- Best jordan Sneakers
- best Running shoes
- Buy Kicks
- jordan release date
- latest jordans
- 555088 134 air jordan 1 high og university blue 2021 for sale
- kanye west 2019 yeezy boot black
- air jordan 1 low unc university blue white AO9944 441 release date
- Air Jordan 12 University Blue Metallic Gold
- Air Jordan 4 White Tech CT8527 100 Release Date
- Home
- Articles Archive, 2006-2016
- Golden Oldies
- 2016-2026 Articles Archive
- A Study of Dom Prosper Gueranger's Detailed Defense of The Mystical City of God Now Published in Kindle and Paperback
- About This Site
- As Relevant Now as It Was One Hundred Six Years Ago: Our Lady's Fatima Message
- Donations (October 7, 2025)
- Now Available for Purchase: Paperback Edition of G.I.R.M. Warfare: The Conciliar Church's Unremitting Warfare Against Catholic Faith and Worship
- Ordering Dr. Droleskey's Books
- US Coalition for Life Appeal to Help the Catholics of the Holy Land
Roncalli Opened the Windows and His Successors Continue to Praise the Fillth That Has Blown Their Way, part two
The “excommunicated” Bishop Carlo Maria Vigano said recently Jorge Mario Bergoglio, aka The Argentine Apostate, was the one who gave the nefarious sociopath named Anthony Fauci credibility.
However, this is not really the case as a conference sponsored by the conciliar Vatican in May of 2021 came a year after Anthony “I am the science” Fauci had been given all the credibility he would ever need by then and current President Donald John Trump and then Vice President Michael Richard Pence in 2020.
The late Jorge Mario Bergoglio was not very focused on Fauci in 2020 as he, ever a foot soldier in the phalanx of globalist entities that comprise what can be called the New World Order’s One World System of Governance, followed in lockstep with the totalitarian “recommendations” of the World Health Organization.
Indeed, Bergoglio ran with the World Health Organization’s “recommendations” and then took the lead in imposing mask—and later vaccine—mandates in the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River and social distancing mandates while telling conciliar “bishops” around the world, including in Italy, to close their churches and schools in total compliance with the statists’ arbitrary rulings.
Here are a few reminders:
Jorge Surrenders While Making Meaningless Gestures and Words
The subservience to the civil state and the fly-by-the-seat-of-their pants medical “experts” on the part of the lords of conciliarism, starting with Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and even many traditional and semi-traditional Catholics flies in the face of the entire history of the Catholic Church.
Barring times of interdict, Holy Mother Church has kept the doors of her churches open in the midst of plagues and other kinds of pestilences, and her priests and consecrated religious always have been at the front lines to minister the needs of the sick. Several examples of this were given over three weeks ago in Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part one, and I want to mention here the words of the Apostle of Charity himself, Saint Vincent de Paul as found in a book written by Bishop Emile Bougaud about the saint’s life:
Here we shall merely mention Mlle. Le Gras, whom we shall describe in the following chapter. Becoming a widow at twenty-four, she devoted herself to the service of the poor with such courage, that she did not hesitate to come in contact with the plague-stricken, which evoked such repeated praise from Saint Vincent. “I assure you,” he writes to her, when he learned of this act of heroism,” this has so touched my heart that, if it had been at night, I should have gone at once to see you. But the goodness of God towards those who give themselves to Him for the service of the poor in the Association of Charity, in which no one up to the present has been stricken with the plague, has given me perfect confidence in Him that you shall suffer no evil from it. Would you believe it, I not only visited the sub-prior at Saint Lazarre, who died of the plague, but felt his breath? And yet, neither those who assisted him nor myself have felt any inconvenience from it. No, do no fear. Our Lord wishes to make use of you for another work which concerns His glory, and I think that He will preserve you for it.” (Bishop Emile Bougaud, History of St. Vincent De Paul: Founder of The Congregation of the Mission and of The Sisters of Charity; Volume 1, Bishop of Laval, Longmans, Green, and Co., 39 Paternoster Row, London New York, and Bombay, 1899, pp. 247-248.)
The work of Saint Vincent de Paul followed the courageous and apostolically zealous example of Saint Charles Borromeo during the plague that battered Milan from 1576 to 1578. The Archbishop of Milan did not stay home in his palace. He did not shrink from his duties to the faithful. He rose to the occasion to minister to the plague-stricken in their very homes, something that a very informative essay makes abundantly clear. Here is an excerpt:
According to surviving chronicles, plague entered Milan in either late July or early August of 1576 and reigned until the city was declared ‘liberated’ on 20 January 1578, meaningfully coinciding with feast day of St. Sebastian, one of the premier protectors against pestilence. Over those eighteen months, the city lost over 17,000 individuals, roughly 15% of her citizens.3 No one knew for certain how plague could have breached the city’s walls, given that Milan was already on alert. Trent, the ground zero for the epidemic, was struck just a year earlier. From there, the disease progressed first to Venice and Mantua in the early part of 1576 before finally reaching Milan. Within a month of the outbreak, most of Milan’s nobility had fled. Even more distressing for the Milanese, ‘the evils produced by this state of things were increased’ when the Governor, the Marquis of Ayamonte, likewise abandoned his city and took refuge in nearby Vigevano.4 Conditions deteriorated throughout the autumn on both the medical and the civic fronts. Trade and commerce faltered, and it became difficult for the government to provision the city with goods from uninfected regions. The city’s plague hospital quickly filled to capacity, and more temporary straw huts for the sick were needed than could be built.5 Increasingly draconian measures were enacted – such as the purging of infected homes, closure of non-essential shops, and a general quarantine – all of which further exacerbated the city’s financial troubles.6
Carlo Borromeo took over where the Milanese officials left off, marshalling the clergy to maintain the city’s temporal and spiritual welfare. He organised the cleaning of homes and streets, and ordered the culling of dogs and cats; he conducted charitable relief work, selling his possessions, spending his own wealth, and borrowing money when his personal funds ran low; and, dismissing concerns over infection, he made visitations across the diocese and even personally ministered to the sick.7
2 The Pestilential Procession
One of Borromeo’s most frequently noted pastoral acts during the crisis – one that would later become an indelible part of his cultic hagiography – was the organisation of three general processions in October 1576.8 Each of the processions began at the city’s cathedral, with the first terminating at the Basilica of Sant’Ambrogio, the second at San Lorenzo, and the third at Santa Maria presso San Celso. With the added incentive of a plenary indulgence, the processions attracted an enormous number of participants, including any noblemen and civic officials who were left, ordinary citizens, and at least a thousand flagellants in tow. Borromeo wore a noose around his neck and walked barefoot to evoke the image of a condemned criminal. During the first procession, he reportedly cut his foot on an iron railing, but instead of tending to the wound, he walked on, letting his blood flow freely for all to see. Witnesses to the wound were all moved to compassion and cried out, ‘Miserere! Miserere!’ The third and final procession was to be the most solemn. Borromeo bid the parochial clergy to bring out their most prized relics in order to both move the masses to devotion and appeal to the saints. He himself carried the prized Milanese relic from the Cathedral, the Holy Nail, attached to a cross. At the close of this procession, Borromeo returned to the Cathedral and began a forty-hour devotion.
The ritual model that Borromeo invoked to rally support for his procession was established nearly a millennium earlier by Gregory I during a Roman outbreak in 590.9 As recounted in the Legenda aurea, the Romans, having lived a continent life throughout Lent, threw off all restraints after Easter and lived sinfully, for which they were heartily punished with buboes on their bodies.10 Amid the scourge, Pope Gregory summoned the entire Roman populace to a sevenfold or septiform litany, so-called because seven classes of people – clergy, monks and religious men, religious women, children, laymen, widows and unmarried women, and married women, each group accompanied by priests from the seven ecclesiastical districts of the city – were to gather separately at seven different churches throughout Rome and then process together toward the Basilica S. Maria Maggiore. The penitents took to the streets, chanting litanies and singing ‘Miserere’. Death was among the ranks, however, as eighty penitents fell dead in the space of an hour. As he headed the trains of suffering Romans, Gregory carried an image of Mary – the Salus populi Romani – purportedly made by St. Luke himself, which miraculously cleansed the surrounding air of infection as it moved through the city. As Gregory approached the Aelian Bridge, the Archangel Michael appeared atop the castle of Crescentius (now the Castel Sant’Angelo) and sheathed his bloody sword as a sign that God had been placated by the pious outpouring. And indeed, the Legenda aurea tells us, the plague promptly came to an end.
Processions such as Gregory’s and Borromeo’s were held across Europe in times of plague. They aimed, in the first instance, to rectify the relationship between the participants and their punitive God – in the case of Milan, a relationship that Borromeo felt had long been strained by the moral lassitude of the citizens in the years leading up to the outbreak.11Subsumed under the processions’ similarities in purpose and ritual framework, however, were local variations in practices that worked together toward a secondary goal of securing civic identification and solidarity. At the most basic, the very route of the procession itself was necessarily unique for every city. The different itineraries also meant that the penitents had the opportunity to make station and pray at different shrines and churches along the way, and to honour patrons and intercessors who were particularly important to the community. The relics displayed during a procession had to be chosen with special care for their proven efficacy and special relationship to the participants; the Romans used the Salus populi Romani in 590, the Venetians favoured a Byzantine icon of the Madonna, and Borromeo brought out the Holy Nail. When another major outbreak hit Milan in 1630, it was St. Carlo Borromeo’s exhumed body that was carried in procession, a choice of relic meant to recall and honour the cardinal’s successful stewardship of the city in the earlier crisis. The holy totems chosen for processions, therefore, expressed a particular civic identity that drew on the shared spiritual history of a given people.
