fully supportive of various evils under cover of the civil law, and none of them is reprobated by Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who, quite instead, praises those of them that he meets as “servants of the poor.”

To return to Father Cahill’s enumeration of the Judeo-Masonic program:

(2) The secularization of marriage.

(3) The establishment of a State system of so-called education which, at least in its primary stages, will be obligatory and conducted by the laity.

(4) Complete freedom of worship (at least for all except the true one.) (Father Edward Cahill, S.J., Freemasonry and the anti-Christian Movement, Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged, published originally by M. H. Gill and Son, Ltd., in Dublin, Ireland, 1930, and republished by Kessinger Legacy Reprints, p. 157.)

Catholics will the good of all men, the ultimate expression of which is the salvation of their immortal souls as members of the Catholic Church. However, it is still nevertheless necessary to call error by its proper name and to explain what forces, in addition to our many sins, are responsible for its spread

The Counterfeit Church of Conciliarism: Wholly Subservient to Those Who Deny the Sacred Divinity of Christ the King

The counterfeit church of conciliarism showed forth the rotten fruit of its infiltration by agents of Marxism, the lodge, and the synagogue early in the “pontificate” of the first of the current line of antipopes and a supreme Judaizer in his own right, Angelo Roncalli/John XXIII, who personally requested the Sacred Congregation of Rites to change the rite of Baptism for those converting from non-Catholic religions, including Judaism and Mohammedanism. The decree was issued by the congregation on August 1, 1960, the last time that the Feast of Saint Peter’s Chains would be celebrated within the conciliar structures before its suppression later that year by the former Patriarch of Venice. The New York Times edition of August 2, 1960, reported on the changes:

Rome—August 1—The Roman Catholic Church disclosed today that it had abolished four ritual formulas that could be interpreted as being offensive to other faiths. The decision follows an order by Pope John XXIII last year [1959] deleting references to the “perfidy” of Jews in the church’s Good Friday liturgy.

The four formulas now eliminated from the 360 year-old Roman ritual, the official collection of Roman Catholic rules for the administration of the sacraments, were used in baptism ceremonies. The Roman ritual prescribed that when a priest was christening an adult convert he was to pronounce a solemn warning against relapsing into the former faith.

If the convert had been a pagan, the priest was to say, “You should abhor the idols and reject the images.” In the case of a converted Jew the formula read: “You should reject Hebrew perfidy and reject Hebrew superstition.”

A former Moslem was to be baptized with the warning: “You should abhor Mohammedan perfidy and the reject the wicked sect of unbelief.” If the convert had been a member of a faith that the Roman Catholic Church considered heretical, such as Protestantism, the formula went: “You should abhor heretical wickedness and reject in the nefarious sects of the impious.”

The omission of the formulas was ordered by decree of the Vatican’s Sacred Congregation of Rites. Priests henceforth are to christen converts without any reference to their former faith.

Vatican sources said that Pope John had asked for the reform of the ritual. The present Pontiff intended to “emphasize everything that unites and remove anything that unduly divides believers in God,” these sources explained. (“Vatican Changes Convert Rites, The New York Times, August 2, 1960. A link to photocopy of the article can be found at: "Vatican Changes Converts' Rites.)

This news report from sixty-four and one-half years ago contains a Rosetta stone of everything one needs to know about the counterfeit church of conciliarism, which has made its reconciliation with Judaism, Mohammedanism, Waldensianism, Hussiteism, Protestantism, Orthodoxy, Hinduism, Jainism, voodooism, Buddhism, at its “popes” and “bishops” have praised false religions, have personally esteemed their false idols and reverenced and have personally entered to and been treated as subordinates in the devil’s dens that are these sects churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques. Conciliarism is all about “uniting” people just as is Judeo-Masonry itself as one of the cardinal rules of conciliarism is this: Thou Shalt Not Offend Anyone Except God.

As subsequent conciliar documents attest, Karol Joszef Wojtyla/John Paul II was the first conciliar “pontiff” to declare that the Old Convent God gave to Moses remained perfectly valid. He did this when speaking in Mainz, German, on November 17, 1980:

“The first dimension of this dialogue, that is, the meeting between the people of the Old Covenant, never revoked by God, and that of the New Covenant, is at the same time a dialogue within our Church, that is to say, between the first and second part of her Bible ... Jews and Christians, as children of Abraham, are called to be a blessing to the world. By committing themselves together for peace and justice among all men and peoples." (Cited by John Vennari in Secret of John Paul II's Success.)

The full text is available on the Vatican website in Italian and German. Here are the relevant passages in these two languages, including a paragraph not cited by Mr. Vennari:

Non si tratta soltanto della correzione di una falsa visuale religiosa del popolo ebraico, che nel corso della storia fu in parte concausa di misconoscimenti e persecuzioni, ma prima di tutto del dialogo tra le due religioni, che - con l’islam - poterono donare al mondo la fede nel Dio unico e ineffabile che ci parla, e lo vogliono servire a nome di tutto ii mondo.

