Our Lady Will Drive Out All of the Devils In Her Divine Son's Good Time

by Thomas A. Droleskey

On the way back to the Petits-Fosses [after the fourth apparition, February 19, 1858], Bernadette revealed how at a certain moment the Apparition seemed different from before. Suddenly loud yells, belched from the Gave, had rent the sacred silent of Massabielle. The 'challenged, crossed, collided with one another, like the clamour of a brawling crowd'. One voice, more furious than the rest, dominated them all and roared out: 'Get out of here! . . . Get out of here!' Bernadette guessed rightly that the threatening curse was by no means addressed merely to her humble self, but was an attack directed beyond her to the Vision of Light standing above the eglantine.

The Vision merely glanced in the direction of the rushing stream. This single look, one of sovereign authority, reduced the invisible mob to silence: the enemy of all good would not drive her from the grotto where she gave her audiences. 'He is in a rage. So much the better!' the saintly Cure d'Ars used to say of the grappin. 'He lets me know himself when big sinners are coming!'

At Massabielle, the future was to prove that the Spirit of evil, in this burst of fury, had admitted his defeat; he was not to extinguish the great radiance that would issue from this dark, peaceful nook, where so many sinners would renounce sin! (Abbe Francois Trochu, Saint Bernadette Soubirous: 184-187, p. 64.)

 

Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ will not suffer His Most Blessed Mother to be mocked. And make no mistake about it: the conciliar revolutionaries have mocked Our Lady just as much as they have mocked Him and the doctrines over the course of the past fifty years, starting with the Modernist conception of the "evolution of dogma" that has been condemned by the [First Vatican Council and smashed to smithereens by Pope Saint Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, September 8, 1907, who required that all seminarians had to take The Oath Against Modernism, September 1, 1910, prior to their ordination to the subdiaconate. It is by means of this rhetorical sleight of hand, packaged as "living tradition" by Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and as the "hermeneutic of continuity" by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, that the conciliar revolutionaries have sought to make everything about Catholic doctrine, liturgy and pastoral praxis a subject of "change" and "renewal" according to the "spirit of the times" as they claim to be following the"prompting" of God the Holy Ghost.

The condemned Modernist notion of "evolution of dogma" is, "however, at the root of each of conciliarism's attacks upon the Catholic Faith. (See Finding Conciliarism's Irreducible Minimum At Long Last and, among hundreds of other articles, "Purifying The Memory" In Order To Bury The Truth.)

It is how Holy Mother Church's very Divine Constitution has been supplanted by a "new ecclesiology."

It is how one false doctrine after another (false ecumenism, religious liberty, separation of Church and State, episcopal collegiality) and how one "novel" pastoral praxis after another have been propagated as the Catholics attached to the conciliar structures become accustomed to "change" and "novelty" as ordinary and expected part of what they see as the work of the Church Militant on earth.

It is how the sensus Catholicus of ordinary Catholics was destroyed through the singular vessel of ceaseless change, replete with options galore, the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service, in order to teach Catholics that we now have uncertainty and ambiguity where once we had certainty and clarity.

After all, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI will have us believe, the "accretions" of the Second Millennium that occurred as a result of Church councils, each of which met, deliberated and made binding declarations that were guided infallibly by God the Holy Ghost, in which the schismatic and heretical Orthodox, who live in a world of ambiguity and murkiness, and the "philosophy" that was "particular to the time" of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Scholasticism, prevented us from having a "true" picture of the meaning of Sacred Scripture and of what was taught by the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, many of whom he has attempted to bring forth as "witnesses" in behalf of conciliarism by distorting and misrepresenting their their lives and their work.

