Front Men For The New World Order

by Thomas A. Droleskey

Barack Hussein Obama is merely a front man for the New World Order.

He has shown himself to be nothing other than a front man throughout his career whenever he is separated from his TelePrompTer. Although glib, Barack Hussein Obama is not a policy "wonk" as was former President William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, who could speak extemporaneously on his various policy proposals for hours on end. Obama could not even discuss some of the provisions of his own health-care take-over bill when questioned about them in an interviewer by Fox News Channel reporter Bret Baier (see President Barack Obama Talks to Bret Baier About Health Care). Barack Hussein Obama is simply a Kenyan (at least by ancestry on his father's side) Horse who is a front man for transforming the United States of America into a European-style cradle-to-gave socialist nation. Obama has filled his administration with social engineers aplenty who have long desired to turn this country into a grand laboratory of socialism. He is simply the front man for these engineers.

There is a great deal of irony in this if you consider the simple fact that the government and the economy of the United States of America are being converted by the example of the socialist nations of formerly Catholic Europe that once sent missionaries to the far corners of the world to convert pagan and barbaric peoples to the true Faith. Saint Henry the Emperor was particularly solicitous of converting those parts of Central and Eastern Europe that had not been evangelized by the end of the First Millennium and the beginning of the Second Millennium:

Henry, surnamed the Pious, Duke of Bavaria, became successively King of Germany and Emperor of the Romans: but not satisfied with a mere temporal principality, he strove to gain an immortal crown, by paying zealous service to the eternal King. As emperor, he devoted himself earnestly to spreading religion, and rebuilt with great magnificence the churches which had been destroyed by the infidels, endowing them generously both with money and lands. He built monasteries and other pious establishments, and increased the income of others; the bishopric of Bamberg, which he had founded out of his family possessions, he made tributary to St. Peter and the Roman Pontiff. When Benedict VIII, who had crowned him emperor, was obliged to seek safety in flight, Henry received him and restored him to his see.

Once when he was suffering from a severe illness in the monastery of Monte Cassino, St. Benedict cured him by a wonderful miracle. He endowed the Roman Church with a most copious grant, undertook in her defence a war against the Greeks, and gained possession of Apulia, which they had held for some time. It was his custom to undertake nothing without prayer, and at times he saw the angel of the Lord, or the holy martyrs, his patrons, fighting for him at the head of his army. Aided thus by the divine protection, he overcame barbarous nations more by prayer than by arms. Hungary was still pagan; but Henry having given his sister in marriage to its King Stephen, the latter was baptized, and thus the whole nation was brought to the faith of Christ. He set the rare example of preserving virginity in the married state, and at his death restored his wife, St. Cunigund, a virgin to her family.

He arranged everything relating to the glory or advantage of the empire with the greatest prudence, and left scattered throughout Gaul, Italy, and Germany, traces of his munificence towards religion. The sweet odour of his heroic virtue spread far and wide, till he was more celebrated for his holiness than for his imperial dignity. At length, his life's work was accomplished, and he was called by our Lord to the rewards of the heavenly kingdom, in the year of salvation 1024. His body was buried in the church of the blessed apostles Peter and Paul at Bamberg. God wished to glorify His servant, and many miracles were worked at his tomb. These being afterwards proved and certified, Eugenius III inscribed his name upon the catalogue of the saints. (Breviary for the Feast of Saint Henry, quoted in Dom Prosper Gueranger, The Liturgical Year, Volume 13: Time After Pentecost, Book IV, pp.106-108.)

 

As a result of Martin Luther's diabolical revolt against the Divine Plan that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ instituted to effect man's return to Him through the Catholic Church, the once proudly Catholic kingdoms of Europe became in successive turns became Protestant and Judeo-Masonic and then socialistic. This is but the inevitable result of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King. The formerly Catholic nations of Europe had to become socialistic over the course of time as statism is the logical "end game" result of the overthrown of Our Lord's Kingship over men and their nations. The United States of America had to become socialistic over the course of time as statism is the logical "end game" result of the false, naturalistic, anti-Incarnational, religiously indifferentist and semi-Pelagian principles upon which it was founded. Men must look to the state as the true secular "church" to provide for their needs here on earth once they have lost all sight of the needs of eternity.

