Relax, Jorge, You're Not The Pope
by Thomas A. Droleskey
Perhaps one of the best ways to handle the madness that passes for Catholicism from the lords of conciliarism is to refuse to pay much attention to it.
After all, the doctrinal, liturgical, moral and pastoral revolutionaries of the counterfeit church of conciliarism repeat themselves over and over again. By so doing, of course, they become cartoon figures who parody themselves without realizing it. Mind you, revolutionaries, whether in realm of Modernity or of Modernism, take their revolutionary work very seriously, which is why they are compelled to repeat themselves so as to make sure no one who pays any attention to them can mistaken them for being part of the "past" whose history must be flushed down the Orwellian memory hole. Only those who live outside of their own individual rubber rooms can come to see by means of the graces sent to them by Our Lady that men who take themselves seriously are really buffoons who traffic in sophistry.
Previous articles on this site have noted that very few people, relatively speaking, pay any attention to the doctrinal, liturgical, moral and pastoral revolutionaries of conciliarism as most human beings in the "developed" nations that have ready access to the internet or other means of mass communication are immersed in all manner of bread and circuses.
Most Catholics who are as of yet attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism and bother to show up at the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service on Saturday evenings or Sundays get their dose of conciliarism, whether quasi-traditional, conservative, progressive or ultra-progressive, at the "retail" level. What goes on in Rome may be of some passing interest.
However, as a student at Nassau Community College noted to me at the end of a lecture I gave in December of 1980 that warned out the moral dissolution of the United States of America, "Everything's fine in my neighborhood." And that's how most Catholics who even bother to to practice the Modernist religion view the state of the Church Militant on the face of this earth in this time of apostasy and betrayal.
The work of this site continues not only to "preach to the choir" but to help the few souls who come upon it now and again, which is why passages and quotations that are familiar to longtime readers are adapted for use when the conciliar authorities repeat their same, pathetic and very tired revolutionary schemes and propositions.
This having been noted, I must say that Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis is garrulous, so full of himself and his "originality," his "humility," his "service to the poor," his "simplicity" and his spontaneity that there is no good purpose served by dealing with this on a daily basis. Once a week is more than enough, barring anything out of what passes for "ordinary" in the world of apostasy, to review the modernist world inhabited by the Argentine entertainer masquerading as the Successor of Saint Peter residing at Casa Santa Marta inside of the Vatican Walls.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis has had a very busy week, capped by telling school students for Jesuit schools throughout Albania and Italy that he was living at the Casa Santa Marta for his "psychiatric health":
Pope Francis has revealed that he never wanted to be pope and that he's living in the Vatican hotel for his "psychiatric" health.
Francis got very personal Friday as he met with thousands of children from Jesuit schools across Italy and Albania. Answering their questions one by one, Francis told them the decision to become a priest had been difficult for him and that he had suffered "moments of interior darkness" when "you feel dry, without interior joy."
But he said he went ahead because he loved Christ.
One of the most touching moments came when Teresa, a bright-eyed redhead no more than six, asked Francis flat out if he had wanted to be pope.
After joking around, Francis replied: "I didn't want to be pope." (Francis tells Jesuit students, 'I didn't want to be pope'.)
Relax, Jorge, you're not the pope.
Take a deep breath for you psychiatric health, Jorge, you are not a priest.
Count to ten, Jorge, you are not a bishop.
Read the Catechism of the Council of Trent, Jorge, and you realize that you are not even a member of the Catholic Church. You are an apostate.
To wit, no true Successor of Saint Peter has spoken in pantheistic terms as have the conciliar "pontiffs" have done repeatedly.
Following the grand example of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis commemorated "World Environment Day," an event sponsored by the pro-contraception, pro-abortion, pro-perversity, anti-national sovereignty Judeo-Masonic instrument of global governance called the United Nations. T
he man who is living in the Casa Santa Marta rather than on the fourth floor of the Apostolic Palace for his "psychiatric health" used his general audience of address of Wednesday, June 5, 2013, Within the Octave of Corpus Christi and the Feast of Saint Boniface, who happened to have chopped down a tree worshipped by German pagans, by the way, to try to disguise pantheism by connecting what he called "human ecology" with "environmental ecology":
Today I want to focus on the issue of the environment, which I have
already spoken of on several occasions. Today we also mark World
Environment Day, sponsored by the United Nations, which sends a strong
reminder of the need to eliminate the waste and disposal of food.
When
we talk about the environment, about creation, my thoughts turn to the
first pages of the Bible, the Book of Genesis, which states that God
placed man and woman on earth to cultivate and care for it (cf. 2:15).
