Francis The Self-Caricaturist
by Thomas A. Droleskey
Waiting for part four of Francis Says Viva La Revolución?
Well, you are going to have to wait yet another day as Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis has engaged in a bit of self-caricaturing upon his return to Rome following the spiritual, doctrinal, liturgical and moral atrocity that was World Youth Day 2013 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Yes, Francis the Self-Caricaturist could not help himself. He just had to commemorate the end of the Mohammedan month-long "Ramadan" observances. It is usually the case that the "president" of the "Pontifical" Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, Jean-Louis "Cardinal" Tauran, who just loves to issue messages such as "Happy Diwali" and "Happy Vesakh," "Happy Ramadan and, to paraphrase Timothy Michael Dolan, "Happy Whatever" (see Have a Happy and Happy
Vesakh, No, I Mean, Happy Diwali, Wait, Wait, Wait, Is It Ramadan Time
Now?--Oops, Let's Try Again, Ah, Yes, Happy High Holy Days, Right? for just two examples of this madness). Not now. Francis the Humble just has to be the star of the show.
Here is the message that Francis the Self-Caricaturist sent to the Mohammedans at the end of Ramadan:
To Muslims throughout the World
It gives me great pleasure to greet
you as you celebrate ‘Id al-Fitr, so concluding the month of Ramadan,
dedicated mainly to fasting, prayer and almsgiving.
It is a tradition
by now that, on this occasion, the Pontifical Council for
Interreligious Dialogue sends you a message of good wishes, together
with a proposed theme for common reflection. This year, the first of my
Pontificate, I have decided to sign this traditional message myself and
to send it to you, dear friends, as an expression of esteem and
friendship for all Muslims, especially those who are religious leaders.
you all know, when the Cardinals elected me as Bishop of Rome and
Universal Pastor of the Catholic Church, I chose the name of “Francis”, a
very famous saint who loved God and every human being deeply, to the
point of being called “universal brother”. He loved, helped and served
the needy, the sick and the poor; he also cared greatly for creation.
am aware that family and social dimensions enjoy a particular
prominence for Muslims during this period, and it is worth noting that
there are certain parallels in each of these areas with Christian faith
This year, the theme on which I would like to reflect
with you and with all who will read this message is one that concerns
both Muslims and Christians: Promoting Mutual Respect through Education.
year’s theme is intended to underline the importance of education in
the way we understand each other, built upon the foundation of mutual
respect. “Respect” means an attitude of kindness towards people for whom
we have consideration and esteem. “Mutual” means that this is not a
one-way process, but something shared by both sides.
What we are
called to respect in each person is first of all his life, his physical
integrity, his dignity and the rights deriving from that dignity, his
reputation, his property, his ethnic and cultural identity, his ideas
and his political choices. We are therefore called to think, speak and
write respectfully of the other, not only in his presence, but always
and everywhere, avoiding unfair criticism or defamation. Families,
schools, religious teaching and all forms of media have a role to play
in achieving this goal.
Turning to mutual respect in interreligious
relations, especially between Christians and Muslims, we are called to
respect the religion of the other, its teachings, its symbols, its
values. Particular respect is due to religious leaders and to places of
worship. How painful are attacks on one or other of these!
clear that, when we show respect for the religion of our neighbours or
when we offer them our good wishes on the occasion of a religious
celebration, we simply seek to share their joy, without making reference
to the content of their religious convictions.
education of Muslim and Christian youth, we have to bring up our young
people to think and speak respectfully of other religions and their
followers, and to avoid ridiculing or denigrating their convictions and
We all know that mutual respect is fundamental in any
human relationship, especially among people who profess religious
belief. In this way, sincere and lasting friendship can grow.
received the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See on 22 March
2013, I said: “It is not possible to establish true links with God,
while ignoring other people. Hence it is important to intensify dialogue
among the various religions, and I am thinking particularly of dialogue
with Islam. At the Mass marking the beginning of my ministry, I greatly
appreciated the presence of so many civil and religious leaders from
the Islamic world.” With these words, I wished to emphasize once more
the great importance of dialogue and cooperation among believers, in
particular Christians and Muslims, and the need for it to be enhanced.
these sentiments, I reiterate my hope that all Christians and Muslims
may be true promoters of mutual respect and friendship, in particular
Finally, I send you my prayerful good wishes, that your lives may glorify the Almighty and give joy to those around you. Happy Feast to you all! (Francis the Self-Caricaturist to Muslims for end of Ramadan: Promoting Mutual Respect through Education.)