Although the late Dr. Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn was hostile to the true Faith as a Russian Orthodox nationalist, he did nevertheless see with a fair amount of clarity how statism must triumph when "humanism" (naturalism) becomes the dominant strain in social thought and practical political action:

When the modern Western States were created, the following principle was proclaimed: governments are meant to serve man, and man lives to be free to pursue happiness. (See, for example, the American Declaration). Now at last during past decades technical and social progress has permitted the realization of such aspirations: the welfare state. Every citizen has been granted the desired freedom and material goods in such quantity and of such quality as to guarantee in theory the achievement of happiness, in the morally inferior sense which has come into being during those same decades. In the process, however, one psychological detail has been overlooked: the constant desire to have still more things and a still better life and the struggle to obtain them imprints many Western faces with worry and even depression, though it is customary to conceal such feelings. Active and tense competition permeates all human thoughts without opening a way to free spiritual development. The individual's independence from many types of state pressure has been guaranteed; the majority of people have been granted well-being to an extent their fathers and grandfathers could not even dream about; it has become possible to raise young people according to these ideals, leading them to physical splendor, happiness, possession of material goods, money and leisure, to an almost unlimited freedom of enjoyment. So who should now renounce all this, why and for what should one risk one's precious life in defense of common values, and particularly in such nebulous cases when the security of one's nation must be defended in a distant country?

Even biology knows that habitual extreme safety and well-being are not advantageous for a living organism. Today, well-being in the life of Western society has begun to reveal its pernicious mask. . . .

As humanism in its development was becoming more and more materialistic, it also increasingly allowed concepts to be used first by socialism and then by communism, so that Karl Marx was able to say, in 1844, that "communism is naturalized humanism."

This statement has proved to be not entirely unreasonable. One does not see the same stones in the foundations of an eroded humanism and of any type of socialism: boundless materialism; freedom from religion and religious responsibility (which under Communist regimes attains the stage of antireligious dictatorship); concentration on social structures with an allegedly scientific approach. (This last is typical of both the Age of Enlightenment and of Marxism.) It is no accident that all of communism's rhetorical vows revolve around Man (with a capital M) and his earthly happiness. At first glance it seems an ugly parallel: common traits in the thinking and way of life of today's West and today's East? But such is the logic of materialistic development.

The interrelationship is such, moreover, that the current of materialism which is farthest to the left, and is hence the most consistent, always proves to be stronger, more attractive, and victorious. Humanism which has lost its Christian heritage cannot prevail in this competition. Thus during the past centuries and especially in recent decades, as the process became more acute, the alignment of forces was as follows: Liberalism was inevitably pushed aside by radicalism, radicalism had to surrender to socialism, and socialism could not stand up to communism. . . . .

If humanism were right in declaring that man is born to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to die, his task on earth evidently must be of a more spiritual nature. It cannot unrestrained enjoyment of everyday life. It cannot be the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then cheerfully get the most out of them. It has to be the fulfillment of a permanent, earnest duty so that one's life journey may become an experience of moral growth, so that one may leave life a better human being than one started it. It is imperative to review the table of widespread human values. Its present incorrectness is astounding. It is not possible that assessment of the President's performance be reduced to the question of how much money one makes or of unlimited availability of gasoline. Only voluntary, inspired self-restraint can raise man above the world stream of materialism.

It would be retrogression to attach oneself today to the ossified formulas of the Enlightenment. Social dogmatism leaves us completely helpless in front of the trials of our times.

Even if we are spared destruction by war, our lives will have to change if we want to save life from self-destruction. We cannot avoid revising the fundamental definitions of human life and human society. Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no Superior Spirit above him? Is it right that man's life and society's activities have to be determined by material expansion in the first place? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our spiritual integrity?  (Solzhenitsyn's Harvard Address.)