And the question comes to my mind: What does cultivating and caring for
the earth mean? Are we truly cultivating and caring for creation? Or are
we exploiting and neglecting it? The verb "to cultivate" reminds me of
the care that the farmer has for his land so that it bear fruit, and it
is shared: how much attention, passion and dedication! Cultivating and
caring for creation is God’s indication given to each one of us not only
at the beginning of history; it is part of His project; it means
nurturing the world with responsibility and transforming it into a
garden, a habitable place for everyone. Benedict XVI recalled several
times that this task entrusted to us by God the Creator requires us to
grasp the rhythm and logic of creation. But we are often driven by pride
of domination, of possessions, manipulation, of exploitation; we do not
“care” for it, we do not respect it, we do not consider it as a free
gift that we must care for. We are losing the attitude of wonder,
contemplation, listening to creation; thus we are no longer able to read
what Benedict XVI calls "the rhythm of the love story of God and man."
Why does this happen? Why do we think and live in a horizontal manner,
we have moved away from God, we no longer read His signs.
But to
"cultivate and care" encompasses not only the relationship between us
and the environment, between man and creation, it also regards human
relationships. The Popes have spoken of human ecology, closely linked to environmental ecology.
We are living in a time of crisis: we see this in the environment, but
above all we see this in mankind. The human person is in danger: this is
certain, the human person is in danger today, here is the urgency of
human ecology! And it is a serious danger because the cause of the
problem is not superficial but profound: it is not just a matter of
economics, but of ethics and anthropology. The Church has stressed this
several times, and many say, yes, that's right, it's true ... but the
system continues as before, because it is dominated by the dynamics of
an economy and finance that lack ethics. Man is not in charge today,
money is in charge, money rules. God our Father did not give the task of
caring for the earth to money, but to us, to men and women: we have
this task! Instead, men and women are sacrificed to the idols of profit
and consumption: it is the "culture of waste." If you break a computer
it is a tragedy, but poverty, the needs, the dramas of so many people
end up becoming the norm. If on a winter’s night, here nearby in Via
Ottaviano, for example, a person dies, that is not news. If in so many
parts of the world there are children who have nothing to eat, that's
not news, it seems normal. It cannot be this way! Yet these things
become the norm: that some homeless people die of cold on the streets is
not news. In contrast, a ten point drop on the stock markets of some
cities, is a tragedy. A person dying is not news, but if the stock
markets drop ten points it is a tragedy! Thus people are disposed of, as
if they were trash.
This "culture of waste" tends to become the
common mentality that infects everyone. Human life, the person is no
longer perceived as a primary value to be respected and protected,
especially if poor or disabled, if not yet useful - such as the unborn
child - or no longer needed - such as the elderly. This culture of waste
has made us insensitive even to the waste and disposal of food, which
is even more despicable when all over the world, unfortunately, many
individuals and families are suffering from hunger and malnutrition.
Once our grandparents were very careful not to throw away any leftover
food. Consumerism has led us to become used to an excess and daily waste
of food, to which, at times, we are no longer able to give a just
value, which goes well beyond mere economic parameters. We should all
remember, however, that throwing food away is like stealing from the
tables of the the poor, the hungry! I encourage everyone to reflect on
the problem of thrown away and wasted food to identify ways and means
that, by seriously addressing this issue, are a vehicle of solidarity
and sharing with the needy.
A few days ago, on the Feast of Corpus
Christi, we read the story of the miracle of the loaves: Jesus feeds the
crowd with five loaves and two fishes. And the conclusion of the piece
is important: " They all ate and were satisfied. And when the leftover
fragments were picked up, they filled twelve wicker baskets" (Lk 9:17).
Jesus asks his disciples not to throw anything away: no waste! There is
this fact of twelve baskets: Why twelve? What does this mean? Twelve is
the number of the tribes of Israel, which symbolically represent all
people. And this tells us that when food is shared in a fair way, with
solidarity, when no one is deprived, every community can meet the needs
of the poorest. Human ecology and environmental ecology walk together.
So
I would like us all to make a serious commitment to respect and protect
creation, to be attentive to every person, to counter the culture of
waste and disposable, to promote a culture of solidarity and of
encounter. Thank you. (Pope at audience: Counter a culture of waste with solidarity.)
Bergoglio/Francis is correct when talking about the culture of waste wrought by consumerism. He is, though, clueless about the cause and offers a false solution to remedy the ills he named.
The world of Modernity has been shaped by the overthrow of the Social Reign of the Social Reign of Christ the King that was wrought by the Protestant Revolution and institutionalized by the inevitable rise of the organized forces of naturalism that can be termed as Judeo-Masonry. The consumerism caused by Judeo-Calvinist-Masonic made possible the ultimate triumph of the monster civil state of Modernity, something that the late Dr. George O'Brien noted with great clarity:
The thesis we have endeavoured to present in this essay is, that
the two great dominating schools of modern economic thought have a
common origin. The capitalist school, which, basing its position on the
unfettered right of the individual to do what he will with his own,
demands the restriction of government interference in economic and
social affairs within the narrowest possible limits, and the socialist
school, which, basing its position on the complete subordination of the
individual to society, demands the socialization of all the means of
production, if not all of wealth, face each other today as the only two
solutions of the social question; they are bitterly hostile towards each
other, and mutually intolerant and each is at the same weakened and
provoked by the other. In one respect, and in one respect only, are they
identical--they can both be shown to be the result of the Protestant
Reformation.
