Of, For And By Killers
Thomas A. Droleskey
One of the many enduring myths of the American regime was expressed by a man whose presidency served as a prototype for the misuse of presidential power that has been the norm more often than not since the presidencies of Thomas Woodrow Wilson (March 4, 1913 to March 4, 1921) and Franklin Delano Roosevelt (March 4, 1933 to April 12, 1945) established the contemporary model of rule by executive decree that was employed by the administrations of Lyndon Baines Johnson (November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969) and the three most recent presidents (William Jefferson Clinton, George Walker Bush and Barack Hussein Obama). That man who presidency was a the prototype for executive dictatorship was Abraham Lincoln, who expressed his undying love for the American concept of civil liberty that he was denying to those who opposed his War Between the States. It was in his Gettysburg Address, delivered on November 19, 1863, that Lincoln tickled the ears of those imbued with the myth of this nation's founding when he said the following:
The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
President Abraham Lincoln believed that he had to suspend the constitutional guarantee that mandated the release of those who had not been charged formally with a crime, preventing such people from seeking a writ of habeas corpus to demand their release. He believed that he had to jail newspaper editors and others who opposed his policies. He believed that he had to use various forms of harassment to "persuade" Federal judges to do his bidding for him. He believed that he had to have the Federal government try certain civilians in military courts even though civilian courts were open and functioning. Suppression of dissent was a cornerstone of his wartime policies. Yet it was this man, who many of us were taught as children fifty years ago to revere as a martyred hero, who claimed that the needless war that he was prosecuting was going to bring about a "new birth of freedom" in order that "government of the people, by the people, for people, shall not perish from the earth."
Abraham Lincoln believed in what he was doing. He was very sincere. He was amoral in the pursuit of his overriding goal, which was the the preservation of the "union" even though the sovereign states had joined that union voluntarily. Of all people, Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev told reporters on one occasion after the collapse of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, that then President George Herbert Walker Bush was on shaky ground when urging freedom for the Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia), which had been "republics" of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics since the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact's provisions were enforced on June 14, 1940 (one year, eight days before the Nazis betrayed the Soviets and invaded the Baltic States, which were under Nazi control until 1944). Gorbachev, trying to blunt what he knew could be the very breakup of the Soviet Union itself, warned Bush the Elder that he ought not be quick to criticize the Soviet attack on a television station in Vilnius, Lithuania, on January 13, 1991, that left thirteen Lithuanian civilians dead as Abraham Lincoln had sought to keep the American states together by the use of armed force.
True, the Baltic States were seized by the Soviet Union while the states that seceded from the United States of America had entered that union voluntarily. Gorbachev, the man hailed as a great "reformer" just in the same manner that Lincoln is hailed as the "great emancipator," had much innocent blood on his hands, blood that he believed had to be spilled to preserve the very existence of his Communist country following the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the ending of Communism in Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria and the former Czechoslovakia. Mikhail Gorbachev was no more a "reformer" than Abraham Lincoln was an "emancipator" who loved freedom (Lincoln believed at various points in his career that freed slaves should be encouraged to leave the country for Liberia in Africa). Both of these dictators sought to suppress dissent violently. Both used whatever means were at their disposal to rule by decree.
It has ever been thus with dictators. The French Revolutionaries cried their slogans of liberte, egalite et fraternite while they did not believe in freedom or equality or brotherhood for those who disagreed with them, reserving special hatred for Roman Catholic bishops and priests and consecrated religious and laymen who recognized them to be agents of the devil. The French Revolutions, though, had their "principles," such as they were, and they were determined to create the "new world order" accordingly. The same has been true of the anticlericalists in Italy during the Risorgimento and the Freemason Otto von Bismarck in Germany during the Kulturkampf and in the Mexican and Bolshevik and Spanish and Maoist and Cuban and Nicaraguan Revolutions. The ends always justify the means for those whose naturalistic "principles" are said to provide the means to establish "peace and justice" for all.
We should not be surprised, therefore, that a true son of the anti-Incarantional revolutions that have rocked the world since Father Martin Luther, O.S.A., posted his ninety-five theses on the door of Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany, Barack Hussein Obama, is seeking to create a socialistic state by means of regulations issued by those who serve under him on various commissions that have been created to implement different pieces of complex legislation, most of which was never read in toto by those who voted upon it in the United States Congress, that have been used as veritable Trojan Horses into which they can control more and more aspects of daily living, up to and including who is going to live and who is going to die.
Elitists of the naturalist "left" claim to have such love for the "people" while they exhibit contempt for the "people" if the unwashed masses do not accept the fact that they, the elitists, know far, far better than they, the people, do about what is best for them. And thus it is that, despite all of Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus's protestations to the contrary sixteen months ago, ObamaCare does permit the creation of "end of life" advisory panels to guide physicians and patients about "end of life care." Such "end of life" care would include the suspension of of food and water to disabled persons for whom there is no "hope" of recovery." It would also include refusing to provide Medicare funds for over a certain age with chronic or life-threatening illnesses not to seek further treatment.
According to an internet report, a neurosurgeon who had just attended a conference in Washington, D.C., telephoned radio talk show host Mark Levin, who is an attorney and a naturalist of the false opposite of the "right," to inform him that the United States Department of Health and Human Services had authorized "ethics committees" (read: death panels) to decide whether neurosurgeons could perform any kind of surgical intervention on on "units" (read: human beings made in the image and likeness of the Most Blessed Trinity) with strokes or brain injures who are on Medicare and are over seventy years of age:
Caller: Basically what the
document stated was that if you were over 70 and you’d come into an
emergency room and you’re on government supported health care, that
you’d get “comfort care”.
Mark Levin: Wait a minute…what’s the source for this?
Caller: This is Obama’s new health care plan for advanced neurosurgical care.
