The Argentine Anti-Apostle’s Biennial Election Interference Campaign Has Begun

The forces of the false opposite of the naturalist “left” used all the apparatus of the national security state in 2016 in an attempt to prevent the election of Donald John Trump as president of the United States of America and then used the same apparatus to wreak havoc during his presidency by means of the Russian collusion hoax before exploiting the coronascam plandemic in 2020 as the excuse to implement mail-in-ballots to manufacture votes for the decrepit former Vice President of the United States of America, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., whose presidential administration is continuing to use its lawfare campaign to prevent Trump’s reelection in 2024.

Similarly, the entire apparatus of the anti-apostolic forces inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River did everything possible to condemn Donald John Trump in 2016 in order to boost the election of former First Lady of the United States/former carpetbagging United States Senator from the State of New York/former Secretary of State of the United States of America/former expert in trading cattle futures/full-time fabulist who spoke of dodging bullets in Bosnia Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio himself led the charge of conciliar sect’s not-so-light brigade against Trump as early as February of 2016. This is what I wrote in 2016 after Vaticanologist Philip Pullela had asked His Apostateness a loaded question about candidate Donald Trump’s immigration policies:

Question from Philip Pullella of Reuters:

Phil Pullella, Reuters: Today, you spoke very eloquently about the problems of immigration. On the other side of the border, there is a very tough electoral battle. One of the candidates for the White House, Republican Donald Trump, in an interview recently said that you are a political man and he even said that you are a pawn, an instrument of the Mexican government for migration politics. Trump said that if he’s elected, he wants to build 2,500 kilometers of wall along the border. He wants to deport 11 million illegal immigrants, separating families, etcetera. I would like to ask you, what do you think of these accusations against you and if a North American Catholic can vote for a person like this?

Interjection Number One:

Yes, I want to interject even before providing Bergoglio’s answers.

Philip Pullella loaded his questions with emotionally laded statements about deporting eleven million illegal immigrants and separating families, thereby “grooving” one for the portly Argentine Apostate to whack out of the park to the delight of his fellow revolutionaries:

Bergoglio: Thank God he said I was a politician because Aristotle defined the human person as 'animal politicus.' At least I am a human person. As to whether I am a pawn, well, maybe, I don't know. I'll leave that up to your judgment and that of the people. And then, a person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian. This is not in the Gospel. As far as what you said about whether I would advise to vote or not to vote, I am not going to get involved in that. I say only that this man is not Christian if he has said things like that. We must see if he said things in that way and in this I give the benefit of the doubt. (The Most Outrageous Bergoglio Interview.)

Interjection Number Two:

What naked hypocrisy and self-righteous pomposity.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio has “excommunicated” Donald John Trump from a generic “Christianity” because of his positions on protecting the borders of the United States of America.

I mean, this is the same man who met on the South Lawn of the White House on Wednesday, September 23, 2015, the Feast of Pope Saint Linus and the Commemoration of Saint Thecla, with President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, a man whose hands are dripping with the blood of the innocent preborn by means of his administration’s full-throated support for the chemical and surgical assassination of the innocent preborn, which has included pressuring governments of Latin America to permit baby-killing-on-demand, without saying of condemnation of our current president and his policies.

Indeed, the hideous “Father” Thomas Rosica, C.S.B., told us five months ago that “Pope Francis” was not going to raise the issue of abortion and “gay marriage” and the ObamaCare health insurance mandate to provide converage for contraception and other "family services" with Obama/Soetoro during his visit to the United States of America as he did not want to involve himself in “politics”:

(CNSNews.com) – If you’re expecting Pope Francis to address the Obamacare contraceptive mandate or religious freedom when he visits the nation’s capital on Tuesday, Father Thomas Rosica, adviser to the Vatican, said that won’t happen. In an interview with “Fox News Sunday,” Rosica said the pope’s “playbook” for the visit will not be “a political manual,” but rather “the gospel of Jesus Christ.”

“What I do think is going to happen … is that he's coming as the cardinal said, as a pastor of souls, and his playbook for this visit, the lexicon, if you will, is not a political manual, it's not the handbook of a particular party, it's the gospel of Jesus Christ, which cuts across all divisions, which cuts across all of our categories,” Rosica said.

“But in dealing with those real problems, Father Rosica, one thing about this pope, is that he’s willing to step on feet on all sides of various issues. He's also going to be meeting with President Obama, and I don't have to tell you the Catholic Church is in something of a struggle with the Obama administration about the issue of religious freedom and the debate about the Obamacare mandate when it comes to contraception and insurance coverage of that, birth control by church-related groups. Do you expect him to bring that up with the president?” Fox host Chris Wallace asked.

“No,” Rosica said, “but what I do think is going to happen … is that he's coming as the cardinal said, as a pastor of souls, and his playbook for this visit, the lexicon, if you will, is not a political manual, it's not the handbook of a particular party, it's the gospel of Jesus Christ, which cuts across all divisions, which cuts across all of our categories.

“The beauty of this pope is we can't pigeonhole him. He's a gentleman. He deals with heads of state with great grace and dignity,” said Rosica.

“The visit to the White House, the president and his wife, and the whole team at the White House are doing a very good job, and they have a certain decorum that's required of them at that stage to welcome the pope as the greatest, I should say, not just the great, the greatest moral leader in the world right now, and this is an opportunity for the president and his whole team to welcome him and to listen to the message of a peacemaker,” he added.