La prima dimensione di questo dialogo, cioè l’incontro tra il popolo di Dio del Vecchio Testamento, da Dio mai denunziato (cf. Rm 11,29), e quello del Nuovo Testamento, è allo stesso tempo un dialogo all’interno della nostra Chiesa, per così dire tra la prima e la seconda parte della sua Bibbia. In proposito dicono le direttive per l’applicazione della dichiarazione conciliare “Nostra Aetate”: “Ci si sforzerà di comprendere meglio tutto ciò che nell’Antico Testamento conserva un valore proprio e perpetuo..., poiché questo valore non è stato obliterato dall’ulteriore interpretazione del Nuovo Testamento, la quale al contrario ha dato all’Antico il suo significato più compiuto, cosicché reciprocamente il Nuovo riceve dall’Antico luce e spiegazione” (Nostra Aetate, II) (Meeting with the representatives of the Hebrew community, Mainz, Germany, 17 November 1980, Italian)

Dabei geht es nicht nur um die Berichtigung einer falschen religiösen Sicht des Judenvolkes, welche die Verkennungen und Verfolgungen im Lauf der Geschichte zum Teil mitverursachte, sondern vor allem um den Dialog zwischen den zwei Religionen, die - mit dem Islam - der Welt den Glauben an den einen, unaussprechlichen, uns ansprechenden Gott schenken durften und stellvertretend für die ganze Welt ihm dienen wollen.

Die erste Dimension dieses Dialogs, nämlich die Begegnung zwischen dem Gottesvolk des von Gott nie gekündigten Alten Bundes, ist zugleich ein Dialog innerhalb unserer Kirche, gleichsam zwischen dem ersten und zweiten Teil ihrer Bibel. Hierzu sagen die Richtlinien für die Durchführung der Konzilserklärung ”Nostra aetate“: ”Man muß bemüht sein, besser zu verstehen, was im Alten Testament von eigenem und bleibendem Wert ist..., da dies durch die spätere Interpretation im Licht des Neuen Testaments, die ihm seinen vollen Sinn gibt, nicht entwertet wird, so daß sich vielmehr eine gegenseitige Beleuchtung und Ausdeutung ergibt“. (Meeting with the representatives of the Hebrew community, Mainz, Germany, 17 November 1980,German.)

This was such a “groundbreaking” event in conciliarism’s compendium of heresies that the conciliar Vatican issued a document in 2015, The Gifts and the Calling of God Are Irrevocable, which was issued by Kurt “Cardinal” Koch in behalf of “Pontifical” Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews, contained another conciliar reiteration of the heresy that the Old Testament has not been revoked and yet another statement that what is said to be the Catholic Church has no missionary activity with respect to the Jews:

37. Another focus for Catholics must continue to be the highly complex theological question of how Christian belief in the universal salvific significance of Jesus Christ can be combined in a coherent way with the equally clear statement of faith in the never-revoked covenant of God with Israel. It is the belief of the Church that Christ is the Saviour for all. There cannot be two ways of salvation, therefore, since Christ is also the Redeemer of the Jews in addition to the Gentiles. Here we confront the mystery of God’s work, which is not a matter of missionary efforts to convert Jews, but rather the expectation that the Lord will bring about the hour when we will all be united, "when all peoples will call on God with one voice and ‘serve him shoulder to shoulder’ " ("Nostra aetate", No.4).

38. The Declaration of the Second Vatican Council on Judaism, that is the fourth article of "Nostra aetate", is located within a decidedly theological framework regarding the universality of salvation in Jesus Christ and God’s unrevoked covenant with Israel. That does not mean that all theological questions which arise in the relationship of Christianity and Judaism were resolved in the text. These questions were introduced in the Declaration, but require further theological reflection. Of course, there had been earlier magisterial texts which focussed on Judaism, but "Nostra aetate" (No.4) provides the first theological overview of the relationship of the Catholic Church to the Jews. (The gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29) - A reflection on theological questions pertaining to Conciliar-Jewish relations, 10 December 2015.)

There is no “mystery” to “clarify” as Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ made it abundantly clear throughout the course of His Public Ministry that He was the promised Messias, and that no one could come to the Father except through Him. He was hated by the Pharisees precisely because they knew He was Who He claimed to be when He said the following:

[51] Amen, amen I say to you: If any man keep my word, he shall not see death for ever. [52] The Jews therefore said: Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest: If any man keep my word, he shall not taste death for ever. [53] Art thou greater than our father Abraham, who is dead? and the prophets are dead. Whom dost thou make thyself? [54] Jesus answered: If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father that glorifieth me, of whom you say that he is your God. [55] And you have not known him, but I know him. And if I shall say that I know him not, I shall be like to you, a liar. But I do know him, and do keep his word.

[56] Abraham your father rejoiced that he might see my day: he saw it, and was glad. [57] The Jews therefore said to him: Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? [58] Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say to you, before Abraham was made, I am. (John 8: 51-56.)