The physical organisation of the participants, too, reflected the demographic make-up and political ideologies of a society. Gregory’s septiform procession distinguished the different kinds of clergy and the laity by gender, marital status, and age. Venetian processions put into practice the republic ideology of La Serenissima, based on clear and stable hierarchies: the Doge walked in the center of the procession; before him, civil servants were ranked in an ascending order of prestige, and behind him, noble magistrates followed in descending order of status.12 The Doge was like a living relic whose power and magnificence emanated outward. In Borromeo’s plague processions, chroniclers noted that the archbishop came first, followed by the governor and the members of the Senate, with the clergy and the general population following them in turn.13 The laity was separated into parishes and marched under separate parish banners. This arrangement, Borromeo reasoned, would also diminish the risk of contagion across neighbourhoods.14 (Singing on the Street and in the Home in Times of Pestilence: Lessons from the 1576–78 Plague of Milan.)
Forget about the conciliar authorities. What is wrong with traditional Catholic clergy who believe that the medical proponents of baby-killing, human vivisection and the rank utilitarianism that is at the foundation of “palliative” are important to obey unquestioningly while refusing to follow the example of those who have gone before us?
So what?
One dies on the way to Holy Mass or gets questioned by the police?
So what?
Didn’t millions upon millions of martyrs risk arrest on daily basis to go to Holy Mass in the catacombs and in the revolutionary assaults against the inestimable treasure that is the unbloody re-presentation or perpetuation of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ’s sacrificial offering of Himself to His Co-Equal and Co-Eternal God the Father in Spirit and in Truth for the atonement of human sins?
Why the timidity?
Where is the trust in Our Lord and His Most Blessed Mother?
Thousands upon thousands of Catholics in Mexico risked death during the Cristeros War to assist at “illegal Masses” after Plutcaro Elias Calles attacked the liberty of Holy Mother Church. The Catholic bishops of Mexico imposed an interdict on the country because they refused to knuckle under to Calles’s efforts to subordinate the Church to his control, and thus it is that they had no problem with their priests, including Padre Miguel Agustin Pro, who continued to offered Holy Mass. Padre Pro was arrested on bogus charges and shot to death on November 23, 1927, as he exclaimed "Viva Cristo Rey!" and extended his arms as Our Blessed Lord had done when He was nailed to the Holy Cross.
Why are we afraid of the Coronavirus when millions upon millions of brave Catholics risked death on a daily basis to go to Holy Mass when it was “forbidden” by the civil authorities, and they walked or rode on donkeys or horseback in treacherous conditions to do so.
What is wrong with us?
As Saint Charles Borromeo himself said:
“Be ready to abandon this mortal life rather than the people committed to your care,” St. Charles of Borromeo told priests as the Plague of 1576 swept through Milan. “Go forward among the plague-stricken as to life, as to a reward, even if there is only one soul to be won to Christ.” (As found in a superb article by “Monsignor” Charles Pope, Cancelling Public Mases in Rome is the Not the Coronavirus Answer. Memorandum to "Monsignor" Charles Pope: Your essay is very good. However, what you think is Holy Mass is actually an abomniable travety in the sight of the Most Blessed Trinity. See Antichrist Has Shown Us His Calling Card.)
"Monsignor" Pope's own commentary ends with the following stirring parapraphs that are nothing other than an expression of immutable Catholic truths:
Some will call me irresponsible for calling for public and communal Masses to resume. “People are dying,” they will say. I can only respond by saying that souls are dying due to fear and worldly obsession with death. Death will come to all of us, and not likely by coronavirus. The deeper and more important question is this: Are you ready to die and face judgment?
Let’s take reasonable precautions. Wash your hands; avoid touching your face; respect that some do not want to shake hands just now. But above all, do not be afraid and think that God is no longer in control. Go to Mass and trust God! Now is the time for faith, not an unwise abandonment of the liturgy which remains our help for salvation in a sin-soaked and unholy world. Run to God! Do not run from him and his sacraments.
Lord, save us from foolish and unfaithful preoccupations! Give us health. But, above all, give us a faith that does not fear the mere attacks on the body but soberly recalls that attacks on the soul are far more serious than the world thinks. Help us to be most concerned in what matters to you. Our bodies will die but our souls will endure. By your grace may we tend to our souls so that our bodies may one day rise to glory. (Cancelling Public Mases in Rome is the Not the Coronavirus Answer.)
Pray for this Catholic man's conversion to an acceptance of the true state of Holy Mother Church in this time of apostasy and betrayal!
While Catholics who believe themselves to be vulnerable to any disease, no less the current outbreak, are under no obligation to assist at Holy Mass on Sundays and other Holy Days of Obligation, the doors of Catholic churches have almost always remained open to provide those who can attend and are properly disposed to receive Our Lord in Holy Communion with access to Holy Eucharist, which is the life-giving remedy of both soul and body. The exceptions to this are few and far between.
Indeed, the following prayer a priest says sotto voce before he receives Our Lord in Holy Communion when he offers Holy Mass, a prayer which is contained in hand missals and should be prayed by all those assisting personally or remotely, speaks directly about the fact that, yes, the Holy Eucharist is a life-giving remedy for soul and body:
Let not the partaking of Thy Body, O Lord, Jesus Christ, which I, though unworthy, presume to receive, turn to my judgment and condemnation; but let it, through Thy mercy, become a safeguard and remedy, both for soul and body; Who with God the Father, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, livest and reignest God, world without end. Amen. (Roman Missal)
Condemning no one and no organization, Catholics in the underground in this time of apostasy and betrayal must have access to their shepherds and to Holy Mass where it can be found in these times. The civil state, no less a civil state wedded to junk science and bad medicine, has no authority from God to shutter Catholic churches or to forbid Catholic priests from visiting the sick at home or in hospitals. A Catholic priest has right to hear Confessions at all times, and he has the duty to make the Sacrament of Extreme Unction accessible to those who in extremis.
The counterfeit church of conciliarism has long been subservient to the civil state, which is the exact same defection from the Holy Faith committed by the Russian Orthodox nearly a thousand years ago, a defection that is one of the principal errors of Russia that paved the way for both Lutheranism and Soviet Bolshevism. The subordination of the Orthodox Church to the civil state, presaging the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the separation of Church and State wrought by Martin Luther and cemented by the rise of Judeo-Masonry and other, inter-related forces of naturalism.
Obviously, the errors of Russian Orthodoxy helped to shape the nature of Russian government over the centuries, something that Greek Orthodoxy, finding itself immersed in the heart of Mohammedanism, could not do. Thus it is that Russian Orthodoxy helped to pave the way over the centuries for Protestantism and Freemasonry by means of its rejection of the Social Reign of Christ King as it must be exercised by the Catholic Church.
The principle error of Modernity, the rejection of the Incarnation as an absolute necessity in the right ordering of men and their nations, had its antecedent roots in Russia. The errors of Russia influenced, albeit indirectly at times and through many filters, the ideas of the so-called Enlightenment in the West. And the failure of those anti-Incarnational and, at times, anti-Theistic ideas to resolve social problems, which have their remote cause in Original Sin and their proximate causes in the Actual Sins of men, made possible the rise of all manner of utopian theories.
After all, if "heaven" is to be here on earth and men cannot resolve their problems by means of mere structural reform sanctioned by a majority of "reasonable men" (see Locke, John, Second Treatise on Civil Government), then men who do not realize that the state of nations depends upon the right ordering of souls according to the tenets contained in the Deposit of Faith entrusted exclusively to the Catholic Church and in cooperation with the graces won for men by the shedding of every single drop of the Most Precious Blood of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, on the wood of the Holy Cross, will gravitate all too naturally to increasingly more utopian schemes of naturalism, including Bolshevism. The failure of Western liberalism, which had been influenced in many ways by the errors of Russia, to "improve" the lot of man helped to create a fertile seed ground for Bolshevism.
Conciliarism made its “peace” with this error long ago, and the fact Jorge and most of his “bishops” and priests/presbyters are so willing to subordinate themselves to the civil state on matters over which its has no authority is yet another proof that these men do not have the Catholic Faith and are willing to obey decrees that have no binding force on anyone who believes himself to be—or actually is—a true priest or bishop.
For his part, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been a very good “boy” to the Italian civil authorities even though he considers himself to be the sovereign of an independent nation, the State of Vatican City. He ventured out on a walk on the mostly deserted streets of Rome on Sunday, March 15, 2020, the Second Sunday of Lent, and visited the empty Basilica di Santa Maggiore and the equally empty Church of San Marcello on usually very busy Via Corso. He did not process with a statue of Our Lady nor did he encourage the Romans to join him. An empty gesture to make him appear courageous (see Antipope Walks Through Empty Streets in Rome Despite Lockdown).
Oh, yes, the Argentine Apostate also walked up the steps of the Basilica di Santo Pietro on Friday, March 27, 2020, the Feast of Saint John Damascene (and the eighteenth birthday of the youngest member of our family), where he prayed before a crucifix that has been responsible for numerous miracles during plagues.
True to his Modernist and apostate self, however, Jorge Mario Bergoglio did not urge Catholics to repent of their sins, nor did he call the China Virus or the panic it has caused what they are in fact: chastisements from the just and merciful God. While he did urge them to have no fear and to embrace the sufferings of the moment, he omitted any mention of accepting this current situation as a chastisement nor did not even given a hint that anyone had to make reparation for their sins.
Moreover, Bergoglio, true to a Modernist’s form of double-mindedness, appeared to sound Catholic at times before he blasphemed the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, yet again, by saying that we must Him “space” for “creativity”:
Embracing his cross means finding the courage to embrace all the hardships of the present time, abandoning for a moment our eagerness for power and possessions in order to make room for the creativity that only the Spirit is capable of inspiring. It means finding the courage to create spaces where everyone can recognize that they are called, and to allow new forms of hospitality, fraternity and solidarity. By his cross we have been saved in order to embrace hope and let it strengthen and sustain all measures and all possible avenues for helping us protect ourselves and others. Embracing the Lord in order to embrace hope: that is the strength of faith, which frees us from fear and gives us hope. (Urbi et Orbi Prayer Remarks.)
Bergoglio is a blasphemer as there are no “new forms of hospitality, fraternity and solidarity,” only the example of true Catholic charity on the part of countless hundreds of saints and millions of ordinary Catholics who ministered to bodies and souls and sought to win back sinners from lives of dissolution and perdition, and was the immutable God the Holy Ghost Who inspired them all to do so.