“The backdrop of this whole visit is not what's happening in American politics or a presidential campaign. The backdrop is a world steeped in violence and bloodshed and rancor and hatred, and here we have coming to your city, to our diocese, a real prince of peace. If there's any princely title that should be associated with Francis, it's a prince of peace, it's a bringer of peace,” Rosica said.

“When peacemakers come, they upset those who are not at peace. So, if people are going to be upset in any side of the spectrum here, let them look inside themselves and see what those issues are first, because in the presence of Francis, as you know and as I know, you're in the presence of extraordinary goodness, of kindness, of intelligence and of humanity. So, humanity is coming to teach us how to be more human,” he added. (Vatican Adviser: Pope's Playbook for DC Is Not a Political.)

Yet it is that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has “excommunicated” Donald John Trump from a generic “Christianity” because of his positions on protecting the borders of the United States of America as he, Bergoglio, deliberately immersed himself into what he knows is a hot-button political issue in this country during an election year. He is an insidious, crapulous hypocrite.

Bergoglio's "excommunication" of Donald Trump from even a generic "Christianity" means that a person who holds a governmental position, whether elected or appointed, can support the execution of the innocent preborn and be considered a “Christian.”

A “Christian” for Jorge Mario Bergoglio is one who opposes the death penalty.

A “Christian” for Jorge Mario Bergoglio is one who supports the right of foreign nations to cross the borders of nations of other nations at will without any regard for just laws.

A “Christian” for Jorge Mario Bergoglio is one who supports “drastic measures” to reduce global warming in order to support “climate change.”

A “Christian” for Jorge Mario Bergoglio is one who supports schemes of income redistribution in the name of “economic justice.”

A “Christian” for Jorge Mario Bergoglio is one who welcomes those who welcome those who live in sinful relationships, whether natural or unnatural, without any degree of judgment. “Who am I am to judge?” Remember that one?’

Hypocrisy.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio jokes and laughs with mass murderous such as Raoul and Fidel Castro without a word of condemnation.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio accepted a sacrilegious crucifix from Bolivian President Evo Morales that was emblazoned with a Marxist hammer and sickle without a word of condemnation.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio has given comfort and succor to homosexuals, lesbians, transvestites and divorced and civilly remarried persons without for a moment questioning whether they were Christians. Indeed, he has reaffirmed such people, including a homosexual “couple from Argentina with whom he met in the “papal” nunciature in Washington, District of Columbia, on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 (see Polluting the Atmosphere With the Smoke of Antichrist, part nine).

Yes, Jorge’s “mercy” does not extend, of course, to those who disagree with what he thinks is part of “openness” and “tolerance,” to those who deny “climate change,” to those who are anti-Jewish, that is, to those who believe teaching of the Catholic Church concerning the simple fact that the Old Covenant was superseded by the New and Eternal Covenant that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour instituted on Maundy Thursday at the Last Supper that He ratified by shedding every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday as the earth quaked and the curtain in the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom.

Behold Jorge the self-righteous and truly Pharisaical hypocrite, a man who condemns those who “judge” the immorality of sinful actions for what they are and as he condemns a nominal Protestant, Donald John Trump a man who is not very knowledgeable about First and Last Things even according the false teachings of his false religious sect to which he belongs, on a matter that is not part of the Sacred Deposit of Faith and thus subject to free discussion among men. (As excerpted from: Jorge's Most Outrageous Interview to Date, part one.)

It was during the general election campaign in 2016 that Wikileaks released a treasure trove of Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton’s campaign’s emails, including one that scoffed at Catholics and so-called “evangelical” Protestants:

Why in the world, therefore, should it be the least bit surprising that three Catholics, two of whom are key advisers to Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton—John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri, and John Halpin—espouse false views of Catholicism that coincide with those of their political patroness? Each of these three individuals are products of both Americanism and conciliarism, thereby making them Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s kind of Catholics.

It is with this in mind, therefore, that one must see the WikiLeaks release of e-mails among these three as having nothing to do with anti-Catholicism per se, but as unintentional documentation of the corrupt view of Catholicism that they have held throughout their entire lives. This corruption is the product of conciliarism and is being espoused openly—without any smokescreen or pretense—by the Argentine Apostate, a man who eschews moral “black and white” and who is constantly attacking “dogmatic” Catholics he contends are “closed in on themselves” and thus use doctrine as a “bludgeon” upon those who do not adhere to the truths of the Faith. The e-mail chain released by WikiLeaks concerning the Catholic Faith is thus useful to demonstrate that the Miss Palmieri and Messrs. Podesta and Halpin have been insulated from any true understanding of the Catholic Faith precisely because they were formed by adherents of Americanism and conciliarism, that is, by adherents of a “democratic” view of Faith and Morals that rejects the simple fact that Divine revelation and moral truth do not depend upon human acceptance for their binding force or validity.

Herewith follows a news story about the WikiLeaks release of the e-mail chain in question:

The latest batch of documents published by WikiLeaks appears to show Hillary Clinton’s campaign communications director joking with a confidant about Catholics and evangelicals in emails sent to John Podesta, chairman of Clinton’s campaign.

