No Crime Is Worse Than Deicide
by Thomas A. Droleskey
The comments made by Bishop Richard Williamson of the Society of Saint Pius X that were mae in an interview that aired on Swedish television on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, the Feast of Saint Agnes, have certainly served as quite a catalyst to expose the Judaizing underbelly of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. Various conciliar officials, including Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, have fallen all over themselves to "prove" to their Talmudic masters, those who deny the one and only Holocaust that our sins imposed upon the God-Man, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as He offered Himself up to His Co-Equal and Co-Eternal Father in Spirit and in Truth in atonement for our sins, that they, the conciliar officials, do indeed consider the atrocities committed by the Third Reich against their co-religionists to be worse than all other crimes committed in the history of the world. This, of course, plays into the racialism of adherents of the Talmud, people who believe Jewish blood (and most of those who adhere to the Talmud are not blood descendants of Abraham) is more precious than any the blood that is shed by any human being.
Topping all of the previous "mea culpas" made by the false "pontiff," a man who is bound and determined to further offend the honor and majesty and glory of God by walking into yet another mosque and into two more synagogues (see From One Strange Religion to Another), and other conciliar "bishops" is the incredible statement made by the conciliar "archbishop" of Boston, Massachusetts, Sean "Cardinal" O'Malley, who called the atrocities committed by the agents of the Adolf Hitler's Third Reich to be "the worst crime in human history."
Here is a news report about "Cardinal" O'Malley's blasphemous remarks.
Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley, facing a group of local Jewish leaders upset by the Vatican's decision to lift the excommunication of a Holocaust denier, yesterday declared the Holocaust to be "the worst crime in human history" and pledged to move a Holocaust memorial to the new Braintree headquarters of the Archdiocese of Boston.
O'Malley and his top advisers on interfaith relations met for about 75 minutes late yesterday with about 20 Jewish leaders at the downtown office building that serves as the headquarters for many Jewish community organizations. Two Holocaust survivors, Israel Arbeiter and Stephan Ross, told the cardinal about their experiences during World War II, and the group then discussed the ramifications of Pope Benedict XVI's decision to lift the excommunication of four traditionalist bishops, including Richard Williamson, who denies that the Nazis used gas chambers to kill Jews.
In a telephone interview after the meeting, O'Malley was unusually forceful in his condemnation, not only of Holocaust denial, but of the leadership of the Society of St. Pius X, the ultraconservative and schismatic organization to which the four bishops belong.
"I sincerely believe that many of the Catholics who have gravitated toward this movement have done so because of nostalgia and a desire to participate in the old Mass, but in some of their leadership there's a broader agenda that's very poisonous," O'Malley said.
But the cardinal reiterated his support for the pope's decision to lift the excommunications, saying it opens the door for the Catholic church to reconcile with as many as 1.5 million members of the society, most of whom live in Europe. One of its congregations worships in Woburn.
"The Holy Father lifted this excommunication unaware of the statements that Bishop Williamson had made, and his intention was to try and begin a dialogue that might lead to reconciliation with this group," O'Malley said. "The alternative is that this group is going to evolve farther and farther away from the Catholic church and probably embrace more and more of an anti-Semitic agenda."
Jewish community leaders said they are particularly sensitive to anti-Semitism now because they perceive a rise in the behavior globally. They noted that there has been a very strong relationship between the Catholic and Jewish communities in Boston for several decades, and said they were pleased by yesterday's meeting.
"It was a good conversation, and obviously the next steps really have to come out of the Vatican," said Alan Ronkin, the deputy director of the Jewish Community Relations Council. "The cardinal understands the pain of the community, and we walked out of there feeling that both sides had been heard."
The current crisis presents the first real opportunity for O'Malley to publicly demonstrate leadership on Catholic-Jewish relations in Boston.
At yesterday's meeting, O'Malley said he had been planning to move a large outdoor menorah that commemorates the Holocaust from the grounds of the former chancery building in Brighton to the new pastoral center in Braintree. He suggested a Holocaust memorial service to mark the transfer. The Jewish community leaders agreed to participate in the ceremony.