 

We are eyewitnesses to the final stages in the preparation for the coming of Antichrist and his One World Government that has long been the goal of the New World Order of Judeo-Masonry. The passage of ObamaCare by the United States House of Representatives last evening Sunday night, Passion Sunday night, mind you!--is simply the beginning of the end of the long, long process of degeneration that began when men wrote a constitution in the belief that they could establish and maintain social order absent a due regard for the Social Reign of Christ the King as It must be exercised by the true Church, men who believed that they and their descendants could pursue "civic virtue" without having belief in, access to or cooperation with Sanctifying Grace.

Even the members of the Democratic Party in the United States House of Representatives who were thought to be "pro-life"-- although most of them make "exceptions" to the inviolability of innocent preborn human life, meaning that they are simply less "pro-abortion" than those who support unrestricted baby-killing under the cover of the civil law as a matter of principle--caved at the last minute as they accepted the promise of an Executive Order from the rabidly pro-abortion President Barack Hussein Obama to "guarantee" that Federal taxpayer dollars would not be used to purchase insurance policies that cover the "elective" assassination of preborn children except in those cases permitted by existing Medicaid policy under the current provisions of the Hyde Amendment, which permits the use of Federal taxpayer dollars to kill babies in some cases (for a review of the moral flaws in the Stupak-Pitts Amendment that is meant to be "reinstated" by means of Obama's pending Executive Order, which can be reversed by himself or some future president, please see Not For A Single Innocent Life, For Thirty Pieces of Pork, and Enabled and Protected By Her Own "Archbishop").

Thus it is that "pro-life" House Democrats, led by Representative Bart Stupak (D-Michigan), who were the last hope, humanly speaking, to block ObamaCare from being passed last evening by the United States House of Representatives jumped on the statist bandwagon without realizing that ObamaCare in and of its statist measure is a violation of the Natural Law principle of subsidiarity as enunciated by Pope Pius XI in Quadragesimo Anno, May 15, 1931:

As history abundantly proves, it is true that on account of changed conditions many things which were done by small associations in former times cannot be done now save by large associations. Still, that most weighty principle, which cannot be set aside or changed, remains fixed and unshaken in social philosophy: Just as it is gravely wrong to take from individuals what they can accomplish by their own initiative and industry and give it to the community, so also it is an injustice and at the same time a grave evil and disturbance of right order to assign to a greater and higher association what lesser and subordinate organizations can do. For every social activity ought of its very nature to furnish help to the members of the body social, and never destroy and absorb them.

The supreme authority of the State ought, therefore, to let subordinate groups handle matters and concerns of lesser importance, which would otherwise dissipate its efforts greatly. Thereby the State will more freely, powerfully, and effectively do all those things that belong to it alone because it alone can do them: directing, watching, urging, restraining, as occasion requires and necessity demands. Therefore, those in power should be sure that the more perfectly a graduated order is kept among the various associations, in observance of the principle of "subsidiary function," the stronger social authority and effectiveness will be the happier and more prosperous the condition of the State.

 

This point has been made in various articles on this site in recent months. I mention it again now to demonstrate that ObamaCare, with or without abortion (and abortion is included in ObamaCare, with or without his upcoming Executive Order, which cannot override the language in the bill passed last evening, and is but a mere bookkeeping trick), is of its nature an assault against the binding precepts of the Natural Law and is designed to replace our current utilitarian health-care system, which is overseen by gigantic corporate hospital conglomerates and avaricious insurance companies, with a utilitarian health-care that is overseen by social engineers of the New World Order.

As noted before, Barack Hussein Obama is one of the front men for this New World Order of statism. ObamaCare is just one of the "gifts" this Kenyan Horse is giving us. And as he demonstrated in his speech against a motion to recommit the ObamaCare bill after it passed by a vote of 219-212 last night, Representative Bart Stupak, shielded, he believes, by Obama's worthless promise of a legally worthless Executive Order, showed himself to be a willing stooge of the Kenyan Horse in helping to bring this nation to the path of total statism (for an examination of how Representative Stupak has done the bidding of the mob in the past, please see the Letter to Benedict XVI he signed last year that protested the "reinstatement" of Bishop Richard Williamson of the Society of Saint Pius X).