So much for the First Commandment.
"We are called to
respect the religion of the other, its teachings, its symbols, its
values. Particular respect is due to religious leaders and to places of
worship. How painful are attacks on one or other of these!"
Utter and complete blasphemy.
There comes a point when repeating oneself on these points becomes in and of itself a participation in the madness of the blasphemous heretics who dare to offend the honor and glory and majesty of the Most Blessed Trinity, the one and only true God of Divine Revelation.
What new is there to say?
After all, I did cite Pope Leo XIII's and Pope Saint Pius X's condemnations of those who give respect to false religions recently in several articles, including Where Does One Begin? part one).
Before presenting my brief case against Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, let me state simply that I am trying to remind those who are new to this site or those who may not remember every point that has been made in hundreds upon hundreds of articles that have dealt with the blasphemy of the conciliar revolution ares that there is really nothing new under the conciliar sun. The conciliar revolutionaries just keep repeating themselves, although they do so sometimes in slightly different ways.
As my first and only witness against Jorge Mario Bergoglio let me Saint Alphonsus de Liguori, the founder of the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer, the Redemptorist Fathers, forward to remind the blasphemer named Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis the Self-Caricaturist that his beliefs are hideous in the sight of the true God of Divine Revelation and mock the witness giving us by the martyrs who gave up their lives rather than even given the appearance of giving any esteem at all to false religions, false religious symbols and false places of worship, each of which belong to the devil:
But to return to the martyrs. The number of Christians who had received the crown of martyrdom, previous to the accession of Constantine, was almost incredible. Many authors calculate the number of those who had laid down their liv r es for the faith to have been
nearly eleven millions! So that if this number were
equally distributed in the course of one year, thirty thousand would be allotted to each day.
Oh, the beautiful harvest of holy martyrs that paradise has reaped since the preaching of the Gospel ! But,
O God ! what will be, on the day of general judgment,
the confusion of the tyrants and of all the persecutors of
the faith, at the sight of the martyrs once so despised
and so maltreated by them, when these celestial heroes
shall appear in glory, extolling the greatness of God,
and armed with the sword of divine justice to avenge
themselves for all the injuries and cruelties exercised
against them, as was foretold by David : The high praises
of God in their mouths, and two-edged swords in their hands
to execute vengeance upon the nations; to bind their kings in
fetters, and their nobles in manacles of iron. Then shall the martyrs judge the Neros, the Domidans, and other
persecutors, and shall condemn them; yea, as we read in the Gospel of St. Matthew, even to the exterior darkness,
where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth?
But it will be for us a subject of more profitable meditation to reflect upon another scene which the great day
of general and irrevocable doom will present the despair of so many Christians who, having died in mortal
sin, will behold with unavailing anguish the triumph of
so many martyrs, who, rather than lose God, suffered
themselves to be despoiled of all things, and underwent
the most horrid torments that hell could suggest or tyrants inflict; while they, rather than yield a point of
honor or forego a momentary gratification, despised the
suggestions of divine grace, and lost their souls forever ! (Saint Alphonsus de Liguori, Victories of the Martyrs, Redemptorist Fathers, 1954 edition, pp. 32-34. Available also online at: Full text of "The complete ascetical works of St. Alphonsus de Liguori.)
The eleven million martyrs who gave up their lives between Nero in 67 A.D. and the time of the Edict of Milan in 313 A.D. refused to do what comes so easily to the conciliar revolutionaries. That is, the early martyrs and Holy Mother Church's martyrs throughout the ages knew that one had to choose to endure all manner of bodily pain, including unspeakably wretched tortures, rather than to give even a momentary appearance of "respect" for false religions or esteeming their false symbols or treating their temples of false worship as anything other then dens of the devil.