Clinton campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri, who ran communications for the liberal think tank Center for American Progress that Podesta founded, responded to emails from think tank fellow John Halpin who noted a 2011 report in the New Yorker about News Corp chief executive Rupert Murdoch and Wall Street Journal managing editor Robert Thomson raising their children Catholic.

“Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the [Supreme Court] and think tanks to the media and social groups,” Halpin wrote in the 2011 email, according to WikiLeaks. “It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.”

Palmieri responded that she believes Murdoch, Thomson and many other conservatives are Catholic because they think it’s “the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion.” “Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals,” she wrote. Podesta did not respond in the email thread.

The Washington Post reported earlier this year that Russian government hackers penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee, gaining access to an entire database of opposition research.

Podesta, a longtime Clinton family confidant, said Tuesday that he was told by FBI officials that the intrusion into his email is now part of a wider inquiry into potential Russian cyberattacks. He would not confirm the authenticity of emails released in recent days by the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks that appear to be from his Gmail account. “I’m a Catholic, I don’t recognize that email that we saw,” he said.

The Clinton campaign declined to comment Wednesday on the contents of the 2011 emails in question, instead linking to a tweet from Clinton’s press secretary Brian Fallon.

Trump’s running mate Indiana Gov. Mike Pence decried the emails in remarks at Liberty University on Wednesday morning. He said that Clinton should denounce the “bigoted remarks” and apologize to people of faith. Trump also noted the emails while he campaigned in Florida, saying it showed Clinton aides attacked Catholics and evangelicals viciously. On a Wednesday conference call with reporters, Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway called on Clinton to “fire the staff who have engaged in this vicious anti-Catholic bigotry.”

Another email that was released appears to suggest that Clinton’s campaign set up Catholic groups to organize on issues such as contraception. Sandy Newman, president of Voices for Progress, wrote in an 2011 email to Podesta that there needs to be “a Catholic Spring,” referring to the “Arab Spring,” a wave of demonstrations and protests in the Arab world.

“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church,” Newman wrote.

“Is contraceptive coverage [in health care] an issue around which that could happen,” he asked.

He noted the controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage, citing claims that 98 percent of Catholic women have used contraception (thatpercentage has been questioned, however).

“Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc.,” he wrote. “Even if the idea isn’t crazy, I don’t qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about how one would ‘plant the seeds of the revolution,’ or who would plant them.”

Podesta responded that the campaign had created the groups Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United “to organize for a moment like this.” Leaders from those two groups did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

“Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up,” Podesta wrote.

Raymond Arroyo, lead anchor and managing editor of EWTN, the global Catholic network, said the emails have the potential to tip the balance for people who were still undecided. “If you have people on the fences, it is irritating,” Arroyo said.

Arroyo said that the emails describing the “Catholic Spring” will especially rub Catholics the wrong way.

“It makes it seem like you’re creating organizations to change the core beliefs of the church,” he said. “For someone to come and say, ‘I have a political organization to change your church to complete my political agenda or advance my agenda,’ I don’t know how anybody could embrace that.”

Earlier in the summer, internal Democratic National Committee emails were published publicly that appeared to show officials discussing using Sen. Bernie Sanders’s faith against him with voters, with one saying “my Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.” Those emails were also published by WikiLeaks.

Past polls have suggested Trump could have a problem among Catholics, many of whom have shifted from voting Republican to Democrat this election cycle. While they once voted primarily with the Democratic Party, they have become divided in recent years, with many voting Republican because of issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. This time around, they are an important swing vote in such states as Florida, Pennsylvania and North Carolina. (https://WikiLeaks Shows Clinton Spokeswoman Joking About Catholics and Evangelicals.)

Poor Raymond Arroyo, a man who would have Catholics believe that the “Catholic Spring” desired by Miss Palmieri and Messrs. Podesta and Halpin is not in full bloom with the man who is making open warfare against Catholic Faith, Morals, and Worship, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who has ripped the mask off of the false face of Catholicism that was worn by his antipapal predecessors since the “election” of Angelo Roncalli/John XXIII on October 28, 1958, the Feast of Saints Simon and Jude. Bergoglio, Mr. Arroyo, is in complete accord with these three Clintonistas, and he has spent much time in the past forty-three months bashing believing Catholics and championing the lifestyles of unrepentant sinners by using a false concept of “mercy” and by using a false dichotomy that he believes exists between doctrine and mercy. Jorge is “ready for Hillary,” and he will send her an enthusiastic note of congratulations following her election on November 8, 2016.

Moreover, neither Bergoglio nor his new crop of American “bishops,” including the newly minted “cardinal”-elect, Blase Cupich, the conciliar “Archbishop” of Chicago, Illinois, will say one word of protest when she appoints completely pro-abortion and pro-sodomite judges to Federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court of the United States of America, and they will hail her for her policies of “open borders” and “globalism.” The Clinton-Kaine administration, therefore, will have a “green light” from the “Green Jorge” to use whatever legal means are necessary to silence the sort of Catholics disparaged in the Podesta-Palmieri-Halpin e-mail exchange as the false “pontiff” rarely misses an opportunity at the Casa Santa Marta to do so himself.

The situation is so tragic that John Halpin can speak of being a “progressive Catholic” who was trained by the sort of Jesuits that Pope Pius XII had warned about in 1957 were seeking to base moral teaching on what people are doing rather than on what they ought to do. This is what Halpin wrote in the aftermath of the WikiLeaks release of his e-mails:

I’m Catholic. My parents are Catholics. I went to a Catholic university. My kids were baptized by their Jesuit uncle and went to Catholic school when they were young. I have conservative Catholic family members. They don’t always agree with my views and I don’t always agree with theirs. But I have always respected people with deeply held religious views and enjoy learning from others with different theological perspectives.