O'Malley also said that he would travel this week to Washington for a memorial service for Rabbi Leon Klenicki, the longtime interfaith-affairs director for the Anti-Defamation League and a friend of the cardinal for the past several decades. O'Malley said that after the memorial service, he would meet with national leaders of Jewish organizations to discuss "improving communications."
O'Malley also said the pope's expected trip to Israel in May "will be a wonderful occasion for him to be able to clarify before the world the church's strong feelings about the Holocaust and our special friendship with the Jewish community." (Cardinal reaches out to Jewish leaders)
The worst crime in human history? It is necessary to examine this apostate's blasphemous statement in depth before examining others of his statements that were designed to curry favor with the people who deny the Sacred Divinity of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and who make war about His Holy Faith by promoting all manner of evils, including abortion, under cover of civil law and in every aspect of popular culture.
Such is the nature of the apostasy wrought by the ethos of conciliarism that a man who thinks himself to be a cardinal-elector of the Catholic Church and the archbishop of a major metropolitan see in the United States of America blurts out such a blasphemous remark without thinking for one moment that the worst crime in history is that which we committed by putting Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, the Son of God made Incarnate in Our Lady's Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of God the Holy Ghost, to death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday.
Our sins motivated the crowd on Good Friday to cry out "Give us Barabbas! Give us Barabbas!"
The weight of our sins caused Our Lord to fall three times as He walked the Via Dolorosa from Pontius Pilate's praetorium to Calvary.
Our sins prompted the Roman soldiers and the Pharisees to mock at Our Divine Redeemer as He was stripped of His garments and the unspeakably horrific wounds our sins imposed upon Him during His bloody scourging at the pillar were exposed for all to see.
Our sins helped to give force to the pounding of the nails into the flesh of Our Lord's hands and feet onto the gibbet of the Holy Cross, the very instrument upon which He wrought our salvation.
Our sins inspired the Pharisees to mock Him as He suffered on the wood of the Holy Cross to pay back in His Sacred Humanity what was owed to Him in His Infinity as God, the debt of our sins.
Our sins put God to death.
Deicide is the worst crime ever committed in human history. Deicide, "Cardinal" O'Malley, is the worst crime ever committed in human history?
What was the attitude of the One Who was killed on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday in this worse crime ever committed in human history? Did He hunt down His executioners to the far corners of the earth? Did He nurture hurt and resentment over the fact that He, the God-Man, had to come into contact in His Sacred Humanity with the very antithesis of His Sacred Divinity, sin?
No.
This is what the God-Man said as our sins put Him to death in the greatest crime ever committed in human history:
And Jesus said: Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. (Lk. 23: 34.)
Did Our Divine Redeemer revoke these words of forgiveness? Did He renege on these words? Was His forgiveness as fleeting as the morning dew? Did He, who knows the intentions of all hearts and the circumstances of all lives, "think better" of having forgiven us, His executioners, in light of the fact that we would fall into sins again and again even after we had availed ourselves of His ineffable Mercy in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance?
No.
Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ taught us that we would be forgiven nothing unless we forgave our brothers from our hearts, unless, that is, we bestowed upon others Mercy and forgiveness for any and all crimes, whether real or imagined, whether slight or great, committed against as we are forgiven of our own sins by Him in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance through the intermediary of an alter Christus acting in persona Christi:
"Then Peter came unto Him and said: 'Lord, how often shall my brother offend against me, and I forgive him? Till seven times.'
"Jesus saith to him: 'I say not to thee, till seven times; but till seventy times seven times.'
" 'Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened to a king, who would take account of his servants. And when he had begun to take the account, one was brought to him, that owed him ten thousand talents. And as he had not wherewithal to pay it, his lord commanded that he should be sold, and his wife and children all that he had, and payment to be made.
" 'But that servant falling down, besought him, saying: "Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all." And the lord of that servant being moved with pity, let him go and forgave him the debt.
" 'But when that servant was gone out, he found one of his fellow servants that owed him an hundred pence: and laying hold of him, he throttled him, saying: "Pay what thou owest." And his fellow servant falling down, besought him, saying: "Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all." And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he paid the debt.