The Argentine Apostate does not realize that the world is being chastised at present in large measure because of the heresies, apostasies, blasphemies, sacrileges and outrages propagated by his false religious sect and that have been evangelized by his predecessors before his own accession to power seven years ago to bring this abominable work to its ultimate conclusion. Moreover, his false religious sect is compounding its debt of sins by continuing its egregious work of false ecumenism as a “solution” without considering for a nanosecond that exercises of this sort are offensive to God and bring down His wrath upon them and upon us all.
Consider the “joint prayer” exercise that took place in Jerusalem on Friday, March 27, 2020 (see Jews, Catholics, Orthodox, Mohammedans Jointly Offend God in Mixed "Prayer" in Jerusalem.)
These sorts of outrages will bring more and more chastisements upon us now and into the future.
This is a time that calls for courage, not cowardice excused as “prudence” that is nothing other than a “prudence of the flesh,” not a genuine Supernatural Prudence that is guided by seeing the world and the events in it through the eyes of the Holy Faith.
It is truly phenomenal that even believing Catholics, of all people, are saying “baa, baa” to our civil minders who are using the China/Chinese/Wuhan/Coronavirus to their full advantage to take away even the myth of “American freedom” with their own consent and approval in the name of “keeping us safe.”
Let me reiterate the simple truth nothing that those who endanger human souls by the promotion, legal protection and public celebration of sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance can do “keep us safe” bodily will ever be successful. The nature of the unrepentantly sinful and the power-hungry is to increase their desire to sin and their lust for power the more that it is appeased. The power lust of the wretchedly sinful is not satiated. (See World risks 'sleepwalking into surveillance' with controls, Baltimore moves ahead on use of surveillance planes to patrol city streets, Residents snitch on businesses, neighbors amid shutdowns, Rewards for reporting violators.) As noted before in this commentary, this is all a preparation for how Antichrist will come to power.
Quite indeed, our civil minders are talking now about placing Bluetooth-enabled armbands on those who are infected with the Coronavirus who do not have “smartpones," a development that is only a "high tech" variation of the use of informants by the Roman emperors and their minions, the Protestant revolutionaries in England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland, the French revolutionaries, the agents of the Italian risorgimento, Otto von Bismarck's Kulturkpampf in Germany between 1872 and 1878, the Soviet revolutionaries between 1917 and 1992, Hitler's "SS" between 1933 and 1945, the East Germany Stasi, the Maoists--and their successors--in Red China, by Israeli Mossad and by organized crime families in Italy and the United States of America.
Can we not see the signs of the times?
Are we as blind as the blinded Pharisees?
All manner of people, including Catholics all up and down and across the vast expanse of the ecclesiastical divide at this time, are being docilely submissive to lords of the civil state, a docility that most of them refuse to render to the binding precepts of the Divine Law and the Natural Law, no less to the infallible teaching of the Catholic Church, that is not the entity we should call the counterfeit church of conciliarism, which is but a tool of Antichrist's New World Order that will culminate in the latter's open manifestation.
Catholics do not live in fear of bodily harm in the exercise of their Holy Faith.
Catholics must fear only one thing: sin, especially, unrepented and un-confessed Mortal Sin in one which persists until the moment of death without even attempting to make a perfect Act of Contrition or even have Attrition, that is, imperfect contrition based a fear of going to hell and not a true and perfect hatred of one’s sins for love of the Most Blessed Trinity.
It is tragic that some presbyters in the conciliar structures have exhibited more courage in their defiance of thoroughly unjust civil decrees that bar Catholics from assisting at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass than true priests in the underground at this time. Civil leaders whose judgments were informed by the Holy Faith would recognize that it is essential for the Catholic Church to continue her work of sanctifying and saving souls as they would know it is only through the supernatural helps she provides that men can endure times of persecution, pestilence, economic distress, personal illnesses and every other problem that they can suffer in life as occasions for redemptive suffering and thus of the building up of the Mystical Body of Christ on earth and the good of the Poor Souls in Purgatory. There is no such sense today as our civil minders are ignorant of (Trump), indifferent to or just plain hostile to the influence of the true Faith in public life. This is the plain truth, and only only the foolish and fleshly "prudent" can ignore this without a qualm of conscience.
It is more tragic that the conciliar presbyters who have held public processions and/or staged the modernized version of the Immemorial Mass of Tradition or the abominable Protestant and Judeo-Masonic liturgical travesty have talked about something that does not exist, namely, a so-called “institutional church” that “has lost its mind.” This kind of ignorant blasphemy reflects the simple fact that the “resist while recognize movement” continues to do as much, if not, more harm to an understanding of genuine Catholic ecclesiology than the conciliar church-wreckers themselves.
The Catholic Church is the spotless, virginal, inerrant mystical spouse of her Divine Founder, Invisible Head and Mystical Bridegroom, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. There is no such thing as the “institutional church.” There is only a false church that is the counterfeit ape of the Catholic Church that has propagated false doctrines in direct defiance of the anathemas of the Council of Trent and the [First] Vatican Council as well as in direct defiance of the plain words of Our Lord as recorded in Sacred Scripture, the teaching of Holy Mother Church’s hat Fathers and Doctors and the writing of our more recent popes (Pius VI, Pius VII, Leo XII, Pius VIII, Gregory XVI, Pius IX, Leo XIII, Saint Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI and Pius XII). This false religious sect has also promulgated invalid and thus sacramentally barren liturgical rites that, like all other false religions, pleases only the adversary, not Christ the King. (From: Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part two, April 1, 2020.)
We must see the signs of the times clearly. Those who blind themselves to the reality of what is happening will be morally culpable for the physical harm caused to them who follow their counsel, which is based on fallacious reasoning and an eager willingness to “trust the government” and the “medical experts” unquestioningly, thereby mimicking Jorge Mario Bergoglio himself, who recently refused pleas by his “bishops” in Italy to resume the public staging of the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical abomination of desolation:
ROME - Since Pope Francis began livestreaming his daily Mass from the Vatican’s Santa Marta residence, many people around the world have been grateful for the opportunity to hear the pope’s words and to participate, albeit virtually, in his liturgy, helping to break the isolation of the coronavirus quarantine.
Tuesday morning, however, probably no one was more grateful than Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte.
Conte got a badly needed favor, as the pontiff essentially hit the off switch on mounting Catholic resistance to the PM’s program for recovery by calling for “prudence and obedience.” What remains to be seen is whether, in addition to pastoral conviction, the utterance was also a clever political tactic, in effect putting the Italian leader in the pope’s debt and creating capital Italy’s bishops now can spend in negotiations with the government.
Francis began with a brief prayer intention, as has been his custom, and today it was devoted to what the Italians call “Phase 2,” meaning the gradual reopening of the country after two months of lockdown.
The plan triggered wide national blowback after Conte announced it on Sunday, in large part because while he authorized the celebration of small-scale funerals, he did not make any provision for the resumption of public Masses despite repeated appeals from the powerful Italian bishops’ conference, CEI, to be able to do so, employing precautions such as social distancing and masks and gloves.
Media reports suggest that Conte’s technical-scientific committee overseeing Phase 2 judged that for now, the risks of movements of people and contact inside churches that restarting public Masses would generate are too great, and that it could be May 25 at the earliest when that decision is reviewed in light of the infection rate.
In response to the decision, CEI put out a testy note Sunday evening stating that “the Italian bishops cannot accept seeing the exercise of freedom of worship compromised.” (Jorge Tells Italian "Bishops" to Obey the Civil Authorities.)
Jorge Mario Bergoglio wants Catholics to be submissive to the civil state, thus showing himself once again to be but a tool of the the forces who are preparing the way for Antichrist.
As has been noted in the first three parts of this series, this is all about social control and various corporations, including but limited to Microsoft, GlaxoKlineSmith, Merck, Pzizer and several others making billions upon billions of dollars from vaccines and drugs that will be administered counteract their side effects, masks, identification chips and other assorted items, not public health. Massive amounts of people have been unemployed and had their own lives and those of their family members thrown into chaos as many of them locked down in states governed by authoritarians who are, to quote the fictional Maxwell Smart, “loving every minute of it.” This is too widespread not to have been planned out in advance. . . .
The infrastructure of the police state, which includes the merchants of surveillance, disinformation and censorship in Silicon Valley along with apparatchiks Federal, state and local governments, the medical and pharmaceutical industries, the corporations that will reap great profits from new, mandatory vaccines, contact tracing and the “identification card” and state and local police departments has been in place for some time now. This planned “pandemic” has provided the perfect opportunity for its implementation, and the fact that it is being accomplished during the administration of a president that the police state pioneers despise and want to destroy is so much the better.
It is case furthermore that “contact tracing” is part and parcel of the police state tactics encouraging relatives, friends and neighbors to inform “public health officials” on the “suspicious” movements or actions of their very own relatives, friends and neighbors. This is how totalitarians have always government, and it is a feature that is a characteristic of all Communist regimes, including the Red Chinese regime that is providing a model for many of our own Xi Jinping wannabes to shut down their states and send ordinary citizens to jail for exercising their legitimate liberties while releasing thousands of convicted criminals because of “social distancing” considerations in prisons. Alas, the real agenda behind social distancing to isolate human beings from each other and to rob them of their livelihood, thus making them more susceptible to infections and “elimination” thereafter. “Social distancing” is about social control, fear of others and depopulation, not public health and safety (see Social Distancing?)
It took the Governor of the State of Texas, Gregory Wayne Abbott, to personally order the release of a salon owner, Shelley Luther, who had been jailed for a bogus “contempt of court” order issued by a judge in Dallas, Texas, because she refused to apologize for “endangering” the public by her reopening her hair salon in violation of state and local emergency decrees (Governor Gregory Wayne Abbott Issues Executive Order Eliminating Jail for Those Who Violate Coronavirus Restrictions). This is the level of fascism that is upon us. What happened to Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, which will be examined again in part two of “Naturally Absurd” in June or June, is happening to ordinary citizens who run afoul of the social engineers, thought police, and “public health monitors.”