At least some of the conciliar "bishops" will be very enthusiastic that the first step taken in the direction a British-style socialized medicine (called by its apologists in this country "universal health-care) has been completed now that "messy" abortion issue has been gotten out of the way. As has been noted in many recent commentaries, many of the conciliar "bishops" in the United States of America are unreconstructed statists in their own right, which is why it is not surprising that so many of the allegedly "pro-life" House Democrats jumped onto the Kenyan Horse's back as soon as he gave them a meaningless promise that will do nothing to save a single, solitary innocent child from execution in his mother's womb.

The statists among the conciliar "bishops" of the United States of America are, in addition to supporting one statist policy after another on the domestic level, full-throated enthusiasts for the undermining of American national sovereignty and for the surrender of that sovereignty to various global governing bodies. They are not "mavericks" in doing so as they have the full support of their "pope," Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who just four days ago demonstrated that he really, really, really meant it in Caritas in Veritate, July 7, 2009, when he expressed his support for global governing bodies as means to stabilize the global economy, protect the environment, and provide a framework for peace among nations:

CURRENT CRISIS CALLS FOR WORLD FINANCIAL REORGANISATION

VATICAN CITY, 18 MAR 2010 (VIS) - At midday today in the Vatican's Clementine Hall the Holy Father received members of the Union of Industrialists and Businesses of Rome.

Opening his remarks to them with a reference to the current economic crisis, the Pope noted how it has "sorely tried the economic and productive systems of various countries. Nonetheless, it should be faced with trust because it can be considered as an opportunity for the revision of development models and the reorganisation of global finance, a 'new time' - as it has been described - of profound reflection".

Benedict XVI then went on to recall how in his own social Encyclical "Caritas in veritate" he had encouraged the world of "economics and finance to focus on the person, whom Christ revealed in his profoundest dignity. Moreover, while recommending that politics not be subordinate to financial mechanisms, I encouraged the reform and creation of an international juridical and political order (adapted to global structures of economy and finance) in order more effectively to achieve the common good of the human family. Following in the footsteps of my predecessors, I underlined that the increase in unemployment, especially among young people, the economic impoverishment of many workers and the emergence of new forms of slavery require that access to dignified work for everyone be a priority objective".

"No-one is unaware of the sacrifices that have to be made in order to open a business, or keep it on the market, as a 'community of persons' which produces goods and services and which, hence, does not have the exclusive aim of making a profit, though it is necessary to do so", said the Pope. In this context he also highlighted the importance of "defeating the individualist and materialist mentality which holds that investments must be detracted from the real economy in order to favour the use of capital on financial markets, with a view to easier and quicker returns.

"I would like to recall", he added, "that the most sure way to contrast the decline of the entrepreneurial system in a particular territory consists in establishing a network of contacts with other social actors, investing in research and innovation, not using unjust competition between firms, not overlooking social obligations, and ensuring a quality productivity that responds to the real needs of people".

"A business can ... produce 'social wealth' if business people and managers are guided by a far-sighted vision, one that prefers long-term investment to speculative profit, and that promotes innovation rather than thinking only to accumulate wealth".

The Holy Father went on: "Business people attentive to the common good are always called to see their activity in the framework of a pluralistic whole. Such an approach generates - through personal dedication and a fraternity expressed in concrete economic and financial decisions - a market that is more competitive and, at the same time, more civil, animated by a spirit of service".

Benedict XVI concluded his remarks by saying that "development, in whatever sector of human existence, also means openness to the transcendent, to the spiritual dimension of life, to trust in God, to love, to fraternity, to acceptance, to justice and to peace". (CURRENT CRISIS CALLS FOR WORLD FINANCIAL REORGANISATION.)

 

Like the Kenyan Horse, Barack Hussein Obama, the Bavarian Horse, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, is yet another front man for the New World Order as he shows his profound "respect" for the "world's religions" and as he endorses the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and as he pushes for the establishment of international bodies that violate the principle of subsidiarity and robs nations of their sovereignty. The statist "bishops" in the United States of America, worthy successors of the likes of John Ireland and James Gibbons and Richard Cushing and Francis Spellman and John Dearden and Joseph Bernardin (each of whom were, of course, true bishops), are just as much of one mind and one heart with the agenda of the New World Order as their "pope" himself. Conciliarism has aided and abetted statism over and over again, which is just another proof that it is of the devil and not, of course, of Christ the King.

