Francis Takes Us To Ding Dong School Of Apostasy

Dr. Frances Rappaport, better known as "Miss Frances" to those of us who watched her on television in the early-1950s, conducted Ding Dong School on the National Broadcasting Company television network from 1952 to 1956. "Miss Frances," who had a doctorate from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, gave simple lessons every day to pre-school children to prepare them for Kindergarten and to some chores around the house. Ding Dong School was one of the first truly educational television programs ever to be broadcast.

"Miss Frances" spoon-fed her lessons to her viewers by speaking very slowly, very deliberately, doing so in a manner that would be considered somewhat condescending today. One lesson available on You Tube teaches boys and girls how to make a sandwich with peanut butter, bananas and lettuce (YUK!!). You can watch it here: Ding Dong School. (You should watch this to understand the style of the next few paragraphs of this commentary.)

Something similar is occurring every day at the Casa Santa Marta as Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis conducts his only daily Ding School of Apostasy. Yes, there is a new "Miss Frances," if you will, boys and girls. He is not going to teach you how to make peanut butter, banana and lettuce sandwiches. Oh no! Our "Miss Frances" gives you daily lessons in apostasy.

Yes, today's "Miss Frances" uses the Ding Dong School at the Casa Santa Marta to teach us how to be good apostates. Conciliarism's "Miss Frances" teaches you about the big, bad "No Church" that is opposed to letting the Holy Ghost blow as He will, showing you that there is a new, exciting, fresh and welcoming "Yes Church" that gives you the freedom to be you as you want to be. If you want to know more about the big, bad "No Church" and how it has been stopped by the new, exciting, fresh and welcoming "Yes Church," boys and girls, then just click the little bitty link that will let you know about all about it: Christ The King Says A Decisive NO To Apostasy, part one.

"Yes, boys and girls, you will learn by following this nice, friendly link all about how those people described by Uncle Reinhard, our cuddly friend in Bavaria--and that is part of Germany, boys and girls, which is a continent called Europe across a big, big, big body of water called the Atlantic Ocean--oh, there lots of mountains with loads of snow in Bavaria--doesn't that sound like fun? oh yes, it does!--living in a museum of the past, are hard-headed as floppy-eared donkeys: "You, Sir, Are A Pharisee!" You don't want to be a donkey like that, do you, boys and girls? Of course you do not want to be a hard-headed donkey like that. You want to be free to be you as you are meant to be.

"So, boys and girls, I want to tell you about the good thing called evangelization and the bad thing called proselytizing, that is, telling others that they must become Catholic to save their immortal souls."

"Let me explain to the grown-ups out there what I mean so that they can tell you all about the exciting world of evangelization that has been rediscovered by some great pioneers of theological exploration who got us out of the museum of the past and brought us into the bright light of the wonderful world of today, a world we call apostasy. Can you say apostasy, boys and girls? I know that it is a big, big word. You really come to love this word once your parents explain the little talk that I gave to your parents yesterday:

"Now, boys and girls, this is very similar to what a man who used to host Ding Dong School a long, long time before me, a man we can call Uncle Charlie [Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II), said while speaking to those nice, peace loving people who follow the teaching of a roly-poly fat man by the name of Buddha who lived a long, long time ago, back in 1995, and those who follow the great religion of Hinduism and those who are followers of the lover of peace-loving prophet named Mohammed as he spoke in Sri Lanka, a little bitty island nation in a far, far away world of adventure and mystery called Asia--that is the largest piece of land in the world, boys and girls--just below the great, great country of India, a land where many people hold cows as sacred and thus do not eat fat, thick, juicy hamburgers the way you and I do":

"No, boys and girls, we cannot do what Saint Francis Xavier did in seeking converts in India in the Sixteenth Century. We must speak to others in what we call 'dialogue'--that's a conversation, children, where you say one thing and someone else says another and we learn from one another about the world of truth that opens up for us when we encounter Our Lord--rather than threatening them with a know-it-all attitude of 'I know more than you do and you better convert because I own the truth.' Faith, you see, boys and girls, comes from within inside each one of us. You don't want to scare someone by telling them that you have 'the' truth. Other people must encounter Our Lord from within themselves.