The authoritarianism of “contact tracing” has even extended to very militant attempts on the part of state and municipal officials to penalize those who attempt to go to what they think is a “church service” (Protestant “churches” are empty assembly halls that offend the true God of Divine Revelation).
These have efforts have included The Mayor of Kansas City, Missouri, Quinton Lucas’s “recommendation” that all churches and other “non-essential” businesses to keep records of everyone who enters their buildings during each thirty-day period. Although is not exactly same thing as requiring people to “register” as in Red China, but it is pretty close, and there will come a day when the Stalinists within the ranks of the false opposite of the naturalist “left” require actual registration lists to go along with the “digital identification card,” and the man who told the longsuffering underground Catholics in Red China to “register” with the Chinese Community Party rump church (Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association), Jorge Mario Bergoglio—or his successor—will be in the vanguard in support of such draconian efforts, which will also include the sort of “social credits” for “good and “compliant” behavior to government edicts as exists in Red China. This is thought control, and it is right in our very face, and as one who has been “branded” the leader of a “hate group” (see Chopped Liver No More and Chopped Liver No More Update) by the Christophobes at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), I find it very predictable that the SPLC is in the vanguard of identifying “Covid-19 deniers” (see SPLC Continues to Fight Against Injustice). (From Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part four, May 1, 2020.)
Jorge Mario Bergoglio thinks and speaks in purely naturalistic terms, which is he can so readily project onto God attributes such as “dreams” that are a denial of His Omnipotence and Omniscience, and it is he views illness, suffering, and death almost exclusively in naturalistic terms, which is why he more than willing to be the “front man,” if you will, for a “new world order” that has never had any place for Christ the King and His true Church, a “new world order” in which a chimerical sense of “justice” can be achieved without men giving up and then repenting of their sins.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio always shows himself to be bereft of the Catholic Faith. The op-ed piece extracted from his “as told to” book with Austin Invereigh that was published in The New York Times on Friday, November 27, 2020, began with a typical Modernist ploy: drawing on one’s own experience to universalize from the particular, that is, to make general conclusions about the state of medical science now in 2020 based upon what he experienced over sixty years ago now in a hospital administered by true Catholics staffed by religious sisters who a cared about the Holy Faith. Bergoglio is thus predisposed to accept whatever the “experts” and the “professionals” (scientists, physicians, public health authorities, etc.) say is the case, and it just happens to be convenient for him that these pathological liars who support contraception, abortion, sodomy, gender-change operations, “brain death”/vital organ vivisection and transplantation, the starvation and dehydration of innocent human beings, “palliative care”/hospice, and vaccinations replete with all kinds of poisons and genetic modifiers are secular statists to the very core of their “professional beings” (Please see the Appendix below for a review of inherent dangers in these genetic modifiers).
Indeed, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, posing under pseudonym of “Pope Francis,” is a secularist at heart who, quite unlike the first pope, Saint Peter, is so ashamed of the Holy Name of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ that he omitted all reference to the Holy Name of the One Whose vicar he proposes to be. Bergoglio, in contradistinction to the regal authority of our true popes, is a compliant servant of the forces of Antichrist in the world who is trying not to sanctify or save souls but to convince Catholics to participate in measures undertaken by men and women who believe that we have no other freedom than to agree to their judgments and then to submit to them without complaint:
In this past year of change, my mind and heart have overflowed with people. People I think of and pray for, and sometimes cry with, people with names and faces, people who died without saying goodbye to those they loved, families in difficulty, even going hungry, because there’s no work.
Sometimes, when you think globally, you can be paralyzed: There are so many places of apparently ceaseless conflict; there’s so much suffering and need. I find it helps to focus on concrete situations: You see faces looking for life and love in the reality of each person, of each people. You see hope written in the story of every nation, glorious because it’s a story of daily struggle, of lives broken in self-sacrifice. So rather than overwhelm you, it invites you to ponder and to respond with hope. (Bergoglio’s Apologia for the Socialist Utopia.)
Comment Number One:
What is this nonsense of thinking “globally”?
One who believes himself to be the Visible Head of the Church that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ founded upon the Rock of Peter, the Pope, has a universal responsibility to assure the sanctification and salvation of every person on the face of this earth. A true pope who is possessed of the Catholic Faith is never “paralyzed” by problems in the natural order of things as he knows that everything occurs within the Providence of God and that the graces won for us by the shedding of every single drop of His Co-Equal, Co-Eternal Divine Son’s Most Precious Blood during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday and that flow into our hearts and souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces, are more than sufficient for us to accept and then to prosper spiritually no matter who kind of suffering is entailed.
Catholics are joyful to lift high the Cross. Indeed, they are grateful to have the opportunity to suffer for the honor and glory of God and the good of souls as they pray to make reparation for their own sins and those of the whole world as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of His Most Blessed Mother, Our Lady.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio, however, does not believe in redemptive suffering because he does not believe in the Catholic Faith. This is why he always thinks in naturalistic terms in times of crisis, something that he related, perhaps without knowing so, as he described his experience of a serious illness that nearly killed him when he was twenty-seven years of age:
These are moments in life that can be ripe for change and conversion. Each of us has had our own “stoppage,” or if we haven’t yet, we will someday: illness, the failure of a marriage or a business, some great disappointment or betrayal. As in the Covid-19 lockdown, those moments generate a tension, a crisis that reveals what is in our hearts.
In every personal “Covid,” so to speak, in every “stoppage,” what is revealed is what needs to change: our lack of internal freedom, the idols we have been serving, the ideologies we have tried to live by, the relationships we have neglected.
When I got really sick at the age of 21, I had my first experience of limit, of pain and loneliness. It changed the way I saw life. For months, I didn’t know who I was or whether I would live or die. The doctors had no idea whether I’d make it either. I remember hugging my mother and saying, “Just tell me if I’m going to die.” I was in the second year of training for the priesthood in the diocesan seminary of Buenos Aires.
I remember the date: Aug. 13, 1957. I got taken to a hospital by a prefect who realized mine was not the kind of flu you treat with aspirin. Straightaway they took a liter and a half of water out of my lungs, and I remained there fighting for my life. The following November they operated to take out the upper right lobe of one of the lungs. I have some sense of how people with Covid-19 feel as they struggle to breathe on a ventilator.
I remember especially two nurses from this time. One was the senior ward matron, a Dominican sister who had been a teacher in Athens before being sent to Buenos Aires. I learned later that following the first examination by the doctor, after he left she told the nurses to double the dose of medication he had prescribed — basically penicillin and streptomycin — because she knew from experience I was dying. Sister Cornelia Caraglio saved my life. Because of her regular contact with sick people, she understood better than the doctor what they needed, and she had the courage to act on her knowledge.
Another nurse, Micaela, did the same when I was in intense pain, secretly prescribing me extra doses of painkillers outside my due times. Cornelia and Micaela are in heaven now, but I’ll always owe them so much. They fought for me to the end, until my eventual recovery. They taught me what it is to use science but also to know when to go beyond it to meet particular needs. And the serious illness I lived through taught me to depend on the goodness and wisdom of others. (Bergoglio’s Apologia for the Socialist Utopia.)
Comment Number Two:
One will notice that, apart from the competence and compassion of the nurses that characterized truly Catholic hospitals in the past and remain the standard for authentic medical care based upon a desire to obey God’s commandments and to treat patients as they would treat Our Lord in the very Flesh, Jorge Mario Bergoglio emphasized his suffering without using the opportunity to catechize his readers that suffering, pain, and death are but the inescapable consequences of Original Sin and provide those who suffer with an opportunity to make reparation for their own sins. Bergoglio’s discussion in this regard is entirely naturalistic.
In this regard, therefore, it should be remembered that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is at a loss to explain human suffering and has made it clear on many occasions that he hopes his death will be a quick one without a lot of pain. In other words, he is a moral coward who is afraid to carry his own crosses with love and gratitude, which is why he is compelled to constantly attack, belittle and defame those who criticize him for his multiple defections from the Holy Faith, and incapable of exhorting others to bear their crosses lovingly and gratefully.
Here is a summary of various other occasions when Jorge Mario Bergoglio was at a loss to explain human suffering as taken from various commentaries that have appeared on this website:
No one who has the sensus Catholicus could say what this hideous heretic from Argentina said to an Italian radio station in an interview on Saturday, November 14, 2015, the Feast of Saint Josaphat, about the Mohammedan terror attacks in Paris, France, that took place on Friday evening, November 13, 2015, the Feast of Saint Didacus (San Diego de Alcala) and the Commemoration (in some places) of Saint Stanislaus Kostka:
In a telephone interview on Saturday with the Italian Bishops’ Conference official television network – TV2000 – Pope Francis said the attacks are “not human.”
“I am close to the people of France, to the families of the victims, and I am praying for all of them,” Pope Francis said. “I am moved and I am saddened. I do not understand, these things hard to understand.”
When asked if this is part of the “piecemeal Third World War” the Holy Father has mentioned many times before, Pope Francis said “this is a piece of it,” adding “there is no religious or human justification for it.” (No religious or human justification for Paris attacks.)
“These things are hard to understand” for Jorge Mario Bergoglio because he does not understand or accept the following facts of the Catholic Faith.:
Fact Number Two:
The remote cause of all problems in the world is Original Sin.
Fact Number Three:
The proximate causes of all problems in the world are the Actual Sins of us all.
Fact Number Four:
Unbaptized persons have souls that are captive to the devil by means of Original Sin, which inclines them to commit Actual Sins, hate others, nurture grudges and then plot and carry out acts of violent revenge against those they hate.
Fact Number Five:
There will always be problems in the world as a result of Original Sin, whose vestigial remnants in the souls of the baptized include the darkened intellect, which inclines men to resist the known truth, and the weakened will, which makes it difficult for men to choose in accord with what they know to be true, and as a result of our own Actual Sins, whether mortal or venial.