I’m certainly not the best Catholic around and I have some criticisms of Church doctrine, but my Catholic upbringing and education helped to shape my own progressive values and perspective on politics and society.

Now, as a result of apparently hacked emails to my former boss, John Podesta, and misleading reporting about these emails, I’m being falsely accused as an anti-Catholic bigot. With no knowledge of me or my work or my past, people are sending me lovely notes ensuring that I “will burn for eternity in Hell” only after they’ve “pissed on my grave” and “prayed for my damnation.”

Although I cannot authenticate any of the other emails in this hack, I did write this one. If the news organizations promoting stories on this email had bothered to look into the context of the email exchange, it would be clear that my intention in this private note was not to insult Catholics or people of faith, but rather in an admittedly offhanded manner, to make a fleeting point about perceived hypocrisy and the flaunting of one’s faith by prominent conservative leaders.

I’ll provide that context here.

My email to my colleagues was in response to an article in The New Yorker by Ken Auletta on Rupert Murdoch. The author starts off with an account of “an exclusive 18-page spread” in another magazine covering the baptism of Murdoch’s children in Jordan, with celebrities attending including Nicole Kidman and Ivanka Trump, and then proceeds to talk about Murdoch’s relationship with then-managing editor of the Wall Street Journal, Robert Thomson.

Now I don’t care that Murdoch and Thomson raise their kids Catholic. Catholics have great values and a Catholic upbringing provides good guidance about how to live one’s life. 
 
 What I reacted to in my email, rightly or wrongly, was the grand public display of Catholicism from a right-wing billionaire who owns a media conglomerate, including Fox News, that routinely assaults the values of the poor, sows racial discord, and attacks immigrants. This seemed inconsistent with what I was taught about Catholic values, so I penned off an email to my other Catholic colleagues.

Likewise, the email I wrote is from April of 2011, just after Paul Ryan released his second budget plan proposing large tax reductions for the rich, severe cuts in social welfare spending, the privatization of Medicare, and the repeal of health care for millions of low-income people — all ideas promoted by Thomson’s newspaper and all concepts that were in my mind and in public discourse at the time. 
 
Rep. Ryan and other conservatives often defend their libertarian economic policies as consistent with the Catholic principle of subsidiarity, a dubious link that many Catholics reject. Subsidiarity is a valuable concept for both progressives and conservatives shaping public policy. Anti-poverty and other social welfare efforts are best handled in smaller, more communal settings. But Catholic social teaching is clear that subsidiarity is not the same thing as federalism and central governments play an important role in helping those in need and advancing societal goals. Policies based on subsidiarity must also be balanced with principles of solidarity and the common good.

So, I’m a progressive Catholic who was reacting in a private email to the arguments of leading conservatives who often misuse Catholicism to defend their agenda. Liberals can be just as guilty of this as conservatives. That’s what makes Catholic social teaching powerful — it doesn’t fit squarely within in any one party or ideological movement.

This email wasn’t an exposition on the nature of people’s faith or an expression of contempt for people of faith. It was simply a fleeting reaction from within the Catholic tradition to something I read. That’s the context of this email, none of which has been reported in media accounts that erroneously accuse me of being an anti-Catholic bigot in an attempt to attack my former colleagues for political purposes.

All the individuals in this email chain are respectful and tolerant people who are being unfairly slandered in a fake scandal based on out-of-context accounts of a stolen email exchange I started long ago. (John Halpin Comments About His E-mails Released by WikiLeaks.)

John Halpin does not know true Catholicism because he was raised in the ethos of the “Second” Vatican Council’s “opening to the world.” Additionally, neither he nor his former colleagues, John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri, realize that the conciliar world view of Church-State relations was shaped in large, although not exclusive, measure by the Americanism heresy, which is premised upon a “reconciliation” of the Church with the “times” and has convinced Catholics to view Holy Mother Church through the lens of egalitarianism and democracy rather than viewing the world through the lens of the Holy Faith. (From: Jorge's Kind of Catholics.)

Obviously, Jorge Mario Bergoglio had nothing to say about John Podesta and John Halpin, and he could not bring himself to congratulate Donald John Trump defeated Madame Defarge on November 8, 2016, leaving the distasteful task to his Secretary of State, Pietro The Red Parolin:

"We take note with respect the will of the American people in this exercise of democracy which they tell me was characterized by a large turnout. Then we congratulate the new president, so that his government can be truly fruitful," the cardinal told Vatican Radio Nov. 9.

He assured of his prayers, "so that the Lord illuminate him and sustain him in the service of his homeland, naturally, but also of the peace and wellbeing of the world...today it is needed for everyone to work to change the global situation, which is a situation of serious laceration and grave conflict."

When asked how the Vatican responded to Trump's inflammatory comments about building a wall, Cardinal Parolin said we must wait to "see how the president moves."

"Normally they say: it's one thing to be a candidate, it's another thing to be president, to have a responsibility," he said.

But when it comes to specific issues and how Trump will act on them, "we will see what choices he makes and according to that you can also make a judgment," Parolin said, adding that "it seems premature to make judgments." (What did Pope Francis.)