Although a number of state attorneys-general have promised to sue the Federal government now that ObamaCare has passed, suits that will be combined and heard directly in the Supreme Court of the United States of America as the court of first instance as the Article III of the Constitution of the United States of America grants original jurisdiction to the high court in cases brought by states (this happened when the provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1970 that sought to extend the right to vote to those between the ages of eighteen to twenty-one in state elections was challenged by several states, resulting in a direct Supreme Court hearing on the matter in the case of Oregon v. Mitchell on October 20, 1970, and a ruling on December 21, 1970, that said provision was indeed unconstitutional), there is no guarantee that the "swing" vote on the Court at this time, Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, who turns seventy-four years of age on July 23, 2010, would side with the "conservatives" (Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito) in striking down ObamaCare in whole or in part. As one trained in constitutional law, I believe that the bill, apart from being a statist, budget-busting, debt-creating violation of the Natural Law principle of subsidiarity that provides for the killing of babies with Federal taxpayer dollars, is indeed thoroughly unconstitutional. Whether a majority of justices on the Court would come to that conclusion is another matter.

If ObamaCare sustains a court challenge, however, it is here to stay as even if Republicans regain control of both Houses of Congress in the general elections on Tuesday, November 2, 2009, they would have to reach 290 members in the House and sixty-seven in the Senate to override an Obama veto of any repeal of ObamaCare in the 112th Congress. Although it is not impossible to reach the 290 mark in the House, it is impossible to reach the mark of sixty-seven senators in one election cycle. The last time that a political party had such a majority in the United States Senate was when the Democratic Party had sixty-seven senators in the 88th Congress (1963-1965) and sixty-eight senators in the 89th Congress (1965-1967). Moreover, those who begin to receive "goodies" from ObamaCare will not likely give them up without a major electoral fight. Past pieces of social engineering (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, No Child Left Behind, etc.) remain. So will ObamaCare if it passes the judicial hurdles that await it.

This is a chastisement.

This chastisement is the logical result of the sins of a nation that has sought to pursue the common temporal good without any reference at all to man's Last End from its very beginning.

A chastisement for a nation whose citizens sent arms and money to found Masonic lodges throughout Latin America soon after its own founding.

A chastisement for a nation whose government introduced Masonic lodges and Protestant "churches" into the Catholic lands of The Philippines and Cuba following the Spanish-American War.

A chastisement for a nation whose corporations have exploited the indigenous peoples of underdeveloped nations to manufacture products cheaply for their own profit, corporations that have now become multinational and that have allegiance to no nation, including the United States of America.

A chastisement for a nation whose presidents have conducted unjust and immoral wars and who have permitted the deliberate targeting of civilian population centers (Atlanta, Savannah, Dresden, Germany, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan) to win their wartime military objectives.

A chastisement for a nation whose purveyors of popular culture have exported the horror of immodest fashions and indecent motion pictures and television programs and diabolical music throughout the world, corrupting so many souls and creating even more enmity among adherents of the false religion of Mohammedanism than exists as a result of that false religion's hatred for all non-Mohammedans.

A chastisement for a nation where blasphemy is considered to be a "right" that is protected under the slogans of "freedom of speech" and "freedom of the press."

A chastisement for a nation where Saint Augustine's teaching that we must prefer death to the freedom of error and has been perverted and distorted and inverted to prefer error rather than death.

A chastisement for a nation whose "doctors" have killed over fifty million innocent human beings under cover of the civil law and whose doctors and pharmacists have dispatched several hundred million more as a result of abortifacient contraceptives, which have exported throughout the world by our companies and by the government of the United States of America with our own taxpayer dollars.

The "people" do not want ObamaCare now. That is true. They may even vote out a number of representative and senators who voted for ObamaCare. This is also true. If ObamaCare stands a court challenge, however, the "people" will come to like their new "goodies." Very few people today challenge Social Security as a violation of the principle of subsidiarity as it shifts responsibility for the care of the elderly retired disabled from family member to the civil state, which uses its confiscatory taxing powers to redistribute income in the most massive Ponzi scheme ever invented, one that makes swindler Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme seem like so much child's play. Give ObamaCare a few years, maybe a decade or so. Anyone who dares to touch it then will be touch a third rail of politics at that time just as much as those who even discuss the fraud that is Social Security do at the present time.