We have seen the direct connection which exists between these modern schools of economic thought and their common ancestor. Capitalism
found its roots in the intensely individualistic spirit of
Protestantism, in the spread of anti-authoritative ideas from the realm
of religion into the realm of political and social thought, and, above
all, in the distinctive Calvinist doctrine of a successful and
prosperous career being the outward and visible sign by which the
regenerated might be known. Socialism, on the other hand, derived
encouragement from the violations of established and prescriptive rights
of which the Reformation afforded so many examples, from the growth of
heretical sects tainted with Communism, and from the overthrow of the
orthodox doctrine on original sin, which opened the way to the idea of
the perfectibility of man through institutions. But, apart from
these direct influences, there were others, indirect, but equally
important. Both these great schools of economic thought are
characterized by exaggerations and excesses; the one lays too
great stress on the importance of the individual, and other on the
importance of the community; they are both departures, in opposite
directions, from the correct mean of reconciliation and of individual
liberty with social solidarity. These excesses and
exaggerations are the result of the free play of private judgment
unguided by authority, and could not have occurred if Europe had
continued to recognize an infallible central authority in ethical
affairs.
The science of economics is the science of
men's relations with one another in the domain of acquiring and
disposing of wealth, and is, therefore, like political science in
another sphere, a branch of the science of ethics. In the Middle Ages,
man's ethical conduct, like his religious conduct, was under the
supervision and guidance of a single authority, which claimed at the
same time the right to define and to enforce its teaching. The
machinery for enforcing the observance of medieval ethical teaching was
of a singularly effective kind; pressure was brought to bear upon the
conscience of the individual through the medium of compulsory periodical
consultations with a trained moral adviser, who was empowered to
enforce obedience to his advice by the most potent spiritual sanctions.
In this way, the whole conduct of man in relation to his neighbours was
placed under the immediate guidance of the universally received ethical
preceptor, and a common standard of action was ensured throughout the
Christian world in the all the affairs of life. All economic
transactions in particular were subject to the jealous scrutiny of the
individual's spiritual director; and such matters as sales, loans, and
so on, were considered reprehensible and punishable if not conducted in
accordance with the Christian standards of commutative justice.
The whole of this elaborate system for the
preservation of justice in the affairs of everyday life was shattered by
the Reformation. The right of private judgment, which had first been
asserted in matters of faith, rapidly spread into moral matters, and the
attack on the dogmatic infallibility of the Church left Europe without
an authority to which it could appeal on moral questions. The
new Protestant churches were utterly unable to supply this want. The
principle of private judgment on which they rested deprived them of any
right to be listened to whenever they attempted to dictate moral
precepts to their members, and henceforth the moral behaviour of the
individual became a matter to be regulated by the promptings of his own
conscience, or by such philosophical systems of ethics as he happened to
approve. The secular state endeavoured to ensure that dishonesty
amounting to actual theft or fraud should be kept in check, but this was
a poor and ineffective substitute for the powerful weapon of the
confessional. Authority having once broken down, it was but a single
step from Protestantism to rationalism; and the way was opened to the
development of all sorts of erroneous systems of morality. (Dr. George
O'Brien, An Essay on the Economic Efforts of the Reformation, IHS Press, Norfolk, Virginia, 2003.)
None of the conciliar "popes" have ever spoken in such a manner as they have made their "reconciliation" with the "principles of that new era inaugurated in 1789" and endorsed the earth-worshipping schemes of the United Nations.
Pope Pius XI decried the materialism that had arisen in Europe in the aftermath of World War I without making advertence to the revolutionary language of the environmentalists, who are, of course, Darwinian evolutionists to the core of their being. The conciliar revolutionaries have a special kinship with the environmentalists as most of them believe in the "Theistic" version of Darwinian evolutionism and as each of them to a person is a theological evolutionist after the mode of the Modernists denounced by Pope Saint Pius X in Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907, and the "new theologians" denounced by Pope Pius XII in Humani Generis, August 12, 1950. This is why the conciliar revolutionaries use the language of naturalists to describe contemporary problems, although they mask the naturalism frequently with "elements of true Catholicism."