Indeed, Ratzinger/Benedict even gives prizes out every year to "scholars" who attempt to show us how to "rediscover the art of living" (see a report on the "Ratzinger Prize"--Ratzinger/Benedict Address to Recipients of the Ratzinger Prize) even though Our Blessed Lord and Saviour taught us clearly how we are to live our lives:

[21] From that time Jesus began to shew to his disciples, that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the ancients and scribes and chief priests, and be put to death, and the third day rise again. [22] And Peter taking him, began to rebuke him, saying: Lord, be it far from thee, this shall not be unto thee. [23] Who turning, said to Peter: Go behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men. [24] Then Jesus said to his disciples: If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. [25] For he that will save his life, shall lose it: and he that shall lose his life for my sake, shall find it.

[26] For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul? [27] For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels: and then will he render to every man according to his works. [28] Amen I say to you, there are some of them that stand here, that shall not taste death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.  (Matthew 16: 21-26.)

 

Yes, everything about the Faith must be "rediscovered" in order to bring it "up to date" as murky language is used to hide outright denials of the doctrine of Transubstantiation, Our Lord's actual Bodily Resurrection from the dead on Easter Sunday and, among so many other examples, in Purgatory as taught with clarity and exactitude by the Catholic Church. A new language for a new theology has been invented so as to make it appear that outright denials of the Holy Father are actually "developments of doctrine" understood according to "living tradition" or the "hermeneutic of continuity" and as more subtle attacks upon the Faith, such as the ones just mentioned, are clouded in murkiness and confusion to such an extent that the average Catholic has learned to say something along of the lines of "This is so profound that I can't understand it." If you can't understand what is being taught by one claiming to be a true Successor of Saint Peter, the problem, is not yours. It is the fact that the man who claims to be pope is an imposter who is seeking to proselytize in behalf of a false gospel whose tenets have been condemned on numerous occasion by Holy Mother Church.

(Those who put out glossy fund-raising letters and who hire telemarketers to convince people that their salvation itself is jeopardy if they don not respond positively have a vested interest in convincing Catholics that a true pope can give us such confusion and error, which itself is erroneous and very offensive to the ecclesial sense and thus of the good of souls. The time invested in protecting the vested interests of organizations whose apologists spread this error ought to be spent in studying and, if possible, refuting Gregorius's The Chair is Still Empty.)

As Ratzinger/Benedict has admitted that he is a rationalist and thus prone to discount the miraculous without some kind of "explanation" that appeals to the "heart" and the "inner senses of man," he cannot accept the simple truth that Our Lady actually physically appeared in such places as the Grotto of Massabielle near Lourdes, France, on eighteen occasions between February 11, 1858, an July 16, 1858, the Feast of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, and in the Cova da Iria near Fatima, Portugal, on six occasions between May 13, 1917, and October 13, 1917:

Before undertaking an interpretation of the message of Fatima, we must still attempt briefly to offer some clarification of their anthropological (psychological) character. In this field, theological anthropology distinguishes three forms of perception or “vision”: vision with the senses, and hence exterior bodily perception, interior perception, and spiritual vision (visio sensibilis - imaginativa - intellectualis). It is clear that in the visions of Lourdes, Fatima and other places it is not a question of normal exterior perception of the senses: the images and forms which are seen are not located spatially, as is the case for example with a tree or a house. This is perfectly obvious, for instance, as regards the vision of hell (described in the first part of the Fatima “secret”) or even the vision described in the third part of the “secret”. But the same can be very easily shown with regard to other visions, especially since not everybody present saw them, but only the “visionaries”. It is also clear that it is not a matter of a “vision” in the mind, without images, as occurs at the higher levels of mysticism. Therefore we are dealing with the middle category, interior perception. For the visionary, this perception certainly has the force of a presence, equivalent for that person to an external manifestation to the senses.   