Consider the example that Saint Alphonsus de Liguori provided in Victories of the Martyrs of Saint Leo of Patara:
At Patara, in Lycia, a great festival was once being
celebrated in honor of a certain idol, at which a great concourse assembled ; some having gone willingly, and
many through fear, as an edict had been published to
that effect. But St. Leo, who was a good Christian, departed from the city, and went to perform his devotions
before the relics of St. Paregorius, who had died for the
faith some short time previously. Upon his return home,
St. Paregorius appeared to him in a vision, standing at
the opposite side of a torrent, and inviting him to pass
St. Leo hence conceived a great hope that he would
be honored with martyrdom ; and going, some days
after, to make a second visit to the tomb of St. Paregorius, he passed by the temple of Fortune, where many
lanterns burned before the idol. Impelled by a special
impulse of the Holy Ghost, he entered the temple and
threw down the lights ; but the idolaters, enraged at
the insult offered to their idol, raised such a clamor,
that the governor heard of the affair, and ordered that
the saint should be brought before him.
When Leo made his appearance, the governor rebuked
him for the outrage he had committed against the gods,
in violation of the commands of the sovereign ; but the
saint, animated with holy zeal, replied : "Thou speakest to me of the gods, as if there were many : there is but one God, and Jesus Christ is his only begotten Son.
Since statues of stone and wood are devoid of sense
and feeling, of what use can lanterns be to them ? If
thou hadst the knowledge of the true God, them wouldst
not worship these false deities. Oh, do abandon this
vain superstition, and adore our Lord and Saviour Jesus
The governor said : " Thou dost then exhort me to
become a Christian ? Better it were for thee to conform
to the general practice, lest thy rashness be punished
as it deserves." The saint with increased ardor replied : "I see about me a multitude of those who,
blindly persevering in error, despise the true God ; but
I am a Christian notwithstanding, and follow the instructions of the apostles. If this deserve chastisement,
award it ; for I am determined to suffer every torture,
rather than become the slave of the devil. Others may
do as they please, since they are solicitous merely for
the present, and are reckless of the future life, which is
to be obtained only by sufferings. The Scripture tells
us that narrow is the way which Icadeth to life."
The governor observed : " Since, then, the way of the
Christians is narrow; exchange it for ours, which is wide
and commodious." Leo answered : " I have said that
the way is narrow, because it is one of affliction, and of
persecutions suffered for justice sake ; but it is wide
enough for those who talk therein, because their faith,
and the hope of an eternal reward, make it so to them.
The love of virtue maketh that easy which to thee seemeth difficult. On the contrary, the road of vice is in
reality narrow, and leads to an eternal precipice."
This discourse was most unpalatable to the pagans,
who accordingly exclaimed that the impious man, who
had spoken against their religion, should be silenced.
The governor then asked St. Leo whether he would
sacrifice ; and being answered that his compliance was
totally impossible, he ordered him to be scourged. Although this command was most cruelly executed, the
saint suffered without a groan ; whereupon the governor
threatened still greater torments, but the saint answered: " I know not these gods, and will never sacrifice to
them." " At least," said the governor, " say that our
gods are great, and I will dismiss thee, for I have compassion upon thy old age." The saint replied : "They
are great for the destruction of those souls that believe
in them." The governor, infuriated at this reply, said : "I will order thee to be dragged over stones till thou
art torn to pieces." The saint replied: "I shall welcome any kind of death that procures me the kingdom
of heaven, and that blessed life which I shall enjoy in
company with the saints, upon my departure from this
The tyrant continued to importune him to sacrifice,
or at least to acknowledge that the gods could save him
from death. The saint replied: "Thou art very weak,
since thou dost nothing but threaten, without putting
thy threats into execution." The populace, being enraged at this reply, obliged the judge to condemn the
saint to be tied by the feet and dragged through a
St. Leo finding himself about to obtain the accomplishment of his desire to die for Jesus Christ, raised his
eyes to heaven, and prayed after the following manner : " I thank Thee, O God, the Father of our Lord Jesus
Christ, for granting me the grace to follow Thy servant Paregorius. I praise Thee, because Thou hast enabled
me, by martyrdom, to cancel my past sins. I commend
my soul to the care of Thy holy angels, that it may be
saved from the perdition prepared for the wicked. I
beseech Thee, by that which it is my blessed lot to
suffer, to have mercy on those who are the cause thereof ;
and since Thou desirest not the death of the sinner,
grant them the grace to recognize Thee as the Lord of
the universe. May all that which I suffer in the name
of Jesus Christ thy Son redound to Thy glory forever
and ever. Amen." As soon as he pronounced the word
Amen, he rendered up his soul to God, and went to enjoy the crown to which St. Paregorius had invited him. The executioners cast the body into a deep pit, in
order to break it to pieces ; but it was taken thence and
found entire, with only a few slight bruises, and the face
appeared comely and smiling. (Saint Alphonsus de Liguori, Victories of the Martyrs, Redemptorist Fathers, 1954 edition, pp. 204-207.)