Pope Pius XI's Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 22, 1922, provides us with an an antidote to the manner in which Bergoglio/Francis spoke of social ills three days ago. Please take your time to read these extended passages from Pope Pius XI's first encyclical letter as they provided a ready contrast with and a true antidote to the madness of conciliarism, which seeks to build a "culture of solidarity" and a "civilization of love" rather than to restore the Catholic City:
18. The evil results of the Great War, as they affect the spiritual life,
have been felt all over the world, even in out-of-the-way and lonely sections of
far-off continents. Missionaries have been forced to abandon the field of their
apostolic labors, and many have been unable to return to their work, thus
causing interruptions to and even abandonment of those glorious conquests of the
Faith which have done so much to raise the level of civilization, moral,
material, and religious. It is quite true that there have been some worthwhile
compensations for these great spiritual misfortunes. Among these compensations
is one which stands out in bold relief and gives the lie to many ancient
calumnies, namely, that a pure love of country and a generous devotion to duty
burn brightly in the souls of those consecrated to God, and that through their
sacred ministry the consolations of religion were brought to thousands dying on
the fields of battle wet with human blood. Thus, many, in spite of their
prejudices, were led to honor again the priesthood and the Church by reason of
the wonderful examples of sacrifice of self, with which they had become
acquainted. For these happy results we are indebted solely to the infinite
goodness and wisdom of God, Who draws good from evil.
19. Our letter so far has been devoted to a recital of the evils which
afflict present-day society. We must now search out, with all possible care, the
causes of these disorders, some of which have already been referred to. At this
point, Venerable Brothers, there seems to come to Us the voice of the Divine
Consoler and Physician Who, speaking of these human infirmities says: "All these
evil things come from within." (Mark vii, 23.)
20. Peace indeed was signed in solemn conclave between the belligerents of
the late War. This peace, however, was only written into treaties. It was not
received into the hearts of men, who still cherish the desire to fight one
another and to continue to menace in a most serious manner the quiet and
stability of civil society. Unfortunately the law of violence held sway so long
that it has weakened and almost obliterated all traces of those natural feelings
of love and mercy which the law of Christian charity has done so much to
encourage. Nor has this illusory peace, written only on paper, served as yet to
reawaken similar noble sentiments in the souls of men. On the contrary, there
has been born a spirit of violence and of hatred which, because it has been
indulged in for so long, has become almost second nature in many men. There has
followed the blind rule of the inferior parts of the soul over the superior,
that rule of the lower elements "fighting against the law of the mind," which
St. Paul grieved over. (Rom. vii, 23)
21. Men today do not act as Christians, as brothers, but as strangers, and
even enemies. The sense of man's personal dignity and of the value of human life
has been lost in the brutal domination begotten of might and mere superiority in
numbers. Many are intent on exploiting their neighbors solely for the purpose of
enjoying more fully and on a larger scale the goods of this world. But they err
grievously who have turned to the acquisition of material and temporal
possessions and are forgetful of eternal and spiritual things, to the possession
of which Jesus, Our Redeemer, by means of the Church, His living interpreter,
calls mankind.
22. It is in the very nature of material objects that an inordinate desire
for them becomes the root of every evil, of every discord, and in particular, of
a lowering of the moral sense. On the one hand, things which are naturally base
and vile can never give rise to noble aspirations in the human heart which was
created by and for God alone and is restless until it finds repose in Him. On
the other hand, material goods (and in this they differ greatly from those of
the spirit which the more of them we possess the more remain to be acquired) the
more they are divided among men the less each one has and, by consequence, what
one man has another cannot possibly possess unless it be forcibly taken away
from the first. Such being the case, worldly possessions can never satisfy all
in equal manner nor give rise to a spirit of universal contentment, but must
become perforce a source of division among men and of vexation of spirit, as
even the Wise Man Solomon experienced: "Vanity of vanities, and vexation of
spirit." (Ecclesiastes i, 2, 14)
23. The same effects which result from these evils among individuals may
likewise be expected among nations. "From whence are wars and contentions among
you?" asks the Apostle St. James. "Are they not hence from your concupiscences,
which war in your members?" (James iv, 1, 2)
24. The inordinate desire for pleasure, concupiscence of the flesh, sows the
fatal seeds of division not only among families but likewise among states; the
inordinate desire for possessions, concupiscence of the eyes, inevitably turns
into class warfare and into social egotism; the inordinate desire to rule or to
domineer over others, pride of life, soon becomes mere party or factional
rivalries, manifesting itself in constant displays of conflicting ambitions and
ending in open rebellion, in the crime of lese majeste, and even in national
parricide.