" 'Now his fellow servants seeing what was done were very much grieved, and they came and told their lord all that was done. Then his lord called him; and said to him: "Thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all the debt, because thou besoughtest me: Shouldst not thou then have had compassion on thy fellow servant, even as I had compassion on thee?" And his lord being angry, delivered him to the torturers until he paid all the debt.
" 'So also shall my heavenly Father do to you, if you forgive not every one his brother from your hearts.'" (Lk. 18: 21-35)
Nothing that anyone does to us, says about us, causes others to think about is the equal of what one of our least Venial Sins caused God in the Flesh to suffer during His Passion and Death and caused His Most Blessed Mother's Immaculate Heart to suffer as those Seven Swords of Sorrow that had been prophesied by the aged Simeon at the time of her Purification in the Temple.
No human being has any right to hold on to any hurt or any personal offense or injury. Let me repeat this so as not be misunderstood: no human being has any right to hold on to any hurt or to any personal offense or injury whatsoever. No such right exists. We must forgive and we must forget. Those who do not forgive and forget as they are forgiven by the God Who forgets will wind up spending their lives in white rage as they strike out at anyone who they believe has ever slighted them even though they may have asked for forgiveness.
Almost every Catholic is familiar with how the legitimacy of the then Sister Margaret Mary Alacoque's claims to have been favored with visits from Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was tested by a spiritual director, who asked her to ask Him what her last sin was that she had confessed. Sister Margaret Mary Alacoque gave her spiritual director the answer when she next met with him. Our Lord had told her "I forgot" when Sister Margaret Mary Alacoque asked Him the last sin that she had confessed.
"I forgot."
"I forgot."
How many of us forgive and forget as Our Lord does? That is, Our Lord, although He is God and knows all things, wills to forget our sins once they have been absolved in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance by a true bishop or a true priest. We can do no less. None of us--and I mean none of us--has any right to do any less.
Ah, go tell that the adherents of the false religion that denies Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Sacred Divinity, the false religion that does not believe in forgiveness, that harbors and nurtures hurt and resentment and seeks to exact vengeance, not justice, upon those they judge guilty of the slightest fault against them and their hideous beliefs that have been rejected by Our Lord and superseded as He breathed His last breath on the wood of the Holy Cross as the curtain in the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The adherents of this false religion, Talmudic Judaism, believe that a crime against a Jew is the worse crime imaginable, and they seek to silence any and all criticism of their nefarious schemes against the Sacred Rights of Christ the King and the Deposit of Faith He has entrusted exclusively to His Catholic Church with the despicable smear of "anti-Semitism."
Sean "Cardinal" O'Malley served as a modern-day Judas Iscariot in this regard as he accused the Society of Saint Pius X and, by way of extension, all traditionally-minded Catholics of gravitating in the direction of "anti-Semitism:"
The alternative is that this group [the Society of Saint Pius X] is going to evolve farther and farther away from the Catholic church and probably embrace more and more of an anti-Semitic agenda.
All right, "Cardinal" O'Malley, what is this "anti-Semitic agenda" of which you speak?
Is it "anti-Semitic" to seek with urgency the unconditional conversion of those who adhere to the Talmud to the Catholic Faith?
Is it "anti-Semitic" to reiterate the perennial Catholic doctrine that the Old Covenant has been superseded by the New and Eternal Covenant that was instituted by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ at the Last Supper on Holy Thursday and ratified by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday?
Was Pope Saint Pius X guilty of "anti-Semitism" when he, the Vicar of Christ, reiterated this exact teaching to the founder of international Zionism on January 25, 1904:
POPE: We are unable to favor this movement [of Zionism]. We cannot prevent the Jews from going to Jerusalem—but we could never sanction it. The ground of Jerusalem, if it were not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church I cannot answer you otherwise. The Jews have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jewish people.
HERZL: [The conflict between Rome and Jerusalem, represented by the one and the other of us, was once again under way. At the outset I tried to be conciliatory. I said my little piece. . . . It didn’t greatly impress him. Jerusalem was not to be placed in Jewish hands.] And its present status, Holy Father?