Mark Levin: And who issued this? HHS?
Yes. And basically they don’t call them patients, they call them units.
And instead of – they call it “ethics panels” or “ethics committees”,
would get together and meet and decide where the money would go for
hospitals, and basically for patients over 70 years of age, that
advanced neurosurgical care was not generally indicated.
Mark Levin: So it’s generally going to be denied?
Yes, absolutely. …If someone comes in at 70 years of age with a bleed
in their brain, I can promise you I’m not going to get a bunch of
administrators together on an ethics panel at 2 in the morning to decide
that I’m OK to do surgery. (Brain surgeon confirms ObamaCare rations care, has death panels.)
There has not been much discussion of this by the midget naturalists in their traveling road shows (at least as far as I know--and I missed, sad to say, the last performance of this circus).
ObamaCare is the quintessence of the model of British socialized medicine that is premised upon rank utilitarianism, placing cost-effectiveness (the cost of treating the "unit" as opposed to its "productivity" in the world. As has been noted in many other commentaries on this site, we have reached the logical "end game" that began with the violation of the Sovereignty of God over the sanctity and fecundity of marriage, a violation that made the surgical destruction of innocent lives inevitable as people became so accustomed to "planning" their families or simply engaging in immoral acts that the best and most convenient way to deal with an "unwanted" child was to kill him.
Yes, we live in a nation that of the killers, for the killers and by the killers.
This nation was founded on the dead falsehoods of naturalism and religious indifferentism, basing their entire structures of governance upon the belief that men could believe in any religion of their choosing--or no religion at all--and order their social affairs properly for the common good.
The founders of this nation, many of whom hated Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, believed in the death-dealing lying that men could be virtuous solely by their own unaided powers without belief in, access to or cooperation with Sanctifying Grace.
It is these death-dealing principles that has produced a nation of wanton killers, a nation whose civil officials are steeped in such craven amorality that the deaths of innocent civilians in combat operations employed in needless and unjust foreign wars are shrugged off with a mere "oops" and considered to be little more than diplomatic nuisances to be smoothed over with oodles and oodles of American taxpayer dollars.
It is these death-dealing principles that view human beings as "units" who are dispensable later in life as at its beginning, "units" whose body members may be vivisectioned from them as a result of the increasingly lower standards of what is considered to be "brain death," which is nothing other than a profit-making myth manufactured by the medical industry.
Most Americans just nod their heads up and down as though they are a collection of bobblehead dolls when they are told the details of ObamaCare. It's just the "money" they care about, after all. Money and the bread and circuses.
The barbarism engendered by the death-dealing principles of Modernity has been enabled all the more by the paucity of grace in the world as a result of the sacramental barrenness of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. And those who believe that there is some kind of secular, religiously indifferent, naturalistic way out of this government of, for and by killers is sadly deluded. Indeed, I keep insisting--and I will continue to insist--that Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus is going to be re-elected next year as there are scores of younger voters, who have been miseducated in the blood-stained environment wrought by chemical and surgical abortion and now fully accept the killing of the elderly or the "brain dead," in the "swing" states who did not vote in 2010 who are going to come out in droves in 2012 and as all manner of fraudulent means are used to continue to rig election results in order to maintain the current crop of statists in power. Our situation is only going to get worse the free rein that has been given to sin requires men to convert and repent, and there's not a whole lot of that taking place right now. Chastisements must worsen over time.
Great empires as well as republics have fallen. The fall of ancient Rome, which was a republic for nearly five hundred years before becoming an empire for its final five hundred years, was expedited by its rampant immorality. Yes, the caesars of Rome overregulated the economy and they overtaxed their people. They engaged in needless foreign wars. They authorized needless bureaucracies whose officials issued burdensome regulations. Yes, yes, yes. It is also the case that baby-killing, pornography and sins of perversity were permitted openly, to say nothing of the killing of over thirteen million Catholics between the time of Nero in 67 A.D. and the Edict of Milan in 313 A.D.
As Pope Gregory XVI observed in Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832, social decay must occur in a country founded on false principles, including those of religious indifferentism and concepts of "liberty" that pervert true human liberty and make possible the ruin of men and their nations:
This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it. "But the death of the soul is worse than freedom of error," as Augustine was wont to say. When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin. Then truly "the bottomless pit" is open from which John saw smoke ascending which obscured the sun, and out of which locusts flew forth to devastate the earth. Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of sacred things and holy laws -- in other words, a pestilence more deadly to the state than any other. Experience shows, even from earliest times, that cities renowned for wealth, dominion, and glory perished as a result of this single evil, namely immoderate freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty. (Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832.)
Thus stand condemned the false beliefs of the lords of Modernity and their Modernist counterparts in the counterfeit church of conciliarism.
The solution? Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary and her Fatima Message. Use the Rosary well as we seek to make reparation for our sins and those of the whole world. Fulfill Our Lady's Fatima Message as far as we can in our own lives, spreading devotion to the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary and her requests that we honor her on five first Saturdays. Protect ourselves with the shield that is the Brown Scapular. Spread devotion to the wearing of Our Lady's Miraculous Medal.
We are now in Advent. It is four weeks from today that we will commemorate the Nativity of the Newborn Christ the King, whose Kingship was a threat to King Herod the Great then just as it is a threat to the civil potentates of today.
Our King has given us so great a Blessed Mother to help us weather the storms of the present day. May her prayers help all men to realize that neither the caesars of today or the "people" are sovereign, only Christ the King, and no one else. It will only be when the Social Reign of Christ the King is restored that our governments will reflect the principles of true justice that redound to both the common temporal good and to our eternal happiness as citizens of Heaven.
We must always proclaim anew what Protestants and conciliarists alike reject: The Social Reign of Christ the King!
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now ?
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us, pray for us!