25. These unsuppressed desires, this inordinate love of the things of the
world, are precisely the source of all international misunderstandings and
rivalries, despite the fact that oftentimes men dare to maintain that acts
prompted by such motives are excusable and even justifiable because, forsooth,
they were performed for reasons of state or of the public good, or out of love
for country. Patriotism -- the stimulus of so many virtues and of so many noble
acts of heroism when kept within the bounds of the law of Christ -- becomes
merely an occasion, an added incentive to grave injustice when true love of
country is debased to the condition of an extreme nationalism, when we forget
that all men are our brothers and members of the same great human family, that
other nations have an equal right with us both to life and to prosperity, that
it is never lawful nor even wise, to dissociate morality from the affairs of
practical life, that, in the last analysis, it is "justice which exalteth a
nation: but sin maketh nations miserable." (Proverbs xiv, 34)
26. Perhaps the advantages to one's family, city, or nation obtained in some
such way as this may well appear to be a wonderful and great victory (this
thought has been already expressed by St. Augustine), but in the end it turns
out to be a very shallow thing, something rather to inspire us with the most
fearful apprehensions of approaching ruin. "It is a happiness which appears
beautiful but is brittle as glass. We must ever be on guard lest with horror we
see it broken into a thousand pieces at the first touch." (St. Augustine de
Civitate Dei, Book iv, Chap. 3)
27. There is over and above the absence of peace and the evils attendant on
this absence, another deeper and more profound cause for present-day conditions.
This cause was even beginning to show its head before the War and the terrible
calamities consequent on that cataclysm should have proven a remedy for them if
mankind had only taken the trouble to understand the real meaning of those
terrible events. In the Holy Scriptures we read: "They that have forsaken the
Lord, shall be consumed." (Isaias i, 28) No less well known are the words of the
Divine Teacher, Jesus Christ, Who said: "Without me you can do nothing" (John
xv, 5) and again, "He that gathereth not with me, scattereth." (Luke xi, 23)
28. These words of the Holy Bible have been fulfilled and are now at this
very moment being fulfilled before our very eyes. Because men have forsaken God
and Jesus Christ, they have sunk to the depths of evil. They waste their
energies and consume their time and efforts in vain sterile attempts to find a
remedy for these ills, but without even being successful in saving what little
remains from the existing ruin. It was a quite general desire that both our laws
and our governments should exist without recognizing God or Jesus Christ, on the
theory that all authority comes from men, not from God. Because of such an
assumption, these theorists fell very short of being able to bestow upon law not
only those sanctions which it must possess but also that secure basis for the
supreme criterion of justice which even a pagan philosopher like Cicero saw
clearly could not be derived except from the divine law.
Authority itself lost its hold upon mankind, for it had lost that sound and
unquestionable justification for its right to command on the one hand and to be
obeyed on the other. Society, quite logically and inevitably, was shaken to its
very depths and even threatened with destruction, since there was left to it no
longer a stable foundation, everything having been reduced to a series of
conflicts, to the domination of the majority, or to the supremacy of special
interests.
29. Again, legislation was passed which did not recognize that either God or
Jesus Christ had any rights over marriage -- an erroneous view which debased
matrimony to the level of a mere civil contract, despite the fact that Jesus
Himself had called it a "great sacrament" (Ephesians v, 32) [just a Droleskey aside here: Take that, Godfried Danneels] and had made it the
holy and sanctifying symbol of that indissoluble union which binds Him to His
Church. The high ideals and pure sentiments with which the Church has always
surrounded the idea of the family, the germ of all social life, these were
lowered, were unappreciated, or became confused in the minds of many. As a
consequence, the correct ideals of family government, and with them those of
family peace, were destroyed; the stability and unity of the family itself were
menaced and undermined, and, worst of all, the very sanctuary of the home was
more and more frequently profaned by acts of sinful lust and soul-destroying
egotism -- all of which could not but result in poisoning and drying up the very
sources of domestic and social life.
30. Added to all this, God and Jesus Christ, as well as His doctrines, were
banished from the school. As a sad but inevitable consequence, the school became
not only secular and non-religious but openly atheistical and anti-religious. In
such circumstances it was easy to persuade poor ignorant children that neither
God nor religion are of any importance as far as their daily lives are
concerned. God's name, moreover, was scarcely ever mentioned in such schools
unless it were perchance to blaspheme Him or to ridicule His Church. Thus, the
school forcibly deprived of the right to teach anything about God or His law
could not but fail in its efforts to really educate, that is, to lead children
to the practice of virtue, for the school lacked the fundamental principles
which underlie the possession of a knowledge of God and the means necessary to
strengthen the will in its efforts toward good and in its avoidance of sin.
Gone, too, was all possibility of ever laying a solid groundwork for peace,
order, and prosperity, either in the family or in social relations. Thus the
principles based on the spiritualistic philosophy of Christianity having been
obscured or destroyed in the minds of many, a triumphant materialism served to
prepare mankind for the propaganda of anarchy and of social hatred which was let
loose on such a great scale.
31. Is it to be wondered at then that, with the widespread refusal to accept
the principles of true Christian wisdom, the seeds of discord sown everywhere
should find a kindly soil in which to grow and should come to fruit in that most
tremendous struggle, the Great War, which unfortunately did not serve to lessen
but increased, by its acts of violence and of bloodshed, the international and
social animosities which already existed?
32. Up to this We have analyzed briefly the causes of the ills which afflict
present-day society, the recital of which however, Venerable Brothers, should
not cause us to lose hope of finding their appropriate remedy, since the evils
themselves seem to suggest a way out of these difficulties.