"What I told your parents yesterday at the Casa Santa Marta, boys and girls, is also very, very similar to what our dear, dear Uncle Joe, who is moving rather slow these days at the junction, said to lots of nice men in red costumes who go by the name of 'cardinals' even though they are not birds--isn't that clever of me?--but men who are really, really important to help us to know and accept all about the the big, bright, ever-changing world of apotasy--back at the end of the year 2011:

"Boys and girls, there is a nasty man coming into the studio now. He appears friendly. Take the word of Miss Frances: he is a nasty man. Oh no! boys and girls, the nasty man, something we call a Droleskey, is approaching me! What should I do, boys and girls? I have so much more to teach you. I have to move to another studio now. Just turn down your television sets real low so that you don't have to hear this Droleskey man say:":

"Ding Dong School is dismissed. Goodbye, Miss Frances of Conciliarism. Here is Catholic truth.

First, the alleged "encounter with Jesus" as the basis of Faith is pure Modernism as it denies that Faith, Hope and Charity are Supernatural Virtues that are infused into our souls at Baptism and thus, much in the heretical system begun by Martin Luther, Faith must spring from "within" as one comes to recognize Our Lord as His Saviour. Pope Saint Pius X dissected this perfectly in Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907:

As a disciple of the founder of Communion and Liberation, the late Father Luigi Guissani, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has the exact same belief about man's "inner sense" and "relation to God" that has been propagated throughout the Joseph Ratzinger's entire priesthood, something that the then "Cardinal" Bergoglio made clear when presenting a book about Guissani's life to Catholics in Buenos Aires, Argentina:

Miss Frances of Conciliarism is trying to make this all quite digestible in the daily Ding Dong School of Apostasy that he holds every morning at Casa Santa Marta.

Second, truth is possessed in the soul of a faithful Catholic. It is a gift. It does not result from any kind of "encounter." While those outside of the Catholic Church can be led to discover the truth of the Catholic Faith as they are led to do so by the very loving hand of God Himself, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has revealed this truth to us exclusively through the Catholic Church, and it is readily accessible.

Third, the continuing conciliar effort to disparage the work of converting all men and their nations to the true Faith by creating a false dichotomy between evangelization and proselytism is nothing other than apostasy.

Such a contention makes a mockery of the very words that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ spoke on this very day, Ascension Thursday, to the Eleven before He took into Heaven what was never there before: human flesh:

Fourth, the effort by Bergoglio/Francis to make Saint Paul into a witness in behalf of conciliarism's "new evangelization" is, no matter how old-hat it has become in the counterfeit church of conciliarism, beneath contempt. It is also nothing new as Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI and Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II both spoke in the same manner, conveying an apostate sense that has been codified formally in the Balamand Statement, June 24, 1993, and the conciliar Vatican's Principles and Norms of Ecumenism, March 25, 1993.

Saint Paul preached in the Areopagus about the "unknown God" (Acts 17: 22-34). He did so by way of analogy to people who had never heard of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as a means of converting them to the true Faith, premising his remarks by telling them that "you are too superstitious (Acts 17: 22). He did not endorse their "temple" of false idols as a "jewel" on the face of the earth! Must it be pointed out that Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI went into the Blue Mosque in Istanbul, Turkey, on November 30, 2006, and took off his shoes so as to signify that he was in a "holy" place and then assumed the Mohammedan "prayer" position as he turned in the direction of Mecca at the behest of his infidel host? Saints gave up their lives rather than even to give the appearance of doing so such a thing.

Father George Haydock's Commentary on the Douay-Rheims Bible provides the following clear explication of Saint Paul's sermon at the Areopagus:

However, from this inscription St. Paul takes an occasion, with wonderful dexterity, with sublime reflections, and with that solid eloquence, of which he was master, and which he employed, as often as it was necessary, to inform them, and instruct them, concerning the works of the one true God, of whom they had little knowledge, by their own fault: that this one true God made the world, and all things in it: that from one man he raised all mankind: that his presence is not confined to temples made by the hands of men, being every where, and in all creatures, preserving them every moment: that in him we live, move, and have our being, or subsist: that it is he, who hath determined the time, limits, or bounds of every empire, and kingdom, and of every man's life: that this true God, who made, preserves, and governs all things in heaven and on earth, cannot be like to gold, silver, or any thing made by the art, or fancy of men. He puts them in mind that according even to one of their own heathen poets, Aratus, men themselves are the offspring of God, being blessed with a being and knowledge above all other creatures in this world: who by the light of reason ought to seek God, and by considering the visible effects of Providence over the world, and the creatures in it, might come to the knowledge of this one God, the author of all, at least to an imperfect knowledge of him, as men find out things by feeling, or as it were, groping in the dark. He then adds, (ver. 30.) that having, as it were, overlooked, and permitted men for many ages to run on in this ignorance and blindness, in punishment of their sins, (this their ignorance of one true God, the author of all things, being wilful and inexcusable) now the same true God hath been pleased to announce to all men, that henceforward they acknowledge, and worship him, that they repent, and do penance for their sins. (Witham)

Ver. 23. It may be asked, why they had not implicit faith, worshipping the true, though unknown, God?[5] 1st. because the worship of the true God can never exist with the worship of idols; 2nd. because an explicit faith in God is required of all; 3rd. because it is repugnant to implicit faith, to admit any thing contrary to it, as comparing this unknown God with the pagan idols; for God to be at all, must be one. Lucan towards the end of his 2nd book, hath these words: What, therefore, you improperly worship, that I preach to you, and instruct you in the true worship, far different from what you pay to your strange gods. (Haydock Comment on Acts: 17.)