I rest my case against the praise Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis the Self-Caricaturist as guilty of blaspheming God and the blood of the martyrs by the praise he gives to false religions as he encourages "understanding through education and dialogue." We respect false religions only at the price of the loss of our souls for all eternity.
Lest anyone believe that he can be silent about how Bergoglio caricatures himself as a cartoon Modernist as he blasphemes God and preaches heresy, permit me to provide you with a condemnation as a fellow blasphemer that was written by Pope Saint Leo the Great:
But it is vain for them to adopt the name of catholic, as they
do not oppose these blasphemies: they must believe them, if they can
listen so patiently to such words. (Pope Saint Leo the Great, Epistle XIV, To Anastasius, Bishop of Thessalonica, St. Leo the Great | Letters 1-59 )
Are we willing to suffer martyrdom, including the white martyrdom of loss of human respect, friendships of longstanding, ties with our blood relatives and material success, to refuse to recognize the conciliar authorities as members of the Catholic Church and to refuse to concede them anything other than that are hideous heretics and blasphemers in the sight of the Most Blessed Trinity?
We must love suffering as much as the martyrs themselves. If we did, you see, then no one in this readership would be in the least nervous or anxious about the time in which God has known for all eternity would be ours as to love Him truly is to love His Divine Son's Holy Cross without any reservation whatsoever.
What Catholics must come to understand is that conciliarism has strange doctrines that are just as hateful in the sight of the Most Blessed Trinity as any other false religion, including Mohammedanism, as to reject one article of the Catholic Faith is to reject It in Its entirety. Yes, The Chair is Still Empty.
We must look beyond the apostasies and blasphemies and sacrileges of the present moment as we trust completely in the mercies of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, rendering unto that Heart of Hearts all of our prayers and penances and mortifications and sufferings and humiliations through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart out of which It was formed, the Immaculate Heart of Mary itself, especially during this month of June that is dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
Our trust must be in the Eucharistic piety and total Marian consecration as we pray as many Rosaries each day as our freely chosen states in life permit.
We must resolve, once and for all, not to be anxious about anything in the world as we trust totally in the mercies of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and and the intercessory power of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
We must stand up to evil in our own lives, rooting it out from our souls in cooperation with the graces sent to us by Our Lord through Our Lady's loving hands as the Mediatrix of All Graces, and fear never to call it by its proper name in the world or in the counterfeit church of conciliarism that has made its reconciliation with its false, anti-Incarnational and religiously indifferentist premises.
May the offerings we continue make in this month of August through the Immaculate Heart of Mary to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus help to transform a world of lies into a world where He, the Way, the Truth and the Life, is recognized as the One and only Redeemer of men, that His truths have been entrusted for all eternity to the authority of the Catholic Church, which will forever champion His Social Reign over men and nations as the conciliar revolutionaries and their insane schemes are vanquished once and for all.
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
Saint Stephen the Protomartyr, pray for us.
See also: A Litany of Saints
(Do Catholics and Muslims worship the same God, by Raymond Taouck.)