33. First, and most important of all, for mankind is the need of spiritual
peace. We do not need a peace that will consist merely in acts of external or
formal courtesy, but a peace which will penetrate the souls of men and which
will unite, heal, and reopen their hearts to that mutual affection which is born
of brotherly love. The peace of Christ is the only peace answering this
description: "let the peace of Christ rejoice in your hearts." (Colossians iii,
15) Nor is there any other peace possible than that which Christ gave to His
disciples (John xiv, 27) for since He is God, He "beholdeth the heart" (I Kings
xvi, 7) and in our hearts His kingdom is set up. Again, Jesus Christ is
perfectly justified when He calls this peace of soul His own for He was the
first Who said to men, "all you are brethren." (Matt. xxiii, 8) He gave likewise
to us, sealing it with His own life's blood, the law of brotherly love, of
mutual forbearance -- "This is my commandment, that you love one another, as I
have loved you." (John xv, 12) "Bear ye one another's burdens; and so you shall
fulfill the law of Christ." (Galatians vi, 2). . . .
40. The only remedy for such state of affairs is the peace of Christ since
the peace of Christ is the peace of God, which could not exist if it did not
enjoin respect for law, order, and the rights of authority. In the Holy
Scriptures We read: "My children, keep discipline in peace." (Ecclesiasticus
xli, 17) "Much peace have they that love the law, O Lord." (Psalms cxviii, 165)
"He that feareth the commandment, shall dwell in peace." (Proverbs xiii, 13)
Jesus Christ very expressly states: "Render to Caesar the things that are
Caesar's." (Matt. xxii, 21) He even recognized that Pilate possessed authority
from on High (John xiv, 11) as he acknowledged that the scribes and Pharisees
who though unworthy sat in the chair of Moses (Matt. xxiii, 2) were not without
a like authority. In Joseph and Mary, Jesus respected the natural authority of
parents and was subject to them for the greater part of His life. (Luke ii, 51)
He also taught, by the voice of His Apostle, the same important doctrine: "Let
every soul be subject to higher powers: for there is no power but from God."
(Romans xiii, 1; cf. also 1 Peter ii, 13, 18)
41. If we stop to reflect for a moment that these ideals and doctrines of
Jesus Christ, for example, his teachings on the necessity and value of the
spiritual life, on the dignity and sanctity of human life, on the duty of
obedience, on the divine basis of human government, on the sacramental character
of matrimony and by consequence the sanctity of family life -- if we stop to
reflect, let Us repeat, that these ideals and doctrines of Christ (which are in
fact but a portion of the treasury of truth which He left to mankind) were
confided by Him to His Church and to her alone for safekeeping, and that He has
promised that His aid will never fail her at any time for she is the infallible
teacher of His doctrines in every century and before all nations, there is no
one who cannot clearly see what a singularly important role the Catholic Church
is able to play, and is even called upon to assume, in providing a remedy for
the ills which afflict the world today and in leading mankind toward a universal
peace.
42. Because the Church is by divine institution the sole depository and
interpreter of the ideals and teachings of Christ, she alone possesses in any
complete and true sense the power effectively to combat that materialistic
philosophy which has already done and, still threatens, such tremendous harm to
the home and to the state. The Church alone can introduce into society and
maintain therein the prestige of a true, sound spiritualism, the spiritualism of
Christianity which both from the point of view of truth and of its practical
value is quite superior to any exclusively philosophical theory. The Church is
the teacher and an example of world good-will, for she is able to inculcate and
develop in mankind the "true spirit of brotherly love" (St. Augustine, De
Moribus Ecclesiae Catholicae, i, 30) and by raising the public estimation of the
value and dignity of the individual's soul help thereby to lift us even unto
God.
43. Finally, the Church is able to set both public and private life on the
road to righteousness by demanding that everything and all men become obedient
to God "Who beholdeth the heart," to His commands, to His laws, to His
sanctions. If the teachings of the Church could only penetrate in some such
manner as We have described the inner recesses of the consciences of mankind, be
they rulers or be they subjects, all eventually would be so apprised of their
personal and civic duties and their mutual responsibilities that in a short time
"Christ would be all, and in all." (Colossians iii, 11)
44. Since the Church is the safe and sure guide to conscience, for to her
safe-keeping alone there has been confided the doctrines and the promise of the
assistance of Christ, she is able not only to bring about at the present hour a
peace that is truly the peace of Christ, but can, better than any other agency
which We know of, contribute greatly to the securing of the same peace for the
future, to the making impossible of war in the future. For the Church teaches
(she alone has been given by God the mandate and the right to teach with
authority) that not only our acts as individuals but also as groups and as
nations must conform to the eternal law of God. In fact, it is much more
important that the acts of a nation follow God's law, since on the nation rests
a much greater responsibility for the consequences of its acts than on the
individual.