Fact Number Six:
The extent to which order prevails in the world is the extent to which it prevails in the souls of men that are at peace with the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, by virtue of being in a state of Sanctifying Grace. Men must strive to be holy and to root out sin from their souls by making a good, integral confession of their sins to a true priest in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance. Men must desire to go to Heaven by seeking to grow in virtue and sanctity as they enslave themselves to Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Fact Number Seven:
Although Jorge Mario Bergoglio had no answer for a young girl in The Philippines ten months ago when she asked him why God would permit the devastation caused by Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) on November 8, 2011, the Octave of the Feast of All Saints, saying that he “did not know” why such tragedies occurred, a Catholic understands that even the forces of nature, having had their perfect balance rent asunder when Adam sinned, are affected by the pestilential influence of unforgiven sins. God permits tragedies to afflict even innocent children because He wants them to embrace the Holy Cross on which His Co-Equal, Co-Eternal Divine Son redeemed them. God permits violent acts to be committed by men to show us the necessity of using our free will responsibly in accord with the dictates of right reason, informed as it must be by the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law, and of making reparation for our sins and those of the whole world. Men must pray for the conversion of non-Catholics to the true Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order, and to pray for the conversion of poor sinners as they seek to amend their own lives by cooperating with the graces for them by the shedding of every single drop of Our Lord’s Most Precious Blood during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross that come down into their souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces.
Fact Number Eight:
A believing Catholic understands that he must suffer in order to go home to Heaven. A believing Catholic desires to suffer even what are grave injustices in the human order of things, knowing that the freely-embraced self-abnegation required of those who are friends of the Cross recognizes all things that occur to him as having been ordained by Divine Providence and is thus an instrument of his own sanctification and salvation.
I want to spend some time on this as Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s perplexity about human suffering speaks volumes about the fact that he is not a friend of the Cross. Saint Louis de Montfort described what it is to be a true friend of Holy Cross of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ:
50. Ninth. The love you are told to have for the Cross is not sensible love, for this would be impossible to human nature.
It is important to note the three kinds of love: sensible love, rational love and love that is faithful and supreme; in other words, the love that springs from the lower part of man, the flesh; the love that springs from the superior part, his reason; and the love that springs from the supreme part of man, from the summit of his soul, which is the intellect enlightened by faith.
51.God does not ask you to love the Cross with the will of the flesh. Since the flesh is the subject of evil and corruption, all that proceeds from it is evil and it cannot, of itself, submit to the will of god, and His crucifying law. It was this aspect of His human nature which Our Lord referred to when He cried out, in the Garden of Olives: “Father, . . . not My will but Thine be done.” (Luke 22, 42). If the power powers of Our Lord’s human nature, though holy, could not love the Cross without interruption, then, with still greater reason, will our human nature, which is very much vitiated, repel it. At times, like many of the saints, we too may experience a feeling of even sensible joy in our sufferings, but that joy does not come from the flesh though it is in the flesh. It flows from our superior powers, so completely filled with the divine joy of the Holy Ghost, that it spreads to our lower powers. Thus a person who is undergoing the most unbearable torture is able to say: “My heart and my flesh have rejoiced in the living God” (Ps. 83, 3).
52. There is another love of the Cross which I call rational, since it springs from the higher part of man, his reason. This love is wholly spiritual. Since it arises from the knowledge of the happiness there is in suffering for God, it can be and really is perceived by the soul. It also gives the soul inward strength and joy. Though this rational and perceptible joy is beneficial, even very beneficial, it is not an indispensable part of joyous, divine suffering.
53.That is why there is another love, which the masters of the spiritual life call the love of the summit and highest point of the soul and which the philosophers call the love of the intellect. When we possess this love, even though we experience no sensible joy or rational pleasure, we love and relish, in the light of pure faith, the cross we must bear, even though the lower part of our nature may often be in a state of warfare and alarm and may groan, weep and sigh for relief; and thus we repeat with Jesus Christ: “Father . . . not My will but Thine be done” (Luke 22, 42), or with the Blessed Virgin: “Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it done unto Thy word” (Luke 1, 38). (Saint Louis de Montfort, A Circular Letter to the Friends of the Cross, Montfort Publications, p. 24.)
To perfectly love the Cross, Saint Louis de Montfort explains, we must be willing to suffer all things well, to suffer them with equanimity and joy. This has special application today in this time of apostasy and betrayal when so many families are so torn apart from by the apostasies and sacrileges wrought by the conciliarists, allies of the devil who have set believing Catholics against each other in the most bitter terms. It is difficult to lose the respect and esteem of others, especially family members and close friends, when one has come to recognize that those who defect knowingly from even one article contained in the Deposit of Faith have expelled themselves from the Catholic Church and cannot hold ecclesiastical office within her legitimately. It is difficult to persevere in the truth when all manner of pressure is brought to bear to conform to the “mainstream” of opinion. This is how many Catholics went over to Arianism in the Fourth Century and how many Catholics in England defected to Protestantism in the Sixteenth Century. It is hard to go against the tide of prevailing views. It is, however, necessary to do so to be faithful to Our Lord, Who was abandoned by all but one of His Apostles at the foot of the Cross:
54. Tenth. Be resolved then, dear Friends of the Cross, to suffer any kind of cross without excepting or choosing any: all poverty, all injustice, all temporal loss, all illness, all humiliation, all contradiction, all calumny, all spiritual dryness, all desolation, all interior and exterior trials. Keep saying: “My heart is ready, O God, my heart is ready” (Ps. 56, 8) Be ready to be forsaken by men and angels, and seemingly by God Himself. Be ready to to be persecuted, envied, betrayed, calumniated, discredited and forsaken by everyone. Be read to undergo hunger, thirst, poverty, nakedness, exile, imprisonment, the gallows, and all kinds of torture, even though you are innocent of everything with which you may be charged. What if you were cast out of your our home like Job and St. Elizabeth of Hungary; thrown, like this saint, into the mire; or dragged upon a manure pile like Job, malodorous and covered with ulcers, without any to bandage your wounds, without a morsel of bread, never refused to a horse or a dog? Add to these dreadful misfortunes, all the temptations with which God allows the devil to prey upon you, without pouring into your soul the least feeling of consolation.
Firmly believe that this is the summit of divine glory and real happiness for the true, perfect Friend of the Cross. (Saint Louis de Montfort, A Circular Letter to the Friends of the Cross, Montfort Publications, p. 28.)
Bergoglio does not understand that the only way to win the crown of glory in eternal life is to be willing to have a crown of thorns beat into our own skulls each and every day of our loves, considering our sufferings as nothing in comparison to those endured by Our Divine Redeemer during this days of His Passion and Death. The Cross is indeed the solution to every problem that we face in our lives:
57. Third, consider the Wounds and Sorrows of our crucified Jesus. Hear what He himself has to say: “All ye that pass along the thorny and crucifying way I had to follow, look and see. Look with the eyes of your body; look with the eye of contemplation, and see if your poverty, nakedness, disgrace, sorrow, desolation are like unto Mine. Behold Me, innocent, as I am, then will you complain, you are guilty” (Lam. 1, 12).
The Holy Ghost tells us, by the mouth of the Apostles, that we should keep our eyes on Jesus Crucified (Gal. 3, 1) and arm ourselves with this thought of Him (1 Pet. 4, 1) which is our most powerful and most penetrating weapon against all our enemies. When you are assailed by poverty, disrepute, sorrow, temptation or any other cross, arm yourselves with this shield, this breastplate, this helmet, this two-edged sword (Eph. 6, 12-18), that is, with the thought of Jesus crucified. There is the solution to your every problem, the means you have to vanquish all your enemies.
58. Fourth, lift up your eyes, behold the beautiful crown that awaits you in Heaven if you carry your cross as you should. That was the reward which kept patriarchs and prophets strong in faith under persecution. It gave heart to the Apostles and martyrs in their labors and torments. Patriarchs used to say as Moses had said: “We would rather be afflicted with the people of God,” so as to enjoy eternal happiness with Him, “than to have the pleasure of sin for a short time (Heb. 11, 25-26). The prophets repeated David’s words: “We suffer great persecutions on account of the reward (Ps. 68, 8; 118, 112). The Apostles and martyrs voice the sentiments of St. Paul: We are, as it were, men appointed to death: we are made a spectacle to the world, and to angels, and to men,” by our sufferings “being made the offscouring of the world,” (1 Cor. 4, 913), “by reason of the exceeding and eternal weight of glory, which this momentary and light tribulation worketh in us” (2 Cor. 4, 17).
Let us see and listen to the angels right above us: “Be careful not to forfeit the crown that is set aside for you if you bravely bear the cross that is given to you. If you do not bear it well, someone will bear it in your stead and will take your crown. All the saints warn us: fight courageously, suffer patiently and you will be given an everlasting kingdom.” Let us hear Jesus: “To him only will I give my reward who shall suffer and overcome through patience” (Apoc. 2, 6; 11, 17; 3, 5; 21,7). (Saint Louis de Montfort, A Circular Letter to the Friends of the Cross, Montfort Publications, p. 26-27.)
Imagine would good “Pope Francis” might have done by writing in these terms in his November 27, 2020, op-ed commentary.
As we know, however, he does not even think in these terms, which is why he is incapable of speaking or writing as befits a Catholic, no less one who has on his immortal soul the duty to make sure that every person alive on the face of the earth has access to the truths of the true Faith so that they can enlightened to convert to the Catholic Church if they are outside the Barque of Saint Peter or to return if they have strayed from the path of salvation.
Writing in Iam Vos Omnes, September 13, 1968, Pope Pius IX explained his duties as the universal shepherd of souls, which is why he was taking the opportunity of addressing non-Catholic Christians to exhort them to predisposed to listen to the pronouncements of the [First] Vatican Council without prejudice when it convened a year so that they recognize that the Catholic Church is the only means of salvation:
It is for this reason that so many who do not share 'the communion and the truth of the Catholic Church' must make use of the occasion of the Council, by the means of the Catholic Church, which received in Her bosom their ancestors, proposes [further] demonstration of profound unity and of firm vital force; hear the requirements [demands] of her heart, they must engage themselves to leave this state that does not guarantee for them the security of salvation. She does not hesitate to raise to the Lord of mercy most fervent prayers to tear down of the walls of division, to dissipate the haze of errors, and lead them back within holy Mother Church, where their Ancestors found salutary pastures of life; where, in an exclusive way, is conserved and transmitted whole the doctrine of Jesus Christ and wherein is dispensed the mysteries of heavenly grace.