Saint Paul did not preach at the Areopagus to engage the philosophers, many of whom laughed at him when he preached of the resurrection of the dead, in any kind of "dialogue." Saint Paul the Apostle preached at the Areopagus to convert the pagans to the true Faith.

Fifth, to contend that the work of evangelization begun on Pentecost Sunday did not involve a firm, unequivocal proclamation of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is to make a mockery of the first papal Urbi et Orbi Address, given by our first pope, Saint Peter, shortly after God the Holy Ghost had descended in tongues of flame on the Apostles and Our Lady and others gathered in the Upper Room in Jerusalem:

Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you, by miracles, and wonders, and signs, which God did by him, in the midst of you as you also know: This same being delivered up, by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, you by the hands of wicked men have crucified and slain. Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the sorrows of hell, as it was impossible that he should be holden by it. For David saith concerning him: I foresaw the Lord before my face: because he is at my right hand, that I may not be moved. For this my heart hath been glad, and my tongue hath rejoiced: moreover my flesh also shall rest in hope. Because thou will not leave my soul in hell, nor suffer thy Holy One to see corruption. Thou hast made known to the the ways of life: thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.

Ye men, brethren, let me freely speak to you of the patriarch David; that he died, and was buried; and his sepulchre is with us to this present day. Whereas therefore he was a prophet, and knew that God hath sworn to him with an oath, that of the fruit of his loins one should sit upon his throne.

Foreseeing this, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ. For neither was he left in hell, neither did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus hath God raised again, whereof all we are witnesses. Being exalted therefore by the right hand of God, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath poured forth this which you see and hear. For David ascended not into heaven; but he himself said: The Lord said to my Lord, sit thou on my right hand, until I make they enemies a footstool.

Therefore let all the house of Israel know most certainly that God hath made both Lord and Christ, this same Jesus, whom you have crucified.

Now when they had heard these things, they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter, and to the rest of the apostles: What shall we do, men and brethren?

But Peter said to them: Do penance, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ., for the remission of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is to you, and to your children, and to all that are far off, whomsoever the Lord our God shall call.

And with very many other words did he testify and exhort them, saying: Save yourselves from this perverse generation.

They therefore that received his word were baptized; and there were added in that day about three thousand souls. And they were persevering in the doctrine of the apostles, and in the communication of the breaking of the bread, and in prayers. (Acts 2: 22-42)

To justify themselves before men, though, the conciliar revolutionaries must attempt to convince us that Saint Peter may never have spoken these words. This is what
"Uncle Joe" himself said in part three of his trilogy of apostasy entitled Jesus of Nazareth: Holy Week: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection:

From a theological understanding of the empty tomb, a passage from Saint Peter's Pentecost sermon strikes me as important, when Peter for the first time openly proclaims Jesus' Resurrection to the assembled crowds. He communicates it, not in his own words, but by quoting Psalm 16:8-10 as follows: "... my flesh will dwell in hope. For you will not abandon my son to Hades, nor let your Holy One see corruption. You have made known to me the ways of life" (Acts 2:26-28). Peter quotes the psalm text using the version found in the Greek Bible. The Hebrew text is slightly different: "You do not give me up to Sheol, or let your godly one see the Pit. You show me the path of life" (Ps. 16:10-11). In the Hebrew version the psalmist speaks in the certainty that God will protect him, even in the threatening situation in which he evidently finds himself, that God will shield him from death and that he may dwell securely: he will not see the grave. The version Peter quotes is different: here the psalmist is confident that he will not remain in the underworld, that he will not see corruption.

Peter takes it for granted that it was David who originally prayed this psalm, and he goes on to state that this hope was not fulfilled in David: "He both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day" (Acts 2:29). The tomb containing his corpse is the proof of his not having risen. Yet the psalm text is still true: it applies to the definitive David. Indeed, Jesus is revealed here as the true David, precisely because in him this promise is fulfilled: "You will not let your Holy One see corruption."