POPE: I know, it is disagreeable to see the Turks in possession of our Holy Places. We simply have to put up with it. But to sanction the Jewish wish to occupy these sites, that we cannot do.
HERZL: [I said that we based our movement solely on the sufferings of the Jews, and wished to put aside all religious issues].
POPE: Yes, but we, but I as the head of the Catholic Church, cannot do this. One of two things will likely happen. Either the Jews will retain their ancient faith and continue to await the Messiah whom we believe has already appeared—in which case they are denying the divinity of Jesus and we cannot assist them. Or else they will go there with no religion whatever, and then we can have nothing at all to do with them. The Jewish faith was the foundation of our own, but it has been superceded by the teachings of Christ, and we cannot admit that it still enjoys any validity. The Jews who should have been the first to acknowledge Jesus Christ have not done so to this day.
HERZL: [It was on the tip of my tongue to remark, “It happens in every family: no one believes in his own relative.” But, instead, I said:] Terror and persecution were not precisely the best means for converting the Jews. [His reply had an element of grandeur in its simplicity:]
POPE: Our Lord came without power. He came in peace. He persecuted no one. He was abandoned even by his apostles. It was only later that he attained stature. It took three centuries for the Church to evolve. The Jews therefore had plenty of time in which to accept his divinity without duress or pressure. But they chose not to do so, and they have not done it yet. (Marvin Lowenthal, Diaries of Theodore Herzl, pp. 427- 430.)
Is it "anti-Semitic," "Cardinal" O'Malley, to refer to this colloquy? Was Pope Saint Pius X guilty of "anti-Semitism" in reiterating the teaching of the Catholic Church to Theodore Herzl?
Is it "anti-Semitic," "Cardinal" O'Malley, to make reference to the words quoted below from the solemn decree, Cantate Domino, issued by the Council of Florence and promulgated by Pope Eugene IV on February 4, 1442?
It [the Holy Roman Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart "into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels" [Matt. 25:41], unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.
Is it "anti-Semitic," "Cardinal" O'Malley, to point out that the very Talmudic rabbi and "papal" "knight," Leon Klenicki, you praised was a member of the Reform branch of Talmudic Judaism, which supports the killing of innocent babies under cover of the civil law, and that he was active in the pro-abortion and pro-perversion Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai Brith, a Judeo-Masonic organization. No matter the number of Jews killed by the agents of the Third Reich during World War II, it is indisputable that fifty million innocent human beings have been slaughtered in the United States of America under the cover of civil law by surgical abortion alone? Is it "anti-Semitic" to point out that the Anti-Defamation League promotes perversity (ADL Supports California Supreme Court Decision) and baby-killing with utter abandon under the aegis of "reproductive rights?"
Is is it "anti-Semitic," "Cardinal" O'Malley, to criticize Leon Klenicki's direct support of chemical and surgical baby-killing under cover of law, making him culpable in the deaths of countless numbers of innocent preborn babies, while pointing out to you that Bishop Richard Williamson has supported the killing of no innocent human being, including those who adhere to the false religion of Talmudic Judaism? Why is it permissible to praise a man, Leon Klenicki, who supported the daily slaughter of the preborn while taking cheap shots at a man who has NOT killed--nor has justified the killing--of any innocent human being, Bishop Williamson? Does being an adherent of the Talmud indemnify one from criticism for his direct and most personal involvement in the promotion of laws favoring the slaughter of the preborn? Are you such a coward, "Cardinal" O'Malley, that you are afraid of being called an anti-Semite by those who deny the one and only Holocaust that Our Lord offered on the wood of the Holy Cross if you dare to point out the Leon Klenicki, unlike Bishop Williamson, had the blood of the innocent on his hands?
Ah, yes, there you have it. "Cardinal" O'Malley will take cheap shots at a man who has killed no one while praises a man who supported the slaughter of the preborn. You can't criticize an adherent of the Talmud, now can you? You also can't discipline the lies of Edward Moore Kennedy or John F. Kerry or any of the other Catholic pro-aborts in public life in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. These individuals are participating quite actively at present in the daily slaughter of the preborn. How are you not an enabler of these supporters of baby-killing by your inaction and cowardice?