From a purely objective point of view, regardless of the doctrinal teaching professed by Mohammedans and Catholics, it is evident that Almighty God is the God over both. God exists. His existence is not dependent on the acknowledgement of mankind that He exists. Nor is God's existence dependent upon any religion. He is the Creator and the Providence of the Universe: the whole of creation, the entire cosmos, of all existing things, whether they be angels, human beings, animals or plants, animate or inanimate. He is also the Savior and the Judge of the living and the dead, having redeemed mankind and must judge Catholics and Mohammedans, believers and atheists. Their god is but another strange god. On every essential point concerning the true God and the nature of the true God, the Mohammedan belief radically and seriously conflicts with the established and revealed Dogma of the Catholic Church.
Again from a purely subjective thinking the Muslims might think and believe with a firm confidence that they are worshiping the true God, "Allah" yet the reality is quite the contrary as objectively speaking we can only affirm the contrary. This point is clear from Scripture "Whosoever does not continue in the doctrine of Christ does not have God". - II St. Jn 1:9
The teaching and the beliefs of Catholicism and Mohammedanism are different and contrary. Their concept of, and their approach to God, diverge and conflict. Catholics indeed accept as dogmatic truth the Holy Trinity, the Incarnation and the Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Moslems vehemently and vociferously deny the Blessed Trinity , the Incarnation , the Crucifixion of our Divine Lord and the Divinity of Christ . The Mohammedans have such a carnal notion of heaven that St. Alphonsus did not hesitate to declare "The Mohammedan Paradise, is only fit for beasts; for filthy sensual pleasure is all the believer has to expect there." 
The Catholic and Christian God is 'The Trinity,' and our Lord Jesus Christ, the second Person of that Trinity, is the Creator and One true and merciful God. Despite monotheistic appearances, we do not have the same God; we do not have the same mediator. How then can it be that " together with us they (The Moslems) adore the one, merciful God."  This is incredible!
The Catholic Teaching: "Without faith it is impossible to please God." - Heb. 11:6
Mohammedans are infidels for "broadly speaking, infidels are those who do not possess the true faith; while in the strict sense infidels are the un-baptized". They are divided into monotheists (Jews and Moslems), polytheists (Hindus, Buddhists, etc.), and atheists.
From a Catholic perspective the Islamic worship is another form of false worship given to a "strange god" for as we read in scripture "All the gods of the Nations are Idols" - I Para 16:26
It would be blasphemous to declare that these false religions are the working of God. On the Contrary ''all faithful disciples of Jesus Christ well know that the false religions are only instruments of the devil to deceive souls and place them beyond Salvation" - [8a]
Pope Pius X long ago put forward that the modernist if they take logically there doctrine, would have no grounds for denying the Muslims there "experience" of " god" as being just as valid as that of another "believer" and hence he states:
"Here it is well to note at once that, given this doctrine of experience united with that of symbolism, every religion, even that of paganism, must be held to be true. What is to prevent such experiences from being found in any religion? In fact, that they are so is maintained by not a few. On what grounds can Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam? [8b]
What a prophetic insight, Pope Pius X was so accurate that not even the Modernist came to deny what he stated, but only affirm the above with great audacity.
The Baltimore Catechism (No. 3) states as follows:
Q. 1148. How do we offer God false worship?
A. We offer God false worship by rejecting the religion He has instituted and following one pleasing to ourselves, with a form of worship He has never authorized, approved or sanctioned.
Islam clearly comes under the notion of false worship that (objectively speaking) is not render to God.
The psalmist tells us that "All the Gods of the Gentiles are Devils" (Psalm 96:5) and hence to whom do they render their worship? The Scriptures tell us clearly " They provoked him by strange gods, and stirred him up to anger, with their abominations. They sacrificed to devils and not to God: to gods whom they knew not: that were newly come up, whom their fathers worshipped not. " (Deut 32:16- 17 Cf. also Baruch 4:7)
They "sacrificed to devils and not to God" - regardless of whether or not they might have believed they were rendering homage to the True God, the reality is quite the contrary! It is an erroneous proposition to qualify a prayer addressed to the devil as authentic prayer.