We need not go into the question here of whether this address goes back to Peter and, if not, who else may have redacted it and precisely when and where it originated. Whatever the answer may be, we are dealing here with a primitive form of Resurrection proclamation, whose high authority in the early Church is clear from the fact that it was attributed to Saint Peter himself and was regarded as the original proclamation of the Resurrection. (Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth: Holy Week: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection, pp. 255-256.)

Left unaddressed in this classic piece of Modernist deconstruction of Sacred Scripture that is a blasphemous affront to God the Holy Ghost and to Saint Peter was the little matter that three thousand Jews from all over the Mediterranean converted because of the stirring words delivered by our first pope moments after he had received the Seven Gifts and Twelve Fruits of God the Holy Ghost, being blessed at that moment with the charism of infallibility of doctrine. Ratzinger/Benedict has to place into question, no matter how subtly by way of refusing address the question that he raises, the fact that Saint Peter delivered this sermon as to admit openly that it is the case is to damn himself for refusing to speak to Jews as Saint Peter did.

Moreover, as we know that Saint Peter did deliver this sermon and that the Acts of the Apostles was written by Saint Luke under the inspiration of God the Holy Ghost, to assert that Saint Peter was wrong about the authorship of Psalm 16, attributing it "incorrectly" to King David, is to mock the papal infallibility with which our first pope had just been clothed by the same God the Holy Ghost.

It is no doubt the case that Jorge Mario Bergoglio believes much the same thing as one cannot disparage the firm proclamation of the Catholic Faith while believing that Saint Peter actually delivered the sermon that he did on the first Pentecost Sunday as recorded in the Acts of Apostles.

Sixth, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis offends truth by contending that "dialogue" is more effective in "evangelization" than in proselytism because the former "builds bridges."

All right, Jorge.

How did Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ "build bridges" by engaging in "dialogue" when He gave the Eucharistic Discourse as recorded by Saint John the Evangelist?

Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say to you; Moses gave you not bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is that which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life to the world.

They said therefore unto him: Lord, give us always this bread.

And Jesus said to them: I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall not hunger: and he that believeth in me shall never thirst. But I said unto you, that you also have seen me, and you believe not. All that the Father giveth to me shall come to me; and from him that cometh to me, I will not cast out. Because I came down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him that sent me. Now this is the will of the Father who sent me: that of all that he hat given me, I should lose nothing; but should raise it up again in the last day.

And this is the will of my Father that sent me: that every one who seeth the Son, and believeth in him, may have life everlasting, and I will raise him up in the last day.

The Jews therefore murmured at him, because he had said: I am the living bread which come down from heaven. And they said: Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How then saith he, I came down from heaven?

Jesus therefore answered, and saith to them: Murmur not among yourselves. No man can come to me, except the Father, who hath sent me, draw him; and I will raise him up in the last day. It is written in the prophets: And they shall all be taught of God. Every one that heareth heareth of the Father, and hath learned, cometh to me.

Not that any man hath seen the Father; but he who is of God, he hath seen the Father.

Amen, amen I say unto you: he that believeth in me, hath everlasting life. I am the bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the desert, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from heaven; that if any man eat of it. he may not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If any mean eat of this bread that I will give, is my flesh, for the life of the world.

The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say unto you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.

He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him.

As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father; so he that eateth me, the same also shall live by me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead. He that eateth this bread, shall live for ever.

These things he said, teaching in the synagogue in Capharnaum.

Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it?

But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured at this, said to them: Doth this scandalize you? If then you shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? It is the spirit that quickeneth: the flesh profiteth nothing. The words that I have spoken to you, are spirit and life.

But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning, who they were that did not believe, and who he was, that would betray him.

And he said: Therefore did I say to you, that no man can come to me, unless it be given him by my Father.

After this many of his disciples went back; and walked no more with him.

Then Jesus said to the twelve: Will you also go away?

And Simon Peter answered him: Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we have believed and have known, that thou art the Christ, the Son of God. (John 6:1-70)

"Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you." That's not what you can "bridge-building." It is what is called proclaiming the truth, something that the most of Jews of Our Lord's time could not accept any more than most people alive in the world today. So what? Our Lord knew that most of the people would abandon him? Are we supposed to do any less?