[11] I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep. [12] But the hireling, and he that is not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and flieth: and the wolf catcheth, and scattereth the sheep: [13] And the hireling flieth, because he is a hireling: and he hath no care for the sheep. [14] I am the good shepherd; and I know mine, and mine know me. [15] As the Father knoweth me, and I know the Father: and I lay down my life for my sheep.

[16] And other sheep I have, that are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be one fold and one shepherd. [17] Therefore doth the Father love me: because I lay down my life, that I may take it again. [18] No man taketh it away from me: but I lay it down of myself, and I have power to lay it down: and I have power to take it up again. This commandment have I received of my Father. [19] A dissension rose again among the Jews for these words. [20] And many of them said: He hath a devil, and is mad: why hear you him?

[21] Others said: These are not the words of one that hath a devil: Can a devil open the eyes of the blind? [22] And it was the feast of the dedication at Jerusalem: and it was winter. [23] And Jesus walked in the temple, in Solomon' s porch. [24] The Jews therefore came round about him, and said to him: How long dost thou hold our souls in suspense? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly. [25] Jesus answered them: I speak to you, and you believe not: the works that I do in the name of my Father, they give testimony of me.

[26] But you do not believe, because you are not of my sheep. [27] My sheep hear my voice: and I know them, and they follow me. [28] And I give them life everlasting; and they shall not perish for ever, and no man shall pluck them out of my hand. [29] That which my Father hath given me, is greater than all: and no one can snatch them out of the hand of my Father. [30] I and the Father are one.

[31] The Jews then took up stones to stone him. [32] Jesus answered them: Many good works I have shewed you from my Father; for which of these works do you stone me? [33] The Jews answered him: For a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, maketh thyself God. [34] Jesus answered them: Is it not written in your law: I said you are gods? [35] If he called them gods, to whom the word of God was spoken, and the scripture cannot be broken;

[36] Do you say of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world: Thou blasphemest, because I said, I am the Son of God? [37] If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. [38] But if I do, though you will not believe me, believe the works: that you may know and believe that the Father is in me, and I in the Father. (John 10: 16-38.)

There is no mystery to “clarify.”

Our Lord has spoken decisively.

Yet it is that the conciliar revolutionaries, ever eager to do the bidding of the Talmudic masters, have long sought to shroud in a “mystery” of their own making the very fact that Judaism is a dead, superseded religion that has the power to save no one. There are not two “parallel” paths to salvation.

Similarly, there is no “mystery” about the fact that the Old Testament has been superseded by the New and Eternal Covenant that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ instituted at the Last Supper on Maundy Thursday and ratified by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday.

The relevant passages of the new document with its rehashed heresies masking as “truth” make it clear that Karol Joszef Wojtyla/John Paul II, not the text of Nostra Aetate, as bad as that document was upon its release fifty-nine years ago, who was the first one to state affirmatively that the Old Testament was not revoked, a heresy so astounding that I, for one, am shame-faced for not facing as such at the time when still in the thrall of the Polish Phenomenologist and New Theologian in November of 1980:

39. Because it was such a theological breakthrough, the Conciliar text is not infrequently over–interpreted, and things are read into it which it does not in fact contain. An important example of over–interpretation would be the following: that the covenant that God made with his people Israel perdures and is never invalidated. Although this statement is true, it cannot be explicitly read into "Nostra aetate" (No.4). This statement was instead first made with full clarity by Saint Pope John Paul II when he said during a meeting with Jewish representatives in Mainz on 17 November 1980 that the Old Covenant had never been revoked by God: "The first dimension of this dialogue, that is, the meeting between the people of God of the Old Covenant, never revoked by God … and that of the New Covenant, is at the same time a dialogue within our Church, that is to say, between the first and the second part of her Bible" (No.3). The same conviction is stated also in the Catechism of the Church in 1993: "The Old Covenant has never been revoked" (121).

Here are the ready antidotes, much used on this site, of course, to this heresy:

It [the Holy Roman Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to the divine worship at that time, after our Lord's coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts that they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors. Therefore, it commands all who glory in the name of Christian, at whatever time, before or after baptism, to cease entirely from circumcision, since, whether or not one places hope in it, it cannot be observed at all without the loss of eternal salvation. Regarding children, indeed, because of danger of death, which can often take place, when no help can be brought to them by another remedy than through the sacrament of baptism, through which they are snatched from the domination of the Devil and adopted among the sons of God, it advises that holy baptism ought not to be deferred for forty or eighty days, or any time according to the observance of certain people, but it should be conferred as soon as it can be done conveniently, but so ,that, when danger of death is imminent, they be baptized in the form of the Church, early without delay, even by a layman or woman, if a priest should be lacking, just as is contained more fully in the decree of the Armenians. . . .

It firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart "into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels" [Matt. 25:41], unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church. (Pope Eugene IV, Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, February 4, 1442.)