Islam is a false Religion. A false religion is any non-Christian religion "in so far as it is not the religion that God revealed and wants to see practiced. Moreover, every non-Catholic Christian sect is false in so far as it neither accepts nor faithfully practices the entire content of Revelation." 
Christ tells us who the true worshipers shall be: "But the hour cometh and now is, when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth." (Jn. 4:23).
These words go directly against the terminology now used by the modernist hierarchy. They speak from a subjective position wishing to dogmatize and "opinion" which goes directly against the mind of the Church on this point.
This religious subjectivism, which she has always condemned under the names of indifferentism or latitudinarianism, and which "seeks to justify itself under the pretended claims of liberty, failing to recognize the rights of objective truth which are made manifest either by the lights of reason or by Revelation." 
This subjectivism only leads to that Religious indifferentism, which is "one of the most deleterious heresies" and which "places all religions on an equal footing," inevitably leads one to consider the truth of religious belief as merely a matter of utility for a well-regulated life.... "One ends by considering religion as an entirely individual thing which can be adapted to the dispositions of each one, letting everyone form his own personal religion, and by concluding that all the religions are good even though they contradict each other." 
The Church is not concerned with the subjective dispositions of men. This is for God to Judge. The Church is concerned with objective facts. Her judgments are objective. Pope St. Pius X, for this reason declared that "those who die as infidels are damned." [11a]
1907 “In answer to a question as to whether Confucius could have been saved,wrote:’It is not allowed to affirm that Confucius was saved. Christians, when interrogated, must answer that those who die as infidels are damned.’ ”
Revelation is a reality, a fact, a truth accredited by God by sure signs. This revelation of God can in no way be placed on the same footing as those erroneous beliefs of infidels. We may say that the Mohammedans worship a false god, the god of their own making, which a deviation from the right worship of the true God.
Further we might rightly ask with St. Paul, "How then shall they call upon Him in whom they have not believed?" - Rom 10: 14
Although the modern terminology used might not seem to be "explicitly heretical" in nevertheless leads one down this path to apostasy. This vague terminology, which has been employed to put forward an erroneous notion of the faith so that we may be deceived along the path of syncretism. Yves Marsaudon, in his book Ecumenism as seen by a Traditional Freemason, commented favorably on the ecumenism that was nurtured at Vatican II. He said:
"Catholics and especially the conservatives must not forget that all roads lead to God. And they will have to accept that this courageous idea of free-thinking, which we can really call a revolution, pouring forth from our Masonic lodges has spread magnificently over the dome of Saint Peter’s." 
This is precisely path of deception to which the enemies of the Church hope to direct her. For this reason St. Pius X, who could see where this disorientation in precise terminology was leading, required every would-be Catholic priest to recite the following words at the feet of his Ordinary:
"I condemn and reject premises from which it follows that dogmas are either false or doubtful". 
The Council of Florence, clearly sets down the four notes of heresy as follows:
1) a pertinacious adherence to teachings expressly contradictory to that which has been defined by the Church;
2) an opinion opposed to a doctrine not explicitly defined by the Church nor clearly proposed dogmatically as an article of Faith;
3) a proposition that, although not directly contradictory to the Faith, nonetheless necessarily entails logical consequences against it; and
4) a speculation which reaches a certain degree of probability of being against the Faith.
The Modernist's in using these subjective terms to formulate their erroneous notions that "We together with the Muslims worship the same God" go directly against the above statements of the Council of Florence. This formulation works directly against the Churches dogma "Outside the Church there is No Salvation" 
Pope Leo XIII, affirms in his encyclical "Satis Cognitum": "Nothing is more dangerous than the heretics who, while conserving almost all the remainder of the Church's teaching intact, corrupt with a single word, like a drop of poison, the purity and the simplicity of the faith which we have received through tradition from God and through the Apostles."