“Pope Francis” did, however, send a congratulatory note upon Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2017:

"At a time when our human family is beset by grave humanitarian crises demanding farsighted and united political responses, I pray that your decisions will be guided by the rich spiritual and ethical values that have shaped the history of the American people and your nation's commitment to the advancement of human dignity and freedom worldwide," the Pope wrote in his Jan. 20 message sent to Trump.

"Under your leadership, may America's stature continue to be measured above all by its concern for the poor, the outcast and those in need who, like Lazarus, stand before our door. With these sentiments, I ask the Lord to grant you and your family, and all the beloved American people, his blessings of peace, concord and every material and spiritual prosperity. (What did Pope Francis.)

One can contrast Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s guarded messages to Donald John Trump in 2017 with the fact that he did not outsource a post-election congratulatory note to Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., after Biden claimed victory three days after the November 4, 2020. He personally called the pro-abortion Biden to offer his congratulations (see Pope Francis congratulates Biden on election win).

Famously, of course, Jorge Mario Bergoglio personally intervened after the conciliar “archbishop” of San Francisco, Salvatore Cordileone, prohibited the then Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi, from receiving what purports to be Holy Communion in the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical abomination because of her support for the daily slaughter of the innocent preborn by chemical and surgical means and because of her support for the entire panoply of evil being promoted by the homosexual collective, Bergoglio invited Pelosi to the Vatican and gave her what purports to be Holy Communion with his own unholy hands. Here is a news report, which is followed by my own commentary at the time:

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) – Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi has reportedly received Holy Communion at a Mass presided over by Pope Francis this morning, despite being banned from receiving Communion by her local ordinary, San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone.

The Democrat leader flew to Rome for a special meeting with Pope Francis, at which she received a blessing, before attending Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica.

According to the teaching of the Catholic Church, Pelosi’s vocal and persistent support for the killing of unborn children precludes the high-profile politician from receiving the Body and Blood of Christ, due to the gravely sinful and scandalous nature of both murder and the sacrilegious reception of Holy Communion.

“[Y]ou are not to present yourself for Holy Communion and, should you do so, you are not to be admitted to Holy Communion, until such time as you [publicly] repudiate your advocacy for the legitimacy of abortion and confess and receive absolution of this grave sin in the sacrament of Penance,” Cordileone wrote to Pelosi in a “notification” last month.

Pope Francis, however, previously expressed opposition to barring pro-abortion politicians from Holy Communion, claiming that priests should accompany such legislators with “compassion and tenderness”.

Joe Biden told reporters last year in Rome that Pope Francis recommended he continue receiving Holy Communion, despite the U.S. president’s long-standing support for killing unborn babies.

Fresh from condemning the Supreme Court’s ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade on Friday, Pelosi’s decision to receive Holy Communion on the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul at a Mass presided over by Pope Francis represents a significant development in her dissent from Church teaching.

Responding to Archbishop Cordileone’s move to ban her from Holy Communion in May, the 82 year-old Democrat had said she didn’t respect pro-life people “foisting” their views on others.

Today she told diplomats in Rome that “faith is an important gift, not everyone has it but it is the path to so many other things.” (Pelosi receives Holy Communion at Novus Ordo service presided over by Jorge Mario Bergoglio.)

The fictional Don Vito Cordileone and real-life mobsters such as Frank Lucchese, Vincent “The Chin” Gigante, Carmine Galante, Paul Castellano, Joey Gallo, Joe Colombo, Charles “Lucky” Luciani, Giuseppe Lucchese, Carmine Galante, Joseph “Joe Bananas” Bonanno, Sam Giancana, and, of course, Al Capone have nothing on the Modernist mobster and enabler of pro-death, pro-sodomite statists pols named Jorge Mario Bergoglio. The Argentine Apostate has just kneecapped “Archbishops” Salvatore Cordileone, Alexander Sample, Paul Coakley, John Neumann, and Samuel Aquila, and “Bishops” Robert Vasa, Michael Olson, Joseph Strickland, Thomas Tobin, Thomas Paprocki, James Conley (sorry, Jim, my one time fellow seminarian and friend, you’re in a false religious sect that teaches things opposed to Divine Revelation and have been condemned repeatedly by our true popes), Liam Carey, Thomas Daly, David Ricken, Donald Hying, and Michael Burbridge). Bergoglio knows exactly what he is doing, and the fact that he gave what he thought was a “blessing” Pelosi is one of the stunningly outrageous and boldly calculated signal that he, a man known for doing and saying outrageous things over and over again, a man who once said “"“I feel like saying something that may sound … heretical”, has done or said in the past in the 3397 days since he walked out on the balcony of the Basilica of Saint Peter and told “Monsignor” Guido Marino to ditch the papal mozetta as “carnival time is over, monsignore.”

What more can be said.

Jorge’s words and gestures, to say nothing of the times when he keeps his ever-flapping mouth shut when things such as the Dobbs decision happen that he does not believe are worth his time or trouble to comment, have said it all.

Yes, Jorge Mario Bergoglio used the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul to mock the papacy, that which is the infallible guardian of the Holy Faith. Although matters of discipline are not covered by the mantle of infallibility, it is nevertheless true no one can name a single one of our true popes who have gone out his way to show that a Catholic woman in public life who supports sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance enjoys his benediction in spite of episcopal sanctions leveled against her.