28.That He completed His work on the gibbet of the Cross is the unanimous teaching of the holy Fathers who assert that the Church was born from the side of our Savior on the Cross like a new Eve, mother of all the living. [28] "And it is now," says the great St. Ambrose, speaking of the pierced side of Christ, "that it is built, it is now that it is formed, it is now that is .... molded, it is now that it is created . . . Now it is that arises a spiritual house, a holy priesthood." [29] One who reverently examines this venerable teaching will easily discover the reasons on which it is based.

29.And first of all, by the death of our Redeemer, the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries, enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in the blood of Jesus Christ. For, while our Divine Savior was preaching in a restricted area -- He was not sent but to the sheep that were lost of the house of Israel [30] -the Law and the Gospel were together in force; [31] but on the gibbet of his death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees, [32] fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross, [33] establishing the New Testament in His blood shed for the whole human race. [34] "To such an extent, then," says St. Leo the Great, speaking of the Cross of our Lord, "was there effected a transfer from the Law to the Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from many sacrifices to one Victim, that, as our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part of the temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom." [35]

30. On the Cross then the Old Law died, soon to be buried and to be a bearer of death, [36] in order to give way to the New Testament of which Christ had chosen the Apostles as qualified ministers; [37] and although He had been constituted the Head of the whole human family in the womb of the Blessed Virgin, it is by the power of the Cross that our Savior exercises fully the office itself of Head in His Church. "For it was through His triumph on the Cross," according to the teaching of the Angelic and Common Doctor, "that He won power and dominion over the gentiles"; [38] by that same victory He increased the immense treasure of graces, which, as He reigns in glory in heaven, He lavishes continually on His mortal members it was by His blood shed on the Cross that God's anger was averted and that all the heavenly gifts, especially the spiritual graces of the New and Eternal Testament, could then flow from the fountains of our Savior for the salvation of men, of the faithful above all; it was on the tree of the Cross, finally, that He entered into possession of His Church, that is, of all the members of His Mystical Body; for they would not have been united to this Mystical Body. (Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943.)

Night and day, ladies and gentlemen. The night of the matter comes from the adversary and is promoted by the counterfeit church at the behest of its Talmudic masters. The light and truth of the matter is from Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, He Who is the very Light of the world.

The Old Covenant has been superseded. It has the power to save no one. Anyone who contends that it does is a heretic. T

Here is a reminder of how widespread this heresy has been in the conciliar structures for so long a time now.

To wit, John Joseph “Cardinal ”O’Connor, who was the conciliar "archbishop" of New York from March 19, 1984 to May 3, 2000, a man who protected moral perverts within his clergy, told a the Masonic B'Nai Brith organization in March of 1998 that "Catholicism and Judaism were meant to coexist side by side until the end of time. This is not what I teach. This is what my boss, Pope John Paul II, teaches, and I work for my boss." Jewish rabbis were amazed at what they heard. Here is an account offered by a "papal" knight, the late Rabbi Leon Klenicki, a pro-abortion rabbi who was present at that Anti-Defamation League dinner in 1998:

Once we invited him [John "Cardinal O'Connor] to talk at one of the Anti-Defamation League dinners. He was there to help present a booklet we had put out. During his speech, he told a story about how he once went to a Reform synagogue and he was the only one there with a yarmulke. Several Reform rabbis who were there looked at each others--I think they couldn't believe it--but everybody was laughing. The Cardinal had a serious point, too. Later that night, he said that he was in pain because there are Jews who do not want to exercise their Judaism because of assimilation or other reasons. It is their duty to practice their faith, he said, to prove that God exists and to refute the Holocaust. He sounded very much like a rabbi when he spoke. The crowd was all around him afterwards, shaking his hand and embracing him. I told him if he ever needed a job I knew a congregation that could use him. (Page 148 of Full of Grace: An Oral Biography of John Cardinal O'Connor.)

Yes, the events of World War II, as horrible as they were, have been exaggerated and exploited by the Talmudists to shame Catholics into feeling guilty about crimes for which they were not responsible.

Indeed, it was the Talmudic exploitation of the Protestant Revolution’s overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King that led directly to the rise and subsequent godless “philosophies” and “ideologies” of Bolshevism and Nazism, which were just two sides of the same socialist coin. Jewish bankers and industrialists were very much responsible for helping to create the religiously indifferentist civil state in Europe.

As noted earlier, Adolph Hitler was merely the end-product of what had been championed by the Freemason Otto von Bismarck sixty years previously. Bismarck started a Kulturkampf against the Holy Faith. Hitler’s own quasi-religion, Nazism, was simply result of four hundred years of revolution against the Divine Plan to effect man’s return to Him through His Catholic Church, a revolution that was aided and abetted by Talmudists at every turn.

It is thus reprehensible that the conciliar revolutionaries still continue to invoke the “Shoah” in order to justify their false religious sect’s “new relationship with the faith of Israel,” which was described by the “restorer of Tradition,” Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, as follows in his infamous Christmas address to the conciliar curia on December 22, 2005:

Thirdly, linked more generally to this was the problem of religious tolerance - a question that required a new definition of the relationship between the Christian faith and the world religions. In particular, before the recent crimes of the Nazi regime and, in general, with a retrospective look at a long and difficult history, it was necessary to evaluate and define in a new way the relationship between the Church and the faith of Israel.  (Christmas greetings to the Members of the Roman Curia and Prelature, December 22, 2005)

No event of secular history can cause the Catholic Church to breathe new life into a false religion that is hated by God.