It is therefore by force of the right of Our supreme Apostolic ministry, entrusted to us by the same Christ the Lord, which, having to carry out with [supreme] participation all the duties of the good Shepherd and to follow and embrace with paternal love all the men of the world, we send this Letter of Ours to all the Christians from whom We are separated, with which we exhort them warmly and beseech them with insistence to hasten to return to the one fold of Christ; we desire in fact from the depths of the heart their salvation in Christ Jesus, and we fear having to render an account one day to Him, Our Judge, if, through some possibility, we have not pointed out and prepared the way for them to attain eternal salvation. In all Our prayers and supplications, with thankfulness, day and night we never omit to ask for them, with humble insistence, from the eternal Shepherd of souls the abundance of goods and heavenly graces. And since, if also, we fulfill in the earth the office of vicar, with all our heart we await with open arms the return of the wayward sons to the Catholic Church, in order to receive them with infinite fondness into the house of the Heavenly Father and to enrich them with its inexhaustible treasures. By our greatest wish for the return to the truth and the communion with the Catholic Church, upon which depends not only the salvation of all of them, but above all also of the whole Christian society: the entire world in fact cannot enjoy true peace if it is not of one fold and one shepherd. (Pope Pius IX, Iam Vos Omnes, September 13, 1868.)
Anyone who believes that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who has told us on numerous occasions that he does not want to convert anyone to what he thinks is the Catholic Church, shares Pope Pius IX's fear for his soul if he did not invite non-Catholics into Church is either mired in delusion or is steeped in ranked intellectual dishonesty as they shut their eyes and close their mouths to the truth that Bergoglio believes not a word of Pope Pius IX's exhortation contained in Iam Vos Omnes. Unlike Pope Pius IX, the Argentine Apostate does not believe that Catholicism is the one and only foundation of personal and social order.
Bergoglio does not believe that the Catholic Church has a “monopoly” on revealed truth and he does not believe that the temporal good of men and their nations depends upon the right ordering of their souls by means of persisting in a state of Sanctifying (Habitual) Grace. Quite instead, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a willing mouthpiece for the lords of the world, including the brutal dictators of Red China, even to the point of ordering us peons in the peanut gallery to lock ourselves up in our houses and live in fear of a virus that has a less than one percent chance of killing people who are not elderly and/or who do not suffering from underlying co-morbidities. (From Jorge Mario Bergoglio: Front Man for the Lockdown State's New Red Dawn, part one, December 10, 2020.)
Part one of this commentary focused on Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s apologia for the lockdown state’s diabolically-conceived and executed effort to impose a Red Chinese-style Communist dictatorship upon the “free world” in order, our civil minds say, to protect us from a virus, while certainly a threat to some people, has a mortality rate of less than one percent in those who are not elderly and/or do not suffer from one or more pre-existing conditions (co-morbidities).
To be sure, what is called “Covid-19” by many but is more accurately referred to as the Wuhan virus it was in a Red Chinese “Bio-Safety Lab 4” there that the biological weapon was developed and leaked accidentally before being completely weaponized. Even the less potent strain of the Wuhan/China/Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus, however, was enough for Chicom dictator Xi Jinping and his minions to deploy Chinese nations from Wuhan and other places in the Hubei province around the world to spread the disease as part of Even 201’s plandemic to create a mass panic that would be endorsed by Red Chinese subsidiary known as the World Health Organization as a “pandemic” and thus be used as the pretext for the restriction of legitimate human liberties in the name of “public health.” The plandemicists’ end goal is to create a “new normal” of state surveillance, mandatory injections of genetically-modifying vaccines replete with all manner of potions and derived, in part, from the stem cell lines of butchered babies, that will make us all mere creatures of the civil state.
Thus, before delving into a detailed analysis of Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s role as the papal” useful idiot for Xi Jinping’s massive propaganda machine to get Catholics to accept the Red Chinese-style “global reset of humanity” after having renewed his sellout of underground Catholics who have been persecuted endlessly for trying to remain faithful to men they have believed to be true “popes” even though they were unaware of the fact that the past three of these imposters were setting the stage for the Bergoglio’s betrayal in 2018, I want to emphasize a few points made in part one of this series so that readers will be able to make some necessary, perhaps even life-saving, distinctions in the midst of statist/conciliarist propaganda and inadequate conclusions reached by some Catholics that ignore the prophetic nature of the times in which we are living. (From Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part eight, December 16, 2020.)
Not to be outdone, of course, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has authorized his minions to warn employees of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River that they could lose their jobs if they do not get vaccinated to “protect” themselves and ostensibly others against the Wuhan/China/Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus:
Rome — The Vatican has taken a hard line against employees who refuse to be vaccinated for COVID-19, warning they risk losing their jobs.
According to a decree by Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello, whose role as President of the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State makes him the territory's top administrator, employees who refuse the vaccine "without proven health reasons" face penalties that can include "the interruption of the work relationship."
Vatican City is the world's smallest independent state, sitting right in the heart of Rome. It employs several thousand people, most of whom actually live outside the walled 100-acre territory and inside Italy proper.
Those who do reside inside the Vatican's walls tend to be elderly, such as retired Pope Benedict XVI, 93, and Pope Francis, 84. The pontiff was vaccinated for COVID-19 last month and has been a big supporter of inoculation in the global fight against the coronavirus.
"It is an ethical choice because you are gambling with your health, with your life, but you are also gambling with the lives of others," Francis told an Italian TV station last month.
Bertello, who runs day-to-day life in Vatican City, tested positive for the coronavirus in December. Fewer than 30 people at the Vatican have contracted the disease.
Last month the Vatican began vaccinating homeless people who are looked after in the territory's food and health facilities.
Under Francis the Vatican has set up a number of facilities to help Rome's homeless population, offering areas for people to bathe and get haircuts, as well as food and health care. This winter it began offering free COVID tests to migrants and the homeless, directly beneath the window where the pope delivers.
Italy, once the epicenter of the global pandemic, is now battling a second wave worse than its first, as well as new variants of the virus such as the one first discovered in the United Kingdom, which now accounts for one in five new cases.
More than 94,000 deaths have been blamed on the virus in Italy, the second highest death toll in Europe behind the United Kingdom. (Vatican May Make Vaccine Mandatory for Employment.)
Obviously, it would be a blessing for those working inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River to be fired and thus bear no further culpability for the dogmatic, canonical, theological, ecclesiological, liturgical, moral, Scriptural and pastoral errors being disseminated therefrom on a daily basis to the detriment of souls and thus to the entirety of a truly just social order, which is premised upon right ordering within the souls of men.
As noted before, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is fully supportive of the "global reset of humanity," and, despite the fact that vaccines used to protect against the Wuhan/China/Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus that containing RNA genetic modifiers that are meant to create "transhumans" (genetically modified organisms, if you will), the Argentine Apostate is requiring that all journalists accompanying him on his anti-apostolic pilgrimage to Iraq in ten days show proof of being vaccinated in order to be allowed onboard the antipapal aircraft:
3.2 Due to the current pandemic situation, it will be necessary to wear personal protective equipment (surgical or FFP2/FFP3 type face mask) in every occasion in which there may be contact with at least one other person and a safe distance of at least one metre is not guaranteed.
3.3 Since some unforeseen situations beyond the control of the trip organization may make it difficult to respect the necessary measures of personal protection from COVID-19, especially with regard to social distancing, in order to participate in the Apostolic Journey of the Holy Father Francis in Iraq it is necessary to have undergone the vaccination against COVID- 19 within the appropriate time.
3.4 If the vaccination has already been provided for in time in their country of residence, journalists admitted to the Papal Flight must send a copy of the relevant vaccination certificate, certifying its effectiveness as of 1 March 2021, to accreditamenti@salastampa.va.
3.5 If the vaccination is not provided for, or has not be administered in time, in their country of residence, journalists admitted to the Papal Flight must include a request to receive the vaccination in their letter of application to the Papal Flight.
3.6 For journalists admitted to the Papal Flight who request it, the vaccine will be administered according to a vaccination schedule which will be communicated at a later date. For organizational purposes only, the first vaccination will be administered in early February and the booster in the last week of the same month.
3.7 With regard to health prescriptions upon return to Italy or your country of residence (quarantine periods, communications to the relevant health authorities, etc.), please refer to the regulations in force at the time of return.
3.8 At present, despite vaccination, health regulations make it compulsory to undergo a PCR test before every international departure. In the unlikely event that the journalists admitted to the Papal Flight, although vaccinated, receive a positive result in the prescribed PCR tests before departure from Rome, they will not be able to participate in the trip and will have to bear the costs of the penalties for the hotel in Iraq and the air ticket. In the event of a positive result to the prescribed PCR tests prior to departure from Iraq, the journalists will not be admitted to the return flight and will have to face the periods of sanitary surveillance in the country, in accordance with the provisions made by the competent authorities, covering costs necessary for the stay and the sanitary expenses. (Argentine Apostate Requires Reporters on His Trip to Iraq to Receive the Covid Vaccine.)
Nonetheless, however, what the news report cited just above demonstrates is that, as noted in previous parts of this series, Antipope Francis is a reliable “partner” of the “Great Reset,” of which the plandemic is an indispensable first step. There has never been anything that the statists have proposed to “improve humanity” that has not received Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s complete antipapal imprimatur and even his apologia in various gabfests called “homilies,” audiences, interviews, and other speeches.
A fake pope goes along with the fake narrative of a Red Chinese "pandemic" tha is part of its genetic warfare and then mandates vaccinations containing fetal cell lines and that permanently modify one's genetic code. This all the work of Antichrist. (From: Revised and Expanded: Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part eleven, February 22, 2021.)