For example, Pope Saint Pius X refused even to meet with former President Theodore Roosevelt in 1913 because the latter had spoken at the Methodist congregation in Rome:

Ever conscious of the Church’s exclusive mission to the world, the Pope refused to receive Theodore Roosevelt after the former American president had lectured to a Methodist congregation in Rome. (See St Pius X: the son of a village postman who urged modernists to beaten with fists.)

Our last truly canonized pope was also a firm opponent of that statism that is being advanced with ready abandon these days by the likes of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi.

As Yves Chriron pointed out in his biography of Pope Saint Pius X, our last true pope to be canonized understod full well that he had to meet error and heresy head-on without being "Mr. Nice Guy." Here is annount of what he said in 1896 as the Cardinal Patriarch of the Archdiocese of Venice:

In August 1896 in Padua, the second Congress of the Catholic Union for Social Studies took place. We have already seen that this organization had been created seven years before by Professor Giuseppe Toniolo, in the presence of the Bishop of Mantua [Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto]. This time, eight bishops were present and several directors of the Opera del Congressi took part. All the eminent representatives of the Italian Catholic Movement were present (Medolago Pagnuzzi, Alessi and others). Cardinal Sarto's address attracted considerable notice. Faced with "ardent enemies" (unbelief and revolution) "...menacing and trying to destroy the social fabric," the Patriarch of Venice invited the participants to make Jesus Christ the foundation of the their work: "the only peace treaty is the Gospel." He warned them against what is now called the "welfare state," the state which provides everything and provides all socialization: "substituting public almsgiving for private almsgiving involves the complete destruction of Christianity and it is a terrible attack on the principle of ownership. Christianity cannot exist without charity, and the difference between charity and justice is that justice may have recourse to laws and even to force, depending on the circumstances, whereas charity can only be imposed by the tribunal of God and of conscience." If public assistance and the redistribution of wealth are institutionalized, "poverty becomes a function, a way of life, a public trade..." (Yves Chiron, Saint Pius X: Restorer of the Church. Translated by Graham Harrison. Angelus Press, 2002, p. 100) 

This firm statement of Catholic truth anticipated his encyclical letter against the revolutionary principles of The Sillon in France, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910, and was in no small measure the fruit of his systematic study of teaching about the Social Reign of Christ the King that had been provided by the late Louis Edouard "Cardinal" Pie, who was the Bishop of Poitiers, France from from May 23, 1849, to the time of his death on May 18, 1880:

"[St.] Pius X, giving audience in the French seminary, declared to have 'often read and re-read' the works of Cardinal Pie . . . . This veneration of [St.] Pius X for the great Bishop of Poitiers is demonstrated for us by this account found in Canon [Paul] Vigue's 'Select Pages of Cardinal Pie': "A priest from Poitiers has recalled that one day he had the honor of having been introduced into the cabinet of the Supreme Pontiff, [St.] Pius X, in the company of a religious who as also from Poitiers. 'Oh! the diocese of Poitiers," the Holy Father exclaimed, raising his hands, when he heard the name Poitiers mentioned. "I have almost the entire works of your Cardinal,' the saintly Pontiff continued, 'and, for years, there has hardly been a day that I have not read some of its pages.' (Selected Writings of Selected Writings of Cardinal Pie of Poitiers, Catholic Action Resource Center, Orlando, Florida, October, 2007, testimonial pages.)

It was Cardinal Pie who "spoke truth to power" when he told Louis-Napoleon, the self-styled Emperor Napleon III, the following:

The time has not come for Jesus Christ to reign? Well, then the time has not come for governments to last. (Cardinal Pie, meeting with Emperor Napoleon III)

Pope Saint Pius X was completely committed to the immutable doctrine of the Social Reign of Christ the King. As he had noted to a priest of the Diocese of Poitiers, hardly a day had gone by that he had not studied the writing of the couragous Cardinal Pie.  

A contemporary Catholic apologoist, Giuseppe Gentile, wrote the following about Pope Saint Pius X's battles with the Modernists as he sat on the Throne of Saint Peter: 

"Catholicism will never be able to turn into the negation of itself, as [Modernists George] Tyrrel and [Alfred] Loisy wished. This truth, so distasteful to the Modernists, resounds throughout the Encyclical [Pascendi Dominci Gregis] of September 8, 1907, from beginning to end. It is a magisterial summary and magnificent critique of the philosophical, theological, apologetical, historical, critical and social demands; he can be said to have judged it from a higher point of view. As for Loisy's ripostes, they make a pitiful showing in the face of the philosophy expressed in the Encyclical..... The Modernists must learn that a Pope's encyclical cannot be judged according to the criteria of that rationalism, which, down the centuries, has always ended up in heresy. To make such a judgment would be as logical as approving a king's achievement insofar as it contributed to the proclamation of a republic." (As found in Yves Chiron, Saint Pius X: Restorer of the Church. Translated by Graham Harrison. Angelus Press, 2002, p. 211.)

As we know conciliarism is a negation of Catholicism, and the counterfeit church of conciliarism is a counter-church, an ape of the Catholic Church that is making a mockery of itself every day with bizarre spectacles that would have shamed even the Huns and the Vandals.

Two other popes named Pius, Pius XI and Pius XII, also made clear their firm and unequivocal opposition to abortion and those in public life who enable it:

Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.)

Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., sold his soul to the adversary when he changed his position from being “pro-life” during the 1972 Senatorial election against two-term incumbent J. Caleb Boggs in the immediate aftermath of Roe v. Wade on January 22, 1973, and his adamancy on behalf of legal protection for the assassination of innocent children has grown in intensity in the five decades thereafter.

The social good can never be advanced by permitting the shedding of innocent blood under the cover of the civil law. Indeed, the social good is not only retarded but impeded by codifying grave moral evils under the cover of the civil law and by celebrating them openly in all quarters of what passes for “popular culture” these days. A just social order cannot be established as men sin wantonly. The entirety of social order depends on the right ordering of men’s souls in cooperation with the graces won for them by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday and that flow into our hearts and soul through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces. (From Georgie "The Chin" Bergoglio Strikes Again on Behalf of the Pro-Aborts.)

It is entirely unsurprising, therefore, that Senor Jorge is at it again in 2024 by inviting the pro-abortion, pro-perversity draconian lockdown statist named Gavin Michael Newsom, the Governor of the People’s Republic of California (why does anyone live in a state with the highest gasoline prices it the nation, epically high crime with almost no prosecution of those who commit the crimes rampant homelessness, draconian laws regulating what home owners can do on their own private property, policies that welcome children to have their bodies mutilated in the vain effort to become the opposite gender and that welcomes all women to butcher their babies chemically and surgically?), and Maureen Healy, the “married” pro-abortion, pro-perversity statist lesbian who is the Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the pro-abortion, pro-perversity Catholic statist who serves as the Governor of the State of New York, Kathleen Hochul to speak at a “climate change” conference inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River that took place between May 15-17, 2024, and featured an audience with the false “pope” on May 16, 2024:

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Three of the nation’s most radical, far-left governors – all of whom identify as Catholic despite their staunch pro-abortion and pro-LGBT stances – have been invited by the Vatican to participate in the Holy See’s summit on “climate change” this week.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of the conference, titled “From Climate Crisis to Climate Resilience” and hosted jointly by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, is that leaders have been called from the U.S. and around the world not because of their devotion to Christ and His Church but because of their extreme viewpoints on “climate change.” Pope Francis will receive the summit participants in an audience on May 16.

A trio of Democrat U.S. governors will be present: Massachusetts’s Maura Healy, California’s Gavin Newsom, and New York’s Kathy Hochul.  

Elected in 2022, Maura Healey became the first lesbian governor in the United States after eight years as Massachusetts’ attorney general. In her previous role, she participated in the multi-state legal challenges that eventually overturned the longstanding Defense of Marriage Act that protected states’ rights to uphold biblical marriage, supported the codification of abortion “rights” in state law, defended mandatory contraception coverage, defended “buffer zone” laws suppressing peaceful pro-life speech and prayer outside abortion centers, and attempted to force Catholic high schools to keep employees who reject Catholic teaching on homosexuality.

Since becoming governor, she has continued to pursue pro-abortion and pro-LGBT agendas, including by funding not only the abortion industry but also disinformation campaigns against pro-life pregnancy centers and by promoting transgender hormones and surgeries for youth as a “fundamental right.” Healy is “partnered” with another woman, Joanna Lydgate. 

Healey will give a keynote address on the first day of the conference, according to the Catholic News Agency. Newsom and Hochul will deliver speeches on the second day.

As California governor, Newsom has overseen the institution of policies that force educators to lie to parents by hiding from them the claimed transgender status of their children and that allow male prisoners, including sexual predators, who claim to be “transgender” to be housed in women’s prisons. He has also worked tirelessly to maintain and strengthen California as one of the nation’s top abortion havens.   

In 2022, the divorced and “remarried” Newsom was accused of committing blasphemy for erecting billboards in other states where abortion is restricted that quote Sacred Scripture to promote the abominable practice.  

Furthermore, as noted by The American Spectator’s Ellie Gardey, “Catholic” Newsom:  

Eased requirements for doctors to kill the elderly; transformed California into a tourist destination for parents wishing to mutilate their children; legalized human composting; attempted to infringe upon the Seal of Confession; funded embryonic stem cell research; allowed local authorities to require public bathrooms to be open to both males and females; shuttered churches and other houses of worship for an unjustified period of time; expanded access to contraceptives; and tried to force Catholic universities, churches, and other organizations to provide abortions.

New York Governor Hochul has also made her state a “safe harbor” for women seeking abortions.  

In March 2023, she pressured executives at Walgreens, CVS, and Rite Aid to distribute abortion pills in states that restrict their distribution. The previous year, she pledged $13 million in grants to abortionists and signed a series of pro-abortion laws in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade. She also introduced an “X” gender marker for driver’s licenses. 

Gov. Newsom praised Pope Francis’ “leadership on the climate crisis,” which he said “inspires us all to push further and faster.” California, New York, and Massachusetts have all moved to ban the sale of new gas cars after 2035, among other radical climate measures.

Pope Francis is the first pope to make so-called “climate change” an important theme of his pontificate, authoring two papal documents calling for governments and individuals to combat the perceived threat.  

The pontiff has made no secret of his zeal for the “climate change” cause and his disdain for those who challenge left-wing climate ideology and steps being implemented by governments toward mitigating the imagined threat.  