The events of World War II have been used by various adherents of the Talmud to demonstrate their deeply held belief that the spilling of Jewish blood is more horrible a crime than the spilling of the blood of others. Indeed, the Zionists in Israel have treated the Palestinians, who were thrown out of their own homes and had their property seized from them in 1948 and have been subjected to all manner of degrading conditions since that time, as the same sort of subhumans as the Jews and others, especially the Poles, were treated by the Nazis. The exploitation of the crimes of the Nazis during World War II has resulted in an endless effort to impose "guilt" on anyone and everyone who dares to proclaim the Holy Name of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in public, no less hold to everything that He has revealed to us in the Sacred Deposit of Faith and has entrusted to the infallible teaching authority of His Catholic Church for Its explication and eternal safekeeping.

Far from fulfilling Our Lord’s mission to the Apostles to seek the conversion of everyone in the whole world, the conciliar revolutionaries have sought to reaffirm adherents of false religions in paths that can lead them only eternal perdition, not eternal salvation.

Things have been so bad for so long that the aforementioned John Joseph “Cardinal” O’Connor even once told a young man, Stephen Dubner, that “God was smiling” on his decision to convert to Talmudism from Catholicism in order to “atone” for his parents having converted from Judaism to Catholicism decades before:

"Tell your mother that you have tried to study this, that you have prayed about it, this is not just a revolt or a rejection, this is not a dismissal of what you don't understand -- that this is where you think God wants you to be, an informed Jew." (BOOKS OF THE TIMES; Words Upon the Heart, Heard at Last.)

An “informed” decision that God wants one to be an “informed Jew.”

Oh, by the American Broadcasting Company television network’s Nightline program, hosted by Ted Koppel, was the venue in which “Cardinal” O’Connor made his “God is smiling on all of this” remark in an interview that aired as part of segment that focused specifically on Stephen Dubner’s conversion to Talmudism.

The date of that Nightline telecast?

December 25, 1998, something that was hardly a coincidence as Talmudists are always at the ready to make a mockery of the Nativity of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

This egregious episode prompted me to write an article for The Wanderer, “How to Break A Mother’s Heart,” meaning, of course, Our Blessed Mother’s Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

No, none of what was released by the conciliar Vatican’s “Pontifical” Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews” in 2015 was the least bit new. It was and remains standard conciliar “orthodoxy” of the sort that prompted the longtime preacher to the antipapal household, Father Raniero Cantalamessa, O.F.M., Cap., who has been at his apostate work inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River for forty-four years, having served as the “papal” preacher from 1980 to 2024, wrote the following in 2005:

If Jews one day come (as Paul hopes) to a more positive judgment of Jesus, this must occur through an inner process, as the end of a search of their own (something that in part is occurring). We Christians cannot be the ones who seek to convert them. We have lost the right to do so by the way in which this was done in the past. First the wounds must be healed through dialogue and reconciliation. (Zenit, September 30, 2005.)

"We have lost the right to do so by the way in which this was done in the past?"

Where in the history of the Catholic Church prior to 1958 can you find any evidence whatsoever that the mandate given by Our Lord to the Eleven on Ascension Thursday to seek to convert all men at all times until His Second Coming in glory is a mere "right" that can be "lost"?

It was also during Karol Joszef Wojtyla/John Paul II’s twenty-six and one-half year reign as the fourth in the current line of antipopes that his hand chosen prefect of the so-called Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Joseph Alois “Cardinal” Ratzinger, made the following statements with his (Wojtyla/John Paul II’s) full approval and consent:

“It is of course possible to read the Old Testament so that it is not directed toward Christ; it does not point quite unequivocally to Christ.  And if Jews cannot see the promises as being fulfilled in him, this is not just ill will on their part, but genuinely because of the obscurity of the texts and the tension in the relationship between these texts and the figure of Jesus.  Jesus brings a new meaning to these texts – yet it is he who first gives them their proper coherence and relevance and significance.  There are perfectly good reasons, then, for denying that the Old Testament refers to Christ and for saying, No, that is not what he said.  And there are also good reasons for referring it to him – that is what the dispute between Jews and Christians is about.” (Joseph "Cardinal" Ratzinger, God and the World, p. 209.)