Mind you, the passages above are just a few examples of how Senor Jorge followed along with the directives of the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum (the Davos Group), and the statist, Eurosocialist apparatchiks within the nooks and crannies of the European area. It was not until May of 2021 that Anthony Fauci received his official “welcoming” into the conciliar clubhouse when he was the keynote speaker, albeit virtually, at a Vatican-sponsored conference that featured the likes of Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky, and pro-abortion “model Cindy Crawford.
Here is a reminder, followed by own contemporary commentary:
This is relevant as the through pro-abortion, pro-sodomite, statist, environmentalist daughter of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton and Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Chelsea Victoria Clinton Mezvinsky, who is now forty-one years of age, will speak virtually as part of a conference on public “health” social control that has been organized by Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s band of theological racketeers that will be held from May 6-8, 2021, and also features the notoriously mercurial statist and lover of the public limelight, Dr. Anthony Fauci:
VATICAN CITY, April 15, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – The Vatican has announced its fifth International Health Conference on “Exploring the Mind, Body & Soul,” and will host scores of globalist and abortion-promoting speakers such as Chelsea Clinton, the CEOs of abortion-tainted vaccine companies Pfizer and Moderna, the director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The conference, entitled “Exploring the Mind, Body & Soul. How Innovation and Novel Delivery Systems Improve Human Health,” is due to take place May 6 through 8.
An incredible 114 speakers are set to appear at the event, which is hosted by the Pontifical Council for Culture, the Cura Foundation, the Science and Faith Foundation (STOQ), and Stem For Life (SFLF).
The speakers include prominent and diverse names such as the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, the former of which produces abortion pills; the Director of the National Institute of Health (NIH) Francis Collins, who advocates using fetal tissue in research projects; the head of Google Health, David Feinberg; and Dr. Anthony Fauci from the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, whose advice to government officials played a major role in shutting down American churches last year.
NIH director Francis Collins has a long history of anti-life policies, and has previously acclaimed the “scientific benefits” which come from fetal tissue research, claiming that such work could be conducted “with an ethical framework.”
He is joined at the Vatican conference by Salesforce CEO, Marc Benioff, who has firmly aligned himself with the globalist, liberal elite, by banning emails from Republicans and the Trump campaign in the wake of the January 6 Capitol protests, as well as prohibiting all clients from even questioning the 2020 U.S. election. Benioff has a history of promoting LGBT issues, and is described by Time as “one of the most outspoken executives,” for LGBT affairs.
Also speaking at the conference will be United Nations representative and conservationist Jane Goodall, who supports population control; new age activist Deepak Chopra; rock guitarist Joe Perry; Mormon Elder William K. Jackson; executive chair of the British Board of Scholars and Imams, Shaykh Dr. Asim Yusuf; pro-abortion model Cindy Crawford; and disgraced ex-prefect of the Secretariat for Communication, Monsignor Dario Viganò.
Numerous other medical professionals, representatives of U.S. federal agencies, university lecturers, high-ranking company officials, and musicians also form the number of speakers. There are only two Catholic clergy listed amongst the 114 speakers.
Taking place within Vatican City, the event is being promoted with the social media messaging of “#UniteToPrevent and #UniteToCure.”
The image promoting the conference (featured at the top of this article) appears to be based on Michelangelo’s famous depiction of the Creation of Adam. In the new image two hands reach towards each other, with both hands covered by disposable gloves.
Indeed, the logo for the conference is a circle of people linking hands, colored in the tones of the LGBT rainbow flag, and positioned next to the crossed keys and Papal tiara of the Pontiff.
The event is hosted by Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, the president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, along with the General Secretary of the STOQ Monsignor Tomasz Trafny, and Robin L. Smith, who is the founder, president and chairman of Cura Foundation and Stem for Life, and vice-president and director of STOQ.
However, the trio will not be moderating the event, as this role will fall to ten “world-renowned journalists,” such as the executive VP of Forbes Moira Forbes,, Katie Couric, and journalists from major left-wing media corporations such as CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and the Wall Street Journal.
Will Vatican conference ignore God?
Perhaps as a sign of the Vatican’s recent declaration of financial difficulties, the conference is supported by numerous large organizations such as Sanford Health, Akkad Holdings, John Templeton Foundation, vaccine company Moderna, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
The first stated aim of the conference is to foster “open dialogue” and to nurture “an interdisciplinary approach to tackle major health care challenges around the globe.”
Another goal is to “Examine the mind, body and soul interaction and discuss what it means to be human, and how transformative medical technologies are raising new challenges around human enhancement and the interpretation of the mind, body and soul.”
Given the minute presence of Catholic clergy at the conference, and the moderation by secular journalists, it remains to be seen whether this goal will reference to Catholic teaching on the relation between man and God, and whether it will ignore Catholic theological and philosophical thought regarding the soul.
Pope Francis’s recent environmental encyclical Laudato Si, is a guiding theme of the three-day conference.
Quoting from the document, the conference aims to “facilitate a conversation…‘about how we are shaping the future of our planet (...) which includes everyone, since the environmental challenge we are undergoing, and its human roots, concern and affect us all’.”
In the ten goals listed for the upcoming 2021 conference, the Pontifical Council for Culture made no reference to God or the Catholic Church.
As part of the conference, a smaller roundtable event will also take place, entitled “Bridging Science and Faith,” and is directed at the “relationship of religion and spirituality to health and wellbeing, including the relationship between mind, body and soul.”
Fauci to deliver conference’s opening address
The opening day of the conference will be headed by an intervention from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and President Joe Biden’s chief health advisor, who recently assured the World Health Organization of the Biden regime’s commitment to funding abortion, and last year suggested that sex with strangers was safer than receiving Holy Communion during COVID times.
Fauci has spent more than a year stoking fear in the American public over the Wuhan coronavirus, despite it only having an infection fatality rate of 0.15%, and able to be effectively treated using Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc.
Topics for the conference range from “Are We What We Eat?” and “Human Enhancement,” to “Living Healthily to 120 and Beyond” and “Sustainable Health Care: Protecting Our Environment.”
Only six of the topics are remotely connected to religion, and deal with themes such as “Religious Dietary Practices and Health” and “How Do You Define the Soul?”
The conference will also address issues related to the current domination of global affairs by governmental responses to COVID-19.
Aided by the presence of the CEOs of both Pfizer and Moderna, whose abortion-tainted vaccines are increasingly followed by deaths and serious injuries in the thousands, the conference will discuss the “revolutionising” of cell therapy, as well as “Comprehensive COVID-19 Solutions” and “A New Generation of Vaccines.”
Pope Francis will close the event by giving the participants a private, virtual “audience.”
With the first such conference taking place back in 2011, previous events have seen individuals such as pro-LGBT pop star Katy Perry addressing attendees on the subject of transcendental meditation.
This year’s iteration of the event has the largest number of speakers by far, and with its advertised line up of speakers and topics, looks set to continue the irreligious and anti-Catholic themes of previous conferences. (Vatican to Host Covid-Jab Developers, Big Tech Leaders, Anthony Fauci, and Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky.)
Putting aside the conference’s aim to extol the “wonders” of the mRNA gene therapy whose goal is to create “transhumans” for the moment as the subject of the genetic engineering represented by the various vaccines supposedly to “immunize” people from a virus that kills about 0.15% of those it infects as this will be discussed thoroughly in part twelve of “Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus,” the upcoming Vatican conference’s aims and list of speakers should be all proof one needs that the counterfeit church of conciliarism is not the Catholic Church.
Despite the incessant quotations of Protestant, Talmudic and even Mohammedan authors, some of whom are supposed Scripture “scholars” and alleged “theologians,” by the likes of Karol Josef Wojtyla/John Paul II, Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, and Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the Catholic Church has nothing to learn from non-Catholics and she has no need of “listening” to the “other side” about matters appertaining to the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law that are not open for debate and discussion, modification or review.
The belief that the Catholic Church has anything to “learn” from non-Catholics who are open and completely unapologetic supporters of grave moral evils that offend God, send souls to hell and are thus injurious to the common temporal good, which must be pursued in light of man’s Last End, the possession of the glory of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity, implies that she, Holy Mother Church is imperfect in her Divine Constitution. . . . In the present context of the upcoming misnamed “Exploring Mind, Body & Soul” conference, therefore, it should be borne in mind that the conciliar revolutionaries responsible for inviting those who support one grave evil after another simply do not possess the Catholic Faith nor do they have any intention of exhorting those steeped in serious errors to abjure them and to seek to do penance for their propagation of such grievous evils.
Then again, obviously, the conciliar revolutionaries themselves have been grievous errors about the immutable nature of God and His Divine Revelation, ecclesiology, eschatology, dogmatic and moral theology, pastoral theology, sacramental theology, Mariology, and philosophy for over sixty very long years. Those who are steeped in errors of their own thus feel quite at home in inviting others who are steeped in errors to address their conferences as it is hard to feel abhorrence the ways other offend God and harm souls when they themselves are doing the exact same thing without a thought of offending God at all, which leads one to consider whether that it is the point, namely, that the conciliar revolutionaries are actually de facto atheists who make of God whatever they want. Modernism is based in agnosticism, and agnosticism leads to the triumph of atheism over time.
It was only four years ago that the conciliar revolutionaries “distinguished” themselves by inviting the anti-life, anti-population Paul Ehrlich to speak at one of their conferences:
VATICAN CITY, January 12, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has invited the undisputed father of the modern, pro-abortion population control movement to present a paper at an upcoming Vatican-run conference.
Dr. Paul Ehrlich, author of the 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb is scheduled to speak in Vatican City during the February 27-March 1 conference that will discuss “how to save the natural world.” The Stanford biologist champions sex-selective abortion as well as mass forced sterilization as legitimate methods to curb population growth.
In his 1968 book, Ehrlich went so far as to defend forced abortion, writing: “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
Titled Biological Extinction, the February conference will address what Vatican organizers call an unsustainable “imbalance” between the world’s population and what the earth is capable of producing. The event is jointly sponsored by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.
Organizers of the Vatican-run conference predict that if effective steps are not taken to reverse so-called man-made “global climate change,” then up to 40 percent of “all biodiversity on Earth” will be destroyed “by the end of this century,” including a “majority” of species of plants.