Oh, yes, it makes for good press to knock down the straw man of Bishop Richard Williamson in front of people who support the mystical dismemberment of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the persons of preborn children in their mothers' wombs. It makes for good press to call the slaughter of Jews by the Nazis the "greatest crime in human history" and to denigrate thereby the crime of Deicide that each one of our own sins, Venial and Mortal, were responsible for prosecuting on Good Friday in the year 33 A.D.
Lest anyone get their jollies by taking their swipes at Sean "Cardinal" O'Malley for blasphemously referring to the atrocities committed by agents of the Third Reich as the "greatest crime in human history," it must be pointed out that it was none other than Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who has been falling all over himself to prove his own bona fides to those who hate Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and who have mocked His Sacred Divinity in Ratzinger/Benedict's very presence in two of their synagogues (with two more to come in three months), who elevated Sean O'Malley to the "college of cardinals" in 2006.Will Ratzinger/Benedict demand that O'Malley "clarify" his "worst crime in human history" remark? No, he will not.
Oh, yes, sure, "Cardinal" O'Malley might issue a "clarification," probably to the effect that the crimes committed by the Nazis against adherents of the Talmud were the "worst crimes in human history" that targeted a specific group of people, that he did not mean to diminish the horror of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's offering of Himself to His Co-Equal and Co-Eternal Father in Spirit and in Truth.
Even such a "clarification" would miss the mark, however, as thirteen million Catholics were killed by the agents of the Roman Empire from 67 A.D. to 313 A.D. Many of these martyrs were sent to their deaths with the assistance of Jewish spies who were eager to curry favor with Roman officials that had dispersed them to the far corners of the earth following the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Who speaks of these crimes that were committed in an effort to impose a "final solution" upon the true Faith? Is the blood of the Catholic martyrs less precious than the blood of those killed by the agents of the Third Reich? Are we to succumb to the racialist lie of Talmudic Judaism, which has shed so much innocent blood in the Middle East in the past sixty-one years, that Jewish blood is more important than the blood of other human beings.
It is still nevertheless the case, however, "Cardinal" O'Malley used this "worst crime in human history" before an audience composed of people who do indeed believe this to be the case without any qualification whatsoever, people who revel in the fact that the word Holocaust has been hijacked by them to make of the victims of the Third Reich "salvific" figures whose "sacrifice" must change the course of the conduct of Catholics as regards Jews, especially by refusing to seek their conversion and by refusing to speak in frank terms about a theology of supersession.
Where is "Cardinal" O'Malley's duty before God to seek the conversion of Jews by explaining to them that no crime is the equal of what our sins did to the God-Man as they put Him to death on the wood of the Holy Cross, that no crime is unforgivable, that we are under a solemn obligation to forgive all others as we ourselves have been forgiven? Such a duty is far, far from the minds and hearts of most of those who comprise the "hierarchy" of the counterfeit church of concilairism. Catering to the ancient enemies of the Faith is the order of the day in the conciliar structures, not seeking with urgency the conversion of all non-Catholics, including those who adhere to false religion of Talmudic Judaism that belongs to the devil and has the power to save no one.
Indeed, even when some in the conciliar Vatican expressed outrage over a television program on "Channel 10" in Israel that blasphemed Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, the concern was not for His Sacred Rights as the Divine Redeemer but for the "sensitivities" of those who believe in Him. In other words, even when criticizing a blatantly blasphemous production on a "private" Israeli television channel, authorities in the conciliar Vatican must make advertence to how such a production offends "believers," not how such it offends God. Such is the apostate nature of conciliarism that it is never permissible to speak about the Sacred Rights of Christ the King with the Jews. It is permissible only to speak in terms of how His followers are offended, reducing the objective nature of the blasphemy to the level of subjectivism. This is yet another proof of the abandonment of the sensus Catholicus within the counterfeit church of conciliarism.