In its work, the Biblical Commission could not ignore the contemporary context, where the shock of the Shoah has put the whole question under a new light. Two main problems are posed: Can Christians, after all that has happened, still claim in good conscience to be the legitimate heirs of Israel's Bible? Have they the right to propose a Christian interpretation of this Bible, or should they not instead, respectfully and humbly, renounce any claim that, in the light of what has happened, must look like a usurpation? The second question follows from the first: In its presentation of the Jews and the Jewish people, has not the New Testament itself contributed to creating a hostility towards the Jewish people that provided a support for the ideology of those who wished to destroy Israel? The Commission set about addressing those two questions. It is clear that a Christian rejection of the Old Testament would not only put an end to Christianity itself as indicated above, but, in addition, would prevent the fostering of positive relations between Christians and Jews, precisely because they would lack common ground. In the light of what has happened, what ought to emerge now is a new respect for the Jewish interpretation of the Old Testament. On this subject, the Document says two things. First it declares that “the Jewish reading of the Bible is a possible one, in continuity with the Jewish Scriptures of the Second Temple period, a reading analogous to the Christian reading, which developed in parallel fashion” (no. 22). It adds that Christians can learn a great deal from a Jewish exegesis practised for more than 2000 years; in return, Christians may hope that Jews can profit from Christian exegetical research (ibid.). I think this analysis will prove useful for the pursuit of Judeo-Christian dialogue, as well as for the interior formation of Christian consciousness. (Joseph "Cardinal" Ratzinger, Preface to The Jewish People and Their Scriptures in the Christian Bible.)

“It is of course possible to read the Old Testament so that it is not directed toward Christ; it does not point quite unequivocally to Christ.  And if Jews cannot see the promises as being fulfilled in him, this is not just ill will on their part, but genuinely because of the obscurity of the texts and the tension in the relationship between these texts and the figure of Jesus.  Jesus brings a new meaning to these texts – yet it is he who first gives them their proper coherence and relevance and significance.  There are perfectly good reasons, then, for denying that the Old Testament refers to Christ and for saying, No, that is not what he said.  And there are also good reasons for referring it to him – that is what the dispute between Jews and Christians is about.” (Joseph "Cardinal" Ratzinger, God and the World, p. 209.)

This is such rank apostasy that it is amazing that there are still those who pine for the supposedly “restorer of tradition” who was simply a more urbane and literate heretic than his vulgar, profane successor, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

It was “Pope Benedict XVI” that Joseph Alois Ratzinger sought to fulfill Roncalli’s desire to unit and not divide that he said the following to Talmudists:

To the religious leaders present this afternoon, I wish to say that the particular contribution of religions to the quest for peace lies primarily in the wholehearted, united search for God.  Ours is the task of proclaiming and witnessing that the Almighty is present and knowable even when he seems hidden from our sight, that he acts in our world for our good, and that a society’s future is marked with hope when it resonates in harmony with his divine order.  It is God’s dynamic presence that draws hearts together and ensures unity.  In fact, the ultimate foundation of unity among persons lies in the perfect oneness and universality of God, who created man and woman in his image and likeness in order to draw us into his own divine life so that all may be one. ("Pope" Benedict XVI, Courtesy visit to the President of the State of Israel at the presidential palace in Jerusalem, May 11, 2009.)

9. Christians and Jews share to a great extent a common spiritual patrimony, they pray to the same Lord, they have the same roots, and yet they often remain unknown to each other.  It is our duty, in response to God’s call, to strive to keep open the space for dialogue, for reciprocal respect, for growth in friendship, for a common witness in the face of the challenges of our time, which invite us to cooperate for the good of humanity in this world created by God, the Omnipotent and Merciful. (Ratzinger/Benedict at Rome synagogue: ‘May these wounds be healed forever!’.)  

Courtesy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who has been strutting around the world as “Pope Francis” since March 13, 2013, “Saint John Paul II’s” “teaching” that the Old Covenant had never been repealed, part of what Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI called on December 22, 2005, “new way of thinking about the faith of Israel,” is now part of the official teaching of the counterfeit church of conciliarism:

247. We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for “the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29). The Church, which shares with Jews an important part of the sacred Scriptures, looks upon the people of the covenant and their faith as one of the sacred roots of her own Christian identity (cf. Rom 11:16-18). As Christians, we cannot consider Judaism as a foreign religion; nor do we include the Jews among those called to turn from idols and to serve the true God (cf. 1 Thes 1:9). With them, we believe in the one God who acts in history, and with them we accept his revealed word.

248. Dialogue and friendship with the children of Israel are part of the life of Jesus’ disciples. The friendship which has grown between us makes us bitterly and sincerely regret the terrible persecutions which they have endured, and continue to endure, especially those that have involved Christians.

249. God continues to work among the people of the Old Covenant and to bring forth treasures of wisdom which flow from their encounter with his word. For this reason, the Church also is enriched when she receives the values of Judaism. While it is true that certain Christian beliefs are unacceptable to Judaism, and that the Church cannot refrain from proclaiming Jesus as Lord and Messiah, there exists as well a rich complementarity which allows us to read the texts of the Hebrew Scriptures together and to help one another to mine the riches of God’s word. We can also share many ethical convictions and a common concern for justice and the development of peoples. (Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Evangelii Gaudium, November 26, 2013.)