Interior vision does not mean fantasy, which would be no more than an expression of the subjective imagination. It means rather that the soul is touched by something real, even if beyond the senses. It is rendered capable of seeing that which is beyond the senses, that which cannot be seen—seeing by means of the “interior senses”. It involves true “objects”, which touch the soul, even if these “objects” do not belong to our habitual sensory world. This is why there is a need for an interior vigilance of the heart, which is usually precluded by the intense pressure of external reality and of the images and thoughts which fill the soul. The person is led beyond pure exteriority and is touched by deeper dimensions of reality, which become visible to him. Perhaps this explains why children tend to be the ones to receive these apparitions: their souls are as yet little disturbed, their interior powers of perception are still not impaired. “On the lips of children and of babes you have found praise”, replies Jesus with a phrase of Psalm 8 (v. 3) to the criticism of the High Priests and elders, who had judged the children's cries of “hosanna” inappropriate (cf. Mt 21:16).   

“Interior vision” is not fantasy but, as we have said, a true and valid means of verification. But it also has its limitations. Even in exterior vision the subjective element is always present. We do not see the pure object, but it comes to us through the filter of our senses, which carry out a work of translation. This is still more evident in the case of interior vision, especially when it involves realities which in themselves transcend our horizon. The subject, the visionary, is still more powerfully involved. He sees insofar as he is able, in the modes of representation and consciousness available to him. In the case of interior vision, the process of translation is even more extensive than in exterior vision, for the subject shares in an essential way in the formation of the image of what appears. He can arrive at the image only within the bounds of his capacities and possibilities. Such visions therefore are never simple “photographs” of the other world, but are influenced by the potentialities and limitations of the perceiving subject. (Theological Commentary on the Fatima Message.)

 

In other words, just as Modernists contend that Faith itself is a matter of interior consciousness that comes from within so do they believe that seers such as Saint Bernadette Soubirous and Jacinta and Francisco Marto and Lucia dos Santos have had real but necessarily "subjective" experiences that have no actual visible, spatial reality with the eyes of the body.

Oh, yeah?

This is what Our Lady thinks about such blasphemy:

French rescue services and police are evacuating hundreds of pilgrims from hotels threatened by floodwaters from a rain-swollen river in the Roman Catholic shrine town of Lourdes.

Lourdes' grotto is said to be the site where the Virgin Mary appeared to a 14-year-old girl named Bernadette in 1858. Officials say the town draws about 6 million visitors a year.

A spokesman for the Lourdes sanctuary said the grotto itself was under 1-1/2 meters of water after the Gave River overran its banks. Visits were temporarily suspended.

Regional government spokesman Anatole Puiseux said about 500 people were being evacuated from riverside hotels, and more rain was forecast for later Saturday. (Pilgrims Evacuated As False "Pope's" Relics Are Exposed at the Shrine of Our Lady of Lourdes in France, Sunday, October 21, 2012, the Twenty-first Sunday after Pentecost and the Commemoration of Saint Hilarion and the Commemoration of Saint Ursula and her Companions.)

 

Yes, the man that Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI "beatified" on May 1, 2011 (see "Beatifying" Yet Another Conciliar Revolutionary, "Canonizing" A Man Who Protected Moral Derelicts, Unimaginable Deceit and Duplicity, Not The Work of God, To Be Loved by the Jews, Perhaps Judas Was the First to Sing "A Kiss is Just a Kiss", Enjoy the Party, George, Enjoy the Party, and Anticlimactic "Beatification" for an Antipope), Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II, the man who destroyed the integrity of Our Lady's psalter, her Most Holy Rosary and the man whose "feast day" will be observed as an "optional memorial" on October 22 each year in the calendar of the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service in the United States of America (see Falsely "Beatified" Imposter to the Papal Throne Gets Feast Day in the United States) had the ignominy of the tears of Heaven being poured forth upon the earth as his "relics" were exposed for "veneration" by unsuspecting Catholics, many of whom, no doubt, believe that the torrent of threatening flood waters is a sign of Heaven's "approval" of their beloved "pontiff.

Guess again, though.