Some might ask why do I "hate" my country by claiming that ObamaCare is a chastisement for its sins over the course of its existence. I do not "hate" my country. It is not to "hate" one's country to point out her flaws and that her sins bring down upon herself various chastisements any more than it is to "hate" oneself when one accuses himself of his own sins in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance, recognizing that he must pay back what he owes God for his sins.

I love my country. This is where I was born and this is where I am likely to die unless I am exiled. There is where God's Holy Providence has put me, and for that I am truly grateful. True love of one's country, however, is an act of the will, and one truly love's one country only if he wills her good, the ultimate expression of which is her Catholicization in every single aspect of her national life.

Impossible?

Go tell that to the Apostles, who planted the seeds for the conversion of nations that resulted eventually in the rise of Christendom, the Christ-centered world of the Middle Ages.

Go tell that to the likes of Saint Henry the Emperor, whose support for the missionary work resulted in the conversion of the parents of Saint Stephen of Hungary and the conversion of the entirety of Hungary itself.

Go tell that to Saint Patrick, who converted the Irish people.

Go tell that to Saint Augustine of Canterbury, who started the process of definitively converting the English to the true Faith.

Go tell that to Our Lady of Guadalupe, who effected the conversion of over nine million indigenous people in the Americas following her apparitions in 1531.

Impossible?

Impossible?

If the conversion of the land I love, my native land, the United States of America, to the true Faith is impossible then the Apostles should have stayed in the Upper Room in Jerusalem following the descent of God the Holy Ghost in tongues of flame upon them on Pentecost Sunday.

Impossible?

 

What do we do in the meantime . We pray. We sacrifice. We suffer. We pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit. And we make sure to have nothing to do with anything that is opposed to Christ the King,

A Christianity which keeps a grip on itself, refuses every compromise with the world, takes the commands of God and the Church seriously, preserves its love of God and of men in all its freshness, such a Christianity can be, and will be, a model and a guide to a world which is sick to death and clamors for directions, unless it be condemned to a catastrophe that would baffle the imagination.

Every true and lasting reform has ultimately sprung from the sanctity of men who were driven by the love of God and of men. Generous, ready to stand to attention to any call from God, yet confident in themselves because confident in their vocation, they grew to the size of beacons and reformers. (Pope Pius XI, Mit Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937.)

 

Sure, we oppose ObamaCare, which, as noted before, passed by a vote of 219-212, thirty-four of them being Democrats, last night, and like measure as best we can. I've tried to do so on this site. More importantly, however, is the fact that we must recognize that ObamaCare is but one in a series of steps presaging Antichrist and his One World Government that is totally opposed to Christ the King and His Catholic Church and thus the good of the souls for whom Our King shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross. We are in a battle with the forces of the world, the flesh, and the devil, which is why we must make sure to make reparation for our own many sins by offering everything that we have and do to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Just pray to Our Lady to send you the graces to stay in a state of Sanctifying Grace as, to rephrase Saint Augustine's thoroughly Catholic teaching about error, we should prefer death in a state of Sanctifying Grace as a member of the Catholic Church to submitting to the health-care rationing determined the statists under ObamaCare.

Let us turn once again to Pope Saint Pius X for our marching orders:

 

This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.

No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

May we believe in this exhortation with all of our hearts as we give unto the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary all of our efforts to plant a few seeds when all men everywhere will exclaim as the fruit of the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary when the only peace plan that matters, Heaven's Peace Plan, Our Lady's Fatima Peace Plan, is fulfilled.

Yes, we do indeed need to pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit and make much reparation for our sins and those of the whole world as clients of those twin Hearts of matchless love that suffered as one during our Redemption and beat now as they have always beat, as one Heart that wills our salvation and the right ordering of men in states that are subordinate at all times to the Social reign of Christ the King.

 

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?

Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!

Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

 

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us, especially on your feast day today!

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Isidore the Farmer, pray for us.

See also: A Litany of Saints

.