There is no need to belabor once again the material covered in Perpetual Immunity of the Church from Error and Heresy. Heresy is heresy, and the Catholic Church can never spotted by anything approaching heresy, no less be headed by a true pope who inserts such a heretical statement in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ sought to convert Saul, the fire-breathing Jewish hater of His own Most Holy Name who presided over the stoning of Saint Stephen the Protomartyr. The conciliar “popes” believe that it is “proselytizing” for Catholics to do now what Our Lord Himself did with Saint Paul the Apostle as He effected His conversion to become the Apostle to the Gentiles.

There is no further need to provide all the documentation of how Jorge Mario Bergoglio and company have appeased Talmudists in the past eleven years nine months as they have built upon the heretical precedents of the fifty-four and one-half years that preceded the Argentine Apostate as the universal public face of apostasy. The record speaks for itself.

In the meantime, of course, we continue to pray the Joyful Mysteries of Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary during this Advent season as we prepare to make room in the inns of our hearts for the commemoration of her Divine Son’s Nativity and, if at all possible in this time of apostasy and betrayal, to receive Him in Holy Communion,

To do this, though, we must live worthily as befits Catholics. We must do penance for our sins, something that Pope Gregory the Great noted in a sermon included in the readings for Matins in today’s Divine Office on the Fourth Sunday of Advent:

John said unto the multitude, that came forth to be baptised of him: O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? The wrath to come in one sense signifieth the great vengeance of the Latter Day the sinner that repenteth not of his sin now, will have no mean whereby to flee from punishment then. Let us remark that addressing evil children copying the example of evil parents, the Baptist calleth them a generation of vipers in that they were envious at the righteous, and persecuted them; that they repaid evil for evil; that they hunted out ways of harming their neighbours, in all these things following the pattern of carnal parents, the prophet likeneth them to a venomous brood hatched from a venomous stock.

We also have sinned, we have fallen into wicked habits. What must we do, if we would flee from the wrath to come? Let us hear John. Bring forth fruits worthy of repentance. In which words let us remark that the Friend of the Bridegroom demandeth not only fruits of repentance, but fruits worthy of repentance. The former are one thing, and the latter another. In considering then what are fruits worthy of repentance, we may remark that if we had done nothing unlawful we might have had free use of things which are lawful, and been able to sanctify ourselves without abstaining from indulgence in the things of the world.

But if any one, for example, hath fallen into fornication, or perhaps, into what is much worse, adultery, he ought to make up for his lawless pleasure by abstaining in some degree from lawful enjoyments. He that hath sinned less is not bound to mortify himself as much as he that hath sinned more, nor he that is innocent like him that is guilty. Let every one hearing these words bring forth fruits worthy of repentance, proceed to judge himself by his own conscience, and the more he perceiveth that he hath sinned, the greater penance let him do. (Pope Saint Gregory the Great, Matins, Divine Office, Fourth Sunday of Advent.)

Each of us mocks Christ the King when we sin, when we make ourselves the arbiters of moral right and moral wrong, when we know what is right but prefer to sin (whether by thought, word, or deed), when we think that we do not need the graces that He won for us by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross and that flow into our hearts and souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces, to grow in virtue in this life and to persevere at all times in a state of Sanctifying Grace so as to be ready to meet Him as Our Divine Judge after we have died.

Let us not deceive ourselves.

We have been given the gift of the true Faith and yet we still sin, something that Our  Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ told Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque grieved His Sacred Heart:

The harsh treatment which He received from the Jews, Gentiles and heretics was indeed very painful to Him, but they were His open enemies. But could we ever thought it possible that those who recognize His benefits, that those who make profession of being faithful to Him, that His own children should not only be insensible to His benefits and in no way touched with compassion at the sight of the grief caused by such contempt, but that they should treat Him with contempt by their irreverences and sacrileges? Our Saviour might well say: "If pagans and Turks and infidels had treated Me so, I might have endured it." "for if my enemy had reviled me, I would verily have borne it". (Ps. 54:13), but that Christians, Catholics whom I have not only redeemed, but have fed and nourished with my Body and Blood, should have nothing but contempt for Me, that they should treat Me with ingratitude, is too much. "But thou a man of one mind, my guide and my familiar: who didst take sweetmeats together with me! (Ps. 54: 14-15)

What must be the sentiments of this most generous and tender Heart of Jesus which has so loved men, and which finds in the hearts of those men only coldness and contempt? "I am become a reproach among my enemies." (Ps. 30: 12). If after exposing Myself to the contempt and hatred of My enemies in the midst of the outrages which I suffer, I could at least find a large number of faithful friends who would console Me! But it is quite the contrary: "They that saw me without fled from me." (Ps. 30:12) The greater number, seeing that I have disguised Myself under the feeble appearance of bread in order to have the pleasure of dwelling among men, abandon Me and forget Me as a person who has no place in their hearts, "I am forgotten as one dead from the heart" (Ps. 30:13).  (Father John Croiset, The Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, republished by TAN Books and Publishers.)