“[T]here is no possibility of improving our situation without the widespread adoption of social justice, both as a matter of morality and as a matter of survival,” the event brochure put out by the Vatican states.
With the invitation of Ehrlich to address the conference, how the Pontifical Academies understand “social justice” takes on a sinister aspect.
In The Population Bomb, Ehrlich forecasted “an utter breakdown in the capacity of the planet to support humanity” that would result in starvation for hundreds of millions, predictions that have proved to be false while his theories have been debunked. The biologist predicted in 1968 that half of Americans would die by 1990. India and China would simply die out. By the year 2000, England would also cease to exist. Ehrlic mentioned in his book sex-selection abortion as a potentially effective tool for conserving the world’s resources by reducing population, a position he continues to defend.
In a 2011 interview with Mara Hvistendahl, Ehrlich defended sex-selection abortion, stating that “it would be a good idea to let people have their choice so that they could have fewer children and could have what they wanted,” adding that a sex-selection abortion and possibly even infanticide might be a better fate for females than what awaited them in an overpopulated world.
“You can be aborted as a conceptus, you can be killed at birth, or you can be sold into slavery and die in a slum someplace,” he said. “It would be interesting to know how many females you’re keeping out of hideous situations [when they are not] killed or infanticided.”
In the same interview, Ehrlich also defended the principle behind mass forced sterilization, a concept mentioned in a 1977 book he co-authored titled Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, suggesting that mass sterilization working in tandem with sex-selection technology would be particularly effective for population control interests.
Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, criticized the Vatican’s choice of Ehrlich as a suitable speaker.
“Ehrlich’s opinions on biological extinction rates are just as exaggerated as his failed predictions of a human population explosion. Why the Vatican should be giving a platform to this secular prophet of doom is beyond me,” he told LifeSiteNews.
“There are plenty of credible Catholic scientists around whose fact-based opinions should be highlighted by their Church. What's next? Inviting Raúl Castro to speak on human rights?” he added. (Pro-Abortion Population Bomb Author to Speak at Vatican Conference on Biological Extinction.)
Steven Mosher, who was denied his doctorate by Stanford University because he had discovered Red China's forced abortion policy, is the best-informed Catholic expert on the genuine population research, and his comment about Raul Castro being invited to speak on "human rights" at the Vatican is more of a possibility than he may think or want to accept.
The conciliar sect does not believe that in the God will provide for the temporal needs of His rational creatures. In other words, the conciliar revolutionaries do not believe in Providence of God. They are pagans, which is why all the consternation by "conservative" and "traditionally-minded" Catholics who are attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism in the mistaken belief that they represent the Catholic Church is really a case of near-sightedness worthy of Mister Magoo himself. The conciliar revolutionaries have surrendered entirely to the Judeo-Masonic One World Order that worked mightily behind the scenes for decades to bring it into existence.
Worse yet, it was just a few months after Ehrlich spoke inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River in 2014 that allies of George Soros were appointed to Pontifical Academy on the Sciences and the “Pontifical” Academy for Life:
(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis appointed Professor Joachim von Braun as the new President of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Wednesday.
Professor von Braun is Ordinary Professor of Economics and Technological Change, as well as Director of the Center for Development Research at the University of Bonn in Germany.
He told Vatican Radio's Mario Galgano his goal as head of the Academy will be to seek solutions for inequality and the destruction of the environment.
Professor von Braun said the Pontifical Academy of Sciences has a unique role to play in the world of science because it is a "global academy" and not linked to any specific nation.
He said the 80 members composing the Academy are from different countries and religious backgrounds and many hold Nobel Prizes for their contribution to science.
This, he said, means the Academy "has become a very influential body in the world of science".
Professor von Braun said the Academy focuses on "the big issues with which humanity is confronted".
"I find it particularly important that we find solutions to the two major problems of inequality - lack of justice, hunger, and poverty - on the one hand and the destruction of the environment and nature."
He said that, because these two themes are interrelated, "academicians from diverse science backgrounds can view these problems in new ways and offer solutions to overcome them." (Jorge Appoints Fellow Pantheist to the "Pontifical" Academy of Science.)
Yes, are the really “big” issues with which “humanity” is concerned, not universal apostasy, moral relativism, the daily slaughter of the innocent preborn by chemical and surgical means and certainly not perverse acts in violation of the binding precepts of the Sixth and Ninth Commandment?
Joachim von Braun, you see, is a believer in “sustainable development,” which is handy euphemism for statist control of private property and for the depopulation of the earth of those inconvenient creatures known as human beings. Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been relentless in his support for the goals of “sustainable development,” which is one of the tools that George Soros has used to infiltrate the social agencies of the counterfeit church of conciliarism (the so-called Catholic Campaign for Human Development and Catholic Charities, which exist to implement Alinsky-style “community organizing” in the name of helping the poor), and he has told us of this support very clearly:
Pope Francis criticized the destruction of forests in order to plant soy in an interview with an Argentine radio station on Saturday, reinforcing his message that the environment should take precedence over financial gain.
"It hurts me in my soul when I see deforestation to plant soy," said the pope in an interview with two priests at Radio Parroquial Virgen del Carmen in Campo Gallo, a tiny parish radio station in the poor northern province of Santiago del Estero in his native Argentina.
"It will take thousands of years to recover. Look after the woods and water."
Argentina is the world's largest supplier of soymeal and soyoil, and much of its vast pampas that were once given over to cattle ranches now grow the plant, used for animal feed and in foodstuffs, with China the leading importer.
In neighboring Brazil, also a major soy supplier, environmentalists claim that its cultivation has led to the destruction of rainforest.
The head of the 1.2 billion member Catholic Church has caused controversy before by weighing into debates on the environment and condemning speculation in food commodities.
He visited South America last month and gave passionate speeches in which he censured capitalism, championed the rights of the poor, and warned of irreversible damage to the planet.
In an encyclical dedicated to the environment in June, Francis, the first pope from a developing nation, advocated a change of lifestyle in rich countries and demanded swift action to save the planet from environmental ruin. (Apostate laments destruction of forests to plant soy.)
Bergoglio continued this theme in an address he delivered on Wednesday, September 16, 2015, the Feast of Saints Cornelius and Cyprian and the Commemoration of Ember Wednesday in September and the Commemoration of Saints Euphemia, Lucy, and Gemianus, to European Union “environment ministers”:
Thank you very much for having called this meeting which gives me the opportunity to share with you, if only briefly, some thoughts also in view of important international events in the coming months: the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals at the end of this month and the Cop 21 Summit in Paris.
I would like to focus on three principles. First of all, the principle of solidarity, a word that is sometimes forgotten and others abused in a sterile manner. We know that those who are most vulnerable to environmental degradation are the poor; they are the ones who suffer its most serious consequences. Thus, solidarity means the implementation of effective tools that are able to fight environmental degradation and poverty at the same time. There are many positive experiences in this regard. For example the development and transfer of appropriate technologies that are able to make the best possible use of the human, natural and socio-economic resources that are most readily available at a local level, in order to ensure their long-term sustainability.
Second, the principle of justice. In the "Laudato si’" encyclical I spoke of "ecological debt", especially between North and South connected to trade imbalances with consequences in the context of ecology, as well as the disproportionate use of natural resources historically exploited by some countries. We must honor this debt. These nations are called upon to contribute to solving this debt by setting a good example: limiting in a big way consumption of non-renewable energy; providing resources to countries in need for the promotion of policies and programmes for sustainable development; adopting appropriate systems for the management of forests, transportation, waste; seriously addressing the grave problem of food waste; favouring a circular model of economy; encouraging new attitudes and lifestyles.
Thirdly, the principle of participation, which requires the involvement of all stakeholders, even of those who often remain at the margins of decision-making. We live, in fact, in a very interesting historical time: on the one hand science and technology give us unprecedented power; on the other, a proper use of this power requires that we adopt a more integral and inclusive vision. This demands that we open the door to dialogue, a dialogue that is inspired by a vision which is rooted in that of integral ecology, the very subject of the “Laudato si’" encyclical. This is obviously a big cultural, spiritual and educational challenge. Solidarity, justice and participation for the respect of our dignity and for respect of creation.
Dear Ministers, the Cop21 summit is fast approaching and there is still a long way to go to achieve a result that is capable of bringing together the many positive stimuli that have been offered as a contribution to this important process. I strongly encourage you to intensify your work, along with that of your colleagues, so that in Paris the desired result is achieved. On my part and on the part of Holy See there will be no lack of support for an adequate response to the cry of the Earth and to the cry of the poor. Thank you. (Antipope urges EU Environment Ministers to work hard in view of SDGs.)
Jorge Mario Bergolio never urges anyone to work hard for the salvation of souls. Moreover, he has quite deliberately chosen people who are enemies of both the eternal and temporal good of men to key positions in the “pontifical” academies as they reflect his own Judeo-Masonic naturalism, which emphasizes a pantheistic worship of the environment and a Marxist-view of the world’s economy. Joachim von Braun is just such a person, which is why Bergoglio chose him to head the “Pontifical” Academy for the Sciences. (From: Jorge's False Church Enables Enemies of Christ the King and Souls Without A Thought of Offending God, April 20, 2021.)
I have taken the time to collect this history for you to demonstrate that Anthony Fauci received his validation from Donald John Trump and Michael Richard Pence while Jorge Mario Bergoglio was busy frying bigger fish in Europe as a front man for the falsehoods of the so-called “public health community” in advancement of a one world socialist utopian order in which his successor, Robert Francis Prevost, believes just as much he did.
May this Feast of the Transfiguration of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ atop Mount Thabor help us to rise above the muck and mire of the statism that is abroad in the anti-Incarnational Judeo-Masonic-Marxist world of Modernity and above the muck and mire of Modernism within the counterfeit church of conciliarism.
Our Lady’s Immaculate will triumph in the end, and every Rosary we pray will help plant a few seed to usher in this Triumph sooner rather than later.
Long live Christ the King ! Long live Christ the King !
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and the hour of our death.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
Saint James the Greater, pray for.
Pope Saint Sixtus, Saints Felicissimus and Agapitus, pray for us.