45. When, therefore, governments and nations follow in all their activities,
whether they be national or international, the dictates of conscience grounded
in the teachings, precepts, and example of Jesus Christ, and which are binding
on each and every individual, then only can we have faith in one another's word
and trust in the peaceful solution of the difficulties and controversies which
may grow out of differences in point of view or from clash of interests. An
attempt in this direction has already and is now being made; its results,
however, are almost negligible and, especially so, as far as they can be said to
affect those major questions which divide seriously and serve to arouse nations
one against the other. No merely human institution of today can be as successful
in devising a set of international laws which will be in harmony with world
conditions as the Middle Ages were in the possession of that true League of
Nations, Christianity. It cannot be denied that in the Middle Ages this law was
often violated; still it always existed as an ideal, according to which one
might judge the acts of nations, and a beacon light calling those who had lost
their way back to the safe road.
46. There exists an institution able to safeguard the sanctity of the law of
nations. This institution is a part of every nation; at the same time it is
above all nations. She enjoys, too, the highest authority, the fullness of the
teaching power of the Apostles. Such an institution is the Church of Christ. She
alone is adapted to do this great work, for she is not only divinely
commissioned to lead mankind, but moreover, because of her very make-up and the
constitution which she possesses, by reason of her age-old traditions and her
great prestige, which has not been lessened but has been greatly increased since
the close of the War, cannot but succeed in such a venture where others
assuredly will fail.
47. It is apparent from these considerations that true peace, the peace of
Christ, is impossible unless we are willing and ready to accept the fundamental
principles of Christianity, unless we are willing to observe the teachings and
obey the law of Christ, both in public and private life. If this were done, then
society being placed at last on a sound foundation, the Church would be able, in
the exercise of its divinely given ministry and by means of the teaching
authority which results therefrom, to protect all the rights of God over men and
nations.
48. It is possible to sum up all We have said in one word, "the Kingdom of
Christ." For Jesus Christ reigns over the minds of individuals by His teachings,
in their hearts by His love, in each one's life by the living according to His
law and the imitating of His example. Jesus reigns over the family when it,
modeled after the holy ideals of the sacrament of matrimony instituted by
Christ, maintains unspotted its true character of sanctuary. In such a sanctuary
of love, parental authority is fashioned after the authority of God, the Father,
from Whom, as a matter of fact, it originates and after which even it is named.
(Ephesians iii, 15) The obedience of the children imitates that of the Divine
Child of Nazareth, and the whole family life is inspired by the sacred ideals of
the Holy Family. Finally, Jesus Christ reigns over society when men recognize
and reverence the sovereignty of Christ, when they accept the divine origin and
control over all social forces, a recognition which is the basis of the right to
command for those in authority and of the duty to obey for those who are
subjects, a duty which cannot but ennoble all who live up to its demands. Christ
reigns where the position in society which He Himself has assigned to His Church
is recognized, for He bestowed on the Church the status and the constitution of
a society which, by reason of the perfect ends which it is called upon to
attain, must be held to be supreme in its own sphere; He also made her the
depository and interpreter of His divine teachings, and, by consequence, the
teacher and guide of every other society whatsoever, not of course in the sense
that she should abstract in the least from their authority, each in its own
sphere supreme, but that she should really perfect their authority, just as
divine grace perfects human nature, and should give to them the assistance
necessary for men to attain their true final end, eternal happiness, and by that
very fact make them the more deserving and certain promoters of their happiness
here below.
49. It is, therefore, a fact which cannot be questioned that the true peace
of Christ can only exist in the Kingdom of Christ -- "the peace of Christ in the
Kingdom of Christ." It is no less unquestionable that, in doing all we can to
bring about the re-establishment of Christ's kingdom, we will be working most
effectively toward a lasting world peace. (Pope Pius XI, Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 22, 1922.)
Do not be fooled by Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis's condemnation of consumerism and the necessity to protect the unborn.
Where was his mention of the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law?
Where was there even a hint of recognition of the fact that the United Nations has worsened social problems around the world and thus made World War III more imminent as an instrument of the wrath of God upon man and his unrepentant and legally protected, culturally promoted sins.
No, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis is a Modernist, which is why he sent a telegram of condolence to Stanislaw "Cardinal" Dziwisz, the longtime secretary of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II who is now the conciliar "archbishop" of Krakow, Poland, upon the death of the ninety-one year-old Stanislas "Cardinal" Nagy by praising him as a champion of false ecumenism:
On
hearing the news of the death of the venerable Cardinal Stanislaw Nagy,
I wish to express to you, to the entire diocesan community, to the
family of the worthy prelate, and to the Congregation of Dehonian
Fathers, my heartfelt participation in their sorrow, remembering with
love this dear brother who so generously served the Gospel and the
Church, especially in the academic world, which appreciated a studious
and expert teacher of the theological disciplines. I recall with
gratitude his fruitful collaboration and warm friendship with Blessed
John Paul II, and their mutual esteem, as well as his intense ecumenical
activity. I lift up my fervent prayers to the Lord, that, through the
intercession of the Blessed Virgin May, He might welcome this His
faithful servant, and a distinguished man of the Church, into joy and
peace eternal, and I gladly impart to all those who mourn his passing,
the consoling Apostolic blessing. (Resident of Casa Santa Marta for reasons of his "psychiatric health" mourns death of Cardinal Stanislas Nagy.)