Although it is true to say that the reason that those outside the Church are not saved is not purely because they worship a false 'god' nevertheless there is still a clear connection. When Christ states, "No one comes to the Father but through me" (Jn. 14:6), this precisely means, if you don't posses Christ, you can't posses the Father (God) for Christ is that door to the Father. Hence without Christ there is no salvation from God. The relation is evident. Again this is confirmed by St. Irenaeus who wrote, "Thus, without the Holy Spirit, we cannot see the Word of God; and without the Son no one can go to the Father." [15a]
The only authentic prayer is true prayer addressed to the true God. Pope Leo XIII declares without hesitation that "the fitting and devout worship of God, which is to be found chiefly in the divine sacrifice and in the dispensation of the sacraments, as well as salutary laws and discipline . . . The (Catholic) Church alone offers to the human race that religion" [15b]
Pope Pius XI declares the same saying that "In her (the Catholic Church) alone is Christ believed with a faith whole and entire, worshiped with sincere homage of adoration, and loved with the constant flame of ardent Charity" [15c]
What happened to the 1st Commandment?
I am the Lord thy God...Thou shalt not have strange gods before me....Thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them..." (Ex. 20:2-5).
If all religions worship the true God by simply claiming to be doing so, then one could not violate the 1st Commandment since all worship of any “god” would be tantamount to worshiping the true "God" according to the post the modernist element in the hierarchy, yet this would not only render the 1st Commandment obsolete but make it seem as though God had given us and absurd command. God does not command anything in vain.
The first commandment is not optional. A man cannot worship in any way that which he does not believe in, for the Law of Praying determines the law of believing, and vice-versa. If Mohammedans believe in a one-person deity, that is what they worship, and in no way can we logically argue that they worship with us the Holy Trinity.
We are not unfamiliar with the notion that claims that they implicitly worship the trinity, yet we cannot maintain this from an objective stand point for the simple reason that we can not hold that one worships implicitly what he explicitly rejects.
In our day and age it is often too easily forgotten that all non-Catholic worship is offensive to God and clearly violates the first commandment. This is because the "first commandment may be broken by giving to a creature the honor which belongs to God alone or by false worship." [16a]
The Church has always regarded the worship of Non Catholics as mere acts of superstitions since "there are four kinds of superstition, namely, illegitimate worship of the true God, idolatry, divination, and superstitious practices. The first consists in a false worship, though applied to the living God; for instance, if you worship Him (God) according to the Mosaic law, which is contrary to all the precepts of the Gospel; or if you adopt a new religion in opposition to the doctrine if the universal Church." [16b] Hence it is clear that "any public worship of the true God, outside the Catholic Church constitutes a superstitious worship of God as no other Church is authorized to give public worship to God. [16c]
Religion has an intellectual foundation, that is, it is based on knowledge. To be true religion its basis must be truth. The basis must be true both speculatively and practically. In other words, true religion must be based on a correct knowledge of God as existing and worthy of all honor, and of the manner and obligation of worshipping Him. On the other hand, religion is false if what is not God is considered to be God, and worshipped as God, or if there is error in the worship of the true God. Therefore, God is not truly worshipped when erroneous signs are used in His worship, as those of the Jews, or when superfluous ceremonies are employed, as by pagans and may heretics. [16d]
Although subjectively, it is the virtue of religion which prompts a man to render to God the worship and reverence that is His by right. [16e]
It is to be noted that an act based on a false religion cannot be really an act of virtue. For a virtue requires a morally good work. But in the cult (worship) of a false god, or in the false and superstitious worship of the true God, there can be no moral goodness, since such worship is opposed to right reason. [16f]
St. Pope Pius X, truly the Pope of our Age, could see where such absurd reason of the Modernists was leading the Church as he affirmed:
"... a great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, nor discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world the reign of legalized cunning and force, the oppression of the weak, and of those who toil and suffer." [17a]
True ecumenism with the Muslims
"Those who have learned theology well," says St. Basil, “will not allow even one iota of Catholic dogmas to be betrayed. They will, if necessary, willingly undergo any kind of death in their defense." [17b]
One of the greatest frauds presented to us by a great number of the current hierarchy is the false notion of ecumenism, which in reality is not ecumenism but simple "syncretism" going by the name of "ecumenism. True Ecumenism requires all those outside the Church to come to the Ark of Salvation so that they may not perish.