It is important, therefore, to keep ever in our minds the fact that our sins caused Our Lord’s sufferings during His Passion Death when having to deal with the efforts of Talmudists to “demand” “answers” from that which they think is the Catholic Church. Catholics hate nothing other than the devil, his demons and the errors and heresies that they inspire in the minds and hearts of men. Most of all, though, believing Catholics hate their own sins.

This having been duly noted, it is no act of “hatred” of any kind to review the actual facts of salvation history and to explain that the Talmudists of today are as blind as were the Biblical Jews of Our Lord’s time. Catholics must perform the Spiritual and Corporal Works of Mercy, and one two of the Spiritual Works of Mercy are to instruct the ignorant and to correct the sinner.

Catholics will the good of all men, the ultimate expression of which is the salvation of their immortal souls as members of the Catholic Church.

Pope Pius XI explained in Ubi Arcano Consilio, December 23, 1922, that there is only one path to peace, Catholicism, not Judaism, not the ethos of Judeo-Masonry, not Mohammedanism, not Buddhism or Hinduism. Catholicism. Nothing else:

There exists an institution able to safeguard the sanctity of the law of nations. This institution is a part of every nation; at the same time it is above all nations. She enjoys, too, the highest authority, the fullness of the teaching power of the Apostles. Such an institution is the Church of Christ. She alone is adapted to do this great work, for she is not only divinely commissioned to lead mankind, but moreover, because of her very make-up and the constitution which she possesses, by reason of her age-old traditions and her great prestige, which has not been lessened but has been greatly increased since the close of the War, cannot but succeed in such a venture where others assuredly will fail.

It is apparent from these considerations that true peace, the peace of Christ, is impossible unless we are willing and ready to accept the fundamental principles of Christianity, unless we are willing to observe the teachings and obey the law of Christ, both in public and private life. If this were done, then society being placed at last on a sound foundation, the Church would be able, in the exercise of its divinely given ministry and by means of the teaching authority which results therefrom, to protect all the rights of God over men and nations.

It is possible to sum up all We have said in one word, "the Kingdom of Christ." For Jesus Christ reigns over the minds of individuals by His teachings, in their hearts by His love, in each one's life by the living according to His law and the imitating of His example. Jesus reigns over the family when it, modeled after the holy ideals of the sacrament of matrimony instituted by Christ, maintains unspotted its true character of sanctuary. In such a sanctuary of love, parental authority is fashioned after the authority of God, the Father, from Whom, as a matter of fact, it originates and after which even it is named. (Ephesians iii, 15) The obedience of the children imitates that of the Divine Child of Nazareth, and the whole family life is inspired by the sacred ideals of the Holy Family. Finally, Jesus Christ reigns over society when men recognize and reverence the sovereignty of Christ, when they accept the divine origin and control over all social forces, a recognition which is the basis of the right to command for those in authority and of the duty to obey for those who are subjects, a duty which cannot but ennoble all who live up to its demands. Christ reigns where the position in society which He Himself has assigned to His Church is recognized, for He bestowed on the Church the status and the constitution of a society which, by reason of the perfect ends which it is called upon to attain, must be held to be supreme in its own sphere; He also made her the depository and interpreter of His divine teachings, and, by consequence, the teacher and guide of every other society whatsoever, not of course in the sense that she should abstract in the least from their authority, each in its own sphere supreme, but that she should really perfect their authority, just as divine grace perfects human nature, and should give to them the assistance necessary for men to attain their true final end, eternal happiness, and by that very fact make them the more deserving and certain promoters of their happiness here below.

It is, therefore, a fact which cannot be questioned that the true peace of Christ can only exist in the Kingdom of Christ -- "the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ." It is no less unquestionable that, in doing all we can to bring about the re-establishment of Christ's kingdom, we will be working most effectively toward a lasting world peace. (Pope Pius XI, Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 23, 1922.) 

Our Lady is the great foe of all heresies, including Modernism, whose rise was made possible by Protestantism and its alliance with Judeo-Masonry, and must pray to her that a bishop after the true pastoral heart and manly spirit of Pope Saint Pius X is restored to the Throne of Saint Peter sooner rather than later.

Pray to Our Lady daily for the conversion of all non-Catholics and for the conversion of the baptized Catholics who lead the counterfeit church of conciliarism after having fallen away from the bosom of Holy Mother Church by embracing every Protestant and Judeo-Masonic error imaginable. Indeed, it is not for nothing that Pope Saint Pius X referred to Modernism as "the synthesis of all heresies."

May we ever have recourse to Our Lady to pray for the conversion of all of those who are attacking the true Faith, including the aforementioned Jorge Mario Bergoglio himself and his fellow revolutionaries, and as we continue to pray each day for our own conversion away from our sins as we seek to offer up reparation for them to the throne of the Most Blessed Trinity as the consecrated slaves of her Divine Son, Christ the King, through her own most Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

May the final three days of Advent find us waiting in expectation with Our Lady and Saint Joseph for the Nativity of Christ the King with hearts beating in unison with theirs as we exclaim:

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthazar, pray for us.