In March, Francis reemphasized a theme from his 2015 encyclical, Laudato si’, asserting, “All of us are called to an ecological conversion.”  

In an interview with CBS News broadcast on May 19, Pope Francis condemned so-called “climate deniers” as “foolish,” citing their alleged ignorance or entrenched “self-interests.”   

Bottom of Form

Last fall, in his apostolic exhortation Laudate Deum, devoted to “climate change,” Pope Francis said “obligatory” and “readily monitored” measures by all countries must be taken to address the issue of “climate change.” 

Papal promotion of the climate cause has not gone without high-profile criticism, including recently from Canadian author and psychologist Jordan Peterson. Peterson called out Francis for his focus on “climate change,” saying the pope “seems to be on about [the topic] constantly when you should be saving souls.” “That’s how you save the planet, not by worshiping Gaia,” said Peterson, referring to the pagan name for “Mother Earth.”

“I don’t see for the life of me what the Catholic Church has to do with the ‘climate crisis,’” he continued. “Just the formulation is wrong; the priority is wrong.” Peterson suggested that the current pontificate “lacks faith in its own mission.” 

The Vatican summit, which will be held from May 15-17 at the Vatican’s Casina Pio IV, will culminate with an outline for addressing “climate change,” a “Planetary Climate Resilience Protocol,” with all participants as cosignatories.  

According to a statement from the Vatican, the protocol will be submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) for global distribution. (Vatican invites Gavin Newsom, other pro-abortion, pro-LGBT Democrats to speak at climate event.)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio knows exactly what he is doing. He is sending a clear signal that the three Catholic supporters of one moral evil after another enjoy his own personal favor and that they are the sort of officeholders whom Catholics should support electorally.

This insidious little pest from Buenos Aires, Argentina, is making it clear once again that anyone who denies “climate change” is “foolish,” meaning that those who support the disproven claims that the “planet” is in “danger” of extinction are the only ones who are fit to hold public office. Translation: a vote for Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., is the only “moral” vote that a Catholic, citizen or noncitizen, of course, can cast in the American presidential election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024.

Bergoglio’s election interference also extends to the realm of openly criticizing “conservative” Catholics in the United States of America, whom he claims live in a “dogmatic box”:

In an interview with “60 Minutes” airing this Sunday, Pope Francis takes aim at his “conservative critics” in the United States, reportedly saying a conservative is someone who “clings to something and does not want to see beyond that.”

“It is a suicidal attitude,” the pope said as reported by “60 Minutes,” which released a brief clip of the upcoming interview conducted by CBS’ Nora O’Donnell. 

“Because one thing is to take tradition into account, to consider situations from the past, but quite another is to be closed up inside a dogmatic box.” (Pope Francis says conservative critics have a ‘suicidal attitude’.)

Although I will have much to say about these remarks and “Archbishop” Carlo Maria Vigano’s very mistaken reaction to them (by the way, how is it that Vigano gets to keep jabbering without being threatened or disciplined as was the case with Joseph Strickland last year?) in my next commentary, suffice it for the purposes of this present commentary to note that His Apostateness is making it clear that there are too many “conservatives” within the structures of his false religion sect within the United States of America and that these “suicidal” Catholics have to be “educated” to keep them from voting for Donald John Trump this year.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio loves to interfere in American politics, and he is not very subtle about this interference whatsoever. He revels in calling out “rigid” Catholics who want to keep the “spirit” locked up in a box.

As we know, though, the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, is unchangeable. He has protected Holy Mother Church from all heresies and errors that have besieged her since He descended in tongues of flame upon Our Lady, the Queen of the Apostles, and the Eleven on the first Pentecost Sunday and He has always kept Holy Mother Church free from any contagion of error or heresy in her doctrines, pronouncements, decrees, papal encyclical letters, canonizations of saints, her Sacred Liturgy, and her absolute opposition to false worship of any kind.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not enjoy the protection of God the Holy Ghost as he is not a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter and the church that he heads is not the Catholic Church but her counterfeit ape that has produced counterfeit doctrines, counterfeit liturgies, and counterfeit pastoral practices. It is blasphemous to believe that the counterfeit church of conciliarism is the Catholic Church and that the men who have laid claim to the Throne of Saint Peter since the death of Pope Pius XII on October 9, 1958, have been anything but figures of Antichrist who are intent to root out anything remotely resembling true Catholicism from the hearts and minds of ordinary Catholics.

Begging Our Lady on this Pentecost Sunday to help us cooperate with the graces she sends us to grow in the Gifts and Fruits of her Mystical Spouse, God the Holy Ghost, may the Glorious Mysteries we pray this day help to plant a few seeds for the day that the Modernists will be vanquished and a true Catholic pope will sit on the Throne of Saint Peter.

Our Lady of the Cenacle, pray for us.

A blessed Pentecost Sunday to you all!

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Andrew, pray for us.

Saint Matthew, pray for us.

Saint Luke, pray for us.

Saint Mark, pray for us.

Saint James the Greater, pray for us.

Saint James the Lesser, pray for us.

Saint Jude Thaddeus, pray for us.

Saint Matthias, pray for us.

Saint Bartholomew, pray for us.

Saint Thomas the Apostle, pray for us.

Saint Philip, pray for us.

Saint Simon, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Pope Saint Peter Celestine (V), whose feast is impeded this year, pray for us.