We begin Lent today. Our period prayer and fasting and almsgiving and mortification is upon us. We must make use of this period of penance to beg forgiveness from Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ for our own infidelities as we pray for the conversion of all of those who are steeped in false religions, including the false religion of conciliarism. That is, while we must criticize the likes of "Cardinal" O'Malley and the man who indemnifies him, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, we must remember at all times that they are loved by God with an infinite love. They have been redeemed by the shedding of every single drop of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross as our sins helped to effect the worst crime in human history, Deicide. He stands ready to forgive them their apostasies and betrayals and sacrileges and blasphemous statements if only they turn to Him with a contrite heart, which is what we must do every day of our lives!
Turn away thy face from my sins, and blot out all my iniquities. Create a clean heart in me, O God: and renew a right spirit within my bowels. Cast me not away from thy face; and take not thy holy spirit from me. Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation, and strengthen me with a perfect spirit. I will teach the unjust thy ways: and the wicked shall be converted to thee.
Deliver me from blood, O God, thou God of my salvation: and my tongue shall extol thy justice. O Lord, thou wilt open my lips: and my mouth shall declare thy praise. For if thou hadst desired sacrifice, I would indeed have given it: with burnt offerings thou wilt not be delighted. A sacrifice to God is an afflicted spirit: a contrite and humbled heart, O God, thou wilt not despise. Deal favourably, O Lord, in thy good will with Sion; that the walls of Jerusalem may be built up. (Psalm 50: 11-20.)
We must concentrate on getting ourselves home to Heaven as we entrust our souls to true bishops and true priests who make no concessions to conciliarism or to the nonexistent legitimacy of its false shepherds, spending extra time these forty days of Lent in prayer before the Blessed Sacrament and to the Mother of God, especially by praying as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit, making sure also to get to the Sacred Tribunal of Penance to make a good, integral Confession on a weekly basis, if at all possible.
Our Lord stands ready to be merciful to us erring sinners. We must be truly sorry for our sins and be ever ready to forgive all others, never reserving for ourselves the nonexistent "right" to nurse various grudges, whether real or imagined, as do those who deny the Sacred Divinity of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and who stand ready to mock all those who are faithful to His teaching without any concessions to the Judaizing tendencies of concilairism.
What I wrote a few weeks ago is relevant once again:
The best way we can show our true friendship to our Jewish associates and colleagues and friends and neighbors is to pray for their conversion and to give them blessed Miraculous Medals and blessed Green Scapulars. The Miraculous Medal prepared the Catholic-hating Jew named Theodore Ratisbonne to convert to the Faith when Our Lady appeared to him on January 20, 1842, as she appears on the Miraculous Medal. Why do we doubt that it can work with our own friends and associates and colleagues and, in some cases, family members? Why are we so ready to put constraints on the power of God to work miracles by converting the most unlikely of souls to the true Faith?
We cannot be like the conciliarists. We cannot reaffirm adherents of false religions in their beliefs. We must try to make some efforts, sometimes undertaken only after spiritual direction in or out of the Confessional, to plant the seed of the true Faith in the souls of those who do not realize that they have been redeemed by God Himself as He offered Himself up as the one and only true Holocaust in atonement for our sins, keeping in mind the bountiful reward that awaits us for helping a soul to convert to the true Faith:
For the continual prayer of a just man availeth much. Elias was a man passible like unto us: and with prayer he prayed that it might not rain upon the earth, and it rained not for three years and six months. And he prayed again: and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit. My brethren, if any of you err from the truth, and one convert him: He must know that he who causeth a sinner to be converted from the error of his way, shall save his soul from death, and shall cover a multitude of sins. (James 5: 16-20.)
May we pray as many Rosaries as possible each day as our states-in-life permit in reparation for our sins and those of the whole world, remembering to pray for the conversion of those who continue to harden their hearts rather than to extend to others the Mercies of the Sacred Heart of Jesus that were shown us as the Immaculate Heart of Mary, out of which It was formed, suffered those Swords of Sorrow to plead for us to be brought us unto eternal life as the adopted sons and daughters of the living God.
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us
See also: A Litany of Saints