To refuse to seek with urgency the unconditional conversion of those who are outside of the Catholic Church, including the Orthodox, not only makes a complete and total mockery of the work that Saint Peter and the other Apostles began Pentecost Sunday. It it is also to make a mockery of the work of Saint Patrick in Ireland and the work Saint Boniface in Germany and the work Saint Augustine of Canterbury in England and the work Saint Hyacinth in Central and Eastern Europe and the work Saint Dominic amongst the Albigensians and work of Saint Vincent Ferrer in the Iberian Peninsula amongst the Jews and Mohammedans and that of Saint Francis Xavier in the Far East and the work of Saints Francis de Sales and Peter Canisius amongst the Calvinists in Europe and the work of Saint Josaphat amongst the Orthodox in the Ukraine and the work of the North American Martyrs of Father Pierre Jean De Smet and Sister Rose Philippine Duchesne and Father Junipero Serra and the work of Saint Francis Solano and Saint Turibius and Saint Peter Claver, among so many others, in the New World.

My advice is this: Don't pay any attention to Miss Frances of Conciliarism's daily Ding Dong School as to do so is to permit oneself to be spoon-fed with one heresy after another as you are taught how to make the equivalent of a peanut butter, banana and lettuce sandwich of the Sacred Deposit of Faith.

Indeed, one of the comments listed on the You Tube video of that clip from Ding Dong Show linked above ran as follows: "What sort of a deranged serial killer would have lettuce on a peanut butter [sandwich]? Well, what sort of deranged serial killer of souls would have you believe that his daily dose of Ding Dong School has anything to do with the Catholic Faith.

Yes, go now in peace to love and hug each other in apostasy. Ding Dong School for the day has ended.

Pope Saint Pius X explained that that Modernists lead others to reject the true Faith by praising that which they see as "true" in false religions such as Islam, an exact description of what the conciliar "popes," including Bergoglio/Francis, Ratzinger/Benedict and Wojtyla/John Paul II have done:

How far this position is removed from that of Catholic teaching! We have already seen how its fallacies have been condemned by the Vatican Council. Later on, we shall see how these errors, combined with those which we have already mentioned, open wide the way to Atheism. Here it is well to note at once that, given this doctrine of experience united with that of symbolism, every religion, even that of paganism, must be held to be true. What is to prevent such experiences from being found in any religion? In fact, that they are so is maintained by not a few. On what grounds can Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam? Will they claim a monopoly of true experiences for Catholics alone? Indeed, Modernists do not deny, but actually maintain, some confusedly, others frankly, that all religions are true. That they cannot feel otherwise is obvious. For on what ground, according to their theories, could falsity be predicated of any religion whatsoever? Certainly it would be either on account of the falsity of the religious .sense or on account of the falsity of the formula pronounced by the mind. Now the religious sense, although it maybe more perfect or less perfect, is always one and the same; and the intellectual formula, in order to be true, has but to respond to the religious sense and to the believer, whatever be the intellectual capacity of the latter. In the conflict between different religions, the most that Modernists can maintain is that the Catholic has more truth because it is more vivid, and that it deserves with more reason the name of Christian because it corresponds more fully with the origins of Christianity. No one will find it unreasonable that these consequences flow from the premises. But what is most amazing is that there are Catholics and priests, who, We would fain believe, abhor such enormities, and yet act as if they fully approved of them. For they lavish such praise and bestow such public honor on the teachers of these errors as to convey the belief that their admiration is not meant merely for the persons, who are perhaps not devoid of a certain merit, but rather for the sake of the errors which these persons openly profess and which they do all in their power to propagate. (Pope Saint Pius X, Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907.)

Although the Church Militant on earth has undergone her Mystical Passion, Death and Burial in recent decades, she will, like her Divine Founder out of Whose Wounded Side she was born, know her Resurrection. We must simply and faithfully continue to cleave exclusively to the Catholic Faith while making who make no concessions to conciliarism or to the nonexistent legitimacy of its apostate "officials," men who are most casual in their acceptance of outrages that have become commonplace in their false church that gives so much offense to Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to His Most Blessed Mother.

We must also recognize that our sins have contributed mightily to the worsening of the state of the Church Militant and to the state of the world. We have much for which to make reparation, especially those of us who were slow to embrace the truth that those who defect from the Faith expel themselves from the Church and cannot hold office within her legitimately. Our Rosaries of reparation today may help to plant the seeds for the restoration of the Church Militant at some point in the future.

The Glorious Mysteries of the Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary during Ascensiontide that begins today prior to Pentecost Sunday presage a glorious future for Holy Mother Church once the conciliarists are vanquished as a result of the fruit of the Triumph of Our Lady's Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

We may not be alive when the Resurrection of the Church Militant occurs. We should and must be content to plant a few seeds for this Resurrection of the Church Militant as the consecrated slaves of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary with joy and with love.

Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and at the hour of our death.


© Copyright 2013, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.

Francis Takes Us To Ding Dong School Of Apostasy

by Thomas A. Droleskey