True ecumenism can be effectively defined as follows:
"The unity of Christians cannot otherwise be obtained than by securing the return of the separated to the one true Church of Christ from which they once unhappily withdrew. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, that stands forth before all and that by the will of its Founder will remain forever the same as when He Himself established it for the salvation of all mankind." 
This has been the constant teaching of the Church. Holy Mother Church has always taught that true unity cannot be effected, except by a unity in faith and government. 
Pope Pius IX condemned in his syllabus of errors the following false notions:
"Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true." (Proposition XV).
"Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation and arrive at eternal salvation." (Proposition XVI).
The real problem with this false ecumenism (which lead to indifferentism) is not only the fact that Catholics are being deceived but in the same process so are the infidels and non-believers and they sadly continue on the road to perdition without being told to recant their errors.
Catholics often forget that those faithful living on earth come under the title of "Church Militant". What is a Catholic who does not confess his faith or worse yet a Catholic who does not believe his faith?
St. Peter Canisius puts it this way: "Who is to be called a Christian? He who confesses the doctrine of Christ and His Church. Hence, he is truly a Christian thoroughly condemns and detests, the Jewish, Mohammedan, and the heretical cults and sects." 
What did St. Peter Mavimenus tell the Mohammedans? Did he say, "We worship the same God, all is well" No! He told them the truth, he put it this way to them "Whoever does not embrace the Catholic Christian religion will be damned, as was your false prophet Mohammed." 
Again we read that Blessed Nicholas Tavilich was just as stern as he openly states, "You Mohammedans are in a state of everlasting damnation. Your Koran is not God's law nor is it revealed by Him. Far from being a good thing, your law is utterly evil. It is founded neither in the Old Testament nor in the New. In it are lies, foolish things, buffooneries, contradictions, and much that leads not to virtue and goodness but to evil and to all manner of vice." 
St. Alphonsus attests to the fact how the Holy Monk St. Goerge of San Saba openly confessed to the Mohammedans: "But the holy monk (St. George of San Saba) having declared that Mahomet was a disciple of the devil, and that his followers were in a state of perdition, he also was condemned (to martyrdom) with his companions." 
The same we read in the testimony of the five disciples of St. Francis of Assisi, who when reproached by the followers of Koran for preaching against Mohammed, simply responded by saying "We have come to preach faith in Jesus Christ to you, that you will renounce Mohammad, that wicked slave of the devil, and obtain everlasting life like us" [23a]
Further we read in the life of St. John Vianney how he stated openly to a Protestant who believed that his worship rendered to God should do him just as well in his Protestant Sect as it would have in the Catholic faith, The Saint responded to him with the contrary advice saying "My friend, there are not two ways of serving Our Lord; there is only one good way, and it is to serve Him as He wishes to be served".
This is the truth we must speak in charity and honesty to these lost souls who without the grace and redemption of Christ can't be saved for By nature, men are "children of wrath" (Eph. 2:3); by Him, we have been reconciled with the Father (Col. 1:20), and it is only by faith in Him that we can have the boldness to approach God with entire confidence (Eph. 3:12). To Him was given all power in heaven and on earth (Mt. 28:18), and at His name every knee must bend, in heaven, on earth, and under the earth (Phil. 2:10,11). No one goes to the Father save by Him (Jn. 14:6), and there is no other name under heaven given to man by which he must be saved (Acts 4:12). He is the Light that enlightens every man who comes into the world (Jn.1:9), and whoever does not follow Him wanders in darkness (Jn. 8:12). Who is not with Him is against Him (Mt. 13:30), and who does not honor Him also dishonors His Father who sent Him (as the Jews do) (Jn. 5:23).
Christ says, " Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No I tell you but division?" With the truth, division must come. This should not dishearten the man of God for "If God is for us, who is against us" - Rom 8:31 (Do Catholics and Muslims worship the same God, by Raymond Taouck.)