"Cardinal" Nagy was considered to be a "pioneer" of false ecumenism in Poland, having been the first director of the "Comparative and Ecumenical Theology Section" at the University of Lublin, Poland, and studied ways to implement the designs of the "Second" Vatican Council to effect "openings" to Protestant sects and Orthodox churches.
"Cardinal" Nagy's "pioneering" efforts were not of God as there is no need to "study" the Catholic approach to the Protestant and Orthodox as that matter has been settled by God Himself, who has used His true popes to tell us that we must pray for the return of those who outside of the bosom of Holy Mother Church:
It is therefore by force of the right of Our
supreme Apostolic ministry, entrusted to us by the same Christ the Lord,
which, having to carry out with [supreme] participation all the duties
of the good Shepherd and to follow and embrace with paternal love all
the men of the world, we send this Letter of Ours to all the Christians
from whom We are separated, with which we exhort them warmly and beseech
them with insistence to hasten to return to the one fold of Christ; we
desire in fact from the depths of the heart their salvation in Christ
Jesus, and we fear having to render an account one day to Him, Our
Judge, if, through some possibility, we have not pointed out and
prepared the way for them to attain eternal salvation. In all Our
prayers and supplications, with thankfulness, day and night we never
omit to ask for them, with humble insistence, from the eternal Shepherd
of souls the abundance of goods and heavenly graces. And since, if also,
we fulfill in the earth the office of vicar, with all our heart we
await with open arms the return of the wayward sons to the Catholic
Church, in order to receive them with infinite fondness into the house
of the Heavenly Father and to enrich them with its inexhaustible
treasures. By our greatest wish for the return to the truth and
the communion with the Catholic Church, upon which depends not only the
salvation of all of them, but above all also of the whole Christian
society: the entire world in fact cannot enjoy true peace if it is not
of one fold and one shepherd. (Pope Pius IX, Iam Vos Omnes, September 13, 1868.)
So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this
Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the
assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can
only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of
Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have
unhappily left it. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, which is
visible to all, and which is to remain, according to the will of its
Author, exactly the same as He instituted it. . . . Let,
therefore, the separated children draw nigh to the Apostolic See, set up
in the City which Peter and Paul, the Princes of the Apostles,
consecrated by their blood; to that See, We repeat, which is 'the root
and womb whence the Church of God springs,' not with the
intention and the hope that 'the Church of the living God, the pillar
and ground of the truth' will cast aside the integrity of the faith and
tolerate their errors, but, on the contrary, that they themselves submit
to its teaching and government. Would that it were Our happy
lot to do that which so many of Our predecessors could not, to embrace
with fatherly affection those children, whose unhappy separation from Us
We now bewail. Would that God our Savior, "Who will have all men to be
saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth," would hear us when We
humbly beg that He would deign to recall all who stray to the unity of
the Church! In this most important undertaking We ask and wish that
others should ask the prayers of Blessed Mary the Virgin, Mother of
divine grace, victorious over all heresies and Help of Christians, that
She may implore for Us the speedy coming of the much hoped-for day, when
all men shall hear the voice of Her divine Son, and shall be 'careful
to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.'" (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.)
Relax, Jorge, you are not the pope.
You refuse to dress properly as a true pope.
You refuse to speak properly as a true pope.
You refuse to act properly as a true pope.
You do not even seek to live truly as a true pope.
Most importantly of all, you do believe and teach as true popes have believed and taught because you believe in and thus preach a false religion, conciliarism, which is the counterfeit ape of Catholicism.
The conciliar revolutionaries may control the
language.
We cannot let them control the perceptions of the truth of the
matter: they are enemies of Christ the King and of the souls He
redeemed by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood
on the wood of the Holy Cross.
We need to pray to Our Lady to help us during the perils of
this present time of apostasy and
betrayal as we seek shelter in her loving arms and as we have
recourse
in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance to the mercy that has been won for
us
by the shedding of every single drop of the Most Precious Blood of
her
Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, on the wood
of
the Holy Cross so that we may be ransomed from our attachment
even to the slightest Venial Sin and as we seek to live more
penitentially each day by making sincere acts of reparation for our
sins, especially by praying as many Rosaries each day as our state in
life permits.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and at the hour our death.
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Our Lady of Fatima, us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
See also: A Litany of Saints.
|