T o use the clever phraseology of the conciliar presbyter who helped to popularize the phrase "Blessed" Paul The Sick back in the 1980s and 1990s, we should remember that  it was on God's "to do" list to visit an earthquake upon Assisi, Italy, on September 27, 1997, one month shy of the eleventh anniversary of the egregious event of "inter-religious" prayer that offended the honor and majesty and glory of the Most Blessed Trinity and thus grieved the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. The image below says all one needs to know about the scandalous blasphemies and sacrileges committed by the showman of one "papal" extravaganza "liturgy after another, "Blessed" John Paul II:

 

 

God will not be mocked, and He will not suffer the mockery of His Most Blessed Mother above all else.

Our Lady drove the devils out of the Grotto of Massabielle with but one glance in their direction. She will do the same with the devils who populate the counterfeit church of concilairism once God is through chastising us and or nations for our sins. It is that simple

In the end, you see, Our Lady's Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart will triumph. We simply need to be in peace as we fight off the devils in our own lives by means of the graces she sends us through her loving hands as the Mediatrix of All the Graces that have been won for us by the shedding of every single drop of her Divine Son's Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross and as we seek to help others, always in charity and never looking for any results or consolations at all, to flee from the conciliar devils once and for all.

It was in France that Our Lady told a Catholic man who had apostatized to embrace the hideous Calvinist religion that he would to Hell if he did not convert. This ought to serve as a reminder to us to quit our own sins so that we will not be sent to Hell and to persevere in our prayers for the conciliar devils so that they can avoid this terrible fate as well.

Let us turn yet again to the Mother of God herself, who sought the conversion of Pierre Port-Combet on March 25, 1656:

Then the Lady said, "Where does that heretic live who cut the willow tree? Does he not want to be converted?"

Pierre [Port-Combet, who had become a Calvinist] mumbled an answer. The Lady became more serious, "Do you think that I do not know that you are the heretic? Realize that your end is at hand. If you do not return to the True Faith, you will be cast into Hell! But if you change your beliefs, I shall protect you before God. Tell people to pray that they may gain the good graces which, God in His mercy has offered to them."

Pierre was filled with sorrow and shame and moved away from the Lady. Suddenly realizing that he was being rude, Pierre stepped closer to her, but she had moved away and was already near the little hill. He ran after her begging, "Please stop and listen to me. I want to apologize to you and I want you to help me!"

The Lady stopped and turned. By the time Pierre caught up to her, she was floating in the air and was already disappearing from sight. Suddenly, Pierre realized that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary had appeared to him! He fell to his knees and cried buckets of tears, "Jesus and Mary I promise you that I will change my life and become a good Catholic. I am sorry for what I have done and I beg you please, to help me change my life…"

On August 14, 1656, Pierre became very sick. An Augustinian priest came to hear his confession and accepted him back into the Catholic Church. Pierre received Holy Communion the next day on the Feast of the Assumption. After Pierre returned to the Catholic Faith, many others followed him. His son and five daughters came back to the Catholic Church as well as many Calvinists and Protestants. Five weeks later on September 8, 1656, Pierre died and was buried under the miraculous willow tree, just as he had asked. (Our Lady of the Willow Tree.)

 

Catholics seek and pray with urgency for the conversion of all non-Catholics to the true Faith. They do give an appearance or impression, whether by omission or commission, that false religions are esteemed by the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, or that they can play a role in the building of a "better" world.

Catholicism bears fruit from God the Holy Ghost.

Conciliarism bears fruit from Hell itself.

Enough.

Remember to pray your Rosaries.

Be devoted to Saint Joseph, the Patron of the Universal Church and the Protector of the Faithful, and to Saints Peter and Paul, both of whom sought the conversion of their own Jewish people and of the Gentiles who are consigned to false assurances from a false church of their salvation absent their conversion to the Catholic Faith, assurances that brought forth the tears of Heaven upon Lourdes two days ago an assurances that will continue to flood the world with disaster if they are not abjured.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon.

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

 

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior and Balthasar, pray for us.

See also: A Litany of Saints